ArticlePDF Available

Tinnitus Treatment and the Effectiveness of Hearing Aids: Hearing Care Professional Perceptions

Authors:

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
Hearing Review - December 2008
Tinnitus Treatment and the Effectiveness of Hearing Aids: Hearing Care Professional Perceptions
by Sergei Kochkin, PhD, and Richard Tyler, PhD
Sergei Kochkin, PhD, is the executive director of the Better Hearing Institute, Washington, DC, and Richard
Tyler, PhD, is a professor in both the Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery and the
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at the University of Iowa, Iowa City. He has authored
numerous articles and edited three books on the subject of tinnitus, including Tinnitus Treatment: Clinical
Protocols (Thieme Publishing), Tinnitus Handbook (Singular Publishing), and The Consumers Handbook to
Tinnitus (Auricle Ink).
Hearing aids are an exceptional starting point for tinnitus patients who also have hearing loss
It is estimated that 10% to 15% of the US population experiences chronic or persistent tinnitus (eg, ringing in
the ears or internal head noises).
1
About half of the people with tinnitus are bothered by it, and it is reported that
about 1% indicate that tinnitus substantially affects their life. Tinnitus can have a direct impact on a person's
emotional well-being, their hearing, and ability to sleep and to concentrate. These in turn influence basic life
functions such as socialization and relaxation.
2,3
In severe cases, it can interfere with the individual's ability to
perform adequately on the job, or contribute to psychological disorders such as depression, suicide ideation,
posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and anger. The constancy of tinnitus and the lack of control can provoke
fear, which exacerbates the problem, leading to an ever-increasing cycle of distress in the person suffering from
tinnitus.
4
Despite the high prevalence of tinnitus and its obvious impact on the psychological health of the patient, only a
small number of people contact physicians or hearing care professionals for help. The reason perhaps lies in the
widespread belief that tinnitus is incurable or untreatable. Yet, there are several methods for treating tinnitus by
alleviating the impact it has on quality of life.
3,5,6
One major inadvertent tragedy associated with the belief that tinnitus cannot be helped is that people, in
addition to not seeking help for their tinnitus, also do not seek help for their hearing loss. In a recent large-scale
survey of the US hearing-impaired population who had neglected their hearing loss, 39% (more than 9 million
adult Americans) indicated they had not sought help for their hearing loss specifically because they
concurrently had tinnitus.
7
The literature is quite specific that untreated hearing loss negatively affects nearly all dimensions of the human
experience. Research demonstrates the considerable negative social, psychological, cognitive, and health effects
of untreated hearing loss—with far-reaching implications that go well beyond hearing alone. In fact, those who
have difficulty hearing can experience such distorted and incomplete communication that it seriously impacts
their professional and personal lives, at times leading to isolation and withdrawal. Studies
8,9
have linked
untreated hearing loss to:
Irritability, negativism, and anger;
Fatigue, tension, stress, and depression;
Avoidance or withdrawal from social situations;
Social rejection and loneliness;
Reduced alertness and increased risk to personal safety;
Impaired memory and ability to learn new tasks;
Reduced job performance and earning power; and
Diminished psychological and overall health.
A survey of 230 hearing care professionals suggests that six out of 10 patients (60%) experience minor to
major relief of tinnitus when wearing hearing aids, and a total of one in five (22%) receive major relief.
Less than 2% of patients experience a worsening of their tinnitus when wearing hearing aids, while 39%
receive no benefit.
So the individual with both untreated tinnitus and untreated hearing loss would be expected to suffer an even
more diminished quality of life than individuals with only tinnitus or only hearing loss.
10
We believe that, if hearing care professionals can provide effective treatment for tinnitus, they can also be
instrumental in motivating people to concurrently treat their hearing loss. This will have a double impact in
improving their patients' quality of life.
Nearly everyone with tinnitus also has a hearing loss. For those with hearing loss, hearing aids should obviously
improve their hearing and communication. But many do not appreciate that hearing aids can also improve
tinnitus:
11-15
Improving communication reduces stress, therefore making it easier to accept or cope with tinnitus.
Amplifying background sound, or producing background ambient noise, thereby reduces the loudness or
prominence of tinnitus.
New open-fit hearing aids might be a particular effective sound therapy for some suffering from tinnitus.
13
Tinnitus is likely coded by spontaneous neural activity in the auditory cortex, perhaps as an increase in activity,
an overrepresentation of some frequency-tuned neurons, or an increase in synchrony across neurons. By
viewing hearing aids as physiotherapy or sound therapy for the ears, the very act of listening to sound exercises
the auditory portion of the brain.
In the presence of hearing loss, the fitting of hearing aids activates the auditory cortex. Thus, sounds amplified
by hearing aids may interfere with the central auditory representation of tinnitus.
13
Hearing aids might be
viewed as Gestalt therapy for the ears since tinnitus that was previously conspicuous in the foreground is
relegated appropriately to the background with all other environmental sounds. The very act of taking the focus
off of tinnitus spells relief for many people.
The purpose of this paper is to report the results of a survey of hearing health care practitioners in America on
their ability to treat tinnitus with hearing aids and other strategies.
FIGURE 1. Reported effectiveness of hearing aids on patients with tinnitus (survey of 230 hearing health care
professionals). About 60% of patients are reported to receive some benefit.
Method
An online survey on tinnitus mitigation was sent to the subscribers of the Better Hearing Institute's enewsletter
in August 2008. A total of 230 hearing care professionals responded to the survey through September 2008:
76% were audiologists, 21% hearing instrument specialists, 1% otolaryngologists, and 1% other. In terms of
practice setting, 41% were in private practice audiology, 20% were private practice hearing instrument
specialists, 16% worked in an otolaryngology office, 9% in a hospital, 7% for the Veterans Administration or
military, 5% in a clinic or health maintenance organization, and 3% in a university clinic. Respondents resided
in 44 of the United States or in Canadian provinces.
Results
With respect to prevalence of tinnitus in their practices, the respondents varied widely from a low of 2% to a
high of 100%; the median was 50% of all patients seen in a typical day by the typical hearing care professional.
A median of 9% of their patients experience tinnitus so severe as to interfere with their ability to lead a normal
life. Hearing care professionals rarely treated a patient with tinnitus who did not have concurrent hearing loss;
only 3% (median) of tinnitus patients were reported to have normal hearing.
A total of 1 in 4 respondents considered their practices as specializing in the treatment of tinnitus, and 35% of
practitioners in fact used psychometrically valid tinnitus severity scales in their practice.
4,5,16
With respect to
education, 44% of practitioners never took a course on tinnitus treatment, 32% took 1 course, 16% 2 courses,
and 8% took 3 or more courses. As part of their education on tinnitus, the typical hearing care professional had
read on average (median) 5 books or articles on the subject.
In terms of treatment, the average tinnitus patient received a median of 10 minutes of counseling and 18% were
recommended self-help books or articles (eg, Living with Tinnitus,
17
Tinnitus: A Self Management Guide for the
Ringing in Your Ears,
18
or The Consumer Handbook on Tinnitus
19
). A median of 60% of hearing care providers
use sound therapy devices to treat tinnitus. The vast majority (88% median) of hearing care professionals use
hearing aids to treat their patients' tinnitus. The minority (<1%) use maskers, combo hearing aids/maskers,
music therapy devices, or environmental sound generators. The majority (90% median) use partial versus total
masking to treat tinnitus.
For 20% (median) of patients, the hearing care professional increased the amplification of low-level sounds as
part of treatment.
20,21
For 10% (median) of patients, the hearing care professional reduced the maximum output
when fitting the hearing aid as part of treatment. This was likely a result of concomitant loudness hyperacusis.
What about efficacy—that is the ability of hearing aids to alleviate the effects of tinnitus? Referring to Figure 1
(mean values), the hearing care professionals report that 6 out of 10 patients (60%) reported minor to major
relief of tinnitus when wearing their hearing aids. A total of 1 in 5 (22%) receive major relief. Less than 2% of
patients experience a worsening of their tinnitus when wearing hearing aids, while 39% receive no benefit.
In our survey of hearing care professionals, they felt that 20% of their patients were inadequately served by any
existing treatment modalities.
Conclusions
Nearly 9 million people with hearing loss have not sought out the services of a hearing care provider because
they have tinnitus and believe that nothing can be done about it. Most people with tinnitus also have hearing
loss. In addition to improving communication, hearing aids can also help tinnitus. The results from this survey
indicate:
60% of patients report some relief of their tinnitus when using hearing aids;
22% actually report major relief of their tinnitus when using hearing aids;
56% of respondents to the survey reported they had taken at least one course on tinnitus;
The median time spent in tinnitus counseling was 10 minutes;
18% of respondents indicated they distributed a self-help book on tinnitus to their patients.
Future research by the Better Hearing Institute will evaluate from the consumer's perspective both the
prevalence of tinnitus and the efficacy of hearing aids in relief of tinnitus. We have recently developed
suggested guidelines for setting up a tinnitus clinic
22
in the hope that more hearing care professionals will be
motivated to do so.
References
1. Davis A, El Refaie A. Epidemiology of tinnitus. In: Tyler RS, ed.
Tinnitus Handbook. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group;
2000:1-24.
2. Erlandsson S. Psychological profiles of tinnitus in patients. In:
Tyler RS, ed. Tinnitus Handbook. San Diego: Singular Publishing
Group; 2000:25-58.
3. Tyler RS. Neurophysiological models, psychological models, and
treatments for tinnitus. In: Tyler RS, ed. Tinnitus Treatment: Clinical Protocols. New York: Thieme;
2006:1-22.
Find out more by listening to the
HR Science and Technology
Thursday Podcast (Dec 18)
featuring Drs Sergei Kochkin and
Richard Tyler in the Media Center
at www.hearingreview.com.
4. Noble W, Tyler R. Physiology and phenomenology of tinnitus: implications for treatment. Int J Audiol.
2007;46(10):569-575.
5. Tyler R, et al. Tinnitus Activities Treatment. Tinnitus Treatments. New York: Thieme; 2006.
6. Jastreboff PJ, Hazell JWP. Tinnitus Retraining Therapy: Implementing the Neurophysiological Model.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
7. Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VII: obstacles to adult non-user adoption of hearing aids. Hear Jour.
2007;60(4):27-43.
8. Kochkin S. Hearing loss and its impact on household income. Hearing Review. 2005;12(11):16-24.
9. Kochkin S, Rogin C. Quantifying the obvious: the impact of hearing aids on quality of life. Hearing
Review. 2000;7(1):8-34.
10. Stocking C. Hearing loss and communication. In: Tyler R, ed. The Consumer Handbook on Tinnitus.
Sedona, Ariz: Auricle Ink Publishers; 2008.
11. Bentler RA, Tyler RS. Tinnitus management. ASHA. 1987;29(5):27-32.
12. Surr RK, Montgomery AA, Mueller HG. Effect of amplification on tinnitus among new hearing aid
users. Ear Hear. 1985;6(2):71-75.
13. Searchfield GD. Sound therapy options. In: Tyler R, ed. The Consumer Handbook on Tinnitus. Sedona,
Ariz: Auricle Ink Publishers; 2008.
14. Vernon J, Schleuning A. Tinnitus: a new management. Laryngoscope. 1978;88(3):413-9.
15. Johnson RM, Goodwin P. The use of audiometric tests in the management of the tinnitus patient. J
Laryngol Otol. 1981; Suppl(4):48-51.
16. Kuk FK, Tyler RS, Russell D, Jordan H. The psychometric properties of a tinnitus handicap
questionnaire. Ear Hear. 1990;11(6):434-45.
17. Davis P. Living with Tinnitus. Rushcutters Bay, NSW: Gore & Osment; 1995.
18. Henry J, Wilson PH. Tinnitus; A Self Management Guide for the Ringing in Your Ears. Boston: Allyn &
Bacon; 2002.
19. Tyler RS, ed. The Consumer Handbook on Tinnitus. Sedona, Ariz: Auricle Ink Publishers; 2008.
20. Searchfield GD. Tinnitus sound therapy options. In: Tyler RS, ed. Tinnitus Treatments: Clinical
Protocols. New York: Thieme Publishing; 2006.
21. Searchfield GD. In Tyler RS, ed. The Consumer Handbook on Tinnitus. Sedona, Ariz: Auricle Ink
Publishers; 2008.
22. Tyler R, Haskell GB, Gogel SA, Gehringer AK. Establishing a tinnitus clinic in your practice. Am J
Audiol. 2008;17:25-37.
Citation for this article:
Kochkin S, Tyler R. Tinnitus treatment and the effectiveness of hearing aids: hearing care professional
perceptions. Hearing Review. 2008;15(13):14-18.
... Синхронизированная нейронная активность, генерируемая этими устройствами, снижает нервную гиперактивность, связанную с шумом в ушах, и, таким образом, обеспечивает временное подавление шума в ушах [30][31][32]. До 60% пациентов испытывают незначительное или значительное облегчение шума в ушах при ношении слуховых аппаратов, менее 2% пациентов испытывают ухудшение шума в ушах при ношении слуховых аппаратов и 39% не ощущают изменения шума [32,33]. Разработан ряд мобильных приложений для людей с шумом в ушах, наиболее часто в них используют звуки природы, повседневной жизни или расслабляющую музыку. ...
Article
Tinnitus is currently a serious problem of rhinolaryngology, leads to a significant decrease in the quality of human life, limits his ability to household, social and professional activities. It has a high prevalence and occurs in 10-15% of the adult population, while in 1-3% of cases a severe form of the disease is observed. There are more than 60 treatments for ear noise in the world. These include drug therapy; physiotherapeutic effects that allow stimulating various parts of the auditory pathway from the hair cells of the cochlea, the nuclei of the brain stem, the medulla oblongata, the temporal gyri of the cerebral cortex; sound therapy, as well as the use of technical means audio maskers, hearing aids, implants. The aim of this review is to highlight the current state of the issue, to analyze the sound-activating methods of rehabilitation of patients with tinnitus proposed in world practice. Such a variety of techniques is due to the polyethological nature of the factors causing tinnitus and the empirical approach to treatment. A significant arsenal of medications and surgical interventions used to treat pathological auditory sensations often turns out to be far from universal and often ineffective. It should be noted that with an increase in the prescription of subjective tinnitus, the effectiveness of drug therapy decreases and, in turn, the importance of rehabilitation therapies increases. Most modern methods of treating this pathology are based on the principles of neuroplasticity the ability of the central nervous system to structurally and functionally reorganize. Recently, much attention has been paid to non-drug treatment methods, including the method of reeducation (sound therapy).
... The mobile-based audiometry apps allow estimation of pure-tone thresholds [32], and are capable of providing accurate, reliable, and audiologists-quality results [33,34], even in clinical settings [35,36], provided that the audio output devices (for instance, headphones) are properly calibrated [37,38]. For hearing enhancement, mobile devices have the potential to be used as a cheaper alternative to cochlear implants or hearing aids in improving the quality of life of patients suffering from tinnitus [39,40]. Moreover, hearing enhancement apps offer: ...
Chapter
Modern mobile devices are mainstream and ubiquitous devices. The widespread adoption of mobile devices has resulted in surge of mobile applications (apps) hosted on marketplaces (app stores) of several mobile platforms. Besides other benefits, these apps are also applied in healthcare-related and medical use, for instance, in case of tinnitus, where tinnitus disorder is associated with the perception of ringing sound without external sound source. In particular, for tinnitus, these apps allow provision of tinnitus-related relief, self-help, and general management. The collective aim of this chapter is to foster and report on Mobile Health (mHealth) solutions, in particular mobile apps within the tinnitus context. First, this chapter provides an up-to-date overview of existing mHealth apps available for major mobile platforms. Second, this chapter provides deep insights into quality and effectiveness of said mobile apps for tinnitus treatment and management. Finally, this chapter provides discussions in relation to the tinnitus-related mHealth apps.
... As hearing loss is a common comorbidity of tinnitus (Baguley et al., 2013), hearing aids are frequently used for the management of tinnitus (Surr et al., 1999;Kochkin and Tyler, 2008;Trotter and Donaldson, 2008;Searchfield et al., 2010). It has been discussed that the beneficial effects on tinnitus from hearing aids may be related to amplified volume of external sounds which may mask the tinnitus sound or refocus attention on alternative auditory stimuli that are unrelated to the tinnitus sound (Del Bo and Ambrosetti, 2007;Hoare et al., 2014a). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Combination devices offering both amplification and sound therapy are commonly used in tinnitus management. However, there is insufficient evidence supporting the relationship between sound therapy and tinnitus outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore longitudinal effects of sound therapy on tinnitus-related distress using a combination device. Method Twenty participants with mild to moderate tinnitus related distress were fitted with combination devices that included three sound-therapy programs. The sound-therapy programs were selected by the participants from the available sounds offered in the combination device. The sounds comprised fractal music, nature sounds and combinations of the two. Participants were asked to wear the devices for 12 months and to complete questionnaires related to tinnitus distress at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months after starting the treatment. Additionally, at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months, the device log data capturing information about amplification and sound-therapy use were collected. Results Tinnitus handicap inventory (THI), tinnitus functional index (TFI), tinnitus awareness and annoyance decreased following the device fitting. This improvement plateaued at 4 months. The degrees of improvement in THI, TFI and tinnitus annoyance were correlated with daily hours of sound-therapy use but not with daily hours of amplification-only or total device use. Conclusions A combination sound therapy consisting of therapy sounds, amplification as needed, and counseling was associated with a reduction in tinnitus-related distress. A future randomized controlled trial should be conducted to allow for detangling the effect of sound therapy from effects of amplification, counseling, placebo, and time itself, and to investigate the predictors of sound-therapy benefit and use.
... Many tinnitus sufferers exhibit some degree of hearing loss, and tinnitus's prevalence increases with more significant hearing loss (Jarach et al., 2022). Although HAs have been widely used in tinnitus management (Kochkin & Tyler, 2008), according to recent European guidelines, there is a weak recommendation for using HAs in tinnitus treatment (Cima et al., 2019). There is currently no substantial evidence to support or refute their use as a routine intervention for tinnitus. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of amplification with hearing aids for people with chronic subjective tinnitus and mild hearing loss. Method In this randomized, controlled, three-arm trial, 38 subjects with a primary complaint of tinnitus were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups. Twelve subjects received informational counselling (IC) only, 13 received IC with hearing aid fitting, and 13 subjects received IC with individualized music stimulation for 12 months. The primary efficacy analysis in tinnitus severity was based on the change from baseline to 12 months after the 1st day of the intervention. Secondary outcome measures included tinnitus impact, psychological and mental health effects, subjective ratings, and psychoacoustically measured tinnitus loudness. Results A statistically significant treatment difference among the three groups in the Chinese Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI-CH) total score at the predefined end point in Month 12 was observed (F = 3.34, p = .04, partial η² = .16). Reductions in the TFI-CH scores in both the hearing aid and the customized music group were more prominent than in the IC-only group. Only the hearing aid group showed a significantly greater treatment effect than the IC-only group. Conclusion Results from this study support that a combination of hearing aid use and IC can help improve tinnitus in people with mild hearing loss. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25015979
... Perceiving tinnitus, especially continuously, causes a psychological reaction in a proportion of individuals, which ranges from mild to severe [10,11]. About 10-20% of individuals who report tinnitus seek medical help for their tinnitus-related impairments, and 1 to 3% indicate that their tinnitus is severe enough to cause significant disability [12,13]. Such impairments include difficulties with sleeping, concentration, and communication. ...
Article
In advancing our understanding of tinnitus, some of the more impactful contributions in the past two decades have come from human brain imaging studies, specifically the idea of both auditory and extra-auditory neural networks that mediate tinnitus. These networks subserve both the perception of tinnitus and the psychological reaction to chronic, continuous tinnitus. In this article, we review particular studies that report on the nodes and links of such neural networks and their inter-network connections. Innovative neuroimaging tools have contributed significantly to the increased understanding of anatomical and functional connections of attention, emotion-processing, and default mode networks in adults with tinnitus. We differentiate between the neural correlates of tinnitus and those of comorbid hearing loss; surprisingly, tinnitus and hearing loss when they co-occur are not necessarily additive in their impact and, in rare cases, additional tinnitus may act to mitigate the consequences of hearing loss alone on the brain. The scale of tinnitus severity also appears to have an impact on brain networks, with some of the alterations typically attributed to tinnitus reaching significance only in the case of bothersome tinnitus. As we learn more about comorbid conditions of tinnitus, such as depression, anxiety, hyperacusis, or even aging, their contributions to the network-level changes observed in tinnitus will need to be parsed out in a manner similar to what is currently being done for hearing loss or severity. Together, such studies advance our understanding of the heterogeneity of tinnitus and will lead to individualized treatment plans.
... El uso de dispositivos auditivos como audífonos amplificadores permite la amplificación del sonido y, por ende, permite enmascarar el tinnitus. Se ha reportado mejora en aproximadamente un 60 % de los pacientes que los usan (61,62). No están indicados en pacientes con pérdidas auditivas mayores de 60 dB, si se trata de audífonos convencionales. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introducción: el tinnitus es una patología prevalente que se presenta en el 10 %-15 % de la población, su diagnóstico es clínico y tiene un impacto negativo en la calidad de vida. La terapia de reentrenamiento del tinnitus (TRT) busca categorizar y ofrecer un manejo adecuado integral a los pacientes para hacer una rehabilitación individualizada con una mejoría en el 80 % de los pacientes. En los últimos años, se ha supuesto que los cambios en la implementación de la TRT mejoran su efectividad global. A la fecha, no se tiene evidencia científica que resuma los hallazgosconcluyentes de estos estudios, por lo cual se plantea una revisión sistemática de la literatura que reúna y sintetice de forma exhaustiva y sistemática toda la literatura con adecuada rigurosidad metodológica sobre la eficacia del manejo con TRT en pacientesadultos con diagnóstico de tinnitus, para estimar una medida combinada del tamaño del efecto de la intervención. Materiales y métodos: se plantea una revisión sistemática de la literatura en cuatro bases de datos diferentes, sin límite de idioma o tiempo; acorde con la metodología de las guías PRISMA. Resultados: se encontró un total de 24 264 artículos, de los cuales 15 fueron elegidos para la extracción dedatos. De estos, 7 eran ensayos clínicos y 8 estudios de cohorte, con una media de Jadad de 1,55. Todos usaron el protocolo de Jastreboff y Hazell con una media de seguimiento de 16,15 ± 7,8 meses. Discusión: la totalidad de los artículos incluidosreportó una mejoría en los valores del Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) (eficacia) que persistió durante la media de seguimiento. Adicionalmente, asociado a su uso se reportó una mejoría en la calidad de vida, sueño, desempeño laboral y socialización con el uso de TRT en dispositivos convencionales o dispositivos móviles. Conclusión: los reportes de los estudios incluidos son congruentes en determinar una reducción de la THI en pacientes con tinnitus de diferentes causas y estadios cuando son tratados con TRT bajo el protocolo Jastreboff y colaboradores, en el seguimiento a largo y corto plazo.
... Tinnitus combined with sensorineural hearing loss might benefit from hearing aids. However, somewhere between 22% and 80% of affected patients are adequately served by using hearing aids [9,10]. The current clinical practice primarily aims at reducing the impact of tinnitus by providing psychoeducation and improving coping strategies via various psychological interventions [11,12]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Chronic tinnitus can have an immense impact on quality of life. Despite recent treatment advances, many tinnitus patients remain refractory to them. Preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment to suppress tinnitus. In rats, it has been shown in multiple regions of the auditory pathway that DBS can have an alleviating effect on tinnitus. The thalamic medial geniculate body (MGB) takes a key position in the tinnitus network, shows pathophysiological hallmarks of tinnitus, and is readily accessible using stereotaxy. Here, a protocol is described to evaluate the safety and test the therapeutic effects of DBS in the MGB in severe tinnitus sufferers. Methods: Bilateral DBS of the MGB will be applied in a future study in six patients with severe and refractory tinnitus. A double-blinded, randomized 2 × 2 crossover design (stimulation ON and OFF) will be applied, followed by a period of six months of open-label follow-up. The primary focus is to assess safety and feasibility (acceptability). Secondary outcomes assess a potential treatment effect and include tinnitus severity measured by the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), tinnitus loudness and distress, hearing, cognitive and psychological functions, quality of life, and neurophysiological characteristics. Discussion: This protocol carefully balances risks and benefits and takes ethical considerations into account. This study will explore the safety and feasibility of DBS in severe refractory tinnitus, through extensive assessment of clinical and neurophysiological outcome measures. Additionally, important insights into the underlying mechanism of tinnitus and hearing function might be revealed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03976908 (6 June 2019).
Article
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tinnitus counseling in improving tinnitus symptoms among hearing-impaired individuals who use hearing aids and have reported difficulties due to tinnitus.Methods: Thirty participants completed the tinnitus handicap inventory (THI), the tinnitus magnitude index (TMI), and a tinnitus knowledge questionnaire both before and after tinnitus rehabilitation counseling. A tinnitogram was also assessed. The tinnitus knowledge questionnaire was customized based on a preliminary survey that identified participants’ misconceptions or specific areas of interest regarding tinnitus, enabling targeted and informative counseling.Results: THI scores showed a statistically significant decrease, from a mean of 48.16 (standard deviation [SD], 27.1) to 41.66 (SD, 25.6), with an average reduction of 6.5 points ( p = 0.000). Similarly, TMI scores showed a statistically significant reduction, from a mean of 20.7 (SD, 6.1) to 19.0 (SD, 6.58), with an average decrease of 1.7 points ( p = 0.01).Conclusion: The findings support the efficacy of tinnitus rehabilitation counseling in alleviating tinnitus-related discomfort among individuals who have used hearing aids for over a year. While the reduction in THI scores was statistically significant, an analysis of the minimum clinically significant difference showed that only 33% of participants exhibited clinically meaningful improvement. Future studies should explore the benefits of continuous counseling for those who do not respond to a single session.
Article
Full-text available
The Veterans Affairs (VA) Rehabilitation Research & Development (RR&D) National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR) was first funded by the RR&D Service in 1997 and has been funded continuously since that time. The overall purpose of the NCRAR is to “improve the quality of life of Veterans and others with hearing and balance problems through clinical research, technology development, and education that leads to better patient care” ( www.ncrar.research.va.gov ). An important component of the research conducted at the NCRAR has been a focus on clinical and rehabilitative aspects of tinnitus. Multiple investigators have received grants to conduct tinnitus research and the present article provides an overview of this research from the NCRAR's inception through 2021.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose While tinnitus is very common among the hearing impaired population, specific treatment for tinnitus is not provided in most clinics. This article provides a plan for establishing a tinnitus treatment program that can be implemented in stages at most audiology clinics. Method Preparation for establishing a tinnitus clinic includes having an overall plan regarding the type and degree of tinnitus management. Assessment involves a measurement of tinnitus and of the reaction a patient has to the tinnitus, including the use of handicap questionnaires. Management typically involves some form of counseling and sound therapy. Four problematic areas in tinnitus management are thoughts and emotions, hearing and communication, sleep, and concentration. Conclusions Licensed audiologists generally have the essential training necessary to provide counseling and sound therapy to treat tinnitus patients. We introduce 3 levels of treatment implementation, depending on whether the patient is curious, concerned, or distressed. Follow-up and referrals might be necessary in more severe cases. Finally, the development of a tinnitus clinic centers around establishing a need for individual treatment, creating a treatment plan, estimating the need for additional staff and resources, reimbursement options, and assessing the effectiveness of the program.
Article
Tinnitus Clinic was established at the University of Oregon Medical School and the result of treatment for 158 patients is discussed. Patients received three forms of masking as treatment: masking from hearing aids, masking from the Tinnitus Masker, and FM-Masking. Conditions leading to each kind of recommendation are discussed. The examination procedures used in the Tinnitus Clinic are presented. The phenomenon of residual inhibition is explained and discussed in relation to possible long-term or permanent relief of tinnitus.Future plans for the clinic and needs of tinnitus patients are presented.