Primate Vocalization, Gesture, and the Evolution of Human Language

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2520, USA.
Current Anthropology (Impact Factor: 2.93). 01/2009; 49(6):1053-63; discussion 1063-76. DOI: 10.1086/593015
Source: PubMed


The performance of language is multimodal, not confined to speech. Review of monkey and ape communication demonstrates greater flexibility in the use of hands and body than for vocalization. Nonetheless, the gestural repertoire of any group of nonhuman primates is small compared with the vocabulary of any human language and thus, presumably, of the transitional form called protolanguage. We argue that it was the coupling of gestural communication with enhanced capacities for imitation that made possible the emergence of protosign to provide essential scaffolding for protospeech in the evolution of protolanguage. Similarly, we argue against a direct evolutionary path from nonhuman primate vocalization to human speech. The analysis refines aspects of the mirror system hypothesis on the role of the primate brain's mirror system for manual action in evolution of the human language-ready brain.

Download full-text


Available from: Michael A Arbib
    • "In male golden-collared manakins, famous for their elaborate courtship dances, volume differences in brain areas of males and nondancing females point towards the arcopallium and hippocampus as candidate control regions (Schlinger, Barske, Day, Fusani, & Fuxjager, 2013). Further studies in this subject are also promising because one prominent theory of language evolution posits a gestural origin (Arbib, Liebal, & Pika, 2008; Armstrong, Stokoe, & Wilcox, 1995). This notion is supported by observations that language and action systems in the brain overlap (Willems, Ozyürek, & Hagoort, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multimodal signalling can improve or maximize information exchange. A challenge is to show that two independent signals, such as vocalizations and visual displays, are deliberately coordinated. Male zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, signal visually and acoustically during courtship, performing a stereotyped dance while singing. The male approaches the female hopping in a zig-zag pattern, turning his body axis, and wiping his beak repeatedly on or above the perch. The only previous quantitative study of song and dance choreography in zebra finches revealed that the distribution of all movements during song was not strongly patterned across birds but very similar in fathers and sons. This raises the possibility that particular movements may follow a choreography. Here we report that three operationally defined dance movements, ‘beak wipe’ (BA), ‘turn-around’ (TA) and ‘hop’, occurred with different frequencies and speed during singing than during silence. BW, TA and hops clustered significantly at the start and end of song bouts and were arranged in a nonrandom fashion. In addition, BW, but not TA, were performed faster during song than nonsong. Finally, hops coincided significantly more often than expected by chance with particular notes. Together, these results suggest that male zebra finches integrate their song and dance during courtship. This may help females to identify courting males in a noisy environment and evaluate the intensity and quality of the courtship performance. Our results underscore that the choreography of movement gestures with learned vocalizations, such as hand gestures accompanying speech, is a further parallel between human and avian signalling. They invite future investigations into the underlying neural mechanisms and consequences for mate choice.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2016
    • "Previous studies of social learning opportunities have often focused on food or the techniques for obtaining it (Adams 2005; Caldwell and Whiten 2003; Lonsdorf and Bonnie 2010; Lonsdorf 2006). However, social learning opportunities can also contribute to learning about nonfood behaviors, such as stone-handling in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) or leaf carrying for nests in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) (Nahallage and Huffman 2007; Russon et al. 2007), and to acquiring social expertise such as species-and community-specific communication, gestures, social skills, and social roles (Arbib et al. 2008; de Waal and Seres 1997; Peters 2001; Russon 1998; van Schaik et al. 2009; Watson and Caldwell 2009). It is therefore important to include a wider range of behaviors in studies of social learning opportunities to gain fuller understanding of factors that may constrain or foster learners' exposure to them across contexts. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Social learning is important in the acquisition of many primate behaviors, including food acquisition, object use, and sociality. Social learning opportunities are social situations in which social learning could occur and provide a means of studying influences on social learning in observational research. Species-specific characteristics and individual relationships may influence the importance of social learning opportunities for some behaviors over others. We observed eight captive orangutans (Pongo abelii) and five mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) for >60 h each at the Toronto Zoo to assess intra- and interspecies differences in social learning opportunities. We measured social learning opportunity quality using spatial proximity because this has been associated with high-quality social learning. Both species had similar captive diets and group structure; therefore observed differences were likely due to species and individual differences, rather than captive environment. We found species differences in the frequency of social learning opportunities, their quality, and the associated type of behavior (food vs. social behavior). Orangutans had more high-quality social learning opportunities relating to food behavior than mandrills, and mandrills had more high-quality social learning opportunities relating to social behavior than orangutans. Both species had more high-quality social learning opportunities in mother–infant vs. other dyads. Our results suggest that learning about food behavior may be more important for orangutans and learning about social behavior may be more important for mandrills. Overall, our results suggest that social learning may be constrained/fostered by differences in frequency and quality of social learning opportunities between species and individuals.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2015 · International Journal of Primatology
  • Source
    • "Recent findings suggest that chimpanzee alarm calls are intentional: they direct them more frequently to allies, persist until their allies are out of danger, and monitor responses (Schel et al., 2013). Both monkeys and apes are more likely to call around certain individuals, suggesting volitional control of vocalizations (Arbib et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: What are the implications of similarities and differences in the gestural and symbolic development of apes and humans? This focused review uses as a starting point our recent study that provided evidence that gesture supported the symbolic development of a chimpanzee, a bonobo and a human child reared in language-enriched environments at comparable stages of communicative development. These three species constitute a complete clade, species possessing a common immediate ancestor. Communicative behaviors observed among all species in a clade are likely to have been present in the common ancestor. Similarities in the form and function of many gestures produced by the chimpanzee, bonobo, and human child suggest that shared nonverbal skills may underlie shared symbolic capacities. Indeed, an ontogenetic sequence from gesture to symbol was present across the clade but more pronounced in child than ape. Multimodal expressions of communicative intent (e.g., vocalization plus persistence or eye-contact) were normative for the child, but less common for the apes. These findings suggest that increasing multimodal expression of communicative intent may have supported the emergence of language among the ancestors of humans. Therefore, this focused review includes new studies, since our 2013 article, that support a multimodal theory of language evolution.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2014 · Frontiers in Psychology
Show more