Driving research in infant and children's nutrition: A perspective on industry

Mead Johnson Nutritionals, Evansville, IN, and the Kellogg Company, Battle Creek, MI, USA.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Impact Factor: 6.77). 04/2009; 89(5):1530S-1532S. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27113I
Source: PubMed


As part of the workshop entitled "Early Risk Determinants and Later Health Outcomes: Implications for Research Prioritization and the Food Supply" (8-9 July 2008, Washington, DC), which was cosponsored by the International Life Sciences Institute of North America and the International Life Sciences Institute Research Foundation, representatives of the food industry discussed the practical application of nutrition science. Nutrition plays a key role in guiding health outcomes throughout the life cycle. In particular, the prenatal, postnatal, and early childhood periods are extremely sensitive to the presence of appropriate nutrition. A growing body of evidence shows that early nutrition may program the unborn and the infant's key physiologic systems, including the endocrine, cardiovascular, and central nervous systems, to influence later life outcomes. While scientists in academia continue to explore the multifactorial nature of early risk determinants and later life outcomes at a mechanistic and basic science level, it is important to understand the potential of the infant and child food industries to address questions such as what factors have been noted to drive research in these sectors of the food industry. How can scientists in these industries work alongside the scientists in academia and in government to set priorities, make decisions around these health issues, and translate academic insights into innovative nutritional solutions for the benefit of public health? Given the commitment of the infant and child food industries to deliver scientifically supported early life nutrition, it is easy to understand why this industry would work in partnership with both the scientists in academia and the government to identify a means of addressing the fundamental questions of this workshop.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "Childhood can be considered to extend from 1 year of age to the beginning of adolescence. Early childhood (1–5 years) is an extremely sensitive period to the presence of appropriate nutrition (Rai & Larson 2009) and can be considered as a vulnerable population group. Adolescence is a time of dramatic change as the relatively uniform growth of childhood is suddenly altered by an increase in growth velocity. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper provides an overview of the current knowledge relating to the nutritional requirements and corresponding recommended nutrient intake values of children and adolescents for micronutrients and specificities related to these requirements in the course of childhood and adolescence in Europe. Aspects that can influence micronutrient requirements, such as physiological requirements and bioavailability of the nutrients in the organism, are discussed. The methodology used to obtain the data and also the main knowledge gaps regarding these concepts are emphasized. Methodological critical points in achieving the data and physiological aspects of children and adolescents are important in order to standardize the reference values for micronutrients among Europe for these stages of life.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2010 · Maternal and Child Nutrition
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This brief review focuses on the genetic contribution to childhood obesity. Evidence for a genetic component to excess body weight during growth is presented from the perspective of genetic epidemiology studies. Parental obesity is a predictor of childhood excess weight. The familial risk ratio for childhood obesity when a parent is obese reaches >2.5. Birth weight is characterized by a genetic heritability component on the order of 30%, with significant maternal and paternal effects in addition to the newborn genes. About 5% of childhood obesity cases are caused by a defect that impairs function in a gene, and >/=5 of these genes have been uncovered. However, the common forms of childhood obesity seem to result from a predisposition that primarily favors obesogenic behaviors in an obesogenic environment. Candidate gene and genomewide association studies reveal that these obesogenic genes have small effect sizes but that the risk alleles for obesity are quite common in populations. The latter may translate into a highly significant population-attributable risk of obesity. Gene-environment interaction studies suggest that the effects of predisposing genes can be enhanced or diminished by exposure to relevant behaviors. It is possible that the prevalence of childhood obesity is increasing across generations as a result of positive assortative mating with obese husbands and wives contributing more obese offspring than normal-weight parents.
    Preview · Article · Mar 2009 · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The International Life Sciences Institute North American Branch, in conjunction with the International Life Sciences Institute Research Foundation, on 8-9 July 2008, sponsored the workshop "Early Risk Determinants and Later Health Outcomes: Implications for Research Prioritization and the Food Supply." A primary objective was to focus on the relative influence of genetics and environmental factors, particularly in relation to specific nutrients and food components, on determinants of risk within the developmental stages of pregnancy, infancy (0-12 mo), and early childhood (</=5 y of age). A panel of experts concluded the workshop by providing their reactions to the papers presented while attempting to identify the critical time windows and the research gaps and challenges for future research. This was followed by a discussion of how the food industry might assist in the acquisition and translation of the knowledge of the determinants of disease to improve human health.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2009 · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Show more