ArticlePDF Available


The impact of globalization on culture and educational system is a major concern. Some people saw it as a treat for traditional institutions such as the family and the school, another argument saw benefits in overturning traditional and developing modern attitudes. this paper will analysis the positive and negative impacts of globalization on education for developing countries. Effective education systems are the foundation of opportunities to lead a decent life. Ensuring that all children have adequate access to education is essential public sector function for countries at all income level. The paper argues that education is a core element of society, and the foundation of democratic choice. The large difference in opportunities in education between countries is one of the basic causes of global inequality. People can only contribute and benefit from globalization if they are endowed with knowledge, skills, and values and with the capabilities and rights needed to pursue their basic likelihoods.
Globalization And Education:
Challenges And Opportunities
Sadegh Bakhtiari, (Email:, Isfahan University, Iran
H. Shajar, Isfahan University, Iran
The impact of globalization on culture and educational system is a major concern. Some people
saw it as a treat for traditional institutions such as the family and the school, another argument
saw benefits in overturning traditional and developing modern attitudes. this paper will analysis
the positive and negative impacts of globalization on education for developing countries.
Effective education systems are the foundation of opportunities to lead a decent life. Ensuring that
all children have adequate access to education is essential public sector function for countries at
all income level. The paper argues that education is a core element of society, and the foundation
of democratic choice. The large difference in opportunities in education between countries is one
of the basic causes of global inequality. People can only contribute and benefit from globalization
if they are endowed with knowledge, skills, and values and with the capabilities and rights needed
to pursue their basic likelihoods.
lobalization is a complex phenomenon that has had far-reaching effects. Not surprisingly, therefore, the term
“globalization” has acquired many emotive connotations. At one extreme, globalization is seen as an
irresistible and benign force for delivering economic prosperity to people throughout the world. At the other,
it is blamed as a source of all contemporary ills.
To different scholars, the definition of globalization may be different. According to Cheng (2000), it may
refer to the transfer, adaptation, and development of values, knowledge, technology, and behavioral norms across
countries and societies in different parts of the world. The typical phenomena and characteristics associated with
globalization include growth of global networking (e.g. internet, world wide e-communication, and transportation),
global transfer and interflow in technological, economic, social, political, cultural, and learning areas, international
alliances and competitions, international collaboration and exchange, global village, multi-cultural integration, and use
of international standards and benchmarks. UNDP in Human Development Report (1999) describes globalization as
the increasing interdependence of the world’s inhabitants, on an economic, technological, cultural, as well as political
level. It is seen as a general tendency towards the liberalization of economic trade, a wider circulation of capital,
goods and products, and a quasi-abolition of national borders. The speed of communication and the relatively low cost
of processing information have caused distances to be eliminated. The categories of time and space have been
completely overturned. Models of consumption, values, and standardized cultural products thus tending to make
behaviors and attitudes more similar and wipe out differences across the globe.
People can only contribute and benefit from globalization if they endowed with knowledge, skills and with
the capabilities and rights needed to pursue their basic livelihoods. They need employment and incomes, and a healthy
environment. These are the essential conditions which empower them to participate fully as citizens in their local,
national and global communities. These goals, can only be reached if national governments allocate adequate
resources to education, basic infrastructure and the environment, and create the institutional framework which ensures
broad access and opportunity.
Education is a major concern for all societies. As the foundation and essential driving force of economic,
social, and human development, education is at the heart of the change that is dramatically affecting our world in the
areas of science, technology, economics, and culture. It is the reason behind social change and scientific progress, and
in its turn, it is subjected to the results of progress that it itself has engendered, both with regard to content as well as
methods and established aims.
In spite of the aforementioned facts, some people argue that education systems no longer seem to take into
account the new needs confronting people everywhere in the world. For example, René Bendit and Wolfgang Gaiser
make the following observation on the education system in the United States of America, which could be applied to
many countries in the world :
The education system has failed to meet current social challenges. The increase in youth problems such as a
problematic transition to the working world , increasing poverty, teen age pregnancies, drug abuse, intolerance
towards minorities, juvenile delinquency and violence, are treated as a reflection of the fact that schools are no longer
have any connection with the real life world.
In order to integrate into the world economy, people must not only acquire the knowledge and tools of
traditional knowledge, but above all, they must be capable of acquiring new skills demanded by a knowledge society.
Indeed, the resulting rapid change in technological and scientific knowledge make learning a permanent process, a
lifelong learning process in the words of the Report of the International Commission on Education for the 21st
Century to UNESCO, entitled: Learning, the treasure within.
Lifelong learning is based on the following four fundamental precepts:
Learning to know, by combining a sufficiently broad general knowledge with the opportunity to work in
depth on a small number of subjects. This also means learning to learn, so as to benefit from the opportunities
education provides throughout life.
Learning to do, in order to acquire not only an occupational skill but also, more broadly, the competence to
deal with a large number of situations and work in teams. It also means learning to do in the context of young
people’s various social and work experiences which may be informal, as a result of the local or national
context, or formal, involving courses alternating study and work.
Learning to live together, by developing an understanding of other people and an appreciation of
interdependence, - carrying out joint projects and learning to manage conflicts in a spirit of respect for the
values of pluralism, mutual understanding and peace.
Learning to be, so as to develop better one’s personality and be able to act with increasingly greater
autonomy, judgment, and personal responsibility. To that end, education must not disregard any aspect of a
person’s potential: memory, reasoning, aesthetic sense, physical capacities, and communication skills.
Although globalization seems to be unavoidable to many countries and numerous initiatives and efforts have
been made to adapt to it with aims at taking the opportunities created from it to develop their societies and people, in
recent years there are also increasing international concerns with the dangerous impacts of globalization on indigenous
and national developments. Various social movements have been initiated against the threats of globalization
particularly in developing countries. The negative impacts of globalization include various types of economic,
political, and cultural colonization by advanced countries on those developing and under-developed countries.
Inevitably, how to maximize the opportunities and benefits from globalization to support local developments and
reduce the threats and negative impacts of globalization will be the major concerns of developing countries.
As mentioned above, globalization is creating opportunities for sharing knowledge, technology, social
values, and behavioral norms and promoting developments at different levels including individuals, organizations,
communities, and societies across different countries and cultures. In particular, the advantages of globalization may
include the following.
Global sharing of knowledge, skills, and intellectual assets that are necessary to multiple developments at
different levels;
Mutual support, supplement and benefit to produce synergy for various developments of countries,
communities, and individuals;
Creating values and enhancing efficiency through the above global sharing and mutual support to serving
local needs and growth;
Promoting international understanding, collaboration, harmony, and acceptance to cultural diversity across
countries and regions.
Facilitating communications, interactions, and encouraging multi-cultural contributions at different levels
among countries.
At the same time, globalization, potentially creating serious negative impacts for developing and
underdeveloped countries. This is also the major reason why there have been so many ongoing social movements in
different parts of the world against the trends of globalization particularly in economic and political areas. The
potential negative impacts of globalization are various types of political, economic, and cultural colonization and
overwhelming influences of advanced countries to developing countries and rapidly increasing gaps between rich
areas and poor areas in different parts of the world. In particular, the potential negative impacts include the following:
Increasing the technological gaps and digital divides between advanced countries and less developed
Creating more legitimate opportunities for a few advanced countries for a new form of colonization of
developing countries;
Increasing inequalities and conflicts between areas and cultures; and
Promoting the dominant cultures and values of some advanced areas.
Many people believe that, education is one of key local factors that can be used to moderate some impacts of
globalization from negative to positive and convert threats into opportunities for the development of individuals and
local community in the inevitable process of globalization. How to maximize the positive effects and minimize the
negative impacts of globalization is a major concern in current educational reform for national and given the
phenomenon of “globalization”, economic growth of the last decades has been accompanied by a worsening of
inequalities in the world and in particular, inequalities of access to knowledge.
Integration into world economy today’s implies not only mastery of traditional knowledge but also the
capacity to acquire the new skills required by a knowledge society. It is therefore evident that an unequal sharing of
the new communication and information technologies only serves to reinforce existing inequalities.
While education deficits are obviously greater in developing countries, this is a major issue in developed
countries as well. In many industrialized countries there is a persistent problem of illiteracy and low skills, which is an
important source of social exclusion. Unequal access to education also fuels growing wage inequality and worsen the
income distribution. The uneducated and unskilled in industrialized countries face severe disadvantage in an
increasingly competitive global market.
However, the provision of both primary and secondary schooling increased during the 90s across the globe,
but progress is inadequate and hides the differences between countries and regions. The OECD countries, for example,
spend 100 times more per pupil in primary and secondary education than low-income countries. There are many
evidences indicate that the more rapid progress is possible if the political will and the resources exist, in high- and
low-income countries alike.
All countries which have benefited from globalization have invested significantly in their education and
training systems. Today women and men need broad based skills which can be adapted to rapidly changing economic
requirements as well as appropriate basic skills which enable them to benefit from information technology, increasing
their ability to overcome barriers of distance and budgetary limitations. While Internet technology is not particularly
capital-intensive, it is very human capital-intensive. Sound education policy also provides an important instrument to
offset the negative impacts of globalization, such as increasing income inequalities, with effects which may ultimately
be stronger than labour market policies.
Education is a core element of society, and the foundation of democratic choice. The large differences in
opportunities in education between countries are one of the basic causes of global inequality. Furthermore,
international migration allows rich countries to benefit from the investments in human capital made in poor countries
giving them a responsibility to support the education systems where those investments are made.
The development of a national qualifications framework is also an important foundation for participation in
the global economy, since it facilitates lifelong learning, helps match skill demand and supply, and guides individuals
in their choice of career. Access to training and skills development for women is often hindered by family
commitments, indicating a need for childcare facilities and possibilities for distance learning. Other priorities include
recognition and upgrading of skills for workers in the informal economy and the adaptation of training to
accommodate workers with no formal education.
In today’s global economy and information society, knowledge and information are the keys to social
inclusion and productivity, and connectivity is the key to global competitiveness. Yet in our unequal world the
networked economy is able to incorporate all that it regards as valuable, but also to switch off people and parts of the
world that do not fit the dominant model.
Technological capability is essential. Countries need the communications infrastructure and the production
system which can process and use information for development; and people must have access to the knowledge and
the ability to use it, in order to participate, take advantage of and be creative in the new technological environment.
That puts education and skills at the centre of a fair and inclusive globalization.
Online distance learning could become a powerful tool for developing countries reducing the need for
expensive physical infrastructure for tertiary and vocational educational facilities and enabling investments to be made
instead in communications equipment, with curricula and teaching provided through regional initiatives. The Global
Distance Learning Network (GDLN) is one such initiative. It is a worldwide network of institutions which are
developing and applying distance learning technologies and methods with a focus on development and poverty
reduction. Such networks are likely to play an important role in building technological capabilities by:
Increasing the technological gaps and digital divides between advanced countries and less developed
countries that are hindering equal opportunities for fair global sharing.
Global sharing of knowledge, skills, and intellectual assets that are necessary to multiple developments at
different levels.
Creating more legitimate opportunities for a few advanced countries to economically and politically colonize
other countries globally.
Mutual support, supplement, and benefit to produce synergy for various developments of countries,
communities, and individuals.
Exploiting local resources and destroying indigenous cultures of less advanced countries to benefit a few
advanced countries.
Creating values and enhancing efficiency through the above global sharing and mutual support to serving
local needs and growth. Increasing inequalities and conflicts between areas and cultures.
ILO argues that promoting international understanding, collaboration, harmony, and acceptance to cultural
diversity across countries and regions by promoting the dominant cultures and values of some advanced areas
acilitating multi-way communications and interactions, and encouraging multi-cultural contributions at different
levels among countries. Clearly, the management and control of the impacts of globalization are related to some
complicated macro and international issues that may be far beyond the scope of this paper.
The increase in poverty in the world is the most tragic phenomenon in this era of abundance. It is the cause of
marginalization and the exclusion of increasingly bigger groups of the world population and in particular, affects
children, the young, and women. As a consequence, we see the development of cultures of poverty and
marginalization that lock the same people into the cycle of poverty and reinforce their exclusion.
But it is still the inequality with regard to knowledge that constitutes one of the biggest challenges of our
societies. The traditional raw materials and non renewable natural resources under threat of extinction no longer
occupy the most important place in the process of production and development. It is knowledge in itself that has
become one of the key resources of economic growth. We thus see a new category of workers appearing on the scene,
“knowledge workers”. Without knowledge, you are subject to marginalization and progressive exclusion, but the
corollary is also true. “The higher the level of education and training of a country’s population, the more chances a
nation has of seizing opportunities and minimizing the social cost of technological change and the transition towards a
more open economy.
Education has been proclaimed an integral part of human rights: “It must be free and compulsory with
regards to basic, elementary teaching. Vocational and technological teaching must be widely available and access to
higher education available to all equally, on the basis of merit.”
Education is also the driving force behind economic
growth and human and cultural development. The application of policies of compulsory basic education for all and
investment in quality teaching have meant governments and experts have been able to measure the impact on
populations and the society as a whole. That impact can be seen in improvement in health, lowering of the rate of
demographic growth, reduction of child mortality and increase in life expectancy. Education also means that
populations become aware of their rights and obligations as citizens and are thus able to participate actively in the
construction and management of life in their communities.
According to studies undertaken by UNESCO as well as by UNDP, the world economic crisis, which
dominated the eighties, spread in virtue of the constraints imposed by economic globalization. It was also pointed out
that “the process of restructuring and social adjustment that have taken place in most countries and are still taking
place in some, seem to have had a lasting effect on national politics at the expense of education.”
The education
sector has not yet acquired the right to benefit from special treatment or to be exonerated from the application of
policies limiting public expenditure in general.
This paper tries to highlights the fact that economic policies in most of the world rarely considered education
as investment for the future or as a key to development, and even less as a fundamental right of human beings. The
repercussions of these policies at all levels of education systems in the world, with the exception of a few
industrialized countries, have been sorely felt. Such repercussions include the worsening of teaching conditions;
insufficient numbers of school establishments and increase in numbers per class, particularly in developing countries
experiencing strong demographic growth; the loss of teaching quality often due to the qualification level of the
teacher's and the material conditions in which they carry out their profession; and finally, the loss of relevance
regarding the education programs themselves. But still remains many questions, such as:
What is education for the 21st. century? The present-day crisis in conventional education systems is only the
syndrome of a society undergoing profound change. Its political, economic, and cultural institutions and the
values and symbols at the heart of those institutions, have become inoperable and obsolete in their regulatory
and integrating function concerning the same individual members of the society in question.
How can education respond to the challenges of increasing poverty, unemployment, and exclusion in the
world and to those of intolerance and violence that affect all societies and are even to be found within schools
How can education answer the needs of a multicultural society which, in virtue of the cultural and ethnic
diversity of that society’s people, requires recognition of that diversity and of the people’s own particular
needs, and at the same time favor their social and economic integration into the majority culture?
How can the trends towards globalization, standardization, and the homogenization of cultural models be
conciliated? And how can we conciliate the increasingly strong claims for cultural diversity which, in their
most extreme form, can be seen as a relinquishment of identity, the violent rejection of the other, and
fundamentalism of all kinds?
In its new guise, continuing education is seen as going far beyond what is already practiced, particularly in the
developed countries , namely, upgrading and refresher training, retraining and conversion or promotion courses for
adults. It should open up learning opportunities for all, for many different purposes offering a second or third
chance, satisfying the thirst for knowledge, beauty, or the desire to surpass oneself, or making it possible to broaden
and deepen strictly vocational forms of training, including practical training.
1. Altbach, P. G. (Ed.). (1999). Private Prometheus: Private Higher Education and Development in the 21st
Century. Contributions to the Study of Education No. 77. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
2. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D.M. (1985). Action science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 3-
3. Ayyar, R. V. V. (1996). Educational policy planning and globalisation. International Journal of Educational
Development, 16(4), 347-354.
4. Bendit, R. and W. Gaiser (1995), Integration and Segregatio of Young People in a Changing World,
Prospects, Vol. xxv, No.3, Sept
5. Brown, P. & Lauder, H. (1996). Education, globalization, and economic development. Journal of Education
Policy, 11(1), 1-25.
6. Brown, T. (1999). Challenging globalization as discourse and phenomenon. International Journal of Lifelong
Education, 18(1), 3-17.
7. Cheng, Y.C. (2000). A CMI-Triplization Paradigm for Reforming Education in the New Millennium.
International Journal of Educational Management. 14(4), 156-174.
8. Cheng, Y.C., Ng, K.H., & Mok, M.M.C. (2002). Economic Considerations in Education Policy Making: A
Simplified Framework. International Journal of Educational Management, 16(1), 18-39.
9. Fowler, F. C. (1994). The international arena: The global village. Journal of Education Policy, 9(5-6), 89-
102. Green, A. (1999). Education and globalization in Europe and East Asia: onvergent and divergent trends.
Journal of Education Policy, 14(1), 55-71.
10. Henry, M., Lingard, B., Rizvi, F., & Taylor, S. (1999). Working with/against globalization in education.
Journal of Education Policy, 14(1), 85-97.
11. Holmes, W. (1999). The Transforming Power of Information Technology. Community College Journal,
70(2), pp10-15.
12. ILO (2004), A Fair Globalization: Creating Opportunities for All, Geneva, International Labour Office
13. James, E. (1994). Public-private division of responsibility for education. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite
(Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 8,). Oxford, England/New York:
Pergamon/Elsevier Science.
14. Jones, P. W. (1999). Globalisation and the UNESCO mandate: Multilateral prospects for educational
development. International Journal of Educational Development, 19(1), 17-25.
15. Klor de Alva, J. (2000). Remaking the academy in the age of information. Issues in Science and Technology,
16(2), 52-58.
16. Lick, D. W. (1999). Transforming Higher Education: A New Vision, Learning Paradigm, and Change
management. International Journal of Innovative Higher Education 1999, Fall, 13,
17. Little, A. W. (1996). Globalization and educational research: Whose context counts? International Journal of
Educational Development, 16(4), 427-438.
18. McGinn, N. F. (1996). Education, democratization, and globalization: A challenge for comparative
education.Comparative Education Review, 40(4), 341-357.
19. UNESCO (1996), Learning the Treasure Within, Paris, Co-publication Unesco/odile Jacob Publishers.
20. UNESCO (1998), World Report on Education, Paris, UNESCO Publications.
21. Wang, Y. (2000) (ed.). Public-private partnerships in the social sector. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank
Institute. Waters, M. (1995). Globalization. London: Routledge.
1. Bendit, R. and W. Gaiser (1995), P. 366.
2. UNESCO (1966).
3. Cheng, Y. C. (2000) and Brown, T. (1999).
4. ILO (2004).
5. Report on World Employment 1996-1999.
6. Art.26, Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
7. UNESCO World Report on Education 1998.
8. Unesco (1996), P. 111.
... As many factors are known to be effective on formation process of cultures; it is clear that nowadays, globalization is the most effective dominant factor on culture (Chinnammai, 2005;Gidley, 2001). The common definition of globalization means that any region of the world is accessible and observable through communication and transportation resources; it also corresponds to the inevitable economic relationship between countries in the World (Bakhtiari ve Shajar, 2006). The reasons of this ...
... Bu nedenle bu kavram üzerinde farklı tanımlar yapmak mümkündür (İçli, 2001;Razak, 2011;Yaşar, Gültekin, ve Bayır, 2013). Küreselleşme tanımları içerisinde ise dünyanın geometrik şekline atıf yapılarak; ′′Dünyanın mekân olarak küçülmesi, mesafelerin kısalması, insanların bilgiye ulaşım hızının artması, ulusal sınırların ekonomik anlamda şeffaflaşması′′ sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır (Bakhtiari ve Shajar, 2006;Irani ve Noruzi, 2011;Yaşar vd., 2013). Bir başka ifadeyle küreselleşme, insanların ve toplumların iletişim kanallarının zaman ve mekân gibi faktörlerden bağımsızlaşmasıdır. ...
... Özellikle 1980'li yıllardan itibaren dünya üzerinde etkili olan küreselleşme olgusunun sonuçları üzerinde fikir birliğinin olmadığı görülmektedir (Özüçetin, 2017). Bazı araştırmacılar demokrasi, insan hakları, sağlık hizmetleri, iletişim, ulaşım olanakları gibi alanlarda insanların yaşamına olumlu katkı sağlaması ve sermaye akışının hızlanması, istihdam fırsatlarını ve eğitimde fırsat eşitliğini artırması nedeniyle küreselleşmeye olumlu yaklaşırken (Ball, Dworkin ve Vryonides, 2010;Chinnammai, 2005;Dağlı, 2007;Lindberg, 2013;Yaşar vd., 2013); bazı araştırmacılar ise küreselleşmeyi "McDonaldslaşma" ya da "Amerikanlaşma" olarak adlandırarak, Batı ülkeleri için ekonomik sömürü ve siyasal üstünlüklerini sürdürme aracı olarak nitelendirmektedirler (Bakhtiari ve Shajar, 2006;Balcı, 2006;Talas ve Kaya, 2007). ...
... Some people see it as a treat for traditional institutions such as the family and the school, another argument see benefits in overturning traditional and developing modern attitudes. Effective education systems are the foundation of opportunities to lead a decent life (Bakhtiari, 2011). ...
... The large difference in opportunities in education between countries is one of the basic causes of global inequality. People can only contribute and benefit from globalization if they are endowed with knowledge, skills, and values and with the capabilities and rights needed to pursue their basic likelihoods (Bakhtiari, 2011). ...
Full-text available
Globalization has impacted education around the world in many important ways either positively or in negative ways. Yet the term "globalization" is relatively new, and its meaning or nature, conceptualization, and impact remain essentially contested within the educational research community. In many countries there have been transformations of the educational policy, practice and technology so that locally-based knowledge and skills can be integrated with the demands of the global workplace. Some questions also arise regarding whether its influence on human communities and the world should be conceived of as mostly good or mostly bad, which have significant implications for debates regarding the relationship between globalization, educationand development of a Nation. This paper examines the importance of a globalized educational sector on the development of a Nation.
... This area of research is widely covered in the works of foreign authors. In particular, S. Bakhtiari [6] identifies the challenges facing the education system and the emerging opportunities. S. Mitra [7] studies the issues of self-organized learning and proves the possibility of its use in practice, L. Jackson [8] observes the main aspects of globalization that influence the process of education. ...
... Some researchers emphasize that global education is not only a set of national educational spaces and systems, in the first place, it acts as a special megasystem that sets and implements the goals of national and world educational policy. This system is aimed at empowering the development of personality [6]. Consequently, today educational institutions that train students in secondary vocational and higher education programs in the field of subsoil use should monitor technology and methods of training specialists in similar areas abroad and find foreign partners to implement joint training projects. ...
Full-text available
The strategic task of the world community is to create a global network of environmental education, in which all educational systems include acquaintance with environmental problems faced by humanity, and form an understanding of the interconnection of man, society and nature on a global scale. The article is devoted to the study of basic provisions and current trends in the formation of innovative processes of globalization of education, in particular, environmental education. Environmental education can be defined as the process of acquiring knowledge of environmental problems, the reasons for their occurrence, the need and the possibilities for their solution. Understood in this way, it should contribute to the formation of environmental awareness and to the development of ecological culture as integral components of the concept of environmental policy aimed at preserving the environment. It has been established that globalization processes in education are universal, they are not inherently essential to the industry-specific training of specialists. Digital transformation, international governmental and institutional agreements, competition relations are the main drivers for the development of environmental education.
... Through perfect skills labor force participation increase a person get job if his expertise match with requirement of that job. Then his income increase through economic development by investing in human capital (HC) individuals got more education (Bakhtiari and Shajar, 2006). ...
... Source: Bakhtiari and Shajar, 2006 ...
... Global Aspect Bakhtiari [10], globalization is creating opportunities for sharing knowledge, technology, social values, and behavioural norms and promoting developments at different levels including individuals, organizations, communities, and societies across different countries and cultures. Aware of the rapid development of this phenomenon, school establish cooperates with another school in Thailand and Malaysia. ...
Full-text available
XYZ Foundation manages several unit of different education levels as part of private education sector. At the time being, the Foundation sees a necessity to encourage the development of one of its units, namely the high school unit. Continuous curriculum development and the addition of classes and facilities require more space to be realized so the school can admit more student, as the interest of prospective students continues to increase every year. But the current school building cannot accommodate any more development. The current high school unit area is still integrated with the junior school unit area. This happen because the junior school unit was built first by the Foundation and later the high school unit. And because of that, the junior school unit occupy most of the area dan already has a better and more comprehensive facilities than the high school. So, the foundation decided to construct a new building for high school unit in separate area. And it is expected that in the school year of 2021 the new buildings are ready to welcome the students. This financial feasibility study is conducted to assess whether the project is feasible or not. The parameters used to assess the project are Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate Return (IRR), Payback Period (PBP), Profitability Index (PI) and risk analysis is also conducted.
... Many parts of the world lie at the intersections of historical and social forces that continue to shape national developments, from traditional leadership and administrative practices through colonial periods, to the current globalised era, including globalised education that constructs the identities of others (Said 1993) through symbolic power and performative practices (Bourdieu 1992). Of increasing concern is the potentially negative impact on national and professional identity in education that shapes nation-building problematically (Bakhtiari 2006;Farazmand and Pinkowski 2006;Zajda, Daun and Saha 2009). Because of differences in culture and social norms, most 'Western' models of leadership identity formation do not fully apply, and may even be damaging culturally (Burbules and Torres 2000;Spring 2014), reducing the sustainability of national identity and its leadership identity for education. ...
This chapter examines postcolonial and Indigenous critiques of dominating and colonising knowledge traditions internationally that have negatively affected identity in many populations and nations and that have implications for education and its administration and leadership. These collectively provide a range of arguments for decolonising the field and creating a more diverse and inclusive curriculum, including the research methodology field that has a strong causal effect.
... Living in the flow of globalization that continues to develop, brings everyone to the face of several complex problems, such as air pollution, water, soil, and global climate change [1]. Education is considered to be one of the main factors that can be used to change some of the globalization effects from negative to positive and turns threats into opportunities [2]. Education that focuses on the young generation to be responsible citizens of the environment and the communities in which they live [3], is a fascinating solution in the education system in this globalization era. ...
... Our decision support system includes the base of problem solving that have been addressed with previous batches/countries to learn from the previous experience. A mentorship system based on cultural affinity could be produced to assure the different groups of students coming from different cultures (Bakhtiari, 2011). Also, events should be organized to help the international student meet national students to exchange experiences at the language level, academic level, political level and cultural level as well. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The potential drawbacks that globalization might have on education are increasing and becoming a main worry. The number of international students is increasing and students’ mobility is becoming a crucial phenomenon to obtain a good degree and secure a decent job. Universities have tripled their efforts to recruit and attract international students but their educational ecosystem is still missing some fundamentals. Ensuring that all international students are admitted using an adapted automated admission system, receiving assistance and decent welcome from international faculty and staff, and building their career after are factors that reduce the negative impacts of globalization in education. This paper presents our Decision Support System using knowledge management (KM) approach and AI techniques contributing to achieve those fundamentals and reduce its impacts.
Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis tantangan pendidikan Islam di era globalisasi. Pembahasan difokuskan pada bagaimana karakteristik era globalisasi? Bagaimana tantangan globalisasi terhadap pendidikan Islam? Bagaimana strategi pendidikan Islam dalam menghadapi tantangan globalisasi? Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan kemudian dianalisis relevansinya dengan fakta aktual yang terjadi dewasa ini. Ada tiga tantangan utama yang kini dihadapi oleh pendidikan Islam, yaitu kemajuan iptek, demokratisasi, dan dekadensi moral. Pada intinya lembaga-lembaga pendidikan Islam harus mereformasi kurikulumnya agar dapat menyiapkan sumber daya manusia yang unggul dan memiliki daya saing dalam menghadapi kompetisi global.Kata kunci: Tantangan pendidikan Islam, Globalisasi. This study aims to identify and analyze the challenges of Islamic education in the era of globalization. The discussion focused on how the characteristics of the era of globalization? How the challenges of globalization on Islamic education? How Islamic education strategy in facing the challenges of globalization? Data obtained through library research and analyzed their relevance to the actual facts that happened today. There are three main challenges now faced by the Islamic education, the advancement of science and technology, democratization , and moral decadence . At the core of Islamic educational institutions should reform the curriculum in order to prepare human resources for excellence and competitiveness in the face of global competition.Keywords: Islamic educational challenges, globalization.
Educational Administration and Leadership Identity Formation explores approaches and issues that arise in leadership identity formation in a variety of educational contexts. Bringing together a range of national and international contributions, this volume provides a global perspective on this multi-dimensional topic. This book examines the theoretical foundations relevant to identity and identity formation, and their implications for researching and teaching in educational administration and leadership. It includes a range of sociological, psychological, political, cultural, and socio--linguistic approaches to examining leadership identity formation. It also addresses models, practices and experiences that vary according to identity politics, cultural difference, and historical and contemporary privilege in leadership identity formation. Working from theoretical and practice-base perspectives, this book will be of great interest for researchers, practitioners, policy-makers and academics, as well as students in teacher education programs and graduate courses in educational administration and leadership, organisational studies, and educational ethics for broad international use.
Full-text available
In recent years the concept of globalization has become widely used in a broad range of disciplines. It is also attracting increasing attention within adult education although the discussion is still only in its infancy. It is not surprising therefore that this discussion has drawn on arguments and positions opened up in other fields but in the process the term has been used indiscriminately and often in a highly uncritical way. Globalization mostly refers to a set of economic and political phenomena. However, it has also become a discourse which serves to treat globalization as an irresistibleand irreversible process beyond the scope of human agency to resist. This paper aims to contribute to the debate about adult education and globalization and raises issues concerning the role of the nation state and the proposition that globalization is a new paradigm. It concludes by posing an alternative way of understanding globalization, seeing it not as the driving force of change, but rather an expression of the expansive, and often explosive nature of capital accumulation.
L'A. explique les tentatives des Etats-Unis d'exporter la democratie dans les autres pays et surtout en Russie. L'education civique est de plus en plus en plus remplacee par l'education politique dans les pays industrialises. L'on doit apprendre aux jeunes dans les ecoles ce que la democratie signifie. Les recherches en education comparee peuvent contribuer a la democratisation en celebrant les communautes a l'echelle locale, nationale et internationale
This article proposes a new paradigm including the concepts of contextualized multiple intelligences (CMIs) and triplization for reforming education. A pentagon theory is developed as the base for learning and teaching, to help students develop the necessary CMIs in the new century. Then the article illustrates the concepts and processes of triplization, including globalization, localization, and individualization, and explains why they together can provide a completely new paradigm to reform school education, curricula and pedagogy and how they can substantially contribute to the development of CMIs, of not only students, but also teachers and schools. Finally, the implications of the new paradigm for changing curricula and pedagogy are advanced. It is hoped that the new century education can support students becoming CMI citizens, who will be engaged in life-long learning and will creatively contribute to building up a multiple intelligence society and global village.
Proposes a new vision of higher education for the "Age of Transformation." Suggests that the primary issue facing higher education is the need to initiate, implement, and manage meaningful, planned change. Offers an expanded view of strategic planning, contrasting the traditional teaching paradigm with a learning paradigm. Stresses that managing change requires understanding that learning must precede change. (DB)
Asserts that higher education institutions can benefit greatly, or cease to exist, depending upon how each college and university adapts to the transformational power of information technology in the future. Discusses the inevitable changes in higher education, catalysts, responses, and potential impact of change, and how to adapt to inevitable change. Contains 12 references. (VWC)
This paper critically examines two trajectories for economic development under the new global economic competition: the neo‐Fordist route of the New Right and the post‐Fordist route of centre‐left Modernizers. It is argued that both positions are unlikely to achieve economic prosperity and equality of opportunity for all, although there are elements in the Modernizers’ programme that are desirable. The Modernizers emphasize the idea of a ‘high skill, high wage economy’ in which the upgrading of educational standards is seen as central to the delivery of social justice and economic growth. However, their characterization of the relationship between national and global economies is seriously flawed. Their explanation for the economic and social polarization of these societies in terms of the global demand for skill rests on commonly held but inadequate neo‐classical economic assumptions. This leads to a paradox in the Modernizers’ position. They place education at the heart of their strategy while being unable to explain or address the problem of polarization. Yet, a polarized society will not create high standards of educational achievement for all. This paper seeks to resolve the paradox by providing a more adequate explanation for polarization and, in doing so, establishes a framework for reconciling the aims of equality of opportunity with economic prosperity under the present global economic conditions.
In this chapter "private" schools are defined as those that were privately founded and are privately managed; they usually have some private funding, although in some cases considerable funding and control come from the government. The size and nature of the private sector is viewed as stemming from excess demand for education due to limited public spending (i.e., these are students who would prefer to use the public schools but are involuntarily excluded and pushed into the private sector); differentiated demand due primarily to cultural heterogeneity (i.e., these are students whose differentiated tastes along religious, linguistic or ethnic lines lead them voluntarily to choose the private sector even if a public school place is available); and the supply of non-profit educational entrepreneurship (e.g., founders who start schools to maximize religious faith or believers, rather than profits) by competing religious organizations. The impact of public policies, including public educational spending and private subsidies, is also considered.
These observations on policy and planning against the backdrop of globalisation are made from the perspective of a large, high population, developing country with considerable human resources and a federal democratic polity trying to liberalise its economy.Whether in the realms of products, ideas, culture or media, one notices two concurrent but opposing streams — homoegenisation and particularisation. This paradox is of great relevance while discussing the impact of globalisation on the policies as well as content and process of education. It is now universally accepted that during the stabilisation phase of structural adjustment, effective policies should be put in place to protect public expenditure on basic services, such as primary education, as an integral part, rather than ex-post. As the economics of education is not considered central to the discipline in the way trade or macroeconomics is, education is not part of the reform package.The increasing and multiple demands on education accentuate the policy-maker's dilemma, particularly in developing countries where the climate is of fiscal austerity, to find resources for education and ensure their optimal allocation among different stages of education. The stylised models postulating priorities with reference to levels of education development are no more relevant than deterministic theories of stages of growth.While alternatives to public funding can contribute significantly, education would continue to be heavily dependent on public exchequer. Financing policy should, therefore, encompass a mixture of reinforced and consistent measures to mobilise resources from multiple sources and simultaneously enhance the efficiency of resource use. Multiplicity, however, casts a heavy burden on the policy-maker.Economic analysis, an essential component of policy planning, often gives little guidance on policy implementation. It needs to be complemented by a sensitivity to the institutional and political settings which constrain policy choices and condition policy processes, and to the tensions inherent in steering the system towards the desired goals of policy changes.Education systems the world over are engulfed in crisis, but one which lacks immediacy and high visibility. Policy leadership lies in scanning the continuously changing environment, identifying the targets of opportunity to get the system do what is right, building a coalition of relevant groups, setting choices that minimise foot-dragging by the unenthusiastic and subversion by the opposed and continuing to retain leeway so that uncertainties are clarified over a period of time.The management of change thus is a process of iterative negotiations and the events are a result of the interplay of conflict and compromise among diverse interests. The outcomes are indeterminate and at variance to what is envisaged. Consequently, monitoring and evaluation need to have a bifocal vision, both longitudinal and cross-sectional, for assessing a process that is essentially probabilistic. It cannot rely on simplistic models of policy formulation and objectively verifiable indicators.In the area of basic education, there is agreement on what the goals should be and what the ideal strategies are. While what needs to be done is clear, how, or much of how, is not. Concepts like capacity building, process projects and participation are not self-executing. For implementing these essential strategies the antagonistic cooperation of a host of actors and modifications of the standard operating procedures of many organisations is called for. Different layers of government, teachers and teacher unions, resource organisations, NGOs and activists have important roles to play and have to be brought on board.The challenge in implementation lies in mastering the logistics of bringing the resources and actors together and of deploying them to achieve agreed goals. Though not recognised, negotiations are at the heart of most of these processes. In policy planning as well as implementation the task of combining the strategic vision with tactical decisions and responses to the emerging situation is formidable.