ArticlePDF Available

Rediscovery of a humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) feeding ground in the Straits of Magellan, Chile

Authors:
  • Whalesound Ltda

Abstract and Figures

New information is presented on the summer distribution of southeastern Pacific humpback whales along the Southern Chilean fjor ds. Sightings of 128 humpback whales observed between December and June from 1997-2001 were analysed. Sightings occurred between 48°50AS to 54°18AS and were concentrated in the waters surrounding Isla Carlos III in the Straits of Magellen (53°37 AS, 72°21AW) and in the Canal Wide (49°36AS-5°S). To date, 23 individual whales have been identified from photographs of the ventral surface of the flukes. Throughout the austral summer, seven individuals were resighted near Isla Carlos III over periods between 2-5 months. Two indiv iduals were observed in 1999 and 2000, and two individuals were previously recorded in 1997 in Canal Wide, about 365km north of Isla C arlos III. Historical records show the occurrence of whales in the area from the 16 th to the 20 th Century. From historic records, scattered whaling data, the small amount of scientific literature available, and the results of this study, it is suggested that the southwestern part of the Straits of Magellan, especially the waters surrounding Isla Carlos III, is the first known feeding ground for humpback whales along the Pacific coast of South America.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Rediscovery of a humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae)
feeding ground in the Straits of Magellan, Chile
Jorge Gibbons
*
, Juan J. Capella
+
and Carlos Valladares
#
Contact e-mail: yubarta@emcali.net.co
ABSTRACT
New information is presented on the summer distribution of southeastern Pacific humpback whales along the Southern Chilean fjords.
Sightings of 128 humpback whales observed between December and June from 1997-2001 were analysed. Sightings occurred between
48°50AS to 54°18AS and were concentrated in the waters surrounding Isla Carlos III in the Straits of Magellen (53°37AS, 72°21AW) and in
the Canal Wide (49°36AS–5°S). To date, 23 individual whales have been identified from photographs of the ventral surface of the flukes.
Throughout the austral summer, seven individuals were resighted near Isla Carlos III over periods between 2-5 months. Two individuals
were observed in 1999 and 2000, and two individuals were previously recorded in 1997 in Canal Wide, about 365km north of Isla Carlos
III. Historical records show the occurrence of whales in the area from the 16
th
to the 20
th
Century. From historic records, scattered whaling
data, the small amount of scientific literature available, and the results of this study, it is suggested that the southwestern part of the Straits
of Magellan, especially the waters surrounding Isla Carlos III, is the first known feeding ground for humpback whales along the Pacific
coast of South America.
KEYWORDS: HUMPBACK WHALE; SOUTH AMERICA; PACIFIC OCEAN; SIGHTINGS SURVEY; PHOTO-IDENTIFICATION;
FEEDING GROUNDS
INTRODUCTION
Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) are widely
distributed throughout the oceans of the Southern
Hemisphere. The question of stock identity has recently been
reviewed by the IWC Scientific Committee (e.g. IWC,
1998b; 2001). Seven distinct Southern Hemisphere breeding
stocks have been identified, including Group G – the West
South America stock (see Fig. 1, IWC, 1998a, p.27). The
general distribution and migratory destinations of humpback
whales in the West South America stock (Group G) are
known from studies based on whaling data (Townsend,
1935; Clarke, 1962; Aguayo, 1974; Ramírez, 1988),
occasional sightings (Oporto, 1986; Guerra et al., 1987;
Aguayo et al., 1998; Gibbons et al., 1998; Capella et al.,
1999) and from the identification of individual animals
(Stone et al., 1990; Flórez, 1991; Flórez et al., 1998;
Scheidat et al., 2000; Félix and Haase, 2001).
The known summer feeding grounds of the southeastern
Pacific humpback whale stock extend along the western
coast of the Antarctic Peninsula (Omura, 1953; Mackintosh,
1965; Olavarría et al., 2000), south to the Antarctic
Convergence. The cold inshore waters of the southern
Chilean fjords, including the Straits of Magellan, have not
been considered part of the summer range of humpback
whales in the Eastern South Pacific.
In recent years, however, there has been an apparent
increase in the frequency of sightings of humpback whales
off the coast of Chile (Aguayo, et al., 1998; Capella et al.,
1999), especially during summer and autumn in the
Patagonian fjords between 49°S to 53°S (Gibbons et al.,
1998). This paper considers sightings and photo-
identification data that have been collected since 1997 in the
Southern Chilean fjords, as well as a compilation of historic
records and opportunistic observations. These data are used
to examine local distribution, seasonality and the possible
existence of feeding grounds in the Straits of Magellan.
METHODS
Study area (Fig. 1)
The study was carried out along inner waters in the Southern
Chilean fjords, from south of the Golfo de Penas (47°40AS)
and the Beagle channel (55°S). The region exhibits a varied
physiography, with more than 37,000km of coastline, great
environmental heterogeneity and extreme oceanographic
conditions.
Due to its large geographical extent, the area has been
divided into the three regions described below.
Region (1). Patagonian fjords, from the south of Golfo de
Penas (47°22°S, 74°50W) to the western area of the Straits
of Magellan (52°40AS).
The area under study included the main channels that
connect this area with the Pacific Ocean (Canal Messier,
Canal Wide and Canal Concepción), interior channels and
fjords that are adjacent to the Southern Ice fields (a 300km 3
40km wide field of ice). This area is characterised by cold
waters with low salinity due to the high rainfall, fresh water
influx from rivers and glacial melting.
Region (2). The Straits of Magellan.
This is a 570km long V-shaped channel that connects the
Pacific and the Atlantic Oceans and separates the southern
part of the continent from Tierra del Fuego. Linked with the
Straits are the sounds, Seno Almirantazgo, Seno Otway and
Seno Skyring; due to their characteristics these last two
sounds are considered true inner seas (Magazzú et al., 1996).
This region has rich habitat diversity as a result of the
different influences of the water masses coming from the
Pacific and the Atlantic Oceans, the east-west gradient in
precipitation, the freshwater contribution of rivers and
glaciers, and major differences in coastal morphology, tides
and water depths (Panella et al., 1991).
*
Instituto de la Patagonia, Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile, Casilla 113-D.
+
Fundación Yubarta, Apartado Aéreo 33141, Cali, Colombia.
#
España 666, Punta Arenas.
J. CETACEAN RES. MANAGE. 5(2):203–208, 2003 203
7DEOH
6XUYH\HIIRUWDQGVLJKWLQJVE\PRQWKLQWKHZKROHVWXG\DUHDWKUHH
VHFWRUVIRUWKHSHULRG
5HJLRQ 5HJLRQ 5HJLRQ
0RQWK
'D\V *URXSV 'D\V *URXSV 'D\V *URXSV
-DQ      
)HE      
0DU      
$SU      
0D\
-XQ      
-XO
$XJ
6HSW      
2FW
1RY      
'HF
7RWDO      
Region (3). Fuegian fjords located to the south of the Straits
of Magellan.
These are similar to the Patagonian fjords in extent,
environmental heterogeneity and varied physical geography,
although glacial influence from the Darwin mountains is less
important than from the Southern Ice fields. They are
influenced in the east by Atlantic waters.
Survey methods and effort
Region 1
A total of 16 trips were made in different boats (14-16m in
length, similar in height and speed) for a total of 126 days of
work: 52 days in 1997, 47 in 1998, 25 in 2000 and 2 in 2001
(Table 1). The surveys followed a predetermined track of
approximately 1,172km (Fig. 1), with minor variations in
five excursions. Iceberg Fjord, Peel Fjord, Golfo de Trinidad
and Seno Ladrones were occasionally visited in addition to
the predetermined track.
Region 2
Both systematic and non-systematic sampling occurred. In
the Primera Angostura of the Straits of Magellan, 227
crossings were made on commercial ferries between Punta
Delgada (52°29AS, 69°30AW) and Bahía Azul (52°029A,
69°31AW) for a total of 22 days between May 2000 and June
2001, on a twice-monthly basis (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Humpback whale survey track in the Patagonian and Fuegian fjords and the Straits of Magellan.
GIBBONS et al.: HUMPBACK FEEDING GROUND IN STRAITS OF MAGELLAN204
In the central area (Paso Ancho) of the Straits of Magellan,
48 trips were made between Punta Arenas (53°07AS,
70°55AW) and Bahía Chilota, Tierra del Fuego (53°18AS,
70°26AW) onboard commercial ferries (Fig. 1), for a total of
24 days between June 2000 and June 2001, on a
twice-monthly basis.
Between Seno Otway and the southern portion of the
Straits of Magellan (Fig. 1), surveys were conducted along a
259km predetermined (entire or partial) track. A total of 57
days over 21 months from 1999 to 2001 were dedicated to
surveys (Table 1). Two main vessels were used: a 10m rigid
inflatable boat with an inboard diesel engine and a Zodiac
MK5 equipped with a 40Hp outboard engine. Shore based
surveys around Isla Carlos III and vessel surveys along the
Straits of Magellan from Punta Arenas to the western mouth
of the Straits were occasionally conducted.
Seno Skyring was surveyed opportunistically on 3 and 21
February 2000 and 30 March 2001, as was Seno
Almirantazgo on 1 September 2000 and 8 February 2001.
Region 3
A total of seven trips was made in December 1999, April,
August, October and November 2000 and February 2001, for
a total of 63 days (Table 1). These trips were made using
different boats (14-16m in length, similar in height and
speed), along a predetermined 497km track between Paso
Shag (Bárbara Channel) and the east of Isla Navarino (Fig.
1). Other surveyed sections, where the effort was more
irregular, have not been considered in this analysis.
Data collection
For each sighting of a whale or a group of whales, the
following information was recorded: date, time, GPS
position, group size and feeding behaviour. Whenever
possible, pictures of flukes or dorsal fins were taken.
Humpback whales were usually individually identified by
their unique patterns of ventral fluke pigmentation (Katona
and Whitehead, 1981). Whales were photographed with a
35mm camera using a 70-210mm zoom lens, black and
white or colour print film (ISO 100 and 200) and colour slide
film (ISO 100 and 400). Photo-identification effort was low
for Region 1 section and minimal for Region 3. Search effort
does not include fieldwork carried out in rain or seastate >4
Beaufort.
For the literature survey to determine the historic presence
of whales in the study area, shipping reports, historic
chronicles written since the European discovery of the
Straits of Magellan in the 16
th
century, other non-referenced
sources of information on whales, as well as available
scientific literature were reviewed. Opportunistic records of
humpback whales in recent years, obtained from
photographs or detailed observations provided by qualified
observers that included date and location, were also
collected.
Data management and analysis
Sightings data were analysed by month in order to examine
the temporal and geographic distribution of humpback
whales.
Relative abundance (defined as the number of whales
surveyed per hour during systematic sampling) was
estimated by region and month. Analysis units of a constant
length of 86.5km were established in the Fuegian and
Patagonian fjords and in Seno Otway 2 Straits of Magellan.
Relative abundance was compared among all the units with
whale records in order to identify concentration areas of
humpback whales.
High-quality fluke photographs (60% or more of the fluke
surface and a vertical angle sufficient to distinguish the
shape of the trailing edge of the fluke) were used to identify
individual animals and create a catalogue. Poor-quality
photographs were not considered in the dataset. Photographs
were used to assess annual returns and within-season
residency. The term residency means here the interval
from the first to the last sighting of an individual whale in a
season. Photo-identification data collected along the
Patagonian fjords (two whales) north to 51°S between 1997
and 1998 (Gibbons et al., 1998) were also included for
regional comparison between Regions and verification of
local movements.
RESULTS
Distribution, abundance and seasonality of whales
An overall summary of effort and whales observed in the
three regions is given in Table 1. A total of 128 groups were
observed. These groups were distributed from Canal Messier
(48°50AS) in the north to the Fuegian fjords (54°18AS) in the
south. Whales were not evenly distributed, with a number of
concentrations being observed. The highest relative
abundance in the period December to May, was observed in
the units that included the Straits of Magellan between Canal
Jerónimo and Isla Charles, with 1 animal/hour, increasing to
1.51 animals/hour in the specific area of Isla Carlos III but
decreasing to 0.21 animals/hour in Canal Wide in the
Patagonian fjords region (Fig. 2). Humpback whales were
not seen in Seno del Almirantazgo, Seno Skyring or in the
western Primera Angostura and the central areas (Punta
Arenas Porvenir) of the Straits of Magellan. They were
only occasionally seen in the northernmost part of Fuegian
fjords (2 sightings) with just one sighting on a systematic
track in good conditions (Figs 1 and 2).
Humpback whales were observed from late spring to late
autumn. The first sighting was made on 1 December (1998)
and the last on 8 June (1997). No whales were directly
observed between July and November although there is
evidence from other observers of the presence of humpback
whales in the months of August, October and November (see
below). The greatest frequency of sightings (98%) occurred
between January and May (Fig. 3).
Group size
Humpback whales formed small groups, with a maximum of
five, a mean of 1.9 (SD=0.73) and a mode of two. Group
size distribution is given in Fig. 4.
Resighting, local movements and residency of
individuals
Twenty-seven individual whales have been identified from
fluke photographs. A total of six different animals have been
resighted between years, indicating that at least some
individuals return to the area. The observed residence time
of individuals throughout the summer season ranged from 1
to 5 months, with three different whales being seen more
than once in a year. The individual with the longest
residence was identified in January, February and May
1999. Short-range movements were recorded in different
years for two individuals photographed in Canal Wide
(50°03S, 74°33W) in February and June 1997 respectively,
and again in the proximity of Isla Carlos III in February and
April 1999, respectively. These sites are separated by
approximately 365km.
J. CETACEAN RES. MANAGE. 5(2):203208, 2003 205
Fig. 2. Humpback whales sighting distribution on the Patagonian and Fuegian Fjords and the Straits of Magellan.
Fig. 3. Seasonal changes in abundance of humpback whales throughout
the study period (1997-2001) in the Southern Chilean fjords
region.
Fig. 4. Frequency histogram of group size in the Patagonian fjords and
the Straits of Magellan during the study period.
GIBBONS et al.: HUMPBACK FEEDING GROUND IN STRAITS OF MAGELLAN206
Foraging activities
Common humpback whale feeding behaviour was observed
throughout the summer and autumn, including surface
feeding (both vertical and horizontal lunge feeding; Jurasz
and Jurasz, 1979) and flick feeding. However, other typical
feeding behaviour described for the species in the Northern
Hemisphere, bubble net and bubble cloud feeding (Jurasz
and Jurasz, 1979; Hain et al., 1982), was not recorded.
Defecation was not observed during the study.
Other behaviour, presumed to be subsurface feeding, was
also observed. This included observations of regular diving
in the same location for 7-15 minutes whilst simultaneous
surface feeding by South American fur seals (Arctocephalus
australis) and sea birds (skuas, Catharacta chilensis; South
American stern, Sterna hirundinacea; black-browed
albatross, Diomedea melanophris; and Southern fulmar,
Fulmarus glacialoides) occurred. These events were
observed for several hours on 12 different days in 1999 and
2000. The prey species recorded, based on surface
observations during these events, were Galatheid crab
(Munida subrugosa) and schooling fish such as herring
(Sprattus fueguensis).
Historic and present time records
There is evidence of the presence of whales in the Straits of
Magellan, mainly near Isla Carlos III, for six consecutive
centuries. Up to the middle of the 19
th
century, these reports
referred in a general way to whales. Pedro Sarmiento de
Gamboa, a 16th century explorer, charted numerous
sightings around Isla Carlos III (53°37AS, 72°21AW) and the
western branch of the Straits of Magellan during the summer
(February) in 1583 (Sarmiento de Gamboa, 1954). Less than
one hundred years later, John Narborough observed whales
in the same area in November 1670 (Mantellero, 2000) and
L.A. Bougainville one century later, on 27 December 1767
(Bougainville, 1946)
1
. In the 19th century, Phillip Parker
King (Adventure and Beagle Expedition) sighted large
numbers of whales near Caleta Bradley, 20km south of Isla
Carlos III in April 1828 (King and Fitz Roy, 1839). The first
explicit mention of humpback whales was made by C.
Skogman in 1841. He stated that the frigate Eugenia
encountered many humpbacks and finbacks around Isla
Carlos III (south of the English Narrows) in February, 1841
(Skogman, 1942)
2
. B. Phillipi mentioned humpback whales
in the Straits of Magellan in 1843 (Martinic, 2001). A shore
whaling station was established to the southeast of Punta
Arenas (see Fig. 2) in Bahía El Aguila (70°58AS, 53°48AW),
on the northern coast of the Straits of Magellan in 1905.
Hunting operations from this shore station were
concentrated on the coastal waters of the southern tip of
western South America (Martinic, 1977), although the
species hunted were not clearly documented. The first
confirmed report of humpback whales in the Patagonian
fjords during the 20
th
century concerns whales taken in 1914
and 1915 by Chilean whalers (Martinic, 1977).
Since the 1970s, several confirmed records of humpback
whales have been collected. In 1972 and 1973, photographs
of the same individual were taken in the Patagonian channels
and the Straits of Magellan (Orlando Dollenz, pers. comm.);
two whales were sighted in the Canal Wide in the Patagonian
fjords in January, 1984 (Oporto, 1986); a picture of two
humpback whales from Mussel Bay, Isla Carlos III in April,
1984 (Alfonso Martinez, pers. comm.); two sightings from
the Canal Abra Channel, 40km north of Isla Carlos III in
March, 1997 (Francisco Garrido, pers. comm.); two
individuals near Isla Carlos III in January, 1998 (Rodrigo
Hucke, pers. comm.); one individual in Mussel Bay, Isla
Carlos III in October, 1999 (Porter, pers. comm.); pictures of
one individual from Primera Angostura, in the eastern
portion of the Straits of Magellan in August 1999 and near
Punta Arenas in June, 2000 respectively (Carlos Leal, pers.
comm.); pictures of one individual from the Fuegian fjords
in March, 2000 (Alejo Contreras, pers. comm.); and a
videotape of two individuals from Seno Unión (52°10AS) in
the Patagonian fjords in November 2000 (Gonzalez, pers.
comm.). Gibbons et al. (1998) detailed 32 sightings obtained
in surveys along the Patagonian fjords (48°S-52°40AS); these
are included in this paper.
DISCUSSION
Distribution and seasonality
The information shows that Isla Carlos III, in the
southwestern section of the Straits of Magellan, appears to
be a suitable feeding habitat for humpback whales. However,
the sample size and effort is still too small to determine the
limits of this feeding ground or to eliminate the possibility of
others in the southern Chilean fjords.
The occasional sightings of humpback whales in the
Straits of Magellan (Leal, pers. comm.) and the Patagonian
channels during winter suggest that not all animals undertake
the migration to low latitudes each year, (c.f. Brown et al.,
1995). Some whales may remain in this feeding ground
through the austral winter.
Residence
The sightings of the same animal over a 5-month period in
the study area, is similar to the upper range reported for some
summer areas from the Northern Hemisphere (e.g. Baker et
al., 1985; Clapham and Mayo, 1987; Katona and Beard,
1990; Clapham et al., 1993). The annual return reported here
(two whales) provides some evidence for the existence of
foraging area philopatry. Studies conducted elsewhere have
suggested that this is the case for humpbacks on other
high-latitude feeding grounds in the North Atlantic and
North Pacific (Baker et al., 1985; Katona and Beard, 1990;
Clapham et al., 1993; IWC, 2002). It is probable that the data
presented here under-represent the true rates of residence
and annual returns given the low level of observations and
effort.
Despite the inevitable uncertainty surrounding the species
identity of early historical records, the probable residence of
humpback whales in the area is reinforced by historical
information that constitutes a complementary line of
evidence. The existence of reports of whales from each
century after the 16th century, confirmed in conjunction with
the presence of humpback whales from early 20th century,
has led us to suggest that humpback whales have
traditionally occupied this region as a summer habitat. A
possible recolonisation by whales to their historic feeding
area might reflect a recovery of the Group G stock from
relatively recent commercial exploitation. However, there
are no reliable estimates of the population size in their
summer grounds and the extent to which humpback whales
return to a specific location has not been fully
documented.
1
Bougainville De, L.A. Viaje alrededor del mundo por la fragata del
rey la Boudeuse y la fusta la Estrella en 1767, 1768 y 1769. Segunda
Edición. Espasa Calpe Argentina, S.A. Buenos Aires 1946. Colección
Austral.
2
Skogman, C. Viaje de la fragata Eugenia. 1851-1853. Brasil,
Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, Peru. Ediciones Argentinas Solar, Buenos
Aires.
J. CETACEAN RES. MANAGE. 5(2):203208, 2003 207
CONCLUSION
Although the data collected during the three years remains
limited, it does show that feeding behaviour is observed.
Together with the inference information about residence, it
suggests that the area of Isla Carlos III is a feeding ground,
the first identified for humpback whales in South America. It
is located about 2,000km closer to the tropical areas than the
principal feeding area near the Western Antarctic Peninsula
(Stone et al., 1990).
The relationship between the humpback whales of the
Straits of Magellan with animals from Colombia and the
Western Antarctic Peninsula is being investigated through
analysis of genetic and photo-id evidence.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Universidad de Magallanes and Instituto de
Fomento Pesquero (IFOP) for helping to fund this research.
We are grateful to Conrado Alvarez, Ricardo Matus, Olivia
Blank, Stefan Bräger, Alejandro Kush, Jaime Gibbons,
Alfonso Martínez, Jaime Cárcamo and Carlos Seguel for
their field assistance and to Antonio Larrea, Isabel C. Avila
and Alexander Tobón for helping in photographic laboratory
work. We also thank Alejo Contreras, Patricio Contreras,
Orlando Dollenz, Rodrigo Hucke, Carlos Leal, Francisco
Garrido, Jorge Ramírez, Mariano Riveros and Tim Scoones
for providing us with records and numerous photographs:
Alfredo Prieto and Mateo Martinic helped us generously in
assembling historical data.
REFERENCES
Aguayo, A., Bernal, R., Olavarria, C., Vallejos, V. and Hucke, R. 1998.
Observaciones de cetáceos realizadas entre Valparaíso e Isla de
Pascua, Chile, durante las inviernos de 1993, 1994 y 1995. Rev. Biol.
Mar. Oceanog. 33(1):101-23. [In Spanish].
Aguayo, L.A. 1974. Baleen whales off continental Chile. pp. 209-17.
In: W.E. Schevill (ed.) The Whale Problem: A Status Report.
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. x+419pp.
Baker, C.S., Herman, L.M., Perry, A., Lawton, W.S., Straley, J.M. and
Straley, J.H. 1985. Population characteristics and migration of
summer and late-season humpback whales (Megaptera
novaeangliae) in southeastern Alaska. Mar. Mammal Sci.
1(4):304-23.
Brown, M.R., Corkeron, P.J., Hale, P.T., Schultz, K.W. and Bryden,
M.M. 1995. Evidence for a sex-segregated migration in the
humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond.
Ser. B. 259:229-34.
Capella, J., Vilina, Y. and Gibbons, J. 1999. Observación de cetáceos
en Isla Chañaral y nuevos registros para el área de la Reserva
Nacional Pingüino de Humboldt, norte de Chile. Estud. Oceanol.
18:57-64. [In Spanish].
Clapham, P.J. and Mayo, C.A. 1987. Reproduction and recruitment of
individually identified humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae,
observed in Massachusetts Bay, 1979-1985. Can. J. Zool.
65(12):2853-63.
Clapham, P.J., Baraff, L.S., Carlson, C.A., Christian, M.A., Mattila,
D.K., Mayo, C.A., Murphy, M.A. and Pittman, S. 1993. Seasonal
occurrence and annual return of humpback whales, Megaptera
novaeangliae, in the southern Gulf of Maine. Can. J. Zool.
71(2):440-3.
Clarke, R. 1962. Whale observation and whale marking off the coast of
Chile in 1958 and from Ecuador towards and beyond the Galápagos
Islands in 1959. Norsk Hvalfangsttid. 51(7):265-87.
Félix, F. and Haase, B. 2001. The humpback whale off the coast of
Ecuador, population parameters and behavior. Rev. Biol. Mar.
Oceanog. 36:61-74.
Flórez, L. 1991. Humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae in the
Gorgona Island, Colombian Pacific breeding waters: population and
pod characteristics. Mem. Queensl. Mus. 30(2):291-5.
Flórez, L., Capella, J., Haase, B., Bravo, G.A., Félix, F. and Gerrodette,
T. 1998. Changes in winter destinations and the northernmost record
of southeastern Pacific humpback whales. Mar. Mammal Sci.
14(1):189-96.
Gibbons, J., Capella, J., Matus, R. and Guzmán, L. 1998. Presence of
humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae (Balaenopteridae), in
the Chilean Patagonian channels. Anales Instituto Patagonia, Serie
Cs Nat. (Chile) 26:69-75.
Guerra, C.G., Van Waerebeek, K., Portflitt, G. and Luna, G. 1987.
Presencia de cetáceos frente a la segunda región de Chile. Estud.
Oceanol. 6:87-96.
Hain, J.H.W., Carter, G.R., Kraus, S.D., Mayo, C.A. and Winn, H.E.
1982. Feeding behavior of the humpback whale, Megaptera
novaeangliae, in the western North Atlantic. Fish. Bull. 80:259-68.
International Whaling Commission. 1998a. Report of the Scientific
Committee. Rep. int. Whal. Commn 48:53-118.
International Whaling Commission. 1998b. Report of the Scientific
Committee. Annex G. Report of the sub-committee on
Comprehensive Assessment of Southern Hemisphere humpback
whales. Rep. int. Whal. Commn 48:170-82.
International Whaling Commission. 2001. Report of the Scientific
Committee. Annex G. Report of the Sub-Committee on the
Comprehensive Assessment of Whale Stocks 2 In-depth
Assessments. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. (Suppl.) 3:177-208.
International Whaling Commission. 2002. Report of the Scientific
Committee. Annex H. Report of the Sub-Committee on the
Comprehensive Assessment of North Atlantic Humpback Whales. J.
Cetacean Res. Manage. (Suppl.) 4:230-60.
Jurasz, C.M. and Jurasz, V.P. 1979. Feeding modes of the humpback
whale, Megaptera novaeangliae, in southeast Alaska. Sci. Rep.
Whales Res. Inst., Tokyo 31:69-83.
Katona, S.K. and Beard, J.A. 1990. Population size, migrations and
feeding aggregations of the humpback whale (Megaptera
novaeangliae) in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Rep. int. Whal.
Commn (special issue) 12:295-305.
Katona, S.K. and Whitehead, H.P. 1981. Identifying humpback whales
using their natural markings. Polar Rec. 20:439-44.
King, P.P. and Fitz Roy, R. 1839. Narrative of the Surveying Voyages
of His Majesty's Adventure and Beagle between the years 1826 and
1836. London.
Mackintosh, N.A. 1965. The Stocks of Whales. Fishing News (Books)
Ltd, London. 232pp.
Magazzú, G., Panella, S. and Decembrini, F. 1996. Seasonal variability
of fractionated phytoplankton, biomass and primary production in
the Straits of Magellan. J. Mar. Sys. 9: 249-67.
Mantellero, C. 2000. Diccionaria geográfico náutico de la toponimia
austral de Chile. Historia y significado de los nombres de los
canales, islas y tierras australes. [In Spanish].
Martinic, M. 1977. Antecedentes históricos sobre la caza de cetáceos en
Chile. An. Inst. Patagonia 8:313-15. [In Spanish].
Martinic, M. 2001. Documentos inéditos para la historia de Magallanes.
Anales Instituto Patagonia, Serie Cs Nat. (Chile) 29.
Olavarría, B.C., Baker, C.S., Medrano G, L., Aguayo L, A., Caballero
G, S., Flórez-Gonzàlez, L., Capella A, J., Rosenbaum, H.C.,
Garrigue, C., Greaves, J., Bannister, J.L., Jenner, M. and Jenner, C.
2000. Stock identity of Antarctic Peninsula humpback whales
inferred from mtDNA variation. Paper SC/52/IA15 presented to the
IWC Scientific Committee, June 2000, in Adelaide, Australia. [Paper
available from the Office of this Journal].
Omura, H. 1953. Biological study on the humpback whales in the
Antarctic whaling areas IV and V. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst., Tokyo
8:81-101.
Oporto, J.A. 1986. Observaciones de cetáceos en los canales del sur de
Chile. Actas, Primera Reunión de Trabajo de Expertos en Mamíferos
Acuáticos de America del Sur. pp. 174-186. [In Spanish].
Panella, S., Michelato, A., Perdicaro, R., Magazzu, G., Decembrini, F.
and Scarazzato, P. 1991. A preliminary contribution to
understanding the hydrological characteristics of the Strait of
Magellan: Austral spring 1989. Boll. Oceanol. teoretica ed applicata
9(2-3): 107-26.
Ramírez, P. 1988. La ballena jorobada Megaptera novaeangliae en la
costa norte del Perú. Bol. Lima 56:91-6. [In Spanish].
Sarmiento de Gamboa, P. 1950. Viajes al Estrecho de Magallanes.
EMECE Buenos. 150pp.
Scheidat, M., Castro, C., Denkinger, J., González, J. and Adelung, D.
2000. A breeding area for humpback whales (Megaptera
novaeangliae) off Ecuador. J. Cetacean Res. Manage.
2(3):165-72.
Stone, G.S., Flórez-Gonzalez, L. and Katona, S. 1990. Whale migration
record. Nature, Lond. 346:705-6.
Townsend, C.H. 1935. The distribution of certain whales as shown by
logbook records of American whaleships. Zoologica (NY)
19(1-2):1-50+6 maps.
Date received: November 2001.
Date accepted: July 2003.
GIBBONS et al.: HUMPBACK FEEDING GROUND IN STRAITS OF MAGELLAN208
... The eastern South Pacific humpback whale population (ESPHW) is one of the seven breeding populations recognized in the Southern Hemisphere (IWC, 1998). The ESPHW breed and calve in a continuous range from northern Peru to Costa Rica (Acevedo and Smultea, 1995;Pacheco et al., 2009), even reaching the waters of southern Nicaragua (De Weerdt et al., 2020) during the austral winter, migrating the bulk of the population to the Antarctic Peninsula waters (Stone et al., 1990;Stevick et al., 2004;Acevedo et al., 2017), and in less extent to the inland fjords of southern Chile, in northern Patagonia and Magellan Strait (Gibbons et al., 2003;Hucke-Gaete et al., 2013;Acevedo et al., 2013) to feed during the austral summer. ...
... With a total surface area of 670 km 2 , this area also includes the Francisco Coloane Marine and Coastal Protected Area (MCPA) and the first Marine National Park of the same name. Even though there are sightings of HWs in other areas to the north and south of the Magellan Strait (e.g., Gibbons et al., 2003), the vast majority of the HWs feed in this area of the strait during the summer/autumn austral season. The feeding area is characterized by different water masses that flow from the South Pacific and South Atlantic Oceans and are mixed with fresh water from rivers and glaciers (Panella et al., 1991;Antezana et al., 1992;Valdenegro and Silva, 2003). ...
... The diet of Magellan Strait humpback whales includes Fuegian sprat (Sprattus fueguensis), squat lobster (Munida spp.), and krill (Euphausia spp.) (Gibbons et al., 2003;Acevedo et al., 2011;Haro et al., 2016). A Bayesian stable isotope mixing model implemented in the 'MixSIAR' package in R (Stock and Semmens, 2013) was used to re-evaluate the relative importance of each prey in the diet for different age-class/sex humpback whales. ...
... In the SE Pacific Ocean the IWC-named breeding Stock G of humpback whales perform long migrations from high latitudes in the Corcovado Gulf (42ºS), Magellan Strait (54ºS) and Antarctica (70ºS) in summer to their breeding and nursing grounds in low latitudes in northern Peru (04ºS), Ecuador, Colombia, Panama and Costa Rica (12ºN) during austral winter [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. ...
... For example, in the Magellan Strait whales were bubble net feeding on Fuegian sprat (Sprattus fueguensis). In the Antarctic Peninsula, bubble net and lateral lunge feeding were performed to capture Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), and skimming/ lunge-feeding to capture lobster-krill (Munida rugosa) [22]. In western Canada, humpback whales used both trap-and lunge feeding while targeting juvenile Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi) [15,38]. ...
... Humpback whales tend to have higher site fidelity to their feeding grounds than to the breeding grounds in both Northern and Southern Hemispheres [27,[45][46][47]. Site fidelity to the Magallanes Strait feeding ground has been described for Stock G [22,27]. The discovery of new feeding habitats for humpback whales have been attributed to climate change effects presumably modifying prey distribution [48][49][50] or the expansion of humpback whale populations increasing competition for food compelling whales to find new feeding grounds [10]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Humpback whales perform long migrations from their breeding and nursing areas at low latitudes to feeding grounds at high latitudes. Nonetheless, this strictly dichotomous paradigm of migration is challenged by accumulating examples of occasional or regular feeding at low latitudes for several stocks worldwide. Here, we report multiple evidences of “Stock G” hump­back whales feeding in coastal waters, at low latitudes of the Southeast Pacific Ocean. Lunge feeding behavior and defecation were observed in Ecuador, while both lunge- and trap feeding in pursuit of Peruvian anchovy was documented in northern Chile. A photographically re-sighted individual feeding at different latitudes of Chile suggested potential site fidelity to two foraging areas. Whether these feeding behaviours are novel due to changes in prey distribu­tion, intensifying competition from a growing humpback whale population, or simply reflect vastly increased research effort remains unknown. Further research into the feeding ecology of Stock G should help reveal historic and potentially new feeding grounds, prey composition and precise migration paths. Competition from anchovy fisheries, vessel collision and net entangle­ment are suspected threats.
... The Francisco Coloane Marine and Coastal Protected Area located in the Magellan Strait is a wellknown feeding area for sea lions and whales (Aguayo-Lobo et al. 2011, Haro et al. 2013. A fraction of the southeast Pacific humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae population feeds in this area annually (Gibbons et al. 2003, Acevedo et al. 2006, with a diet composed of zooplankton (Euphausia lucens), squat lobsters (Munida gregaria, M. subrugosa) and Fuegian sprat Sprattus fuegensis according to direct feeding observations (Gibbons et al. 2003, Acevedo et al. 2011). In addition, SIA indicated inter-annual changes, with Fuegian sprat contributing 55% to the diet in certain years, while in others, euphausiids and squat lobsters were the main prey (> 80%) (Haro et al. 2016). ...
... The Francisco Coloane Marine and Coastal Protected Area located in the Magellan Strait is a wellknown feeding area for sea lions and whales (Aguayo-Lobo et al. 2011, Haro et al. 2013. A fraction of the southeast Pacific humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae population feeds in this area annually (Gibbons et al. 2003, Acevedo et al. 2006, with a diet composed of zooplankton (Euphausia lucens), squat lobsters (Munida gregaria, M. subrugosa) and Fuegian sprat Sprattus fuegensis according to direct feeding observations (Gibbons et al. 2003, Acevedo et al. 2011). In addition, SIA indicated inter-annual changes, with Fuegian sprat contributing 55% to the diet in certain years, while in others, euphausiids and squat lobsters were the main prey (> 80%) (Haro et al. 2016). ...
... In parallel, a different person took photographs of the dorsal fin and the fluke of the humpback whale for identification purposes (Katona et al. 1979). The age of the whales was estimated according to a photo-ID catalog and the life history of the animals in the area (i.e. more than 20 yr of monitoring the animals; Gibbons et al. 2003). Individuals were classified as juveniles (sexually immature) between 1 and 5 yr old and as adults (sexually mature) at ages > 5 yr, considering the same age of sexual maturity for both sexes, as reported for the species (Chittleborough 1965, Clapham & Mayo 1987, Clapham & Mead 1999. ...
Article
The ecological niche is dynamic, since the position and width of the niche can vary at different spatial and temporal scales. We examined the trophic ecology of southeast Pacific humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae in the Magellan Strait feeding area in 2011, 2012 and 2017, analyzing changes in diet and the width of the isotopic niche in relation to ontogeny and seasonality. The isotopic composition of carbon (δ ¹³ C) and nitrogen (δ ¹⁵ N) in whale skin and in putative prey species was analyzed. Bayesian mixing models were used to determine the diet, and the isotopic niche was estimated using the standard ellipse area. Differences were found between the diets of juveniles and adults; Fuegian sprat Sprattus fuegensis was consumed mostly by adult individuals. We found no differences in the diet or in the isotopic niche of humpback whales throughout the feeding season in all years. This study suggests that the differences in diet between age classes are influenced by the ability to find and capture prey, whereas seasonality does not influence the niche width of humpback whales in the Magellan Strait. Our results suggested that fluctuations in the abundance of prey populations could influence in the trophic niche dynamics of humpback whales in the Magellan Strait. In particular, a reduction in the availability of Fuegian sprat would mainly affect adult individuals, leading to a dietary switch and/or to an expansion of their feeding area.
... If there was once a population of gray whales visiting the coast of Ecuador, then those whales have no directly comparable modern counterpart, but some insight may come from looking at the behavior of humpback whales that breed off the modern Ecuador coast (Sheidat et al., 2000;Felix and Botero-Acosta, 2011). These modern humpbacks are known to migrate to feeding areas along the coast of Chile, within the Magellan Strait, and along the Antarctic Peninsula (Gibbons et al., 2003;Acevedo et al., 2007;Capella et al., 2008;Felix and Olavarria, 2012;Hucke-Gaete et al., 2013). It is known that small numbers of modern gray whales do not migrate (Pyenson and Lindberg, 2011), but the δ 18 O ranges of these fossils are difficult to explain via annual variation in the immediate area, suggesting that the whales did migrate to some extent. ...
... The δ 18 O maxima are less enriched than would be expected if the host whales were traveling to Antarctica, but the δ 18 O ranges are similar to those of some barnacles collected from modern, migrating humpback whales (Taylor et al., 2019). It is plausible these ancient whales may have migrated to the Chilean coast, as some modern humpbacks do (Gibbons et al., 2003;Acevedo et al., 2007;Capella et al., 2008;Felix and Olavarria, 2012;Hucke-Gaete et al., 2013), but they also may have migrated to any number of unknown ancient feeding grounds. ...
Article
Full-text available
We report the finding of two partial specimens of Cryptolepas rhachianecti (Cirripedia, Coronulidae), a coronulid barnacle known only to inhabit the skin of gray whales ( Eschrichtius robustus ), in Pleistocene-aged sediments from the Canoa Basin, Ecuador. While the historical range of gray whales includes the North Pacific and North Atlantic, to our knowledge this is the first inferred evidence of a gray whale population having resided within the South Pacific. We describe the two Cryptolepas rhachianecti fossils, use isotopic analysis to investigate evidence of migration in their host whales, and discuss their implications for our understanding of gray whale evolutionary history.
... With more than 8000 km in length (4971 miles), the Chilean coast has numerous locations with high concentrations of whales, including rorquals (Gibbons, Capella and Valladares 2003). Among them, key locations for migratory species and feeding grounds for fin, blue and humpback whales are: (i) Pingüino de Humboldt Natural Reserve (PHNR) in Northern Chile (Toro et al. 2016;Sepúlveda et al. 2018), (ii) Gulfs of Corcovado and Ancud (CHLO; Hucke- Gaete et al. 2004) and (iii) Francisco Coloane Marine Park in the Strait of Magellan (MS) (Gibbons, Capella and Valladares 2003). ...
... With more than 8000 km in length (4971 miles), the Chilean coast has numerous locations with high concentrations of whales, including rorquals (Gibbons, Capella and Valladares 2003). Among them, key locations for migratory species and feeding grounds for fin, blue and humpback whales are: (i) Pingüino de Humboldt Natural Reserve (PHNR) in Northern Chile (Toro et al. 2016;Sepúlveda et al. 2018), (ii) Gulfs of Corcovado and Ancud (CHLO; Hucke- Gaete et al. 2004) and (iii) Francisco Coloane Marine Park in the Strait of Magellan (MS) (Gibbons, Capella and Valladares 2003). In all of these locations, anthropogenic impact have increased over time, mainly due to activities such as whalewatching, salmon aquaculture and ship traffic (Toro et al. 2016;Guzman and Capella 2017;Hucke-Gaete et al. 2018;Sepúlveda et al. 2018). ...
Article
Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing have enabled the large-scale interrogation of microbiota in the most diverse environments, including host-associated microbiota. This has led to the recognition that the skin microbiota of rorquals is specific and structurally different from that of the ocean. This study reveals the skin microbiome of 85 wild individuals along the Chilean coast belonging to Megaptera novaeangliae, Balaenoptera musculus, and Balaenoptera physalus. Alpha diversity analysis revealed significant differences in richness and phylogenetic diversity, particularly among humpback whales from different locations and between blue and humpback whales. Beta diversity was partially explained by host and location but only accounting for up to 17% of microbiota variability (adjusted VPA). Overall, we found that microbiota composition was dominated by bacterial genera such as Cardiobacter, Moraxella, Tenacibaculum, Stenotrophomonas, Flavobacteria, and Pseudomonas. We also found that no ASVs were associated with the three rorqual species. Up to 4 ASVs were specific of a location, indicating a great variability in the microbiota. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the composition and structure of the skin microbiota of whales off the coast of Chile, providing a foundational dataset to understand the microbiota's role in rorquals.
... the documented feeding ground in the Straits of Magellan [34,57,58]. It is worth noting that one individual recorded "Unknown" behavior (e.g. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Despite exhibiting one of the longest migrations in the world, half of the humpback whale migratory cycle has remained unexamined. Until now, no study has provided a continuous description of humpback whale migratory behavior from a feeding ground to a calving ground. We present new information on satellite-derived offshore migratory movements of 16 Breeding Stock G humpback whales from Antarctic feeding grounds to South American calving grounds. Satellite locations were used to demonstrate migratory corridors, while the impact of departure date on migration speed was assessed using a linear regression. A Bayesian hierarchical state–space animal movement model (HSSM) was utilized to investigate the presence of Area Restricted Search (ARS) en route. Results 35,642 Argos locations from 16 tagged whales from 2012 to 2017 were collected. The 16 whales were tracked for a mean of 38.5 days of migration (range 10–151 days). The length of individually derived tracks ranged from 645 to 6381 km. Humpbacks were widely dispersed geographically during the initial and middle stages of their migration, but convened in two convergence regions near the southernmost point of Chile as well as Peru’s Illescas Peninsula. The state–space model showed almost no instances of ARS along the migratory route. The linear regression assessing whether departure date affected migration speed showed suggestive but inconclusive support for a positive trend between the two variables. Results suggestive of stratification by sex and reproductive status were found for departure date and route choice. Conclusions This multi-year study sets a baseline against which the effects of climate change on humpback whales can be studied across years and conditions and provides an excellent starting point for the investigation into humpback whale migration.
... No obstante, pronto se olvidaría la extraordinaria presencia de estos animales en la zona y solo casi 100 años después se observó el regreso de esta especie (En Peligro, IUCN, 2018) a este histórico e importante sitio. De la misma forma, para el estrecho de Magallanes (Patagonia sur, en los alrededores de isla Carlos III) se ha descrito una importante zona de alimentación para ballenas jorobadas, Megaptera novaeangliae, la primera reconocida para todo el Pacífico sudeste (Gibbons et al., 2003) y posteriormente otra área más en Patagonia norte (Hucke-Gaete et al., 2013). Otras especies de grandes cetáceos observadas con frecuencia en conductas de alimentación y/o tránsito por la Patagonia chilena incluyen a ballenas sei o rorcuales de Rudolphi, Balaenoptera borealis, fin o rorcuales comunes, Balaenoptera physalus, francas australes, Eubalena australis, minke, Balaenoptera bonaerensis, B. acutorostrata sp. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Resumen. La Patagonia chilena incluye 100.627 km de borde costero, incluyendo 40.050 islas, numerosos fiordos y canales, lo que genera un alto grado de complejidad geomorfológica e hidrográfica y la transforman en una de las zonas mega-estuarinas más grandes del mundo. Estas y varias otras características generan ecosistemas marinos que pueden considerarse estructural y funcionalmente únicos, así como "hotspots" de biodiversidad. En este capítulo se realiza una revisión bibliográfica amplia y se releva a los mamíferos y aves marinas desde una perspectiva operacional, como especies focales, con el objeto de analizar y sugerir acciones de conservación que permitan minimizar impactos antropogénicos y resguardar la integridad ecosistémica de la Patagonia, al considerarla como un refugio ante el cambio climático. Además, y como recomendación central, se propone considerar a las especies focales como de gran utilidad para guiar la priorización en procesos de manejo y conservación, dada sus características como especies paraguas, ecológicamente importantes, indicadoras y centinelas, con el objeto de alcanzar estándares de conservación de escala mundial en la Patagonia chilena. Palabras claves. Patagonia, Chile, refugio climático, áreas marinas protegidas, pla-nificación espacial marina, amenazas, integridad ecosistémica, resiliencia, mamíferos marinos, aves marinas.
... This information suggests an important increase in reproductive output that could potentially overcome natural mortality, favoring recruitment and population growth. As these populations ex -pand, the species seem to occupy (or return to) breeding (Pacheco et al. 2009, Gonçalves et al. 2018 and feeding (Gibbons et al. 2003, Hucke-Gaete et al. 2013 habitats where they were rarely sighted in the past or used during whaling. The presence of humpback whales in relatively new habitats presents a challenge for the species' conservation. ...
Article
Humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae are undergoing a population increase after ca. 40 yr of a whaling ban. However, anthropogenic activities threaten their recovery in recolonized breeding habitats. Predictive habitat models are important tools that can help create effective conservation measures. Due to the spatially structured distribution of this species that depends on the presence of calves and the number of individuals, models must account for specific population variability that could refine management direction. We modeled potential breeding habitats of humpback whales considering group type variability. A total of 10 yr of data (3115 sighted humpback whales from 2010 to 2019) obtained from whale-watching surveys in the breeding area of northern Peru (4°S, Southeast Tropical Pacific) were used. Maximum entropy models were constructed to predict potential habitats for breeding humpback whales considering groups with and without calves. Depth and sea surface temperature were used as descriptors for modeling the potential habitat of humpback whale groups. Depth was the main explanatory variable for all models. The optimal potential habitat for groups with calves was located between 20 and 50 m depth. Groups without calves ranged more widely in habitat, from 20 to 100 m depth. The predictive character of these models shows segregated potential habitats of breeding humpback whales, which could help refine conservation actions. For example, limiting the number of whale-watching boats in nearshore waters when mother and calf pairs are present would reduce conflict, while restricting the use of gillnets in transitional neritic to oceanic waters is mandatory to mitigate entanglements.
Article
Zooplankton is the primary production consumer in the aquatic food web in fjords and channels of western Patagonia. In this study, the role of vertically migrating and not-vertically migrating crustacean mesozooplankton (collected in a 300 μm mesh net) as potential consumers of spring phytoplankton was assessed in an inshore gulf of central Patagonia through repeated stratified zooplankton sampling during the day and night, over a 30 h cycle. Results show that while a group of copepods remained close to the surface where chlorophyll-a concentrations were higher, other copepod groups and euphausiids exhibited diel vertical migrations. The maximum depth of migration appeared to be limited by very low oxygen concentrations in the water column (< 0.2 mL O2 L−1). Meanwhile, the abundance of not-migrating copepods (62%) was higher than that of vertically migrating copepods and euphausiids combined (38%). The latter two groups doubled their carbon consumption at night (37.0%) compared to daytime (18.8%) but their contribution continued to be lower than that of not-vertically migrating groups at night (63%). Over the 24 h cycle, the carbon consumption carried out by all vertically migrant groups together accounted for almost one-third (28.8%) of the total daily carbon consumption by the mesozooplankton crustacean community. In most areas surveyed along Patagonia, total community respiration exceeded the estimated gross primary production when autotrophic and microheterotrophic respiration was pooled, suggesting that external subsidies of carbon (e.g., allochthonous, terrestrial) and/or recycling of fecal pellets are required to support the micro- and meso-zooplankton communities of these sub-Antarctic fjord systems.
Article
Full-text available
The Lafken Mapu Lahual Coastal Marine Protected Area of Multiple Uses (Lafken Mapu Lahual), Osorno coast, southern Chile, is one of the first protected areas of created in Chile during 2006, but only in 2019 its Management Plan was presented. This study provides information on its marine mammal species to be used in future biodiversity monitoring plans. The sighted mammals were recorded and counted through 18 navigation tracks and one observation point in the 2014-2015 austral breeding season. Five species were recorded systematically (one whale species, two dolphin species, one marine otter species and a one sea lion species). Two of them (Lontra felina and Balaenoptera musculus) are classified by the IUCN in the conservation category corresponding to Endangered. Laken Mapu Lahual is an important area for the species of whales that use it for their migratory route to the south of Chile.
Article
Full-text available
Fifty animals were identified in 1986, 40 in 1987 and 35 in 1988 for a total of 108. Eleven individuals were common to 1986/1987 and size to 1987/1988. Three individuals were common for the three years. Estimates of the population for the 3 yr ranged from 170-450. The importance of Gorgona as a calving area is shown by the fact that 26.5% of animals were calves. -from Author
Article
Full-text available
Between 1991 and 1997 the southeastern Pacific humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) stock was studied off the central part of Ecuador (01°24'S, 80°55'W) during the breeding season (June-September). For this purpose, surveys were carried out onboard whale-watching boats at two different sites: Puerto López and Puerto Cayo. Some population parameters such as distribution, group structure, population size, calving rate and behavior were evaluated. The first whales arrived by the end of May, they peaked in July and most of them had left the area by the end of September. Along the Puerto López route, groups were significantly larger (P
Article
Full-text available
Although some 35 species of cetaceans have been reported for Chilean waters, the amount of published data remains very limited. Historical information on the cetofauna of northern Chile is next to inexistent. Presented here is a preliminary compilation of cetaceans recorded from sightings, strandings and by-catches, off the coast of the Second Region of Chile (21° 27' S to 26°07' S) between 1980 and 1986. Evidence for the following species is available: Eubalaena australis, Balaenoptera acutorostrata, B. edeni and/or B. borealis. Phocoena spinipinnis, Delphinus delphis, Lagenorhynchus obscurus, Tursiops truncatus, Lissodelphis peronii, Globicephala melaena, G. macrorhynchus, Orcinus orca, Grampus griseus, Physeter macrocephalus. Twenty-nine cetacean specimens conserved at the Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas (Universidad de Antofagasta) are listed. The urgent need for future systematical collection of specimens and sighting data in the study area is expressed.
Article
Highlights the strong influence exerted by the intense tidal currents in the shallow eastern sector of the Strait resulting in the mixing of Atlantic and more diluted internal waters and in the resuspension of inorganic particulate sediments, rich in metals; the presence in the central sector of a water mass generated by the mixing of Atlantic water with continental runoff and glaciofluvial water; the formation in the western sector of a stable two-layer structure consisting of colder and more diluted waters of continental origin in the surface layer, and of warmer and saltier waters of Sub-Antarctic origin in the underlying layer. -from Authors
Article
Over 9000 photographs of humpback whale flukes have been collected. As of 31 December 1986, 3647 individual whales were represented. Over 1100 photographically-verified resightings of individually-known humpbacks demonstrated the existence of at least 4, probably 5, separate feeding aggregations: Iceland-Denmark Strait; W Greenland; Newfoundland (including the Labrador coast); Gulf of St. Lawrence; and Gulf of Maine-Scotian Shelf. Individual whales returned annually to a particular feeding region, but whales from all feeding aggregations migrated to nearshore areas and banks in the Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands for breeding. The variance-weighted mean of annual capture-recapture estimates of the total North Atlantic humpback population for years 1979-1986 was 5502 ± 2617 (95% CI). -from Authors