Article

Requirements for the recycling of hazardous waste

Authors:

The regulatory status of materials destined to be recycled is not always clear. There have been numerous questions from DOE Field Elements regarding the applicability of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to certain materials that can be recycled. The Office of Environmental Guidance, RCRA/CERCLA Division, has responded to questions relating to the RCRA regulations as they apply to materials that are recycled or are destined for recycling. Additional regulatory requirements for these materials may be promulgated upon the reauthorization of RCRA (e.g., regulation of used oil). Additional EH-23 information Briefs will be issued as these regulations develop. The Office of Environment, Safety and Health has convened a workshop to establish DOE's position on a number of issues associated with mixed waste and materials management, several relative to recycling.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.

Article

Recycling Hazardous Waste

March 1982 · Environment: Science and Policy For Sustainable Development

As regulations covering the generation, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous wastes promise to increase the costs to industry of managing these materials, recycling is becoming an increasingly attractive cost-cutting and resource-conserving alternative. To encourage this move, states and the federal government are adopting policies which impose disincentives for disposal and provide ... [Show full abstract] incentives for recovery of materials once considered only as wastes. Successful management strategies of companies which have taken the lead in developing techniques for waste material recovery and reduction are highlighted.-Editors

Article

RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) ground-water monitoring projects for Hanford facilitie...

January 1970

This report describes the progress during 1989 of 16 Hanford Site ground-water monitoring projects covering 25 hazardous waste facilities and 1 nonhazardous waste facility. Each of the projects is being conducted according to federal regulations based on the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and the State of Washington Administrative Code. 40 refs., 75 figs., 6 tabs.

Article

Economic impact of pending regulations on the disposal of hazardous and nonhazardous energy wastes

January 1970

This study evaluates the impact of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) on utility and industrial coal-fired energy facilities. Information presented herein should be useful for policy decisions regarding solid and hazardous wastes from energy production.

Article

RCRA – The first 30 years of hazardous waste regulation

November 2010 · Journal of Chemical Health and Safety

Russell Phifer

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act was passed by the US Congress in 1976; the law charged the Environmental Protection Agency with developing regulations to control the disposal of hazardous wastes from “cradle to grave”. These RCRA regulations went into effect on November 19, 1980. The ensuing 30 years have seen dramatic changes in how waste is managed both at the generator's site and in ... [Show full abstract] terms of ultimate disposal. This paper will look at those changes and grades the overall progress that has been made to reduce improper disposal of hazardous chemical wastes.

Article

Full-text available

Regulating Nonnuclear Industrial Wastes by Hazard Classification

January 1983 · Journal of Environmental Systems

Jonathan Bard

With the passage of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act efforts to provide tighter controls on the disposal of nonnuclear industrial wastes have been steadily gaining ground. This paper first discusses the current approach to the regulatory problem and then suggests an integrated strategy based on hazard classification. Traditional methods of risk-benefit analysis are examined but found ... [Show full abstract] wanting in their selection criteria. As an alternative a decision model based on cost referents and socioeconomic constraints is offered as a means of comparing different policies. An example is given to illustrate the methodology and computations.