... On the other hand,as a consequence of the global scope of the organizations, leaders' traditional responsibilities such as risk-taking, foresight, conceptualization, and critical thought (Spears and Lawrence, 2002), mostly embedded in a rational and male role, arise no longer as the only key to lead as they used to be, while moral and emotional qualities, both considered much more close to a female style,acquire a significant role (Barbuto et al., 2014; Hayes, 1999). In fact, the most recent literature indicates a tendency to lead with a much more female style (Arar, 2012; Brandt and Laiho, 2013),which have renewed the interest among scholars for studying gender principles and how they may influence the approaches of leadership (Andersen and Hasson, 2011;Mavin and Grandy, 2012; Mensi-Klarbach, 2014: Trinidad and Normore, 2006)This, put in a neutral language, is explained in terms of adopting approaches more concerned with the person of the leader –self-leadership or authentic leadership (D'Intino et al., 2007; Yagil and Medler-Liraz, 2014)–, and the emotional processes that she or hedrives to the creation of lastrelations within and outside the organizations –transformational or servantleadership (Barbuto et al., 2014; Greenleaf, 1970; Lord and Brown, 2004; Schneider and George, 2011; Smith et al., 2004). Nonetheless, inspite of the recommendations about the current importance of female qualities to lead teams and organizations, there is still a considerable gap in organizations led by women as in leadership literature addressing issues of gender (Kezar and Lester, 2009; O'Connor, 2010; Sandberg, 2013; Werhane and Painter- Morland, 2011). ...