Article

Incidental focal colorectal F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Soung Hoon Cho, Sang Woo Kim, Won Chul Kim, Jae Myung Park, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, South Korea.
World Journal of Gastroenterology (Impact Factor: 2.37). 06/2013; 19(22):3453-3458. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i22.3453
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

To assess the clinical significance of incidental focal colorectal (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) uptake on (18)F-FDG-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).
The records of all the cases which had undergone colonoscopy after PET/CT within a two weeks interval were reviewed. Adenomas were considered advanced when they were villous, ≥ 10 mm in size, or had high-grade dysplasia. Colorectal cancers and advanced adenomas are collectively referred to as advanced colorectal neoplasms. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the significant predictive maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) cutoff value for advanced colorectal neoplasms and cancer.
Ninety-five colorectal lesions matched the site of incidental focal colorectal (18)F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and 146 did not. Colonoscopy showed advanced colorectal neoplasms corresponding to the site of (18)F-FDG uptake in 49 of the 95 (51.5%) lesions with incidental uptake. Of the lesions without incidental uptake, only 6 of 146 (4.1%) had advanced colorectal neoplasms on colonoscopy, indicating a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of incidental focal (18)F-FDG uptake in identifying advanced colorectal neoplasms were 89.1%, 75.3%, 51.6%, 95.9%, and 78.4%, respectively. In detecting only CRC, these values were 89.2%, 69.6%, 34.7%, 97.3%, and 72.6%, respectively. The significant SUVmax cutoff value for advanced colorectal neoplasms (area under the curve 0.755, P < 0.001) was 4.35, with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 75.5%, 65.2%, 69.8%, 71.4% and 70.5%, respectively. For CRC, 5.05 was the significant SUVmax cutoff value (area under the curve 0.817, P < 0.001), with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 84.8%, 71.0%, 80.9%, 89.8%, and 75.8%, respectively.
The presence of incidental focal colorectal (18)F-FDG uptake on PET/CT with a SUVmax ≥ 4.35 increases the likelihood of an advanced colorectal neoplasm.

Full-text preview

Available from: wjgnet.com
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT have a wide variety of indications in children and young adults. Oncologic indications are the most common, but others include neurology, sports medicine, cardiology, and infection imaging. Accurate interpretation of pediatric (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT requires a technically adequate study and knowledgeable interpretation of the images. A successful pediatric (18)F-FDG PET requires age-appropriate patient preparation and consideration of patient age and developmental stage. Accurate interpretation of the study requires familiarity with normal patterns of physiologic (18)F-FDG uptake in children at all stages of development.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2014 · PET Clinics
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When an intense intestinal FDG accumulation is present, especially if focal, it can be referred to either physiological intestinal activity or bowel disease, thus leading to a radical change in patient's prognosis. Within a year, we recommended a colonoscopy to 103 of 7365 patients who were subjected to a total body FDG PET/CT and in a case-series study we re-evaluated the patients and their lesions if already investigated with colonoscopy and biopsy. Only 18 patients were included in our study, but in none of them biopsy was negative and 3 adenocarcinomas, 8 adenomas, 5 inflammatory pattern, 1 hyperplastic polyp and 1 eosinophylic infiltrate were diagnosed. In 16 patients, no suspicion was present and diagnosis was absolutely incidental. Besides, among the three major groups (adenocarcinomas, adenomas and phlogosis), SUVmax values were significantly different. Adenocarcinomas are mainly linked with SUVmax higher than 8 and size larger than 15 mm. In detecting inflammatory localizations, FDG PET SE is of 100% if SUVmax is higher than 4. SE is lower in detecting adenomas, being 71.4% if they are larger than 6 mm and 50% if SUVmax is lower than 4.9. CCR is still the second leading cause of cancer death, for this reason in many countries screening programs have been approved and colonoscopy is considered the golden standard. PET/CT cannot be considered as a screening test, but if it incidentally reveals intestinal abnormalities, this data cannot be underestimated and colonoscopy is highly recommended.
    No preview · Article · Jun 2014 · Current Radiopharmaceuticals
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Unexpected focal colonic or rectal radiotracer activity is an usual finding in patients subjected to a PET study. The aim of this work has been to evaluate the clinical significance of this finding in the prediction of an existing colorectal malignancy. Material and methods: During the last three years, all patients studied with (18)F-FDG PET/CT and PET for oncologic work-up purposes were prospectively surveyed for focal colorectal radiotracer activity. Colonoscopy was performed in all patients with this incidental finding in order to exclude colonic malignancy. CEA level, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), CT findings, colonoscopy findings and histopathological results were prospectively analyzed in all patients. Results: A total of 2290 patients were evaluated, 158 of whom were studied with PET and the remainder with a hybrid PET/CT. Focal FDG colorectal activity was incidentally detected in 27 patients with no previous history of colorectal cancer. Colorectal adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in seven (25.9%) patients. A pre-cancerous lesion was found in eleven patients (40.7%). Eight patients (29.6%) had no macroscopic lesions. One patient was diagnosed with a benign lesion. Any focal activity found in the colon by (18)F-FDG PET/CT examination predicts a probability greater than 50% of an underlying malignant or premalignant lesion in the histopathological analysis (logistic regression, p=0.01), independently of the calculated SUVmax. Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, we recommend the performance of a colonoscopy and biopsy of any suspicious lesions, in all patients with unexpected focal FDG activity found in colon or rectum during a (18)F-FDG PET/CT examination.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2014 · Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular
Show more