ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Although the percentage of businesses involved in crisis planning increased after September 11, 2001, it is still alarmingly low. Some managers believe crisis planning unnecessary, while others become overwhelmed when attempting to plan for all potential crises. Even those managers who develop plans may find them overly-simplistic or ineffective when crises occur. This work discusses the importance of crisis planning and presents a five-step process to simplify planning efforts while increasing their effectiveness. Effective crisis preparedness can be achieved by forming a crisis team, analyzing vulnerabilities, creating strategies, working the plans, and assessing plan performance.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Business & Economics Research April 2005 Volume 3, Number 4
Crisis Planning: Increasing Effectiveness,
Decreasing Discomfort
Michelle G. Hough, (Email:, Pennsylvania State University, McKeesport Campus
John E. Spillan, (Email:, Pennsylvania State University, DuBois Campus
Although the percentage of businesses involved in crisis planning increased after September 11,
2001, it is still alarmingly low. Some managers believe crisis planning unnecessary, while others
become overwhelmed when attempting to plan for all potential crises. Even those managers who
develop plans may find them overly-simplistic or ineffective when crises occur. This work
discusses the importance of crisis planning and presents a five-step process to simplify planning
efforts while increasing their effectiveness. Effective crisis preparedness can be achieved by
forming a crisis team, analyzing vulnerabilities, creating strategies, working the plans, and
assessing plan performance.
he old saying goes, into each life some rain must fall. Likewise, we might say, into each business
some crisis must occur. Whether loss of data from a computer glitch, loss of equipment, or life due to
a full-scale natural disaster, adversity strikes businesses with alarming frequency and little warning.
Just as individuals save for rainy days to mitigate their ill-effects, businesses can benefit from employing a proactive
strategy toward potential crises. Crisis management entails minimizing the impact of an unexpected event in the life
of an organization (Spillan & Hough, 2003). Oxford Executive Research Centre study showed that publicly traded
companies able to execute disaster recovery plans reduced the initial negative capital impact by 60%; companies
unable to execute plans had initial losses equating to 11% of their capitalization and average stock price losses of
almost 15% (West, 2003). In fact, evidence shows that the effective execution of well-developed crisis plans can not
only control crises; it can create competitive advantage for the “afflicted” organizations.
In the pre-September 11 world, organizations traditionally did little to formally plan for adversity. Spillan
and Hough’s study of small businesses in New York and Pennsylvania showed that only 15% of businesses surveyed
had crisis management teams, that respondents demonstrated little concern for crises, and that concern was generated
for a potential crisis only if the business had experienced that event previously (2003). Henry’s pre-September 11
survey of Fortune 500 companies found that only 30% of respondent organizations had crisis management plans
(Henry, 2000). Overwhelmingly, businesses justified their apathy toward crisis management with reasons such as the
improbability of crises occurring, the lack of need for planning due to the cohesiveness of the management team, and
the use of insurance coverage as an acceptable crisis planning substitute (Caponigro, 2000, Mitroff, 1989).
Yet it appears that the tragic events of September 11, 2001, aided perhaps by recent corporate ethic scandals,
have impacted organization’s attitudes toward crisis management. Since the September 11 attacks, the American
Management Association has surveyed members and customers regarding crisis management efforts and has found
increasing attentiveness toward the discipline. In 2003, 64% of respondents indicated they had crisis management
plans, up from 49% in 2002. Further, 62% of respondents have crisis management teams, up from 54% in 2002, and
42% indicated they conduct crisis drills or simulations, up from 39% in 2002 (AMA, 2003). The approach to crisis
management, whether reactive or proactive, has consequences that each manager has to weigh in relation to his/her
business goals. The following illustration provides a graphic depiction of the crisis event stream for managers
engaging in reactive and proactive decision making.
Journal of Business & Economics Research April 2005 Volume 3, Number 4
Figure 1 - Crisis Management Two Stances
a. Reactive Stance Crisis Stage Post-crisis Stage
b. Proactive Stance Preparation Stage Crisis Stage Post-crisis Stage
(Source : J. E. Spillan, Ph.D., M. G. Hough, D.Sc.)
Figure 1 illustrates the events which occur in crisis situations. In the reactive stance, decisions about the crisis
are made after the event has occurred. In the proactive stance, managers have anticipated crises and have completed
vulnerability analyses toward developing plans to deal with potential crises. The consequences of each management
decision are significant. Managers must weigh the difference between the investments in planning for a crisis against
the losses they may incur from failing to plan. Clearly, implementing some sort of crisis planning process provides
significant benefit for the continued viability of the business.
Traditionally, the field of crisis management has addressed the actions taken by an organization when
confronted by a crisis. Caponigro (2000) defines crisis management as the function that works to minimize the impact
of a crisis and help the organization gain control of the situation, while Whitman and Mattord (2003) define crisis
management as the actions taken during and after a disaster. While proper management of an existing crisis is
important, actively planning to prevent crises and to mitigate the effects of those crises which cannot be prevented is
critical. To date, little attention has been given to this key component of crisis management. Crisis planning can be
defined as proactively assessing and addressing vulnerabilities to avoid or minimize the impact of crises. It focuses on
the activities that should be addressed before a crisis ever looms.
As a necessity, businesses are viewing crisis planning with increased interest. But understanding the
importance of crisis planning is different from developing effective plans, particularly when management may have to
sell the need for crisis planning to organizational cultures that previously looked upon the effort as a waste of time and
money. Attempting to plan for all the potential crises that could conceivably strike a business can be time-consuming,
tiresome, and difficult. As such, even organizations that choose to plan for crises may find their plans shallow,
overly-simplistic, or ineffective when crises occur and plans are put to the test. To effectively tackle adversity then,
management must not only believe in the value of crisis planning, they need to understand the components of effective
No crisis
1. React
2. Plan to
CRISIS averted
1. Pay costs incurred
2. Restructure
3. Review decision-making
4. Make personnel changes
5. Brace for potential
business failure
1.Crisis reaction
2. Crisis planning
to prevent
Journal of Business & Economics Research April 2005 Volume 3, Number 4
crisis planning and implement those components in their organizations. Discussed here is a five-step process that
management can follow to create sufficiently detailed, comprehensive crisis plans. By following the process of
forming a team, analyzing vulnerabilities, creating strategies, working the plans, and assessing performance, managers
can decrease their discomfort regarding crisis planning and increase the probability that their organizations will
survive, or perhaps even benefit from, times of crisis.
Step 1: Form A Crisis Team
Look beyond the financial statements of any successful business and you will likely see a cohesive, effective
management team. Just as the formation of an effective management team is critical to the financial success of an
organization, the choice of the individuals who will comprise the crisis team is critical not only to successfully
managing crises; it may be a decision upon which corporate survival rests. Gerber and Feldman (2002) suggest that
the crisis team be comprised of the firm’s top managers, including a senior accounting or financial officer, a senior
human resources representative, a senior manufacturing or operations representative, a senior information systems or
technology officer, a senior insurance or risk management representative, internal and external public relations/media
relations representatives, and internal and external legal counsel.
Although designating the top management team as the crisis team undoubtedly will assure that crisis
planning is viewed in a strategic manner, some adjustments to the team mix may be necessary to ensure its
effectiveness. If certain top managers are relatively new to the organization, it may be beneficial to substitute a lower-
level manager with greater organizational experience. Likewise, external consultants may be used to fill gaps of
expertise regarding some crisis events with which the organization is not familiar. Additionally, the organization
should investigate the possibility of retaining as consultants retired employees whose wealth of specific organizational
knowledge may enrich the subsequent steps of analyzing vulnerabilities and creating strategy.
Further, regardless of education or experience, some individuals do not perform well in crisis situations. As
such, it is critical that the team be formed of personalities whom not only work well as a team, but whom can operate
in a pressure-filled environment, even for extended periods of time when necessary. Finally, consideration should be
given to appropriate team size. Initially, it may seem desirable to compile a team with representation in every
organizational area and with expertise in a wide variety of crisis situations, but problems of coordination and control
increase proportionally with team size. Creating a very large crisis team conceivably could lead to less effective
performance during a crisis event. For these reasons, effective team configuration may be the most critical step to
ensuring comprehensive management of crises.
Step 2: Analyze Vulnerabilities
For some, critically assessing all the crises that potentially could strike a business is not only disheartening, it
can be completely overwhelming. Most managers can easily list the three or four crises they most likely face fire;
floods; extended power outages; hurricanes or other natural disasters. Few, excluding those managers in organizations
with risk management departments, can comprehensively list and rank all potential vulnerabilities. Additionally, the
attacks on September 11, 2001 generated a new set of concerns formerly thought so improbable as to prompt
immediate exclusion from consideration. In fact, the events of September 11 created an entirely new meaning to the
phrase “worst case scenario” and may possibly be the primary impetus to increased management attention on crisis
planning (Spillan & Hough).
Table 1, revised from Crandall et al. (1999) to include terrorist activities, provides a detailed list of crises and
impacts from which the crisis team can begin their vulnerability analysis. Depending upon the organization,
additional crises may require assessment. For example, transnational corporations with operations in countries less
than politically or economically stable may need to place more emphasis than their domestic counterparts on assessing
vulnerabilities related to revolution, invasion, kidnapping of key managers, or governmental corruption. After
tailoring the list of potential crises, the crisis team should analyze the events not only for probability of occurrence,
but also to assess the associated financial, operational, human resource, and public relation consequences. Ideally, the
Journal of Business & Economics Research April 2005 Volume 3, Number 4
outcome of vulnerability analysis will be a prioritized list of potential crises with some grouping of events which will
require similar management strategies.
Table 1 - Crisis Classification Framework
Crisis Events
Short-term or long-term disruption of
organization’s daily activities
Loss of records permanently due to fire
Computer system breakdown
Loss of records permanently due to computer
system breakdown
Computer system invaded by hacker
Major industrial accident
Major product/service malfunction
Death of key executive
Breakdown of a major piece of production/service
Public Image
Negative public perception
Boycott by consumers or the public
Product sabotage
Negative media coverage
Loss of stakeholder confidence, reduced employee
morale and productivity
Theft or disappearance of records
Embezzlement by employee(s)
Corruption by management
Corporate espionage
Theft of company property
Employee violence in the workplace
Asset misappropriation
Natural Disaster
Temporary or permanent disruption of daily
activities, destruction of facilities or equipment,
loss of life
Negative public perception, loss of stakeholder
confidence, bankruptcy due to cost of legal
representation or payment of fines and penalties
Consumer lawsuits
Employee lawsuit
Government investigation
Product recall
Temporary or permanent disruption of daily
activities, long-term consequences in employee
morale and confidence, destruction of resources,
loss of life
Chemical or biological attack
Adapted from Crandall, et al. (1999).
Step 3: Create Strategies
Armed with a prioritized list of potential crises, the crisis team can set to work on developing comprehensive
strategies to avoid or mitigate crisis events. As with any strategic initiative, the role of the crisis team is not to create
and orchestrate minutely detailed plans; its focus instead is to establish major goals and expectations for crisis survival
along with sufficiently detailed directives to be implemented at functional levels. For example, it is probably
counterproductive for a crisis team to create detailed disaster recovery plans in the event of a major computer system
outage. Instead, the crisis team should focus on goals and objectives for recovery such as identifying the maximum
acceptable loss of data, mandating a frequency for system backups, detailing expectations regarding the timeframe for
system recovery, prioritizing the mission-critical systems for restart, and providing direction regarding the use of
external disaster recovery installations. The systems operations group then would derive and implement the detailed
disaster recovery procedures to accomplish the crisis team’s goals and objectives.
Journal of Business & Economics Research April 2005 Volume 3, Number 4
Relieved of attempting to plan to minute levels of detail, the crisis team adds the greatest value by focusing
on the comprehensiveness of the strategies they deliver. A truly comprehensive strategy will focus on all aspects of
the organization’s survival including detailing interdependencies among departments; building contingencies in the
task environment with customers, distributors, suppliers, and even some friendly competitors; and addressing
requirements of the general environment such as liaising with employees’ families, aid providers such as fire
departments and emergency medical technicians, government agencies, affected local communities, and other
stakeholders. Inherent in comprehensive strategy formulation is the development and utilization of effective, fail-safe
mechanisms for communication, including the appointment of a corporate spokesperson that can interact with all
parties in a knowledgeable, professional manner.
Finally, no crisis planning strategy is complete unless it includes a mechanism for attempting to circumvent
crises from the outset. Given sufficient warning, most crises can be significantly diminished if not entirely avoided
(Spillan & Hough, 2003). The organization will benefit greatly if the crisis team mandates the development of an
early warning system, complete with a list of indicator events which automatically trigger the execution of crisis
plans. Employee preparedness is critical to the effectiveness of an early warning system. Employees who have
received sufficient training, been exposed to comprehensive simulations and drills, and who have participated in the
testing and fine-tuning of crisis plans will not only be vigilant in watching for early warning signs, they will likely be
effective and efficient in executing the developed strategies and increasing the likelihood of a successful crisis
Step 4: Work The Plans
In theory, the preparation entailed in forming an effective crisis team, creating comprehensive crisis planning
strategies, implementing the strategies in sufficient detail at functional levels, and training and preparing employees to
perform effectively and efficiently in crisis situations should ensure that any crisis can be mitigated or avoided. In
reality, few plans account for all potential variation or complexity in a given situation. Only rarely does a plan so
perfectly fit the situation for which it was intended that no modifications are necessary and execution is flawless.
Instead, organizations dealing with crises frequently are faced with the need to deviate from their plans in order to
deal with unforeseeable complexities in the crisis situation.
In these instances, the wisdom and experience of both the crisis team and the effected employees is
invaluable. To whatever extent is reasonable, the organization should work the plan but be sufficiently empowered
and flexible to adapt to variations as events require. When adaptations are warranted, the crisis team should ensure
that the deviations are documented, including the rationale and the outcome of the changes, so that the changes can be
evaluated after the crisis has passed and incorporated as needed into future plans. As important as creating and
rehearsing plans for crises are, understanding when and how to deviate from the plans may be even more crucial to
surviving a crisis situation.
Step 5: Assess Performance
Sometimes, even the best-laid plans fail despite all efforts to the contrary. Whether the execution of a crisis
plan was a dismal failure or an astounding success, lessons can be learned from analyzing actual performance against
the expectations of the plan. If performance fell short, it is important to question why and determine how to remedy
the shortcomings in the future. If performance exceeded all expectations, possibly turning a potential disaster into an
advantageous situation, analyzing the success can provide important insights that may be transferred to other
situations. Innovations developed during crisis situations may even be applied to normal operating conditions to
create a long-term strategic advantage. Regardless of the outcome, analysis of past performance almost always
provides significant lessons for the future.
Since September 11, 2001, managers are increasingly aware of the importance of crisis management. While
managing an existing crisis is important, actively planning to prevent crises is critical. Crisis planning, or proactively
Journal of Business & Economics Research April 2005 Volume 3, Number 4
assessing and addressing vulnerabilities to avoid or minimize the impact of crises, focuses on the activities that
should be addressed before a crisis ever looms. Planning for crises can minimize their impact and even create
competitive advantage yet trying to anticipate all the adverse events that might occur in an organization and then plan
related crisis strategies can be disheartening or overwhelming. By following the steps of forming a team, analyzing
vulnerabilities, creating strategies, working the plans, and assessing performance, managers can decrease their
discomfort regarding crisis planning and increase the probability that their organizations will survive and possibly
benefit from times of crisis.
1. American Management Association, 2003 AMA Survey: Crisis Management and Security Issues.
2. Brown, B. “The Disaster Business,” Management Today, October 1993, pp. 42-48.
3. Caponigro, J. The Crisis Counselor: A Step-by-Step Guide to Managing a Business Crisis (Chicago:
Contemporary Books, 2000).
4. Crandall, W. & Menefee, M. “Crisis Management in the Midst of Labor Strife: Preparing for the Worst,” SAM
Advancement Management, 61, 10(1993): 1, 11-15.
5. Darling, J. “Crisis Management in International Business: Keys to Effective Decision-making,” Leadership &
Organization Development Journal, 15, 8(1994): 3-8.
6. Dean, J. “Disaster and Recovery,” Government Executive, 33, 15(December 2001): 63-66.
7. Fink, S. Crisis management: Planning for the inevitable (Lincoln, NE: Guild, 2000).
8. Gerber, J. & Feldman, E. “Is Your Business Prepared for the Worst?” Journal of Accountancy, April 2002, pp.
9. Henry, R. You’d Better Have a Hose if You Want to Put Out the Fire (California: Gollywobbler Productions,
10. Hickman, J. & Crandall, W. “Before Disaster Hits: A Multifaceted Approach to Crisis Management,Business
Horizons, March-April 1997, pp. 75-79.
11. Jones, G. & George, J. Contemporary Management, 3rd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003).
12. Meyer, G. & Holusha, J. When It Hits the Fan: Managing the Nine Crises of Business (Boston: Houghton
Mifflin, 1986).
13. Mitroff, I. (1989) Programming for Crisis Control, Security Management, (October 1989): 75-79.
14. Muller, R. “Corporate Crisis Management”, Long Range Planning, 18, 5(1985): 38-48.
15. Spillan, J. & Hough, M. “Crisis Planning in Small Businesses: Importance, Impetus and Indifference,” European
Management Journal, 21, 3(2003): 398-407.
16. West, M. “Crisis Management’s Real-time Frontier: Using New Technology to Secure Critical Data,” Public
Relations Strategist, 9, 3 (Summer 2003): 30-31.
17. Whitman, M. & Mattord, H. Principles of Information Security. (Massachusetts: Course Technology, 2003).
18. Wilderoter, D. Crisis Management: A New Plan Is Necessary,” National Underwriter
(Property/Casualty/Employee Benefits), 91(33): 34-35 & 40-41.
... e incorporation of information about the Paiwan community into a website enables individuals to access real-time information about events and developments related to the community through their personal devices. An inquiry response platform should be established, and this platform should be supported by personnel who are dedicated to providing comprehensive responses to receive inquiries [36]. Hough and Spillan [36] suggested that effective crisis management can be realized by establishing a crisis team, analyzing loopholes, formulating strategies and plans, and evaluating the performance of plans. ...
... An inquiry response platform should be established, and this platform should be supported by personnel who are dedicated to providing comprehensive responses to receive inquiries [36]. Hough and Spillan [36] suggested that effective crisis management can be realized by establishing a crisis team, analyzing loopholes, formulating strategies and plans, and evaluating the performance of plans. For tourism, a blockchain platform provides a high degree of convenience; however, human involvement is still required because a blockchain only provides general information, and personnel are required to respond to unanticipated situations. ...
... Data from Taiwan's Central Weather Bureau and strategic forest management organizations can be incorporated. For example, a blockchain can facilitate the prediction of typhoons, floods, and landslides [36] and enable project members to access all related information through their computers and phones. (5) Establishing a blockchain for transportation network information: is step involves providing multiple travel options by consolidating the available transportation options (i.e., Taiwan Railways, Taiwan High Speed Rail, and buses) for travelers in accordance with their travel plans [39]. ...
Full-text available
Forest protection is crucial to ensuring the balance between human beings and ecology. This study explores the key role played by communities that originally lived in forest-protected areas in implementing the traditional management of forests. The unified management mode previously used by the state power can no longer meet the demands of modern times; hence, multiple types of management systems should be implemented to enable adaption to the original ecology of forest areas. A multimodal management mode should be adopted to restore the original ecology of forest areas. The adoption of this management system can restore a forest to its original state (i.e., the state that existed prior to the entry of state power). The forest has been in a state of ecological balance involving numerous species since ancient times. However, in the modern field of science, the passive restoration of a community’s self-governance ability could be unsustainable and unstable. To improve this situation, blockchain technology can first be used to improve the community management of a forest, such that the capabilities of the original local community can be improved; second, tourism promotion benefits both the community and the forest. When a community in a forest develops the tourism industry with the support of blockchain technology, the information and resources of all parties can be widely connected with the larger world, and this considerably increases success rates; finally, the traditional spiritual culture of a community, such as the culture of sharing, should be promoted. In addition to the skillful utilization of technology, culture can improve the traditional forest management ability of tribal communities who live in native forest areas in terms of their personality traits. Overall, we conclude that: against the evolution history of the over one hundred years, the adoption of new technology for forest management is inherently a creative innovation for the tribal community’s entrepreneurial development.
... The primary goal of crisis management in higher education is to guarantee the continuity of the HEI's core tasks, responsibilities, and functions (Whitman & Mattord, 2003;Spillan & Hough, 2005). The crisis management system used in higher education follows the established model presented by Fink (1986) and Mitroff (1994), which outlines crisis management as a cycle consisting of three main stages: pre-crisis, crisis and post-crisis. ...
... However, organizations, including HEIs, usually do not pay enough attention to this stage. Thus, crisis management is a set of related events and responses that may not be undertaken in a strict sequence (Spillan & Hough, 2005). It is difficult to establish clear boundaries between the stages of crisis management -when one begins and another one ends. ...
... In the context of higher education systems, a crisis can be categorized as organizational or operational, as it includes events that interrupt the normal operations of HEIs. Spillan & Hough (2005) listed several organizational/operational crises (e.g., hostile takeover, product tampering, fatal accident, copyright infringement, environmental leakage, computer hacking, natural disaster that destroys the organization's information base, terrorist attack, sexual harassment, attacks on staff). The types of risks and crises listed are by no means exhaustive. ...
Full-text available
This study considers the COVID-19 pandemic as a crisis to which the world and organizations have responded differently. The impact of the crisis on higher education institutions (HEIs) has been enormous. It is exploratory, as it seeks to explore the existing crisis responses in two diverse higher education contexts during the COVID-19 crisis. Two very different cases were chosen for comparison: a medium-sized research-intensive university in a developed country, the Tampere University (TAU) and a sizeable research-intensive university from the global South, The University of São Paulo (USP). Both universities faced a similar crisis that led to closing their campuses and abruptly suspending all campus activities. Both universities had similar goals in responding to the crisis: first, to monitor and control the epidemic situation and, second, to ensure continuity of the most important activities, especially teaching and research. In addition, both universities, being research-oriented, mobilized their research competencies to contribute to the health crisis facing their societies. The study shows that two measures were important to assure institutional resilience: well-defined vertical channels for communication between the high administration and the entire university and the willingness of the high administration to respond to uncertainty.
... Classifications of definitions for the concept of crisis (Spillan, 2000) The classification since then has been modified by Mitroff (2004) and includeseconomic, human resource, informational, reputational, crisis of physical and natural causes and terrorism-related crisis. Hough and Spillan (2005) crisis classification framework later expanded Mitroff's by adding a dimension of the operational crisis. ...
... On balance, Hough and Spillan (2005) criticize that three-stage model of crisis management, emphasizing that it assumes that each crisis stage will include the processes of crisis analysis, crisis planning, and preparation, as well as evaluation of crisis after it occurred. The authors, therefore, propose a model that illustrates two possible scenarios when tackling crisis: reactive and proactive (see Figure 3 below). ...
... - Fink's (1986) four stage model: the prodromal crisis stage, the acute crisis stage, the chronic stage, the resolution stage; -Mitroff's (1994) five stage model: signal detection, probing and prevention, damage containment, recovery, learning; -Spillan (2000), Hough and Spillan's (2005) Therefore, by combining the crisis management approaches from higher education and business organizations, this study compiles a crisis management framework for empirically analyzing the impact areas of the case displaced universities. The framework is composed of three phases of crisis management. ...
Full-text available
Higher education of Ukraine did not stay immune to political and economic turbulence the country has been undergoing since 2014. As a result of the political turmoil, Ukrainian higher education suffered a massive decline in student population and a halt in the education process for some institutions. In the process of military actions in eastern Ukraine and annexation of Crimea, 18 state universities, two private universities and 11 research institutions were evacuated. The educational infrastructure of Donetsk and Luhansk regions suffered major infrastructural, financial and organizational losses. Limited understanding of the impacts the armed conflict had on the higher education institutions in Ukraine guided this research. Therefore, the aim of the study is to identify how the Ukrainian higher education institutions have been impacted by and have been coping with the crisis. The study focuses attempts to elicit the impacts that disrupt the functions of the Ukrainian crisis-affected universities and crisis management practices that have been used by these institutions to cope with the crisis. This study used a qualitative research design. The researcher selected five conflict-affected higher education institutions as a research site using a purposive sampling technique. The participants of the research were sampled using the expert and snowball sampling techniques. The data was collected with the help of the qualitative semi-structured interviews and the secondary data analysis. The research findings revealed the armed conflict negatively impacted the universities’ human resources, educational and research infrastructure, organizational operations and institutional legitimacy. The institutional crisis management capacity has been undermined and delayed as a result of the lack of a national and university evacuation plans, inconsistent and weak communication efforts and untrained self-appointed crisis personnel. Additionally, the efforts of the crisis teams were subverted by the self-proclaimed Donetsk National Republic and Luhansk National Republic governing and security institutions.
... Scholars have written on various strategies or techniques that corporations could employ in curtailing organizational crisis; this includes confrontation, containment, cooperation, and escaping (Abd-Elaal, 2008;Karam, 2017). While proactive and reactive strategies were implemented by (Hough & Spillan, 2005). For the purpose of this study we will adopt Hough and Spillan (2005) techniques because it seemingly suits our present study. ...
... While proactive and reactive strategies were implemented by (Hough & Spillan, 2005). For the purpose of this study we will adopt Hough and Spillan (2005) techniques because it seemingly suits our present study. ...
Full-text available
The latest type is the pandemic crisis which has affected not only Nigeria but the whole of the African continent and the rest of the world, this includes; the Ebola outbreak which started in Liberia in 2014, the Cholera outbreak in Kano State, northern Nigeria, and the latest is Coronavirus which started in Wuhan China in late 2019. The findings revealed that a crisis that is either induced by natural forces or human activity is an inescapable phenomenon that threatens an organization's survival if not handled with the utmost sense of urgency. The researchers concluded that any organization that wants to survive and bounce back to normalcy in the face of a crisis must be resilience-driven in its behaviour. Although crisis management is an integral tool for organizational sustainability through corporate resilience culture, there appears to be a dearth of knowledge on how crisis management can influence the corporate resilience of the hotel industries in Rivers State. Organizations should ensure that mechanisms are put in place to manage crises such as proactive and reactive strategies to prepare them to curtail unanticipated circumstances. Presidential Hotel should not let their guard down because a ban on the restriction of movement is lifted; they should ensure that all the guests and employees continue to strictly adhere to the NCDC regulations in curtailing COVID-19.
... Furthermore, in crisis planning, decision making and management, there is a need to decrease discomfort to citizens while increasing effectiveness of interventions since those affected and their families are not just numbers in statistics [8,9,10]. ...
Full-text available
Background The spread of the novel COVID-19 virus has raised many questions on the performance of the national and global healthcare systems. Methods In this paper, we present the results of a study on how the decision-making speed at the national and city levels on dealing with the spread of the Corona virus has impacted the rate of mortality by means of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Bubble chart. Results We considered variables such as the level of infrastructures in health, Information Technology, and human development in China and 5 other countries as all these factors could affect the rate of mortality in those countries as well. For each country, the data has been collected and analyzed starting with the time when the first patient was detected as a positive case up to three weeks later. For the time of decision-making, the data which could be used to illustrate the delay or promptitude of decisions included date of first death, date of quarantine, and the date of aviation suspension. Conclusion Our findings support the hypothesis that the timing of a government’s decision, either proactive or preemptive, along with its level of sophistication in urban and social infrastructures, can impact the mortality rate of contagious diseases such as COVID-19.
Full-text available
2(1): 45-59 İster büyük ister küçük olsun krizler örgütlerde istenmeyen durumlardır. Büyük bir örgüt olarak değerlendirildiğinde devletin de kriz yaşaması normal karşılanabilir. Devlet örgütü içinde yaşanan krizlerde göz önünde bulundurulması gereken noktalardan biri, krizin nedeni olan kurumun yapısal ve işlevsel niteliğidir. Devlet, karşı karşıya bulunduğu çoğu toplumsal krizlere güvenlik temelli yaklaşım sergilemektedir. Bu tür durumlarda da başrolü güvenlik örgütleri oynamaktadır. Krizin oluşumunda baş aktör devletin güvenlik birimlerinden biri olan polis örgütü ise o halde kriz yönetimi nasıl uygulanacak, çözüm nasıl bulunacaktır? Bu çalışmanın amacı söz konusu sorulardan hareketle, 12-13 Aralık 2000 tarihinde Türkiye'nin çeşitli illerinde meydana gelen Çevik Kuvvet olaylarını değerlendirmektir. Söz konusu olaylar boyunca devlet ve örgüt yetkilileri tarafından alınan önlemler kriz yönetimi çerçevesinde ele alınmıştır. Çalışmada, ilgili yazın ve gazete haberleri incelenmiştir. ÖZET Anahtar Kelimeler: Örgütlerde Kriz, Devlet krizi, Polis Örgütü, Polis Gösterileri, Çevik Kuvvet Yürüyüşü Jel Kodu: D23, H12 Crisis are undesirable situations in organizations no matter big or small they are. It can be accepted as normal that crisis occurs in state as it is considered as a big organization. One of the points that has to be taken into consideration during the crisis occurred in state organization is the structural and functional nature of conducive establishment. States stage security based approaches to most social crisis to which they come face to face. In these situations security organizations have leading part. If the leading part in occurring crisis is police organization which is one of security organizations of a state then how the crisis management will be implemented and how its solution will be found out? The purpose of this study is to try to find out answers of those questions by taking the example of Riot Police demonstrations occurred between 12th-13th of December 2000 in some provinces of Turkey. The measures that were taken by the officials of state and organization during said demonstrations were argued in the frame of crisis management. In this study, related literature and news from newspapers were scrutinised.
Full-text available
Pengelolaan lembaga anak usia dini perlu dikelola dengan baik agar menjadi sebuah lembaga berkualitas. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji manajemen strategi pembelajaran lembaga pendidikan anak usia dini pada masa pandemi Covid-19. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan kualitatif, yaitu memakai data yang diperoleh dari hasil analisis di lapangan baik melalui observasi, wawancara maupun dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya manajemen strategi yang diupayakan oleh kepala sekolah dalam mengelola risiko bencana di lembaganya. Kepala Sekolah TK Pertiwi 4 Giripurno Borobudur menerapkan manajemen strategi pembelajaran sebagai cara dalam rangka memperlancar proses pembelajaran di masa pandemi. Setidaknya ada empat strategi yang dilakukan TK Pertiwi 4 Giripurno dalam mengelola pembelajaran di era pandemi, di antaranya yaitu implementasi perencanaan yang matang melalui analisis manajemen krisis (before crisis, during crisis dan after crisis), pengorganisasian (organizing) lembaga yang tersistem, pelaksanaan (actuating) yang maksimal dan pemantauan (controlling) dengan menyesuaikan pada ketentuan perundang-undangan terkait situasi kondisi kedaruratan pandemi Covid-19. Melalui implementasi manajamen strategi tersebut, maka dapat menjadi strategi yang efektif dan efisien dalam mengendalikan proses pembelajaran walaupun di tengah kondisi krisis pandemi Covid-19.
This chapter explores the preparedness and initial responses to the COVID-19 crisis of two higher education institutions, Tampere University in Finland and the University of São Paulo in Brazil, using a crisis management framework. The crisis has disrupted teaching and research operations and caused unforeseen challenges to universities. While the crisis is still ongoing, and the long-term impact of the crisis cannot be assessed, this chapter focuses on the initial phase of the crisis, crisis preparedness, and response. The findings suggest that the Finnish case university applies a very systematic and centralized crisis management strategy, while the Brazilian case university has a more decentralized approach coming from its collegial mode of governance. Cross-case analysis shed light on similarities and differences in their capacity to respond to crises such as COVID-19.
Full-text available
The purpose of this paper is to propose instruments to improve crisis management in an organization from the perspective of organizational learning. The assumption on which the research was based is the claim that the success of crisis management depends both on the effectiveness of the learning processes that enable overcoming a crisis and the ability to learn a lesson from a crisis. Organizational crises may be conducive to the process of intensive organizational knowledge acquisition. Actions undertaken in terms of crisis management often constitute the means for organizational learning, which is related to issues of the adaptation, survival, and competitiveness of enterprises in conditions of discrete changes in the environment. A crisis is a chance for revitalizing changes that would otherwise be impossible to implement. Increasing the ability to manage crises can be considered as a favorable condition for long-term economic and social development. Real help for managers confronted with organizational crises depends on the awareness of the importance of anti-crisis management and, above all, the problems they must face. In shaping the ability to learn valuable lessons from a crisis, the following factors are crucial: normalization mechanisms, the organization’s double-loop learning ability and the managers’ awareness of its importance in learning from a crisis, and the organization’s single-loop learning ability. Improving organizational learning should lead to the reconstruction of the organization’s abilities to cope in the crisis.
Full-text available
تناولت هذه الدراسة إمكانية توظيف قابليات إدارة الأزمة للحد من آثار الانحدار التنظيمي ، بالإضافة الى الدور التفاعلي للقيادة التحويلية، إذ حاولت تقديم إطار نظري لأهم ما عرضه الكتاب والباحثون حول متغيرات الدراسة ، إلى جانب إطار عملي تحليلي لأراء (174) من القيادات الجامعية في عينة من كليات الاهلية في ( بغداد ، بابل ، النجف ، ذي قار) بلغ عددها (21) كلية اهلية. وقد تم التعبير عن قابليات ادارة الازمة بوصفها متغيراً مستقلاً من خلال أبعادها الثلاثة المتمثلة ﺒ (الاستراتيجية التنظيمية ، نظام المنظمة والعامل الثقافي ، والتنفيذ والاتصالات ) ، فيما تم التعبير عن القيادة التحويلية بوصفها متغيراً تفاعلياً يضم أربعة أبعاد هي (التأثير المثالي، الدافعية الملهمة ، التحفيز الفكري، والاعتبار الفردي)٬ في حين تم التعبير عن الانحدار التنظيمي بعِّده متغيراً معتمداً احادي البعد. واعتمد الباحثون الاستبانة أداة رئيسة لقياس متغيرات الدراسة والتي تتكون من ثلاثة أقسام . خصص القسم الأول منها لقياس قابليات ادارة الازمة بالأعتماد على المقياس الذي طوّره ( (Kim et al., 2008 وخصص القسم الثاني لقياس القيادة التحويلية بالأعتماد على المقياس الذي طوّره (Kamola, 2016) ، في حين اعتمدت الدراسة المقياس الذي طوّره (Cameron et al., 1987) للانحدار التنظيمي. وباعتماد مجموعة من الأدوات الإحصائية كالوسط الحسابي، والانحراف المعياري٬ وتحليل التباين المتعدد MANOVA)) تحليل التباين الأحادي (ANONA) ، توصلت الدراسة إلى مجموعة من الإستنتاجات من أهمها (عدم وجود وحدة مختصة بادارة الازمات على مستوى الكليات او الجامعات، إذ يتم التعامل مع الازمات من خلال لجان ادارة الازمات التي يتم تشكيلها عند الاستشعار بحدوثها). وخرجت الدراسة بمجموعة من التوصيات المتعلقة بمتغيراتها الثلاث منها الحاجة لاستحداث وحدة مختصة بادارة الازمات على مستوى الكلية ، او تشكيل خلية ازمة دائمة مهمتها استكشاف الاشارات المبكرة لحدوث الازمات بهدف الاستعداد لادارتها بالطريقة التي تقلل من آثارها السلبية الى ادنى حد ممكن
In a crisis it is highly unlikely that problems will be solved at a single stroke or by ad-hoc action. Despite the urgency of the crisis the situation demands planning and coordination. For those who have had responsible positions during a corporate crisis, and this includes not only top management but also non-executive directors, banks, management consultants and receivers, emphasize that crisis management is a three-dimensional problem. It must address: •☆strategic and operating problems;•☆the political problem of how to implement deicisions among often conflicting interested parties;•☆the organizational structure necessary to overcome the crisis.The author offers a framework for corporate crisis management. Among the questions demanding answers: (1) What are the main reasons for the failure of crisis management? (2) How can the crisis be identified before it is too late? (3) What strategies are suitable for overcoming a crisis? (4) How should management organize itself to overcome a crisis? (5) What functions must assume a leading role during a crisis? (6) How does crisis management turn into the successful management of innovation?
Firms involved in international business are affected by many crisis and crisis-like events not generally associated with normal operations. Crisis management provides a business firm with a systematic, orderly response to crisis situations. Many crises can be prevented – or at least coped with more effectively – through early detection. The real challenge is not just to recognize crises, but to recognize them in a timely fashion and with a will to address the issues they represent. A crisis in an international business firm can consist of as many as four different and distinct phases: prodromal crisis stage, acute crisis stage, chronic crisis stage and crisis resolution stage. Recognizing these phases, and dealing with them effectively, gives the business manager an important edge in addressing issues of importance to the organization.
This study examines crisis planning in a survey of small businesses. It specifically focuses on the perceived importance of crisis planning by small business managers. In particular, we investigate whether the experience of an actual crisis event by a business generates concern for future crises, if concern is generated more from the occurrence of a crisis event or from the presence of a crisis management team. Results of the study indicate that crisis planning receives little attention in the small businesses surveyed, and for most small business managers, an actual crisis event must occur before crisis planning becomes a concern. Concern for crises is generated by experiencing crisis events, rather than by the presence of crisis management teams. It was found that even those businesses that had previously experienced crises did not have crisis management teams.
Crisis Management: A New Plan Is Necessary
  • D Wilderoter
Wilderoter, D. "Crisis Management: A New Plan Is Necessary," National Underwriter (Property/Casualty/Employee Benefits), 91(33): 34-35 & 40-41.
You'd Better Have a Hose if You Want to Put Out the Fire
  • R Henry
Henry, R. You'd Better Have a Hose if You Want to Put Out the Fire (California: Gollywobbler Productions, 2000).
Programming for Crisis Control
  • I Mitroff
Mitroff, I. (1989) "Programming for Crisis Control", Security Management, (October 1989): 75-79.
Disaster and Recovery
  • J Dean
Dean, J. "Disaster and Recovery," Government Executive, 33, 15(December 2001): 63-66.