ArticlePDF Available

Introduced Iguanas in Southern Florida: A History of More Than 35 Years

Authors:
R
esearchers have been aware of the pres-
ence of non-native reptiles and amphib-
ians in Florida for more than 140 years.
Cope (1863) reported the small, terres-
trial Greenhouse Frog, Eleutherodactylus
planirostris (Cope), from southern Florida, and
the report of Anolis sagrei followed about 25 years
later (Garman 1887). Since then, numerous papers
have detailed the introduced herpetofauna of
southern Florida (e.g., Carr 1940, Duellman and
Schwartz 1958, King and Krakauer 1966, Wilson
and Porras 1983, Butterfield et al. 1997), and
more than 40 non-native species are presently
reported. These reptiles and amphibians were ini-
tially introduced and their populations are supple-
mented via various routes. Some of these exotics
may find their way into the suitable climate of
southern Florida as stowaways in shipments of
ornamental plants and other commerce, but many
recent introductions can be attributed to individ-
Introduced Iguanas in
Southern Florida: A History
of More Than 35 Years
Josiah H. Townsend
1
, Kenneth L. Krysko
1
, and Kevin M. Enge
2
1
Division of Herpetology, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7800
2
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Joe Budd Wildlife Field Office, 5300 High Bridge Road,
Quincy, Florida 32351
All photographs are by the senior author except where noted.
111
IGUANA
December 2003
Adult female Ctenosaura similis on Key Biscayne using an old park bench as a basking site. Photograph by Joe Burgess.
uals being intentionally released by or escaping
from reptile dealers or pet owners. As the trade in
reptiles and amphibians has increased, so has the
number of exotic species that have become estab-
lished. Some of the more notable, and noticeable,
of these species are three large lizards in the family
Iguanidae (sensu Frost et al. 2001): the Mexican
Spiny-tailed Iguana, Ctenosaura pectinata
(Wiegmann), the Black Spiny-tailed Iguana, C.
similis (Gray), and the Green or Common Iguana,
Iguana iguana (Linnaeus).
Lizards in the genus Ctenosaura are com-
monly referred to as Spiny-tailed Iguanas or
Ctenosaurs. They are large iguanids that typically
have tails ringed with rows of enlarged, spiny
scales. Presently, 17 species are recognized.
Ctenosaurs are found in southern Baja California,
its offshore islands, and on mainland Central
America from adjacent parts of Mexico to Panama
(Köhler 2002; see also IGUANA 10(2):56–57
and 10(3):79–81). Two of these species, C. pecti-
nata and C. similis, are known to be established in
southern Florida.
Ctenosaura pectinata is native to the Pacific
versant of southern Mexico. This species was first
reported in Florida by Eggert (1978), who
described digging up eggs and observing adults
near Old Cutler Road in southeastern Miami-
Dade County. However, Eggert (1978) erro-
neously identified this population as C. similis,
which was later corrected by Wilson and Porras
(1983). This case of mistaken identity was the first
in a series of misidentifications involving intro-
duced Ctenosaurs in Florida, as C. pectinata was
subsequently reported from Key Biscayne
(Butterfield et al. 1997), Gasparilla Island (Bartlett
and Bartlett 1999, McKercher 2001, McCoid
2002), and from “… the streets and trees of met-
ropolitan Miami” (Bartlett and Bartlett 1999).
After examining all Florida specimens of
Ctenosaura in systematic collections and collecting
specimens from all known localities in southern
Florida, Townsend et al. (2003) concluded that
most populations (including those known from
Key Biscayne and Gasparilla Island) are C. similis,
and the only extant population of C. pectinata
occurs near the original Old Cutler Road site. We
visited the Old Cutler Road site at least six times
from 2002–2003 and observed two adult males,
six adult females, and one subadult of unknown
sex living on and adjacent to a single private prop-
erty east of Old Cutler Road between SW 168
th
and SW 184
th
streets. No other C. pectinata was
seen, and local residents with whom we talked
were unfamiliar with the lizards and unaware of
their presence. However, one resident of the
Florida Keys related that she had observed
Ctenosaurs crossing Old Cutler Road while dri-
ving through the area in 2002 and 2003 (H.
Kavney, pers. comm.).
Ctenosaura similis is native to Central
America, and is found from the Isthmus of
Tehuantepec to northeastern Nicaragua and west-
112
IGUANA
Volume 10, Number 4
Three species of iguanas have become established in
southern Florida: Ctenosaura pectinata, from near Old
Cutler Road (top), southeastern Miami-Dade County, and
adult male Ctenosaura similis (middle), and Iguana iguana
from Key Biscayne (bottom).
ern Panama on the respective Atlantic and Pacific
versants. The extent to which C. similis has
become established in southern Florida is only
now becoming clear. One of the earliest known
populations of C. similis in Florida occurs on Key
Biscayne. That population probably has persisted
there since at least 1979, when the Crandon Park
Zoo was closed and most of the exhibit animals
were relocated to the Miami Metrozoo
(Townsend et al. 2003). Since its introduction on
Key Biscayne, C. similis has become well-estab-
lished in Crandon Park and is being found in
increasing numbers in Bill Baggs Cape Florida
State Park at the southern end of Key Biscayne (E.
Donlan and E. Golden, pers. comm.). This
species also was introduced on Gasparilla Island,
Charlotte and Lee counties, on Florida’s south-
western Gulf Coast during the late 1970s or early
1980s, when an island resident released as few as
three individuals brought back from Mexico
(Krysko et al. 2003). Ctenosaura similis now
occurs on Gasparilla Island in large numbers and
has expanded its range onto the adjacent main-
land and onto Cayo Costa, a small island south of
Gasparilla Island. Large populations also occur on
Keewaydin and Little Marco islands and within
the boundaries of the Rookery Bay Estuarine
Research Reserve, Collier County. The latter pop-
ulation was established in 1995, when a
Keewaydin resident intentionally (and illegally)
released 5–30 C. similis on his property (Krysko
et al. 2003). The deliberate introduction of non-
native reptiles is illegal according to Florida
Statute 372.265, which specifically prohibits the
release of exotic wildlife without a permit from
the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission.
Confusion regarding the identities of southern
Florida’s Ctenosaurs may be attributed partially to
a general similarity in the appearance of the two
species. As adults, both C. pectinata and C. similis
are large, dark-colored terrestrial lizards that may
113
IGUANA
December 2003
Map of South Florida showing localities mentioned in the article.
appear striped or banded. Juveniles of both species
are green at the time of hatching, gradually taking
on the brown or black adult coloration as they
mature. However, these two species may be dis-
tinguished easily by using a few morphological
characters that were defined by Köhler and Streit
(1996) and later applied by Townsend et al.
(2003) to Florida Ctenosaurs. Adult C. similis usu-
ally have a gray or tan ground color with 4–12
well-defined dark dorsal bands that extend nearly
to the ventral scales. Male C. similis also may take
on an orange color around the head and throat
during the breeding season. In contrast, mature C.
pectinata have a black to brown ground color
marked with irregular whitish blotches, with addi-
tional white coloration usually apparent in the area
of the neck and throat. These white markings may
give C. pectinata a partially banded appearance.
Both C. similis and C. pectinata have tails that are
ringed with rows of enlarged spiny scales, or
whorls, that are separated by smaller smooth scales,
or intercalaries — but differ in the number of
intercalaries that separate the whorls. This is most
apparent near the base of the tail. Ctenosaura sim-
ilis has whorls separated by two rows of intercalar-
ies and C. pectinata has whorls separated by three
rows of intercalaries. Florida C. similis also tend to
have very few (usually zero) small dorsal scales
between the posterior end of the dorsal crest and
the anterior end of the caudal crest, whereas
Florida C. pectinata usually has 7 or 8 (range
0–20) dorsal scales between crests (Townsend et
al. 2003).
Currently, C. pectinata appears to be restricted
to a single small area around Old Cutler Road, and
occurs in low numbers there despite having been
introduced at least 25 years ago. Expansion of this
population may have been limited by natural and
man-made geographic barriers, including a canal
to the north, construction in the early 1980s of a
large corporate headquarters to the south,
114
IGUANA
Volume 10, Number 4
Adult female (right) and an adult male and
female (below) Ctenosaura pectinata near Old
Cutler Road, southeastern Miami-Dade County.
(below) Adult male
Ctenosaura similis,
Key Biscayne.
Biscayne Bay to the east, and Old Cutler Road to
the west. A large area directly to the south of the
current population was developed since the time it
was reported by Wilson and Porras (1983), a
process which may have reduced the numbers of
C. pectinata to the low numbers seen today. In
contrast, C. similis has been an exceedingly suc-
cessful invader, becoming well-established and
expanding its range in a number of Florida locali-
ties. Site fidelity associated with Ctenosaura uti-
lization of holes or other refugia may slow the
process of range expansion beyond the original site
of introduction. Nonetheless, neither species of
Ctenosaura has been nearly as successful as an
invader as their familiar relative, the Green or
Common Iguana (Iguana iguana).
Iguana iguana is one of the most popular rep-
tiles in the pet trade, with over 1.14 million
imported into the United States in 1995 alone,
and represents about 45% of all reptilian imports
(Hoover 1998). Iguana iguana has a wide native
range and is found at low elevations on the main-
land from Sinaloa, Mexico south to Ecuador on
the Pacific versant and Veracruz, Mexico to south-
ern Brazil on the Atlantic versant, as well as on
some Central and South American coastal islands
115
IGUANA
December 2003
Juvenile Ctenosaura similis, Key Biscayne.
Adult male Iguana iguana, Key Biscayne.
Three Green Iguanas (Iguana iguana) sit at canal’s edge,
Key Biscayne.
and throughout the Lesser Antilles. In the United
States, I. iguana has been introduced in southern
Florida and Hawaii (McKeown 1996). Iguana
iguana was first reported in southern Florida by
King and Krakauer (1966), who indicated that
iguanas could be found on Key Biscayne, Hialeah,
Coral Gables, and near the Miami International
Airport. Iguana iguana has since become estab-
lished at least as far north as Palm Beach County
on the Atlantic Coast and Lee County on the Gulf
Coast (Bartlett 1980, Bartlett and Bartlett 1999,
Townsend et al. 2002, Krysko et al. in press), and
as far south as Stock Island in the Florida Keys,
Monroe County. In all likelihood, this species is
much more abundant in southern Florida than
previously reported in the literature. The largest
populations of I. iguana probably occur in eastern
Miami-Dade County on Key Biscayne, in Fairchild
Tropical Garden, and Matheson Hammock Park,
but these lizards are now found at localities
throughout the county and have been sighted
numerous times in Everglades National Park
(Meshaka et al. 2000).
In Florida, I. iguana usually is found near
water, often in trees or on embankments border-
ing canals and lakes, or even basking on lawns or
pavement in urban and suburban areas. Juveniles
and adults are strictly
herbivorous. In
Florida, iguanas eat a
wide variety of both
exotic ornamentals and
native plants (see
IGUANA
10(3):94–95). Iguana
iguana on Key
Biscayne nests in sandy
areas, often with multi-
ple females utilizing a
single small area. Most hatchlings appear during
July and August. Relatively few predators of juve-
niles occur in the urban and suburban areas of
southern Florida, a factor that may lead to rapid
growth in any introduced I. iguana population
that contains multiple reproducing females. Lack
of predators and abundance of food are some of
the primary explanations for the very high popula-
tion densities of I. iguana found in southern
Florida.
Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park (CFSP)
occupies 174 ha at the southern end of Key
Biscayne, almost all of it consisting of coastal
strand habitat dominated by Saw Palmetto
(Serenoa repens) or coastal hammock dominated by
Buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus) and Sea Grape
(Coccoloba uvifera). In 2003 alone, CFSP staff
removed over 500 Green Iguanas (E. Donlan,
pers. comm.). However, thousands of iguanas live
on Key Biscayne outside of CFSP, and, when an
I. iguana is removed from the grounds of CFSP,
other iguanas from outside the park simply move
in and take up available space. Low winter tem-
peratures appear to be a major factor limiting the
northern expansion of I. iguana in Florida; how-
ever, a freeze in Miami-Dade County during the
winter of 2002–2003 did little more than tem-
116
IGUANA
Volume 10, Number 4
An obviously gravid female Iguana iguana pauses while
excavating her nest at Key Biscayne. Photographs by Esther
M. Langan.
porarily reduce numbers (see IGUANA
10(3):98). Interestingly, many I. iguana have
learned to seek shelter in burrows or under build-
ings, and we have observed I. iguana taking
refuge under water, exposing only their snouts for
breathing, to escape extremely cold temperatures.
Another large iguanid, the Hispaniolan
Rhinoceros Iguana or Cyclura cornuta
(Bonnaterre), was reported in very small numbers
in the vicinity of the Miami Seaquarium on
Virginia Key and also possibly on Key Biscayne
(King and Krakauer 1966). A few individuals of
this species escaped from an exhibit at the
Seaquarium and are purported to have repro-
duced in small numbers (Bartlett and Bartlett
1995). However, we have not observed this
species in the wild, and no specimens from Florida
are known to have been deposited in any system-
atic collections.
With the ranges and population sizes of
Ctenosaura similis and Iguana iguana continuing
to grow and the population of C. pectinata per-
sisting for over 25 years, these species obviously
have become a permanent part of the dynamic
herpetofauna of southern Florida. These three
lizard species are only a few of the growing num-
ber of introduced reptiles and amphibians that call
southern Florida home. This number seems to be
increasing as quickly as researchers are able to
investigate each new report of a possible intro-
duced species. Without importers and pet owners
showing greater responsibility and stricter enforce-
ment of Florida state laws regarding the release of
exotic animals, what remains of the native her-
petofauna in southern Florida stands a good
chance of being displaced by exotic species in the
near future.
Acknowledgements
We thank Kevin Kirwin and Ernest Link of
Crandon Park; Elizabeth Golden and Ellen Donlan
of Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park; Reggie
Norman, Ken Alvarez, Chris Angel, and Patty
Middleton of Gasparilla Island State Park; and
Steve Bertone of Rookery Bay Estuarine Research
Reserve for facilitating field work at their respective
parks and for providing much useful information.
Helen Kavney provided additional information.
117
IGUANA
December 2003
A Buttonwood Tree
(Cornocarpus erectus)
provides food and a place to
bask for this Green Iguana
(Iguana iguana) on Watson
Island in Miami. Photograph
by Joe Wasilewski.
A Green Iguana (Iguana
iguana) makes itself at home
on a Coconut Palm (Cocos
nucifera) in downtown
Miami. Photograph by Joe
Wasilewski.
Literature Cited
Bartlett, R.D. and P.P. Bartlett. 1995. Iguanas. Barron’s Educational
Series, Hauppauge, New York. 88 pp.
Bartlett, R.D. and P.P. Bartlett. 1999. A Field Guide to Florida
Reptiles and Amphibians. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston,
Texas. 280 pp.
Butterfield, B.P., W.E. Meshaka, Jr., and C. Guyer. 1997.
Nonindigenous amphibians and reptiles, pp.123–138. In: D.
Simberloff, D. C. Schmitz, and T. C. Brown (eds.), Strangers in
Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species
in Florida. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Carr, A.F., Jr. 1940. A contribution to the herpetology of Florida.
University of Florida Publications, Biological Sciences 3:1–118.
Cope, E.D. 1863. On Trachycephalus, Scaphiopus, and other
American Batrachia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural
Sciences of Philadelphia 15:43–54.
Duellman, W.E. and A. Schwartz. 1958. Amphibians and reptiles
of southern Florida. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum,
Biological Sciences 3:181–324.
Eggert, J. 1978. The invasion of the Wish Willy. Florida Wildlife
31(5):9–10.
Frost, D.R., R. Etheridge, D. Janies, and T.A. Titus. 2001. Total
evidence, sequence alignment, evolution of polychrotid lizards,
and a reclassification of the Iguania (Squamata: Iguania).
American Museum Novitates (3343):1–38.
Garman, S. 1887. On West Indian reptiles. Iguanidæ. Bulletin of the
Essex Institute 19:1–26.
Hoover, C. 1998. The U.S. Role in the International Live Reptile
Trade: Amazon Tree Boas to Zululand Dwarf Chameleons.
TRAFFIC North America, Washington, D.C. 59 pp.
King, F. W. and T. Krakauer. 1966. The exotic herpetofauna of
southeast Florida. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of
Sciences 29:144–154.
Köhler, G. 2002. Schwarzleguane. Lebensweise, Pflege, Zucht.
Herpeton, Offenbach. 142 pp.
Köhler, G. and B. Streit. 1996. Notes on the systematic status of
taxa acanthura, pectinata, and similis of the genus Ctenosaura
(Reptilia: Sauria: Iguanidae). Senckenbergiana Biologica
75:33–43.
Krysko, K.L., K.M. Enge, J.H. Townsend, E.M. Langan, S.A.
Johnson, and T.S. Campbell. In press. New county records of
amphibians and reptiles from Florida. Herpetological Review.
Krysko, K.L., F.W. King, K.M. Enge, and A.T. Reppas. 2003.
Distribution of the introduced Black Spiny-tailed Iguana
(Ctenosaura similis) on the southwestern coast of Florida.
Florida Scientist 66:74–79.
McCoid, M.J. 2002. Geographic distribution: Ctenosaura pectinata.
Herpetological Review 33:321.
McKeown, S. 1996. A Field Guide to Amphibians and Reptiles in
the Hawaiian Islands. Diamond Head Publishing, Los Osos,
California. 172 pp.
McKercher, E. 2001. Ctenosaura pectinata (Iguanidae) on Gasparilla
Island, Florida: colonization, habitat use and interactions with
Gopherus polyphemus. M.S. Thesis, University of Florida,
Gainesville, Florida. 117 pp.
Meshaka, W.E., Jr., W.F. Loftus, and T. Steiner. 2000. The her-
petofauna of Everglades National Park. Florida Scientist
63:84–103.
Townsend, J.H., K.L. Krysko, and K.M. Enge. 2003. The identity
of Spiny-tailed Iguanas, Ctenosaura, introduced to Florida, USA.
Herpetozoa 16:67–72.
Townsend, J.H., K.L. Krysko, A.T. Reppas, and C.M. Sheehy III.
2002. Noteworthy records of introduced reptiles and amphib-
ians from Florida, USA. Herpetological Review 33:75.
Wilson, L.D. and L. Porras. 1983. The ecological impact of man on
the south Florida herpetofauna. University of Kansas Museum
of Natural History, Special Publication (9):vi + 89 pp.
118
IGUANA
Volume 10, Number 4
A Green Iguana (Iguana
iguana) shares the shoreline
with White Ibises (Eudocimus
albus) in a Miami park.
Photograph by Joe Burgess.
Green Iguanas, such as
this juvenile, are a
common sight in and
around the Colobus
Monkey exhibit at the
Miami Zoo. Photograph
by Carole Saucier.
... Although free-living individuals were first observed in Florida in the 1960s (King and Krakauer 1966), evidence of selfsustaining populations came only decades later (Meshaka et al. 2004). During the 1990s, populations in southern Florida expanded exponentially (Krysko et al. 2007), likely taking advantage of plentiful food and few predators (Townsend et al. 2003). Today, iguanas are found in most of Florida's coastal areas, reaching the highest densities in frost-free areas (Meshaka et al. 2004). ...
... Despite the currently low number of reported Green Iguanas outside of Florida, surveillance for new observations in the USA is worthwhile. During the 1960s, iguana sightings in Florida were also sporadic and the present populations materialized progressively after two to three decades (Krysko et al. 2007) and are today difficult to control (Townsend et al. 2003;Meshaka et al. 2007). This highlights the importance of gathering information useful for wildlife managers to investigate early incursions and initiate pre-emptive interventions. ...
... Thus, this model of collecting opportunistic observations from a broad group of contributors provides a valuable tool for wildlife managers seeking to address biosecurity incursions before invasive populations can become established. Citizen science is particularly effective for the surveillance of Green Iguanas in the USA due to the absence of other iguanas, with the notable exception of invasive populations of spiny-tailed iguanas (Ctenosaura spp.) in Florida Townsend et al. 2003), largely circumventing the challenges of morphologically similar species being misidentified by citizen scientists (Vantieghem et al. 2017). We therefore encourage engagement campaigns that motivate members of the public to report observations of non-native animals, especially species, such as the Green ...
Article
Full-text available
Presently, the only established populations of invasive Green Iguanas (Iguana iguana) on the mainland USA occur in Florida. We examined observation data from the online citizen-science application iNaturalist to determine the frequency of reports of free-living Green Iguanas in Florida and identify where iguanas have been reported in other parts of the mainland USA. Observations from Florida comprised 99.6% of the 5,929 verified Green Iguana observations from the mainland USA. The largest proportion were observations from 2016 to 2021, corresponding with an increasing number of application users contributing to the dataset during this period. The majority of Green Iguana observations from latitudes of 27–41°N in 11 other mainland states were from California. However, we noted no obvious concentrations of sightings to indicate the presence of established populations in any of those 11 states. The majority of observations from outside Florida were adults and were most frequently reported from suburbia and urban parks, suggesting that released or escaped pets were the likely source. More than one third of iguanas reported outside Florida were near water, which is worrisome because iguanas are known to use waterways to disperse. This study clearly demonstrates the value of public participation in assembling sighting records of non-native animals, and we encourage engagement campaigns that leverage reports from members of the public to achieve early detections of potentially invasive species.
... Green iguanas have a wide distribution through South America, and populations are also found in North America, and the Caribbean and Pacific Islands ( Fig. 7) (Buckley et al. 2016;Bock et al. 2020Bock et al. [2018). In the last few decades, there have been reports of green iguanas becoming increasingly abundant in urban areas (Townsend et al. 2003). This is thought to be largely due to the popularity of green iguanas as pets, particularly in Florida, where they sometimes escape or are intentionally released by owners who find them difficult to care for (Townsend et al. 2003;Meshaka et al. 2004;Krysko et al. 2007). ...
... In the last few decades, there have been reports of green iguanas becoming increasingly abundant in urban areas (Townsend et al. 2003). This is thought to be largely due to the popularity of green iguanas as pets, particularly in Florida, where they sometimes escape or are intentionally released by owners who find them difficult to care for (Townsend et al. 2003;Meshaka et al. 2004;Krysko et al. 2007). ...
... Populations of green iguanas occur in urban areas of southern mainland Florida and the Florida Keys (Meshaka et al. 2004), and it is thought that colder winter temperatures have limited their range and expansion further north (Townsend et al. 2003). It has been suggested that the numerous canal systems in Florida have facilitated the dispersal and colonization of iguanas in new areas (Meshaka et al. 2004;Krysko et al. 2007). ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
The welfare of wild animals has so far received little attention in the scientific literature, particularly concerning wild animals living in urban environments. While there has been an increasing amount of research regarding urban wild animals over the last few decades, it has primarily been focused on the topics of animal behavior, conservation, landscape ecology, wild animal management, and population ecology. Few of these studies have considered the wellbeing of urban animals, but information from this research can be used to consider the ways in which urban wild animal welfare may be impacted. This review aims to gain a better understanding of what the lives of urban wild animals are like and the factors that may positively or negatively affect their welfare. This information can then be used to devise ways of improving overall welfare and reducing suffering in urban wild animals. We will also present ideas regarding future research that could inform the development of a new research field called urban welfare ecology. We conducted a review of publications on urban wild animals from various fields to investigate how the welfare of these animals may be impacted. Definitions of the term “urban” vary within the existing field of urban ecology, and we have specified the types of urban areas and degrees of urbanization as they have been described in the literature. We consider the general term “urban” to refer to areas occupied by humans that have a relatively high cover of buildings and infrastructure, primarily cities, suburbs, and industrial areas.
... Non-native, invasive species (hereafter, 'invasive species') are a major threat whose introductions cause, or are likely to cause, ecological, economic, and/or human health and safety harm (Beck et al., 2008). Within the natural sciences literature, there is increasing recognition of links among the trade in live animals (in particular, the pet trade), the establishment of invasive species, and global biodiversity loss (Krysko et al., 2016;Romagosa, Guyer, & Wooten, 2009;Townsend, Krysko, & Enge, 2003). The invasion risk associated with the pet trade is attributable to (a) the deliberate release of unwanted pets by individual owners (Hardin, 2007;Krysko, Enge, Donlan, Seitz, & Golden, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), (b) the deliberate release of animals by importers and commercial sellers (Hardin, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), (c) accidental escapes from pet owners and sellers (Bilger, 2009;Hardin, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), and (d) a lack of appropriate and effective pet trade regulations (Witmer, Keirn, Hawley, Martin, & Reaser, 2009). ...
... Within the natural sciences literature, there is increasing recognition of links among the trade in live animals (in particular, the pet trade), the establishment of invasive species, and global biodiversity loss (Krysko et al., 2016;Romagosa, Guyer, & Wooten, 2009;Townsend, Krysko, & Enge, 2003). The invasion risk associated with the pet trade is attributable to (a) the deliberate release of unwanted pets by individual owners (Hardin, 2007;Krysko, Enge, Donlan, Seitz, & Golden, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), (b) the deliberate release of animals by importers and commercial sellers (Hardin, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), (c) accidental escapes from pet owners and sellers (Bilger, 2009;Hardin, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), and (d) a lack of appropriate and effective pet trade regulations (Witmer, Keirn, Hawley, Martin, & Reaser, 2009). ...
... Within the natural sciences literature, there is increasing recognition of links among the trade in live animals (in particular, the pet trade), the establishment of invasive species, and global biodiversity loss (Krysko et al., 2016;Romagosa, Guyer, & Wooten, 2009;Townsend, Krysko, & Enge, 2003). The invasion risk associated with the pet trade is attributable to (a) the deliberate release of unwanted pets by individual owners (Hardin, 2007;Krysko, Enge, Donlan, Seitz, & Golden, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), (b) the deliberate release of animals by importers and commercial sellers (Hardin, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), (c) accidental escapes from pet owners and sellers (Bilger, 2009;Hardin, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), and (d) a lack of appropriate and effective pet trade regulations (Witmer, Keirn, Hawley, Martin, & Reaser, 2009). ...
Article
There is growing recognition of the link between the non-native pet trade and the introduction and establishment of invasive species due to the release and escape of non-native pets. However, it is unclear whether participants in the pet trade recognize the magnitude of this invasion risk. Successful mitigation of the pet trade invasion risk requires stakeholder support for, and participation in, regulations. We conducted 29 interviews in Florida to investigate key stakeholders’ opinions about the pet trade invasion risk and the effectiveness of potential regulations to mitigate this risk. Respondents framed the effectiveness of regulations in terms of their feasibility. Respondents also identified lack of trust and the existence of an adversarial relationship among stakeholder groups as major barriers to managing the pet trade invasion risk. Compliance with regulations may be improved if policy makers and managers utilize participatory decision-making to engage stakeholders in management of this risk.
... Non-native, invasive species (hereafter, 'invasive species') are a major threat whose introductions cause, or are likely to cause, ecological, economic, and/or human health and safety harm (Beck et al., 2008). Within the natural sciences literature, there is increasing recognition of links among the trade in live animals (in particular, the pet trade), the establishment of invasive species, and global biodiversity loss (Krysko et al., 2016;Romagosa, Guyer, & Wooten, 2009;Townsend, Krysko, & Enge, 2003). The invasion risk associated with the pet trade is attributable to (a) the deliberate release of unwanted pets by individual owners (Hardin, 2007;Krysko, Enge, Donlan, Seitz, & Golden, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), (b) the deliberate release of animals by importers and commercial sellers (Hardin, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), (c) accidental escapes from pet owners and sellers (Bilger, 2009;Hardin, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), and (d) a lack of appropriate and effective pet trade regulations (Witmer, Keirn, Hawley, Martin, & Reaser, 2009). ...
... Within the natural sciences literature, there is increasing recognition of links among the trade in live animals (in particular, the pet trade), the establishment of invasive species, and global biodiversity loss (Krysko et al., 2016;Romagosa, Guyer, & Wooten, 2009;Townsend, Krysko, & Enge, 2003). The invasion risk associated with the pet trade is attributable to (a) the deliberate release of unwanted pets by individual owners (Hardin, 2007;Krysko, Enge, Donlan, Seitz, & Golden, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), (b) the deliberate release of animals by importers and commercial sellers (Hardin, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), (c) accidental escapes from pet owners and sellers (Bilger, 2009;Hardin, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), and (d) a lack of appropriate and effective pet trade regulations (Witmer, Keirn, Hawley, Martin, & Reaser, 2009). ...
... Within the natural sciences literature, there is increasing recognition of links among the trade in live animals (in particular, the pet trade), the establishment of invasive species, and global biodiversity loss (Krysko et al., 2016;Romagosa, Guyer, & Wooten, 2009;Townsend, Krysko, & Enge, 2003). The invasion risk associated with the pet trade is attributable to (a) the deliberate release of unwanted pets by individual owners (Hardin, 2007;Krysko, Enge, Donlan, Seitz, & Golden, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), (b) the deliberate release of animals by importers and commercial sellers (Hardin, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), (c) accidental escapes from pet owners and sellers (Bilger, 2009;Hardin, 2007;Townsend et al., 2003), and (d) a lack of appropriate and effective pet trade regulations (Witmer, Keirn, Hawley, Martin, & Reaser, 2009). ...
Presentation
There is growing recognition in the science community of the link between the non-native pet trade and the introduction and establishment of invasive species, owing to the deliberate release and accidental escape of non-native pets. Successful mitigation of the invasion risk posed by the non-native pet trade requires stakeholder participation and public support for appropriate management actions. We conducted both qualitative and quantitative studies in 2017 to measure stakeholder and public preferences for non-native pet trade management in Florida, and determinants of this support. We conducted 29 semi-structured interviews with non-native pet trade stakeholders, and we received 1,619 completed surveys from members of the Florida public and individuals who are involved in the pet trade. We found that 82% of survey respondents recognized the link between the pet trade and invasion risks. Respondents indicated the highest level of support for a law requiring non-native pet owners to microchip and register their pets, and least support for the euthanasia of all non-native animals that are captured in the wild. Respondents’ opinions on the effectiveness of management actions depended on the feasibility of these actions. They identified the following barriers to effective management of invasion risks: lack of institutional trust; the existence of an adversarial relationship between stakeholder groups; and ethical concerns about destroying non-native and invasive species. The majority of respondents (85%) stated that they would vote in favor of a mandatory added payment on the sale of every non-native animal in Florida.
... Intertidal foraging, or its behavioral precursors, is either unknown or poorly described in other (related) species of iguanas. Three introduced species of iguanas are established in southern Florida, and two of those species are common (Townsend et al. 2003). The Black Spiny-tailed Iguana (Ctenosaura similis), native to Mexico and Central America, was first introduced into southern Florida in 1979, and subsequently established populations on both the Gulf and Atlantic Coasts (Krysko et al. , 2009Avery et al. 2014). ...
... The Black Spiny-tailed Iguana (Ctenosaura similis), native to Mexico and Central America, was first introduced into southern Florida in 1979, and subsequently established populations on both the Gulf and Atlantic Coasts (Krysko et al. , 2009Avery et al. 2014). The Green Iguana (Iguana iguana), with an extensive Neotropical distribution, was first introduced into southern Florida in the early 1960s, and has established populations throughout the southern half of the state (Townsend et al. 2003). These two introduced species co-occur on Key Biscayne, a low-lying barrier island south of Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida. Green Iguanas are almost entirely herbivorous, whereas Black Spiny-tailed Iguanas are omnivorous (Montanucci 1968;Fitch and Henderson 1978;Krysko et al. 2009). ...
... Human consumption and exports for the pet trade have lowered population numbers to such an extent that efforts are currently underway to protect native populations (e.g., Escobar et al. 2010). Paradoxically, this species is highly invasive where established outside of its native range (Lazell 1973;Rivero 1998;Townsend et al. 2003;Krysko et al. 2007;Falcón et al. 2012;Iguana Specialist Group 2017;Kwak et al. 2019). These areas include the mainland United States (southern Florida) and multiple islands including the Dominican Republic (Pasachnik et al. 2012), the Cayman Islands (Moss et al. 2018), Puerto Rico (Rivero 1998), and more recently Dominica (van den Burg et al. 2020a). ...
... Invasive green iguanas represent a problem for both the general public and wildlife managers (Townsend et al. 2003;Krysko et al. 2007). Following hurricane Andrew in 1992, the number of green iguana populations in Florida increased, likely aided by canopy openings, planting of additional food sources, and the inadvertent creation of nesting sites. ...
Article
Full-text available
Invasive populations of green iguanas (Iguanidae: Iguana iguana) are widely established beyond their native Central, South American, and Lesser Antillean range in various islands of the Pacific, Florida USA, and in the Greater Caribbean Region. Although widespread, information about these invasions is scarce. Here we determine the origin of invasive populations of green iguanas in Puerto Rico, Fiji, The Caymans, Florida USA, The Dominican Republic, the US Virgin Islands (USVI) of St. Thomas and St. Croix, and a U.S.A pet store. We sampled 120 individuals from these locations and sequenced one mitochondrial (ND4) and two nuclear (PAC and NT3) loci. We also include a preliminary characterization of population structure throughout Puerto Rico using six microsatellite loci to genotype individuals across 10 sampling sites. Comparing the genealogical relationships of all our samples to published sequencing data from the native range, we found that sampled populations were largely a product of populations from Colombia and El Salvador; two countries with multiple, industrial-size pet iguana farming operations. Notably, we found that haplotypes detected exclusively in the USVI and Puerto Rico’s outlying island of Vieques are closely linked to green iguanas native to Saba and Montserrat (Lesser Antilles); a clade not reported in the pet trade. Our population genetic analyses did not reveal isolation among sampling sites in Puerto Rico, rather the evidence supported admixture across the island. This study highlights the roles of the pet trade and lack of regulation in the spread of green iguanas beyond their native range.
... For example, the species was only scientifically verified on Andros Island, Bahamas, in September 2019, but the same study retrospectively established that local people had encountered I. iguana for at least three years prior (Johnson, 2020). As a further example, sightings of I. iguana were mostly sporadic in Florida during the 1960s (Krysko et al., 2007) and a population materialised over a period of a few decades, which is now difficult to control (Townsend et al., 2003). Based on these examples, it could be plausible that emerging reports of I. iguana in Hong Kong could represent a contemporary invasion presently under way. ...
... Green iguanas are excellent climbers and prefer areas with trees, but they also occur in places lacking them. They are almost always found near permanent water and are strong swimmers (10). When startled, they are quick to dive into water (8), only crawling back on land after the perceived threat has passed ( Figure 11). ...
Article
Full-text available
This is one in a series of similar EDIS documents summarizing general knowledge about Florida's introduced reptiles.
... The highest number of deaths occurred in November, December, January and February, these months correspond to the holiday periods in Colombia, which triggers both greater numbers of vehicles on the road, and a higher probability of accidents (Oxley et al., 1974;Arévalo et al., 2017). Also, the most roadkills were from the species Iguana iguana and Didelphis marsupialis, two animals commonly found dead on Colombian roads (Rodda 1990;Delgado-Vélez 2014;Castillo-R et al., 2015;De La Ossa & Galván-Guevara 2015); where I. iguana, has the habit of basking on the edges of the roads (Townsend et al., 2003), like many other reptiles (Colino-Rabanal & Lizana 2012); and D. marsupialis with its nocturnal behaviour of eating carrion on the roads, when the lights of the vehicles shine in the opossum's eyes, they remain still, making them more susceptible to be roadkilled (Delgado 2007;Castillo-R et al., 2015). These behaviours and the fact that both are species with high population density (Rodda 1990;Pinowski 2005;Castillo-R et al., 2015) may explain their high number of deaths in our study. ...
Article
Full-text available
Highway infrastructure is a source of multiple environmental problems, where wildlife roadkills is the most noticeable impact. Most of research in roadkills have focused in how different aspects as seasons, traffic density, location of roads, among others, have implications in the wildlife mortality on roads. However, little research have been developed on understanding how geometrical road design affects wildlife mortality. On a highway in the central Andes of Colombia, we tested whether the geometric design, it is horizontal alignment and vertical curves influence the mortality of vertebrate animals on the road. We determined the number of straight lines, circular, transition curves and vertical convex curves along the entire route of the highway (13.9 km), and between April 2018 and December 2019 we made 4 weekly tours in search of wildlife roadkills. With records, we related and compared groups of animal deaths and road shapes. We got 95 roadkills where reptile’s deaths were more than the 47% of total. We found no dependence in the distribution of deaths by Class of animals on the road shapes; the shape in which most deaths occurred was straight line (58 deaths). However, when the mortality rate per meter of route was obtained on the shape units, we found that the circular and transition curves presented two and three times (respectively) higher mortality rates than straight lines. Curved sections are presented as more dangerous geometric designs than straight lines for wildlife, regardless of their length on the road. Our research provides information necessary to take into account the relationship of geometric road design in the development of management and conservation plans of altered ecosystems with road infrastructure.
Thesis
Full-text available
本研究探討台南地區綠鬣蜥(Iguana iguana)野外族群的數量與變化。調查範圍主要以台南市仁德區三爺宮溪流域為主。三個調查與採樣區域 A、B、C 分別距離相隔約 1.5 公里,每個樣區的有效採樣範圍約半徑一百公尺,調查期間為 2016 年 7 月至 2017 年 9 月,每個月定期前往各樣區進行調查,以檢視野外族群數量的變化。調查方法先以望遠鏡先觀察樣區內綠鬣蜥的數量,再以單眼相機配備大砲鏡頭拍攝並做紀錄,每次紀錄完畢後在樣區內架設紅外線自動相機,當紅外線感應器偵測到有動物經過時會自動拍攝相片與影片,讓我們能夠更了解綠鬣蜥的移動路徑及是否有其他動物在樣區中活動。 結果顯示: 台南地區野外的綠鬣蜥在夏季 9 月時最為活躍,推斷可能 9 月的氣候環境與原產地中南美洲最為相近, 1 月為三個樣區調查到的數量最少,推測因 1 月氣溫較低,使綠鬣蜥活動力降低,故調查取得的結果比其他月份少。 關鍵詞:三爺宮溪、外來種、綠鬣蜥
Article
Full-text available
The black spiny-tailed iguana (Ctenosuara similis) was introduced onto Gasparilla Island in southwestern peninsular Florida ca. 30 years ago. Since then, this exotic species has undergone both natural and human-mediated range expansion, and it is presently found in Placida, Cape Haze, Gulf Cove, Cayo Costa, Keewaydin Island, and Little Marco Island. Although C. similis is primarily herbivorous, it will feed opportunistically on small animals, including insects, crabs, rodents, fishes, nestling birds, bird eggs, and hatchling sea turtles. Because of the possible ecological impacts of C. similis on Florida's native flora and fauna, population monitoring and/or eradication efforts should be conducted on C. similis.
Article
Full-text available
Florida is well known for its non–native herpetofauna (King and Krakauer 1966; Wilson and Porras 1983). The substantial trade in exotic plants and animals and the humid subtropical environment in Florida have been instrumental in perpetuating populations of exotics. From May 2000 through March 2001 we surveyed areas in Florida where introduced species have been reported and other areas that contained suitable habitat. We utilized a variety of diurnal capture methods including blowguns with corks, fishing rods with barbless hooks (Krysko 2000), and nooses (Strong et al. 1993). In nocturnal situations we searched areas around houses buildings. Representative voucher specimens were deposited in the Florida Museum of Natural History (FLMNH), Gainesville, Florida. Additionally three new county records were kindly provided by the California Academy of Science (CAS). All of the following records were collected by the authors unless otherwise noted.
Article
The book arose from our conviction that Florida is a state in serious trouble from nonindigenous species and that the lessons we have learned about the problems these species pose, and how to deal with them, are valuable far beyond Florida. Florida and Hawaii are the states most affected by nonindigenous species, and in Florida can be found versions of virtually all the problems described in the burgeoning literature on invasion biology. Further, some regions and habitats in Florida are much less affected by the nonindigenous species than others. Why? In parts of southern Florida, the seeds of introduced plants pollinated by introduced insects are eaten and dispersed by introduced birds. Entire landscapes there are dominated by introduced plants. Such stories and scenes are uncommon in northern Florida. Moreover, some introduced species, though persistent, have seemed ecologically innocuous, while others are scourges. Some plant species have changed entire major ecosystems, while others are harmless curiosities. nonindigenous species of whole animal groups, reptiles and amphibians, for example, seem ecologically benign. What causes these differences among taxa? What can we predict about potential invaders from observing the effects of past incursions?
Article
Printout. Thesis (M.S.)--University of Florida, 2001. Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 113-116).