... However, the ecological validity of such testing is questionable, with prior research showing discrepancies in physiological parameters, stroke rates (SR), muscle activity patterns and kinematic profiles between ergometer and on-water performance (Fleming, Donne, Fletcher, & Mahony, 2012;Klitgaard, Hauge, Oliveira, & Heinen, 2020;Villarino-Cabezas, González-Ravé, Santos-García, & Valdivielso, 2013;Winchcombe, Binnie, Doyle, Hogan, & Peeling, 2019). Furthermore, due to the technical difficulty of measuring PO on-water, the heart rate (HR) collected during the GXT that correspond to LT 1 and LT 2 are commonly used to demarcate onwater intensity into various training zones, which is then used for training monitoring and prescription purposes (Bullock et al., 2012;García-Pallarés, Sánchez-Medina, Carrasco, Díaz, & Izquierdo, 2009). However, HR measures can be heavily influenced by day-to-day biological variability (Bagger, 2003), and are limited by cardiovascular drift, delay, and the relative amplitude of the slow component of HR kinetics (Hogan, Binnie, Doyle, Lester, & Peeling, 2020a;Hogan, Binnie, Doyle, Lester, & Peeling, 2020b;Sanders, Myers, & Akubat, 2017;Zuccarelli, Porcelli, Rasica, Marzorati, & Grassi, 2018); accordingly, more direct and immediate measures of PO may be better suited for monitoring and prescribing training (Hogan et al., 2020a(Hogan et al., , 2020bSanders et al., 2017). ...