Obesity, End-stage Renal Disease, and Survival in an Elderly Cohort With Cardiovascular Disease

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Obesity (Impact Factor: 3.73). 04/2009; 17(12):2216-22. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2009.70
Source: PubMed


Obesity is highly prevalent in African Americans and is associated with increased risk of End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and death. It is not known if the effect of obesity is similar among blacks and whites. The aim of this study is to examine racial differences in the association of obesity with ESRD and survival in elderly patients (age >65). Data were obtained for 74,167 Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between February 1994 and July 1995. BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m(2)). We evaluated the association of BMI class with ESRD incidence and death using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, testing for race-BMI interactions. Compared to whites, African Americans had higher BMI (26.9 vs. 26.0, P < 0.0001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (72.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 66.6 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P < 0.0001). Crude ESRD rates increased with increasing obesity among whites but not among blacks. However, after adjusting for age, sex, and other comorbidities, obesity was not associated with increased ESRD rate among blacks or whites and the interaction between race and BMI was not significant. Furthermore, for both races, patients classified as overweight, class 1 obese, or class 2 obese had similar, significantly better survival abilities compared to normal weight patients and the race BMI interaction was not significant. In conclusion, obesity does not increase risk of ESRD among black or white elderly subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, both obese blacks and whites, in this population, experience a survival benefit. Further studies need to explore this obesity paradox.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "On the other hand, DXA-measured abdominal fat describes more accurately fat distribution and hence may be more suitable to address the question on the effect of central fat versus peripheral fat. We and others have shown that adiposity (Adams et al. 2006; Flicker et al. 2010) and truncal adiposity (Auyeung et al. 2010) may be beneficial for survival in old age, even for those with history of cardiovascular disease (Lea et al. 2009). Our present results showed that in contrary to findings in middle-aged adults, higher proportion of abdominal fat may also be beneficial for survival in men older than 65 years of age. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In contrast to that in the middle-aged, higher body mass index (BMI) in older people is associated with higher survival rates. Yet, BMI makes no distinction between fat elsewhere and abdominal fat, the latter being metabolically more harmful. We hypothesized that overall adiposity might be protective in old age, but that central fat might offset that benefit and remained harmful as in the middle-aged. Three thousand nine hundred seventy-eight Chinese elderly ≥65 years had demographics, medical conditions, physical activity, and body composition by DXA recorded at baseline. Overall adiposity was measured as whole body fat%, and abdominal adiposity as waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and relative abdominal fat (RAF) (relative abdominal fat = abdominal fat according to anatomical landmarks/whole body fat). Deaths within 1 year from baseline were excluded from analysis. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality were analyzed using Cox regression, adjusted for covariates. The lowest quintile of adiposity measurements was used for comparison. After a mean follow-up of 72.3 months, 13.7% men and 4.5% women had died. In men, the highest two quintiles of whole body fat % and the upper four quintiles of RAF were associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality, and adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) in ascending quintiles of RAF compared with the lowest quintile was 0.62 (0.43-0.89), 0.58 (0.4-0.85), 0.52 (0.36-0.77), and 0.67 (0.47-0.96). No relationship was found between abdominal adiposity and cardiovascular mortality in both genders. Higher whole body fat % as well as higher proportion of abdominal fat was associated with lower all-cause mortality in men. No such relation was found in women.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2011 · Age
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obesity is increasingly recognized as a global pandemic that threatens the health of millions of people. Obesity is considered to be an important cardiovascular risk factor, but there is increasing evidence that patients with elevated body mass index may be better off than others if they develop cardiovascular or renal disease. This phenomenon has been described as the "obesity paradox" or "reverse epidemiology." This article reviews some recent publications that have studied this phenomenon as it relates to heart failure, coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, kidney disease, and a cohort of patients undergoing nonbariatric surgery.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2010 · Current Hypertension Reports
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The quality and effectiveness of resuscitation processes may be influenced by the patient's body mass index (BMI); however, the relationship between BMI and survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest has not been previously studied. We evaluated 21 237 adult patients with an in-hospital cardiac arrest within the National Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (NRCPR). We examined the association between BMI (classified as underweight [<18.5 kg/m(2)], normal [18.5 to 24.9 kg/m(2)], overweight [25.0 to 29.9 kg/m(2)], obese [30.0 to 34.9 kg/m(2)], and very obese [≥35.0 kg/m(2)]) and survival to hospital discharge using multivariable logistic regression, after stratifying arrests by rhythm type and adjusting for patient characteristics. Of 4499 patients with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia as initial rhythm, 1825 (40.6%) survived to discharge. After multivariable adjustment, compared with overweight patients, underweight (odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.84; P=0.003), normal weight (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; P<0.001), and very obese (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96; P=0.02) had lower rates of survival, whereas obese patients had similar rates of survival (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.06; P=0.17). In contrast, of 16 738 patients with arrests caused by asystole or pulseless electric activity, only 2501 (14.9%) survived. After multivariable adjustment, all BMI groups had similar rates of survival except underweight patients (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82; P<0.001). For cardiac arrest caused by shockable rhythms, underweight, normal weight, and very obese patients had lower rates of survival to discharge. In contrast, for cardiac arrest caused by nonshockable rhythms, survival to discharge was similar across BMI groups except for underweight patients. Future studies are needed to clarify the extent to which BMI affects the quality and effectiveness of resuscitation measures.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2010 · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Show more