ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Abstract

Recently, vegetarian diets have experienced an increase in popularity. A vegetarian diet is associated with many health benefits because of its higher content of fiber, folic acid, vitamins C and E, potassium, magnesium, and many phytochemicals and a fat content that is more unsaturated. Compared with other vegetarian diets, vegan diets tend to contain less saturated fat and cholesterol and more dietary fiber. Vegans tend to be thinner, have lower serum cholesterol, and lower blood pressure, reducing their risk of heart disease. However, eliminating all animal products from the diet increases the risk of certain nutritional deficiencies. Micronutrients of special concern for the vegan include vitamins B-12 and D, calcium, and long-chain n-3 (omega-3) fatty acids. Unless vegans regularly consume foods that are fortified with these nutrients, appropriate supplements should be consumed. In some cases, iron and zinc status of vegans may also be of concern because of the limited bioavailability of these minerals.
Health effects of vegan diets
1–3
Winston J Craig
ABSTRACT
Recently, vegetarian diets have experienced an increase in popular-
ity. Avegetarian diet is associated with many health benefits because
of its higher content of fiber, folic acid, vitamins C and E, potassium,
magnesium, and many phytochemicals and a fat content that is more
unsaturated. Compared with other vegetarian diets, vegan diets tend
to contain less saturated fat and cholesterol and more dietary fiber.
Vegans tend to be thinner, have lower serum cholesterol, and lower
blood pressure, reducing their risk of heart disease. However, elim-
inating all animal products from the diet increases the risk of certain
nutritional deficiencies. Micronutrients of special concern for the
vegan include vitamins B-12 and D, calcium, and long-chain n–3
(omega-3) fatty acids. Unless vegans regularly consume foods that
are fortified with these nutrients, appropriate supplements should be
consumed. In some cases, iron and zinc status of vegans may also be
of concern because of the limited bioavailability of these
minerals. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1627S–33S.
INTRODUCTION
A nationwide poll conducted in April 2006 by Harris In-
teractive reported that 1.4% of the American population is vegan,
in that they eat no meat, fish, dairy, or eggs (1). Vegan diets are
growing in popularity today among teenagers and youth, espe-
cially females. For many vegans, nutritional choices center
around taking better care of the earth’s resources and the envi-
ronment, ethical issues about animal care, the use of antibiotics
and growth stimulants for the production of animals, the threat
of animal-borne diseases, and the health advantages of a plant-
based diet (2–6). In addition, the potential of allergies from dairy
products and lactose intolerance have fueled the popularity of
soy-based dairy substitutes.
What then is the nutritional and health status of those who
follow a vegan diet? Compared with other vegetarians (eg,
lactoovovegetarians), are there any advantages or disadvantages
to following a vegan diet? Does the elimination of dairy and eggs
offer any additional benefits or create potential concerns? The
purpose of this brief review is to summarize current knowledge
on the health effects of vegan diets, to discuss the nutritional
concerns or shortfalls of a vegan diet and to provide some
practical dietary recommendations for following a healthy vegan
diet. Key et al (7) have provided a pertinent overview of the
health effects of vegetarian diets, focusing on their European
Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition–Oxford
(EPIC-Oxford) study and other large population studies.
HEALTH EFFECTS OF VEGAN DIETS
Vegan diets are usually higher in dietary fiber, magnesium,
folic acid, vitamins C and E, iron, and phytochemicals, and they
tend to be lower in calories, saturated fat and cholesterol, long-
chain n–3 (omega-3) fatty acids, vitamin D, calcium, zinc, and
vitamin B-12 (8). In general, vegetarians typically enjoy a lower
risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), obesity, type 2 diabetes,
and some cancers (3). A vegan diet appears to be useful for
increasing the intake of protective nutrients and phytochemicals
and for minimizing the intake of dietary factors implicated in
several chronic diseases (9). In a recent report (10), different
plant food groups were rated with respect to their metabolic-
epidemiologic evidence for influencing chronic disease reduc-
tion. According to the evidence criteria of the World Health
Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization (WHO/
FAO), cancer risk reduction associated with a high intake of fruit
and vegetables was assessed as probable or possible, risk of
CVD reduction as convincing, whereas lower risk of osteopo-
rosis was assessed as probable (10). The evidence for a risk-
reducing effect of consuming whole grains was assessed as
possible for colorectal cancer and probable for type 2 diabetes
and CVD. The evidence for a risk-reducing effect of consuming
nuts was assessed as probable for CVD (10).
Cardiovascular disease
In summarizing the published research, Fraser (11) noted that,
compared with other vegetarians, vegans are thinner, have lower
total and LDL cholesterol, and modestly lower blood pressure.
This is true not only for whites; work by Toohey et al (12) showed
that blood lipids and body mass index (BMI; in kg/m
2
)were
significantly lower in African American vegans than in lacto-
ovovegetarians. Similarly, among Latin Americans, vegetarians
had lower plasma lipids than did their omnivore counterparts,
with the lowest reported among vegans (13). In that study, plasma
total and LDL cholesterol were 32% and 44% lower among ve-
gans than among omnivores. Because obesity is a significant risk
factor for CVD, the substantially lower mean BMI observed in
1
From the Department of Nutrition and Wellness, Andrews University,
Berrien Springs, MI.
2
Presented at the symposium, ‘‘Fifth International Congress on Vegetar-
ian Nutrition,’’ held in Loma Linda, CA, March 4–6, 2008.
3
Reprints not available. Address correspondence to WJ Craig, Depart-
ment of Nutrition and Wellness, Andrews University, Marsh Hall, Room
301, Berrien Springs, MI 49104-0210. E-mail: wcraig@andrews.edu.
First published online March 11, 2009; doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736N.
Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1627S–33S. Printed in USA. Ó2009 American Society for Nutrition 1627S
at Universitaetsspital-Bibliothek USB on November 13, 2009 www.ajcn.orgDownloaded from
vegans may be an important protective factor for lowering blood
lipids and reducing the risk of heart disease (8).
Vegans, compared with omnivores, consume substantially greater
quantities of fruit and vegetables (14–16). A higher consumption of
fruit and vegetables, which are rich in fiber, folic acid, anti-
oxidants, and phytochemicals, is associated with lower blood
cholesterol concentrations (17), a lower incidence of stroke, and
a lower risk of mortality from stroke and ischemic heart disease
(18, 19). Vegans also have a higher consumption of whole
grains, soy, and nuts (14, 15, 20), all of which provide significant
cardioprotective effects (21, 22).
Cancer
Data from the Adventist Health Study showed that non-
vegetarians had a substantially increased risk of both colorectal
and prostate cancer than did vegetarians (23). A vegetarian diet
provides a variety of cancer-protective dietary factors (24). In
addition, obesity is a significant factor, increasing the risk of
cancer at a number of sites (25). Because the mean BMI of
vegans is considerably lower than that of nonvegetarians (8), it
may be an important protective factor for lowering cancer risk.
Vegans consume considerably more legumes, total fruit and
vegetables, tomatoes, allium vegetables, fiber, and vitamin C than
do omnivores (14–16, 20, 23). All those foods and nutrients are
protective against cancer (25). Fruit and vegetables are described
as protective against cancer of the lung, mouth, esophagus, and
stomach and to a lesser degree some other sites, whereas the
regular use of legumes provides a measure of protection against
stomach and prostate cancer. In addition, fiber, vitamin C, car-
otenoids, flavonoids, and other phytochemicals in the diet are
shown to exhibit protection against various cancers, whereas al-
lium vegetables provide protection against stomach cancer, and
garlic against colorectal cancer. Foods rich in lycopene, such as
tomatoes, are known to protect against prostate cancer (25).
Fruit and vegetables are known to contain a complex mix-
ture of phytochemicals that possess potent antioxidant and anti-
proliferative activity and show additive and synergistic effects (24,
26). The phytochemicals interfere with several cellular processes
involved in the progression of cancer. These mechanisms include
inhibiting cell proliferation, inhibition of DNA adduct formation,
inhibiting phase 1 enzymes, inhibiting signal transduction path-
ways and oncogene expression, inducing cell-cycle arrest and
apoptosis, inducing phase 2 enzymes, blocking the activation of
nuclear factor-jB, and inhibiting angiogenesis (24).
With this wide array of useful phytochemicals in thevegetarian
diet, it is surprising that population studies have not shown more
pronounced differences in cancer incidence or mortality rates
between vegetarians and nonvegetarians (7, 27). The bioavail-
ability of the phytochemicals, which depends among other
things on food preparation methods, may be an important de-
termining factor. However, new evidence suggests that a low
vitamin D status, a problem often reported in vegan populations
(8, 28), is associated with an increased risk of cancers (29, 30).
The sources of protein avoided or consumed by vegans also
have definite health consequences. Red meat and processed meat
consumption are consistently associated with an increase risk of
colorectal cancer (25). Those in the highest quintile of red meat
intake had elevated risks, ranging from 20% to 60%, of esoph-
ageal, liver, colorectal, and lung cancers than did those in the
lowest quintile of red meat intake (31). In addition, the use of
eggs was recently shown to be associated with a higher risk of
pancreatic cancer (32). Although vegans avoid consuming red
meat and eggs altogether, they consume greater amounts of le-
gumes than do omnivores (14, 16, 20). This protein source was
seen in the Adventist Health Study to be negatively associated
with risk of colon cancer (23). New data suggest that legume
intake is also associated with a moderate reduction in the risk of
prostate cancer (33). In Western society, vegans also consume
substantially more tofu and other soy products than do omni-
vores (14, 16). Consumption of isoflavone-containing soy prod-
ucts during childhood and adolescence protects women against
the risk of breast cancer later in life (34), whereas a high
childhood dairy intake has been associated with an elevated risk
of colorectal cancer in adulthood (35). Cancer risk in vegans
may be altered because vegans consume soy beverages rather
than dairy beverages. Data from the Adventist Health Study
showed that consumption of soy milk by vegetarians protected
them against prostate cancer (36), whereas in other studies the
use of dairy was associated with an increased risk of prostate
cancer (25, 37–39).
Further research is needed to explore the relation between
consuming plant-based diets and risk of cancer because there are
many unanswered questions about how diet and cancer are con-
nected. To date, epidemiologic studies have not provided convincing
evidence that a vegan diet provides significant protection against
cancer. Although plant foods contain many chemopreventive
factors, most of the research data comes from cellular bio-
chemical studies.
Bone health
Cross-sectional and longitudinal population-based studies pub-
lished within the past 2 decades suggest no differences in bone
mineral density (BMD), for both trabecular and cortical bone,
between omnivores and lactoovovegetarians (40). More recent
studies with postmenopausal Asian women showed spine or hip
BMD was significantly lower in long-term vegans (41, 42). Those
Asian women, who were vegetarian for religious reasons, had low
intakes of protein and calcium. An inadequate protein and low
calcium intake has been shown to be associated with bone loss and
fractures at the hip and spine in the elderly (43, 44). Adequate
calcium intake may be a problem for vegans. Although lacto-
ovovegetarians generally consume adequate amounts of calcium,
vegans typically fall short of the recommended daily intake for
calcium (8, 45, 46). Results from the EPIC-Oxford study provide
good evidence that the risk of bone fractures for vegetarians was
similar to that of omnivores (46). The higher risk of bone fracture
seen in vegans appears to be a consequence of a lower mean
calcium intake. No difference was observed between the fracture
rates of the vegans who consumed .525 mg calcium/d and the
omnivore fracture rates (46).
Bone health depends on more than just protein and calcium
intakes. Research has shown that bone health is also influenced by
nutrients such as vitamin D, vitamin K, potassium, and magnesium
and by foods such as soy and fruit and vegetables (47–50). Vegan
diets do well in providing a number of those important sub-
stances. The maintenance of acid-base balance is critical for bone
health. A drop in extracellular pH stimulates bone resorption (51),
because bone calcium is used to buffer the pH drop. An acid-
1628S CRAIG
at Universitaetsspital-Bibliothek USB on November 13, 2009 www.ajcn.orgDownloaded from
forming diet, therefore, increases urinary calcium excretion (52).
However, a diet rich in fruit and vegetables that is typical of
a vegan diet has a positive effect on the calcium economy and
markers of bone metabolism in men and women (49). The high
potassium and magnesium content of fruit and vegetables pro-
vides an alkaline ash, which inhibits bone resorption (53). Higher
intakes of potassium are associated with greater BMD of the
femoral neck and lumbar spine of premenopausal women (54).
Blood concentrations of undercarboxylated osteocalcin, a sen-
sitive marker of vitamin K status, is considered an indicator of hip
fracture (55) and a predictor of BMD (56). Results from 2 large,
prospective cohort studies support an association between vita-
min K intake and relative risk of hip fracture. In the Nurses’
Health Study, middle-aged women consuming the most vitamin
K had the lowest risk of hip fracture. Risk of hip fracture was
decreased 45% for 1 servings/d of green leafy vegetables (the
main vitamin K source) compared with 1 serving/wk (57). In
the Framingham Heart Study, elderly men and women in the
highest quartile of vitamin K intake had a 65% decreased risk of
hip fracture than did those in the lowest quartile (58).
In addition to a high intake of fruit and vegetables, vegans also
tend to have a high intake of tofu and other soy products (14, 16).
Soy isoflavones are suggested to have a beneficial effect on bone
health in postmenopausal women (50). In a meta-analysis of 10
randomized controlled trials, soy isoflavones showed a signifi-
cant benefit to spine BMD of menopausal women (59). In an-
other meta-analysis, soy isoflavones significantly inhibited bone
resorption and stimulated bone formation compared with pla-
cebo (60). In a randomized clinical trial lasting 24 mo involving
osteopenic postmenopausal women, increases in BMD of both
lumbar spine and femoral neck were substantially greater with
the soy isoflavone, genistein, than with placebo (61).
As long as the calcium and vitamin D intake of vegans is
adequate, their bone health is probably not an issue because their
diet contains an ample supply of other protective factors for bone
health. However, more studies are needed to provide more de-
finitive data on the bone health of vegans.
POTENTIAL NUTRITIONAL SHORTFALLS
To obtain a nutritionally adequate diet, the consumer must first
have an appropriate knowledge of what constitutes a nutritionally
adequate diet. Second, accessibility is important, ie, the avail-
ability of certain foodstuffs and foods fortified with key nutrients
that are otherwise lacking in the diet. This accessibility will vary
greatly, depending on the geographic region of the world, because
different countries have different fortification laws. The fol-
lowing section deals with nutrients of concern in the vegan diet.
The problem of insufficient calcium has already been discussed in
the section on bone health.
n–3 Polyunsaturated fat
Diets that do not include fish, eggs, or sea vegetables (sea-
weeds) generally lack the long-chain n–3 fatty acids, eicosa-
pentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5n23) and docosahexaenoic acid
(DHA; 22:6n23), which are important for cardiovascular health
as well as eye and brain functions. The plant-based n–3 fatty
acid a-linolenic acid (ALA; 18:3n23) can be converted into
EPA and DHA, albeit with a fairly low efficiency (62, 63).
Compared with nonvegetarians, vegetarians, and especially ve-
gans, tend to have lower blood concentrations of EPA and DHA
(64). However, vegans can obtain DHA from microalgae sup-
plements containing DHA, as well as from foods fortified with
DHA. However, EPA can be obtained from the retroconversion
of DHA in the body. The oil from brown algae (kelp) has also
been identified as a good source of EPA.
The new Dietary Reference Intakes recommend intakes of 1.6
and 1.1 g ALA/d for men and women, respectively, which ac-
counts for ,1% of the daily calories. Presently, the intake of EPA
plus DHA in the United States is only 0.1–0.2 g/d, with the DHA
intake being 2–3 times the intake of EPA (65). Vegans should
be able to easily reach the n–3 fatty acid requirements by in-
cluding regular supplies of ALA-rich foods in their diet and also
DHA-fortified foods and supplements. However, DHA supple-
ments should be taken with caution. Although they can lower
plasma triacylglycerol, they can raise total and LDL cholesterol
(66, 67), cause excessively prolonged bleeding times, and impair
immune responses (65).
Vitamin D
In the EPIC-Oxford study, vegans had the lowest mean intake
of vitamin D (0.88 lg/d), a value one-fourth the mean intake of
omnivores (8). For a vegan, vitamin D status depends on both
sun exposure and the intake of vitamin D-fortified foods. Those
living in areas of the world without fortified foods would need to
consume a vitamin D supplement. Living at high latitudes can
also affect one’s vitamin D status, because sun exposure in that
region is inadequate for several months of the year (68). Those
who are dark skinned, elderly, who extensively cover their body
with clothing for cultural reasons, and who commonly use
sunscreen are at an increased risk of vitamin D deficiency (45).
Another matter of concern for vegans is that vitamin D
2
, the
form of vitamin D acceptable to vegans, is substantially less
bioavailable than the animal-derived vitamin D
3
(69).
In Finland, the dietary intake of vitamin D in vegans was in-
sufficient to maintain serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and parathy-
roid hormone concentrations within normal ranges in the winter,
which appeared to have a negative effect on long-term BMD (28).
Throughout the year serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations
were lower and parathyroid hormone higher in vegan women than
in omnivores and other vegetarians. BMD in the lumbar region of
the spine was 12% lower in vegans than in omnivores.
Iron
Heme iron absorption is substantially higher than non-heme iron
from plant foods. However, hemoglobin concentrations and the
risk of irondeficiency anemia are similar for vegans compared with
omnivores and other vegetarians (70). Vegans often consume large
amounts of vitamin C–rich foods that markedly improve the ab-
sorption of the nonheme iron. Serum ferritin concentrations are
lower in some vegans, whereas the mean values tend to be similar
to the mean values of other vegetarians but lower than the mean
value for omnivores (71). The physiologic significance of low
serum ferritin concentrations is uncertain at this time.
Vitamin B-12
Compared with lactoovovegetarians and omnivores, vegans
typically have lower plasma vitamin B-12 concentrations, higher
HEALTH EFFECTS OF VEGAN DIETS 1629S
at Universitaetsspital-Bibliothek USB on November 13, 2009 www.ajcn.orgDownloaded from
prevalence of vitamin B-12 deficiency, and higher concentrations
of plasma homocysteine (72). Elevated homocysteine has been
considered a risk factor for CVD (73) and osteoporotic bone
fractures (74). Vitamin B-12 deficiency can produce abnormal
neurologic and psychiatric symptoms that include ataxia, psy-
choses, paresthesia, disorientation, dementia, mood and motor
disturbances, and difficulty with concentration (75). In addition,
children may experience apathy and failure to thrive, and macro-
cytic anemia is a common feature at all ages.
Zinc
Vegetarians are often considered to be at risk for zinc deficiency.
Phytates, a common component of grains, seeds, and legumes,
binds zinc and thereby decreases its bioavailability. However,
a sensitive marker to measure zinc status in humans has not been
well established, and the effects of marginal zinc intakes are
poorly understood (76). Although vegans have lower zinc intake
than omnivores, they do not differ from the nonvegetarians in
functional immunocompetence as assessed by natural killer cell
cytotoxic activity (14). It appears that there may be facilitators of
zinc absorption and compensatory mechanisms to help vegeta-
rians adapt to a lower intake of zinc (77).
DIETARY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OPTIMAL VEGAN
DIETS
1) To avoid B-12 deficiency, vegans should regularly consume
vitamin B-12–fortified foods, such as fortified soy and rice
beverages, certain breakfast cereals and meat analogs, and
B-12–fortified nutritional yeast, or take a daily vitamin B-12
supplement. Fermented soy products, leafy vegetables, and
seaweed cannot be considered a reliable source of active vi-
tamin B-12. No unfortified plant food contains any significant
amount of active vitamin B-12.
2) To ensure adequate calcium in the diet, calcium-fortified plant
foods should be regularly consumed in addition to consuming
the traditional calcium sources for a vegan (green leafy vege-
tables, tofu, tahini). The calcium-fortified foods include ready-
to-eat cereals, calcium-fortified soy and rice beverages,
calcium-fortified orange and apple juices, and other beverages.
The bioavailability of the calcium carbonate in the soy bever-
ages and the calcium citrate malate in apple or orange juice is
similar to that of the calcium in milk (78, 79). Tricalcium
phosphate–fortified soy milk was shown to have a slightly
lower calcium bioavailability than the calcium in cow milk
(78).
3) To ensure an adequate vitamin D status, especially during the
winter, vegans must regularly consume vitamin D–fortified
foods such as soy milk, rice milk, orange juice, breakfast
cereals, and margarines that are fortified with vitamin D.
Where fortified foods are unavailable, a daily supplement of
5–10 lg vitamin D would be necessary. The supplement would
be highly desirable for elderly vegans.
4) A vegan should regularly consume plant foods naturally rich in
the n–3 fatty acid ALA, such as ground flaxseed, walnuts,
canola oil, soy products, and hemp seed–based beverages. In
addition, it is recommended that vegans consume foods that
are fortified with the long-chain n–3 fatty acid DHA, such as
some soy milks and cereal bars. Those with increased require-
ments of long-chain n–3 fatty acids, such as pregnant and
lactating women, would benefit from using DHA-rich micro-
algae supplements.
5) Because of the high phytate content of a typical vegan diet, it
is important that a vegan consume foods that are rich in zinc,
such as whole grains, legumes, and soy products, to provide
a sufficient zinc intake. Benefit could also be obtained by
vegans consuming fortified ready-to-eat cereals and other
zinc-fortified foods.
A more comprehensive list of eating guidelines for vegans is
available elsewhere (80).
FURTHER RESEARCH NEEDED
The term vegetarian is often used to describe a whole range
of diets practiced with varying degrees of restriction, making it
a challenge to meaningfully compare and contrast the health
benefits of various vegetarian diets. Although preliminary data
are valuable, more scientific studies on vegans are needed to get
a clearer picture of their health status (7, 11). Current data show
that vegans have a lower risk of heart disease than do omnivores
and other vegetarians, but there are too few studies on other risk
factors for definitive conclusions. One small pilot trial has
shown that a vegan diet improves glycemic control in in-
dividuals with type 2 diabetes (81), but more studies are needed
that look at the effects of a vegan diet on the risk of diabetes, as
well as cancer. On the basis of our present knowledge, vegans do
not appear likely to have any significant advantages over other
vegetarians about chronic disease patterns (11). The vegan
studies that do exist often involve only a small number of sub-
jects. More studies are also needed with long-term vegans be-
cause the health advantages appear more clearly defined when
a person has been following a plant-based diet for .5 y (82).
Research is also needed to investigate whether the age at which
a vegan diet is adopted has any influence on health outcomes.
SUMMARY
Vegans are thinner, have lower serum cholesterol and blood
pressure, and enjoy a lower risk of CVD. BMD and the risk of
bone fracture may be a concern when there is an inadequate
intake of calcium and vitamin D. Where available, calcium- and
vitamin D–fortified foods should be regularly consumed. There
is a need for more studies on the relation between vegan diets
and risk of cancer, diabetes, and osteoporosis. Vitamin B-12
deficiency is a potential problem for vegans, so that the use of
vitamin B-12–fortified foods or supplements are essential. To
optimize the n–3 fatty acid status of vegans, foods rich in ALA,
DHA-fortified foods, or DHA supplements should be regularly
consumed. Vegans generally have an adequate iron intake and do
not experience anemia more frequently than others. Typically,
vegans can avoid nutritional problems if appropriate food choices
are made. Their health status appears to be at least as good as
other vegetarians, such as lactoovovegetarians. (Other articles in
this supplement to the Journal include references 83–109.)
The author had no financial disclosures to report.
REFERENCES
1. Stahler C. How many adults are vegetarian? Veg J 2006;25:14–5.
2. Jacobsen MF. Six arguments for a greener diet: how a more plant-based
diet could save your health and the environment. Washington, DC:
Center for Science in the Public Interest, 2006.
1630S CRAIG
at Universitaetsspital-Bibliothek USB on November 13, 2009 www.ajcn.orgDownloaded from
3. Position of the American Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Can-
ada. Vegetarian diets. J Am Diet Assoc 2003;103:748–65.
4. Fox N, Ward K. Health, ethics and environment: a qualitative study of
vegetarian motivations. Appetite 2008;50:422–9.
5. Rollin BE. Farm animal welfare: social, bioethical, and research issues.
Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2003.
6. Volpe T. The fast food craze: wreaking havoc on our bodies and our
animals. Parks, AZ: Volpe T Canyon Publishing, 2005.
7. Key TJ, Appleby PN, Rosell MS. Health effects of vegetarian and
vegan diets. Proc Nutr Soc 2006;65:35–41.
8. Davey GK, Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Allen NE, Knox KH, Key TJ.
EPIC-Oxford: lifestyle characteristics and nutrient intakes in a cohort
of 33,883 meat-eaters and 31,546 non meat-eaters in the UK. Public
Health Nutr 2003;6:259–69.
9. Dewell A, Weidner G, Sumner MD, Chi CS, Ornish D. A very-low fat
vegan diet increases intake of protective dietary factors and decreases
intake of pathogenic dietary factors. J Am Diet Assoc 2008;108:347–56.
10. Strohle A, Waldmann A, Wolters M, Hahn A. Vegetarian nutrition:
preventive potential and possible risks. Part 1: plant foods. Wien Klin
Wochenschr 2006;118:580–93.
11. Fraser G. Risk factors and disease among vegans. In: Fraser G, ed.
Diet, life expectancy, and chronic disease. Studies of Seventh-day
Adventists and other vegetarians. New York, NY: Oxford University
Press, 2003:231–9.
12. Toohey ML, Harris MA, Williams D, Foster G, Schmidt WD, Melby
CL. Cardiovascular disease risk factors are lower in African-American
vegans compared to lacto-ovo-vegetarians. J Am Coll Nutr 1998;17:
425–34.
13. De Biase SG, Fernandes SF, Gianini RJ, Duarte JL. Vegetarian diet and
cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Arq Bras Cardiol 2007;88:35–9.
14. Haddad EH, Berk LS, Kettering JD, Hubbard RW, Peters WR. Dietary
intake and biochemical, hematologic, and immune status of vegans
compared with nonvegetarians. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;70(suppl):
586S–93S.
15. Larsson CL, Johansson GK. Young Swedish vegans have different
sources of nutrients than young omnivores. J Am Diet Assoc 2005;105:
1438–41.
16. Keinan-Boker L, Peeters PH, Mulligan AA, et al. Soy product con-
sumption in 10 European countries: the European Prospective In-
vestigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Public Health Nutr
2002;5:1217–26.
17. Djousse
´L, Amett DK, Coon H, Province MA, Moore LL, Ellison RC.
Fruit and vegetable consumption and LDL cholesterol: the National
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr
2004;79:213–7.
18. Bazzano LA, He J, Ogden LG, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk
of cardiovascular disease in US adults: the first National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Am J
Clin Nutr 2002;76:93–9.
19. Bazzano LA, Serdula MK, Liu S. Dietary intake of fruits and vegeta-
bles and risk of cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2003;5:
492–9.
20. Larsson CL, Johansson GK. Dietary intake and nutritional status of
young vegans and omnivores in Sweden. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:
100–6.
21. Kelly JH Jr, Sabate J. Nuts and coronary heart disease: an epidemio-
logical perspective. Br J Nutr 2006;96(suppl):S61–7.
22. Mellen PB, Walsh TF, Herrington DM. Whole grain intake and car-
diovascular disease: a meta-analysis. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2008;
18:283–90.
23. Fraser GE. Associations between diet and cancer, ischemic heart dis-
ease, and all-cause mortality in non-Hispanic white California Seventh-day
Adventists. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;70(suppl):532S–8S.
24. Liu RH. Potential synergy of phytochemicals in cancer prevention:
mechanism of action. J Nutr 2004;134(suppl):3479S–85S.
25. World Cancer Research Fund. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and
the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington, DC:
American Institute for Cancer Research, 2007.
26. Liu RH. Health benefits of fruits and vegetables are from additive and
synergistic combinations of phytochemicals. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;
78(suppl):517S–20S.
27. Key TJ, Fraser GE, Thorogood M, et al. Mortality in vegetarians and
nonvegetarians: detailed findings from a collaborative analysis of 5
prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;70(suppl):516S–24S.
28. Outila TA, Karkkainen MU, Seppanen RH, Lamberg-Allardt CJ. Di-
etary intake of vitamin D in premenopausal, healthy vegans was in-
sufficient to maintain concentrations of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D
and intact parathyroid hormone within normal ranges during the winter
in Finland. J Am Diet Assoc 2000;100:434–41.
29. Pilz S, Dobnig H, Winklhofer-Roob B, et al. Low serum levels of
25-hydroxyvitamin D predict fatal cancer in patients referred to coronary
angiography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:1228–33.
30. Holick MF. Sunlight, UV-radiation, vitamin D and skin cancer: how
much sunlight do we need? Adv Exp Med Biol 2008;624:1–15.
31. Cross AJ, Leitzmann MF, Gail MH, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A,
Sinha R. A prospective study of red and processed meat intake in re-
lation to cancer risk. PLoS Med 2007;4:e325.
32. Chan JM, Wang F, Holly EA. Pancreatic cancer, animal protein and
dietary fat in a population-based study, San Francisco Bay Area,
California. Cancer Causes Control 2007;18:1153–67.
33. Park SY, Murphy SP, Wilkens LR, Henderson BE, Kolonel LN. Le-
gume and isoflavone intake and prostate cancer risk: the Multiethnic
Cohort Study. Int J Cancer 2008;123:927–32.
34. Warri A, Saarinen NM, Makela S, Hilakivi-Clarke L. The role of early
life genistein exposures in modifying breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer
2008;98:1485–93.
35. van der Pols JC, Bain C, Gunnell D, Smith GD, Frobisher C, Martin
RM. Childhood dairy intake and adult cancer risk: 65-y follow-up of
the Boyd Orr cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:1722–9.
36. Jacobsen BK, Knutsen SF, Fraser GE. Does high soy milk intake re-
duce prostate cancer incidence? The Adventist Health Study. Cancer
Causes Control 1998;9:553–7.
37. Allen NE, Key T, Appleby PN, et al. Animal foods, protein, calcium
and prostate cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation into
Cancer and Nutrition. Br J Cancer 2008;98:1574–81.
38. Qin LQ, Xu JY, Wang PY, Tong J, Hoshi K. Milk consumption is a risk
factor for prostate cancer in Western countries: evidence from cohort
studies. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2007;16:467–76.
39. Chan JM, Stampfer MJ, Ma J, Gann PH, Garziano JM, Giovannucci
EL. Dairy products, calcium, and prostate cancer risk in the Physician’s
Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;74:549–54.
40. New SA. Do vegetarians have a normal bone mass? Osteoporos Int
2004;15:679–88.
41. Chiu JF, Lan SJ, Yang CY, et al. Long-term vegetarian diet and bone
mineral density in postmenopausal Taiwanese women. Calcif Tissue
Int 1997;60:245–9.
42. Lau EMC, Kwok T, Woo J, Ho SC. Bone mineral density in Chinese
elderly female vegetarians, vegans, lacto-ovegetarians and omnivores.
Eur J Clin Nutr 1998;52:60–4.
43. Chan HHL, Lau EMC, Woo J, Lin F, Sham A, Leung PC. Dietary
calcium intake, physical activity and risk of vertebral fractures in
Chinese. Osteoporos Int 1996;6:228–32.
44. Lau E, Donnan S, Barker DJ, Cooper C. Calcium intake and physical
activity in fractured proximal femur in Hong Kong. BMJ 1988;297:
1441–3.
45. Smith AM. Veganism and osteoporosis: a review of the current liter-
ature. Int J Nurs Pract 2006;12:302–6.
46. Appleby P, Roddam A, Allen N, Key T. Comparative fracture risk in
vegetarians and nonvegetarians in EPIC-Oxford. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007;
61:1400–6.
47. Lanham-New SA. Importance of calcium, vitamin D and vitamin K for
osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Proc Nutr Soc 2008;67:163–76.
48. Yaegashi Y, Onoda T, Tanno K, Kuribayashi T, Sakata K, Orimo H.
Association of hip fracture and intake of calcium, magnesium, vitamin
D, and vitamin K. Eur J Epidemiol 2008;23:219–25.
49. New SA. Intake of fruit and vegetables: implications for bone health.
Proc Nutr Soc 2003;62:889–99.
50. Cassidy A, Albertazzi P, Lise Nielsen I, et al. Critical review of health
effects of soyabean phyto-oestrogens in post-menopausal women. Proc
Nutr Soc 2006;65:76–92.
51. Arnett TR, Spowage M. Modulation of the resorptive activity of rat
osteoclasts by small changes in extracellular pH near the physiological
range. Bone 1996;18:277–9.
52. Buclin T, Cosma M, Appenzeller M, et al. Diet acids and alkalis in-
fluence calcium retention in bone. Osteoporos Int 2001;12:493–9.
53. Tucker KL, Hannan MT, Kiel DP. The acid-base hypothesis: diet and
bone in the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. Eur J Nutr 2001;40:
231–7.
HEALTH EFFECTS OF VEGAN DIETS 1631S
at Universitaetsspital-Bibliothek USB on November 13, 2009 www.ajcn.orgDownloaded from
54. New SA, Bolton-Smith C, Grubb DA, Reid DM. Nutritional influences
on mineral density: a cross-sectional study in premenopausal women.
Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65:1831–9.
55. Vergnaud P, Garnero P, Meunier PJ, Breart G, Kamihagi K, Delmas
PD. Undercarboxylated osteocalcin measured with a specific immu-
noassay predicts hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS Study.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82:719–24.
56. Szulc P, Arlot M, Chapuy MC, Duboeuf F, Muenier PJ, Delmas PD.
Serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin correlates with hip bone mineral
density in elderly women. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1591–5.
57. Feskanich D, Weber P, Willett WC, Rockett H, Booth SL, Colditz GA.
Vitamin K intake and hip fractures in women: a prospective study. Am
J Clin Nutr 1999;69:74–9.
58. Booth SL, Tucker KL, Chen H, et al. Dietary vitamin K intakes are
associated with hip fracture but not with bone mineral density in el-
derly men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71:1201–8.
59. Ma DF, Qin LQ, Wang PY, Katoh R. Soy isoflavone intake increases
bone mineral density in the spine of menopausal women: meta-analysis
of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 2008;27:57–64.
60. Ma DF, Qin LQ, Wang PY, Katoh R. Soy isoflavone intake inhibits bone
resorption and stimulates bone formation in menopausal women: meta-
analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Clin Nutr 2008;62:155–61.
61. Marini H, Minutoli L, Polito F, et al. Effects of the phytoestrogen
genistein on bone metabolism in osteopenic postmenopausal women:
a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:839–47.
62. Burdge GC, Finnegan YE, Minihane ME, Williams CM, Wootton SA.
Effect of altered dietary n–3 fatty acid intake upon plasma lipid fatty
acid composition, conversion of [13C]alpha-linolenic acid to longer-chain
fatty acids and partitioning towards beta-oxidation in older men. Br J
Nutr 2003;90:311–21.
63. Burdge GC, Wootton SA. Conversion of alpha-linolenic acid to eico-
sapentaenoic, docosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids in young
women. Br J Nutr 2002;88:411–20.
64. Rosell MS, Lloyd-Wright Z, Appleby PN, Sanders TAB, Allen NE,
Key TJ. Long-chain n23 polyunsaturated fatty acids in plasma in
British meat-eating, vegetarian, and vegan men. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;
82:327–34.
65. Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine of the National
Academies. Dietary fats: total fats and fatty acids. Dietary Reference
Intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol,
protein, and amino acids (macronutrients). Washington, DC: National
Academy Press, 2005:422–541.
66. Geppert J, Kraft V, Demmelmair H, Koletzko B. Microalgal docosa-
hexaenoic acid decreases plasma triacylglycerol in normolipidaemic
vegetarians: a randomised trial. Br J Nutr 2006;95:779–86.
67. Sanders TA, Gleason K, Griffen B, Miller GJ. Influence of an algal
triacylglycerol containing docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n23) and do-
cosapentaenoic acid (22:5n26) on cardiovascular risk factors in
healthy men and women. Br J Nutr 2006;95:525–31.
68. Webb AR, Kline L, Holick MF. Influence of season and latitude on the
cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D3: exposure to winter sunlight in
Boston and Edmonton will not promote vitamin D3 synthesis in human
skin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988;67:373–8.
69. Trang HM, Cole DE, Rubin LA, Pierratos A, Siu S, Vieth R. Evidence
that vitamin D3 increases serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D more efficiently
than does vitamin D2. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68:854–8.
70. Craig WJ. Iron status of vegetarians. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;59(suppl):
1233S–7S.
71. Wilson AK, Ball MJ. Nutrient intake and iron status of Australian male
vegetarians. Eur J Clin Nutr 1999;53:189–94.
72. Majchrzak D, Singer I, Manner M, et al. B-vitamin status and con-
centrations of homocysteine in Austrian omnivores, vegetarians and
vegans. Ann Nutr Metab 2006;50:485–91.
73. McNulty H, Pentieva K, Hoey L, Ward M. Homocysteine, B-vitamins
and CVD. Proc Nutr Soc 2008;67:232–7.
74. McLean RR, Jacques PF, Selhub J, et al. Plasma B vitamins, homo-
cysteine and their relation with bone loss and hip fracture in elderly
men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:2206–12.
75. Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine. Vitamin B12: Dietary
Reference Intakes for thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B
6
, folate,
vitamin B
12
, pantothenic acid. Washington, DC: Biotin, and Choline.
National Academy Press, 1998;306–56.
76. Hunt JR. Moving towards a plant-based diet: are iron and zinc at risk?
Nutr Rev 2002;60:127–34.
77. Gibson RS. Content and bioavailability of trace elements in vegetarian
diets. Am J Clin Nutr 1994;59(suppl):1223S–32S.
78. Zhao Y, Martin BR, Weaver CM. Calcium bioavailability of calcium
carbonate fortified soymilk is equivalent to cow’s milk in young
women. J Nutr 2005;135:2379–82.
79. Andon MB, Peacock M, Kanerva RL, De Castro JA. Calcium ab-
sorption from apple and orange juice fortified with calcium citrate
malate (CCM). J Am Coll Nutr 1996;15:313–6.
80. Messina V, Melina V, Mangels AR. A new food guide for North
American vegetarians. J Am Diet Assoc 2003;103:771–5.
81. Barnard ND, Cohen J, Jenkins DJA, et al. A low-fat vegan diet im-
proves glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in a random-
ized clinical trial in individuals with type diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;
29:1777–83.
82. Brathwaite N, Fraser HS, Modeste N, Broome H, King R. Obesity,
diabetes, hypertension, and vegetarian status among Seventh-day Ad-
ventists in Barbados: preliminary results. Ethn Dis 2003;13:34–9.
83. Rajaram S, Sabate
´J. Preface. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):
1541S–2S.
84. Jacobs DR Jr, Gross MD, Tapsell LC. Food synergy: an operational
concept for understanding nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):
1543S–8S.
85. Jacobs DR Jr, Haddad EH, Lanou AJ, Messina MJ. Food, plant food,
and vegetarian diets in the US dietary guidelines: conclusions of an
expert panel. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1549S–52S.
86. Lampe JW. Interindividual differences in response to plant-based
diets: implications for cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):
1553S–7S.
87. Simon JA, Chen Y-H, Bent S. The relation of a-linolenic acid to the
risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J
Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1558S–64S.
88. Pierce JP, Natarajan L, Caan BJ, et al. Dietary change and reduced
breast cancer events among women without hot flashes after treatment
of early-stage breast cancer: subgroup analysis of the Women’s Healthy
Eating and Living Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1565S–71S.
89. Newby PK. Plant foods and plant-based diets: protective against
childhood obesity? Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1572S–87S.
90. Barnard ND, Cohen J, Jenkins DJA, et al. A low-fat vegan diet and
a conventional diabetes diet in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a ran-
domized, controlled, 74-wk clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;
89(suppl):1588S–96S.
91. Mangat I. Do vegetarians have to eat fish for optimal crdiovascular
protection? Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1597S–601S.
92. Willis LM, Shukitt-Hale B, Joseph JA. Modulation of cognition and
behavior in aged animals: role for antioxidant- and essential fatty
acid–rich plant foods. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1602S–6S.
93. Fraser GE. Vegetarian diets: what do we know of their effects on
common chronic diseases? Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1607S–12S.
94. Key TJ, Appleby PN, Spencer EA, Travis RC, Roddam AW, Allen NE.
Cancer incidence in vegetarians: results from the European Prospective
Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Oxford). Am J Clin Nutr
2009;89(suppl):1620S–6S.
95. Key TJ, Appleby PN, Spencer EA, Travis RC, Roddam AW, Allen NE.
Mortality in British vegetarians: results from the European Prospective
Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Oxford). Am J Clin Nutr
2009;89(suppl):1613S–9S.
96. Weaver CM. Should dairy be recommended as part of a healthy veg-
etarian diet? Point. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1634S–7S.
97. Lanou AJ. Should dairy be recommended as part of a healthy vege-
tarian diet? Counterpoint. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1638S–42S.
98. Sabate
´J, Ang Y. Nuts and health outcomes: new epidemiologic evi-
dence. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1643S–8S.
99. Ros E. Nuts and novel biomarkers of cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin
Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1649S–56S.
100. Rajaram S, Haddad EH, Mejia A, Sabate
´J. Walnuts and fatty fish
influence different serum lipid fractions in normal to mildly hyper-
lipidemic individuals: a randomized controlled study. Am J Clin Nutr
2009;89(suppl):1657S–63S.
101. Lampe JW. Is equol the key to the efficacy of soy foods? Am J Clin
Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1664S–7S.
102. Badger TM, Gilchrist JM, Pivik RT, et al. The health implications of
soy infant formula. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1668S–72S.
103. Messina M, Wu AH. Perspectives on the soy–breast cancer relation.
Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1673S–9S.
1632S CRAIG
at Universitaetsspital-Bibliothek USB on November 13, 2009 www.ajcn.orgDownloaded from
104. Lo
¨nnerdal B. Soybean ferritin: implications for iron status of vegeta-
rians. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1680S–5S.
105. Chan J, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Fraser GE. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D
status of vegetarians, partial vegetarians, and nonvegetarians: the Ad-
ventist Health Study-2. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1686S–92S.
106. Elmadfa I, Singer I. Vitamin B-12 and homocysteine status among
vegetarians: a global perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):
1693S–8S.
107. Marlow HJ, Hayes WK, Soret S, Carter RL, Schwab ER, Sabate
´J. Diet
and the environment: does what you eat matter? Am J Clin Nutr 2009;
89(suppl):1699S–703S.
108. Carlsson-Kanyama A, Gonza
´lez AD. Potential contributions of food
consumption patterns to climate change. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;
89(suppl):1704S–9S.
109. Eshel G, Martin PA. Geophysics and nutritional science: toward a no-
vel, unified paradigm. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1710S–6S.
HEALTH EFFECTS OF VEGAN DIETS 1633S
at Universitaetsspital-Bibliothek USB on November 13, 2009 www.ajcn.orgDownloaded from
... Soy isoflavones have been shown to improve bone health in postmenopausal women. The soy isoflavone genistein substantially increased the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and femoral neck compared to a placebo in a 24-month randomized clinical study involving osteopenic postmenopausal women [43]. ...
... Moreover, dietary components such as fiber, vitamin C, carotenoids, flavonoids, and other phytochemicals demonstrate protective effects against several malignancies, while Allium vegetables provide shields from gastric cancer and garlic offers protection against colorectal cancer. Foods abundant in lycopene, like tomatoes, are recognized for their protective effects against prostate cancer [43]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The increased consumption of fruit and vegetables is essential for moving towards a healthier and more sustainable diet. Vegetarian diets are gaining in popularity due to their environmental and health implications; however, there is a need for additional research investigating pesticide residues in these foods. It is increasingly recognized that the global food system must prioritize nutritional quality, health, and environmental impact over quantity. Food contaminants, including pesticides, mycotoxins, and heavy metals, pose a substantial threat to food safety due to their persistent nature and harmful effects. We conducted a literature search utilizing four distinct databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, NIH, ScienceDirect) and several combinations of keywords (pesticides, food, vegetarian diet, toxicity, sustainable, removal). Consequently, we selected recent and relevant studies for the proposed topic. We have incorporated articles that discuss pesticide residues in food items, particularly in plant-based products. This study rigorously analyzes the harmful environmental impacts of pesticides and ultimately provides sustainable solutions for their elimination or reduction, along with environmentally sound alternatives to pesticide use. This study concludes that the transition towards sustainable agriculture and food production is essential for reducing pesticide residues in food, thereby protecting human health, wildlife populations, and the environment. This paper argues for the urgent need to transform global food systems to prioritize health and sustainability.
... et al, 2006) [5] . It has been demonstrated that avoiding foods with animal origin lowers the risk of cardiovascular disease, also known as CVD, hypertension, obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and some malignancies (Craig WJ et al., 2009;McEvoy CT et al., 2012) [7,25] . ...
... et al, 2006) [5] . It has been demonstrated that avoiding foods with animal origin lowers the risk of cardiovascular disease, also known as CVD, hypertension, obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and some malignancies (Craig WJ et al., 2009;McEvoy CT et al., 2012) [7,25] . ...
... "Vegan" terimi "hayvansal ürünler tüketmeyen kişi" olarak tanımlanır ve 1944 yılında Donald Watson tarafından "vejetaryen" teriminden türetilmiştir (Gheihman, 2021;Mathias, 2022 (Volpe, 2005;Jacobsen, 2006). Buna ek olarak, süt ürünlerinden kaynaklanan alerji potansiyeli ve laktoz intoleransı, soya bazlı süt ürünleri ikamelerinin popülerliğini artırmıştır (Craig, 2009 ...
Book
Full-text available
Gastronomi; toplumların kültürel yapıları, inanışları, içinde yaşadıkları coğrafyanın özellikleri ve diğer toplumlarla etkileşimleri gibi pek çok değişkenden etkilenerek ortaya çıkan deneyimsel ve dinamik bir süreçtir. Günümüzde gastronomi, yalnızca yöresel çerçevede beslenme ihtiyacının giderilmesinde ortaya konulan ürünleri değil, farklı lezzetler üretme ve deneyimlemeyi, kültürler arası etkileşimi ve yeni beslenme eğilimlerini de ifade etmektedir. Dijitalleşme ve sosyal medyanın da etkisi ile artan kültürlerarası etkileşim, beslenme eğilimleri ve gastronomi cephesinde yenilikleri beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu kitap, gastronomiye etki eden unsurları ve ortaya çıkan güncel beslenme eğilimlerini kapsamlı bir şekilde ele almaktadır. Bu çalışmada gastronomik yapı, etkilendiği alanlar ve eğilimleri olmak üzere iki ayrı kapsamda ele alınmıştır. İlk dört bölümde, gastronomik yapının nelerden etkilenerek şekillendiği açıklarken kalan dokuz bölümde gastronomik ve toplumsal yapı neticesinde ortaya çıkan güncel beslenme eğilimleri açıklanmaktadır.
... Adhering to a vegan diet involves avoiding all foods derived from animals and therefore consuming more plant-derived foods. Consuming a vegan diet typically results in increased consumption of dietary fiber and certain types of vitamins, minerals, and plant-derived polyphenols compared to other types of diets 7 . Increased consumption of dietary fiber has been associated with modulation of the gut microbiota, resulting in increased production of short-chain fatty acids and other beneficial metabolites 8,9 . ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes and obesity pose a significant global health burden. Plant-based diets, including vegan diets, are linked to favorable metabolic outcomes, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In a randomized trial involving 21 pairs of identical twins, we investigated the effects of vegan and omnivorous diets on the host metabolome, immune system, and gut microbiome. Vegan diets induced significant shifts in serum and stool metabolomes, cytokine profiles, and gut microbial composition. Notably, vegan diet subjects exhibited elevated serum glycine levels despite lower dietary glycine intake, linked to reduced abundance of the gut pathobiont Bilophila wadsworthia. Functional studies demonstrated that B. wadsworthia metabolizes glycine via the glycine reductase pathway and modulates host glycine availability. Removing B. wadsworthia from gnotobiotic mice elevated glycine levels and improved metabolic markers. These findings reveal a previously underappreciated mechanism by which the gut microbiota regulates host metabolic status through diet.
Article
Full-text available
This article examines the benefits of plant-based diets in lowering cholesterol levels and promoting heart health. A growing body of evidence suggests that diets rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, and seeds can significantly improve lipid profiles and reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases. The mechanisms through which plant-based diets exert their effects include the high content of dietary fiber, antioxidants, and healthy fats, which collectively contribute to the reduction of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and inflammation. Furthermore, the article discusses the role of specific plant-based foods, such as oats, beans, and avocados, in heart health, highlighting their ability to enhance endothelial function and improve overall cardiovascular outcomes. By adopting a plant-based dietary pattern, individuals can not only lower their cholesterol levels but also embrace a lifestyle that supports long-term heart health.
Chapter
Proteins are a necessary element for human nutrition. Flora and fauna can be used to provide dietary proteins. Despite its higher need, animal protein is often considered less environmentally sustainable. To preserve food affordability, environmental stability, ethical considerations, increased food safety, meet growing consumer demand, and prevent protein-energy malnutrition, a gradual shift from animal to plant-based protein foods may be preferable. Plant-based proteins are growing in popularity and due to these factors, it is anticipated that this upward tendency will last for the next several decades. Plant proteins supply vital amino acids and other essential macronutrients for complete protein nutrition. The primary goal of this chapter is to present an overview of the nutritional value of plant proteins as an alternative to meet the requirements of proteins and how they contribute to a higher quality of life for humans. As a result, the current research thoroughly examines the comparison between the resource requirements of both animal and plant protein production, their environmentally friendly effects, and their relationship between exercise performance and dietary patterns and consequences for nutrition. Additionally, this chapter contains a few case studies identifying the technological hurdles for future research and focuses on the new technologies for enhancing the bioavailability of plant proteins.
Preprint
Full-text available
This study explores the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3 (good health and well-being) and the Theravada Buddhist concept of the four Rūpa-Samutthānā (karmic, mental, seasonal, and nutritional/food). This study aims to construct a Buddhist health framework to address contemporary health challenges. First, this study analyzes the concept of the four dimensions of SDG 3 to gain a holistic understanding of health. Second, this study examines the Rūpa-Samutthānā and explores their relationship with health. A literature analysis approach is used to combine Buddhist texts with modern health promotion principles. The results show that the Rūpa-Samutthānā not only helps understand the causal relationship between health and disease, but also supports a health framework that values psychological regulation, moral self-discipline, and lifestyle moderation. Finally, this study proposes a Theravada Buddhist health framework to complement the goals of SDG 3 and provide pathways for individual well-being and global health policies inspired by Buddhist thought.
Article
This article investigates the extent to which health professionals are equipped to support vegan mothers in the UK and how stigma plays a part in this issue. Veganism has grown in popularity in the UK in recent years (as well as in many other countries worldwide) with the environmental, health and animal welfare benefits of the lifestyle becoming more widely researched and publicised. However, research into the topic of veganism has highlighted that, up until recently, many vegans experienced stigma for their beliefs, with the UK being no exception. Similarly, a growing body of research has highlighted the long-accepted and gendered issue of mum-shaming, whereby mothers, as opposed to fathers, are disproportionately criticised and blamed for their parenting skills. In this article we want to examine the experience of women who fit into both categories of veganism and motherhood in their encounters with health professionals during pregnancy and while raising their babies on a vegan diet. Adopting semi-structured interviews, this study gauged the opinions of a sample of vegan mothers, non-vegan mothers, midwives and paediatricians. Our findings indicate that in the UK, healthcare professionals are not equipped to provide vegan mothers with nutritional advice. This was found to be due to a lack of understanding of veganism, which, in some cases, fuelled negative ideas on veganism and led to stigma towards vegan pregnant women and vegan mothers. All healthcare professionals interviewed stressed the severe lack of training on vegan nutrition, as well as nutrition more generally.
Chapter
Full-text available
Yeryüzünde tüketici gereksinimlerinin sonsuz ve insanların yaşamlarını sürdürebilecekleri kaynakların kıt olması, hem günlük hayatta hem de üretim süreçlerinde insanları kaynakları kullanırken daha verimli olmaya zorlarken bu kullanılan kaynakların da gelecek nesiller tarafından kullanılması gerektiği düşüncesi beraberinde gelmektedir. Gelecek kuşaklara kullanılan tüm kaynakların dengeli bir şekilde aktarılması hususunda düşük karbon ayak izi, su tasarrufu, toprak ve arazi kullanımı, enerji tüketimi, kirlilik ve atık yönetimi ve gıda güvenliği gibi nedenlerle veganlık sürdürülebilirlik açısından önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda vegan tüketim anlayışı, çevresel etkileri azaltma, doğal kaynakları koruma ve iklim değişikliğiyle mücadele etme konularında büyük bir potansiyele sahip olan gastronomi trendi olarak literatürde yer almaktadır. Toplumların kendilerinden sonra gelen nesillere daha iyi bir gelecek bırakma isteği günümüzde daha bilinçli bir yapıda ilerlemekte ve insanların satın alma ve tüketim alışkanlıkları geleceğin sorumluluğu altında değişime uğramaktadır. İnsanların bu yöndeki satın alma davranışları da yaşam tarzlarını şekillendirmektedir. Bu bağlamda kitabın bu bölümünde vegan yaşam tarzına sahip kişilerin sürdürülebilirlik açısından motivasyon sebepleri açıklanarak vegan yaşam tarzının gıdaların sürdürülebilirliğine etkisi ve veganlığın çevresel, sosyal ve ekonomik boyutlarının sürdürülebilirlik kapsamında değerlendirilmesine yer verilmiştir.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Plasma concentrations of long-chain n−3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are lower in vegetarians and in vegans than in omnivores. No data are available on whether these concentrations differ between long- and short-term vegetarians and vegans. Objectives: We compared plasma fatty acid composition in meat-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans and examined whether the proportions of eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n–3; EPA), docosapentaenoic acid (22:5n–3; DPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n–3; DHA) were related to the subjects’ duration of adherence to their diets or to the proportions of plasma linoleic acid (18:2n–6; LA) and α-linolenic acid (18:3n-3; ALA). Design: The present cross-sectional study included 196 meat-eating, 231 vegetarian, and 232 vegan men in the United Kingdom. Information on anthropometry, diet, and smoking habits was obtained through a questionnaire. Total fatty acid composition in plasma was measured. Results: The proportions of plasma EPA and DHA were lower in the vegetarians and in the vegans than in the meat-eaters, whereas only small differences were seen for DPA. Plasma EPA, DPA, and DHA proportions were not significantly associated with the duration of time since the subjects became vegetarian or vegan, which ranged from <1 y to >20 y. In the vegetarians and the vegans, plasma DHA was inversely correlated with plasma LA. Conclusions: The proportions of plasma long-chain n−3 fatty acids were not significantly affected by the duration of adherence to a vegetarian or vegan diet. This finding suggests that when animal foods are wholly excluded from the diet, the endogenous production of EPA and DHA results in low but stable plasma concentrations of these fatty acids.
Article
Full-text available
The extent to which women of reproductive age are able to convert the n-3 fatty acid alpha-linolenic acid (ALNA) to eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) was investigated in vivo by measuring the concentrations of labelled fatty acids in plasma for 21 d following the ingestion of [U-13C]ALNA (700 mg). [13C]ALNA excursion was greatest in cholesteryl ester (CE) (224 (sem 70) micromol/l over 21 d) compared with triacylglycerol (9-fold), non-esterified fatty acids (37-fold) and phosphatidylcholine (PC, 7-fold). EPA excursion was similar in both PC (42 (sem 8) micromol/l) and CE (42 (sem 9) micromol/l) over 21 d. In contrast both [13C]DPA and [13C]DHA were detected predominately in PC (18 (sem 4) and 27 (sem 7) micromol/l over 21 d, respectively). Estimated net fractional ALNA inter-conversion was EPA 21 %, DPA 6 % and DHA 9 %. Approximately 22 % of administered [13C]ALNA was recovered as 13CO2 on breath over the first 24 h of the study. These results suggest differential partitioning of ALNA, EPA and DHA between plasma lipid classes, which may facilitate targeting of individual n-3 fatty acids to specific tissues. Comparison with previous studies suggests that women may possess a greater capacity for ALNA conversion than men. Such metabolic capacity may be important for meeting the demands of the fetus and neonate for DHA during pregnancy and lactation. Differences in DHA status between women both in the non-pregnant state and in pregnancy may reflect variations in metabolic capacity for DHA synthesis.
Chapter
Vegans avoid all animal products in their diet, even eggs and dairy products. The reason for these choices is often animal rights rather than the expectation of better health. One might, however, predict that certain risk factors would have even more favorable values for vegans than for lactoovo vegetarians since the intake of saturated fats, cholesterol, and sodium is lower still in vegans, and their consumption of dietary fiber and potassium is greater. If a lacto-ovo vegetarian diet is beneficial, do vegans gain even further benefits? Evidence that addresses this question is presented in this chapter. My intention is not to establish the nutritional adequacy of the vegan diet in terms of recommended daily allowances for nutrients and vitamins, but, in keeping with the rest of this book, to focus on the risk for common chronic diseases. However, a vegan diet is nutritionally adequate if certain precautions are taken (see Chapter 15), and these have been succinctly reviewed by the American Dietetic Association (ADA Reports, 1997).
Book
Research into the role of diet in chronic disease can be difficult to interpret. Measurement errors in different studies often produce conflicting answers to the same questions. Seventh-day Adventists and other groups with many vegetarian members are ideal study populations because they have a wide range of dietary habits that adds power and clarity to research findings. This book analyses the results of such studies, focusing on heart disease and cancer. These studies support the benefits of a vegetarian diet and in addition provide evidence about the effects of individual foods and food groups on disease risk that is relevant to all who are interested in good health. The author places the findings in the broader context of well-designed nutritional studies of the general population. He discusses the degree of confidence we can have in particular relationships between diet and disease based on the strength of the evidence. The book is written in a clear style with an extensive glossary, and should be accessible to a wide audience.
Article
Background: Dairy consumption affects biological pathways associated with carcinogenesis. Evidence for a link between cancer risk and dairy consumption in adulthood is increasing, but associations with childhood dairy consumption have not been studied adequately. Objective: We investigated whether dairy consumption in childhood is associated with cancer incidence and mortality in adulthood. Design: From 1937 through 1939, some 4999 children living in England and Scotland participated in a study of family food consumption, assessed from 7-d household food inventories. The National Health Service central register was used to ascertain cancer registrations and deaths between 1948 and 2005 in the 4383 traced cohort members. Per capita household intake estimates for dairy products and calcium were used as proxy for individual intake. Results: During the follow-up period, 770 cancer registrations or cancer deaths occurred. High childhood total dairy intake was associated with a near-tripling in the odds of colorectal cancer [multivariate odds ratio: 2.90 (95% CI: 1.26, 6.65); 2-sided P for trend = 0.005] compared with low intake, independent of meat, fruit, and vegetable intakes and socioeconomic indicators. Milk intake showed a similar association with colorectal cancer risk. High milk intake was weakly inversely associated with prostate cancer risk (P for trend = 0.11). Childhood dairy intake was not associated with breast and stomach cancer risk; a positive association with lung cancer risk was confounded by smoking behavior during adulthood. Conclusions: A family diet rich in dairy products during childhood is associated with a greater risk of colorectal cancer in adulthood. Confirmation of possible underlying biological mechanisms is needed.
Article
Background: Adolescents sometimes become vegetarian for ethical rather than health reasons. This may result in health problems caused by lack of interest in and knowledge of nutrition. Objective: We compared the dietary intake and nutritional status of young Swedish vegans and omnivores. Design: The dietary intakes of 30 vegans (15 males and 15 females; mean age: 17.5 ± 1.0 y) and 30 sex-, age-, and height-matched omnivores were assessed with the use of a diet-history interview and validated by the doubly labeled water method and by measuring nitrogen, sodium, and potassium excretion in urine. Iron status and serum vitamin B-12 and folate concentrations were measured in blood samples. Results: The diet-history method underestimated energy intake by 13% and potassium intake by 7% compared with the doubly labeled water method and 24-h urine excretion, respectively. Reported dietary nitrogen and sodium intakes agreed with the 24-h urinary excretion measure. Vegans had higher intakes of vegetables, legumes, and dietary supplements and lower intakes of cake and cookies and candy and chocolate than did omnivores. Vegans had dietary intakes lower than the average requirements of riboflavin, vitamin B-12, vitamin D, calcium, and selenium. Intakes of calcium and selenium remained low even with the inclusion of dietary supplements. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of low iron status among vegans (20%) and omnivores (23%). Two vegans with low intakes of vitamin B-12 had low serum concentrations. Conclusion: The dietary habits of the vegans varied considerably and did not comply with the average requirements for some essential nutrients.
Conference Paper
Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that regular consumption of fruits and vegetables is strongly associated with reduced risk of developing chronic diseases, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease. It is now widely believed that the actions of the antioxidant nutrients alone do not explain the observed health benefits of diets rich in fruits and vegetables, because taken alone, the individual antioxidants studied in clinical trials do not appear to have consistent preventive effects. Work performed by our group and others has shown that fruits and vegetable phytochemical extracts exhibit strong antioxidant and anti proliferative activities and that the major part of total antioxidant activity is from the combination of phytochemicals. We proposed that the additive and synergistic effects of phytochemicals in fruits and vegetables are responsible for these potent antioxidant and anticancer activities and that the benefit of a diet rich in fruits and vegetables is attributed to the complex mixture of phytochemicals present in whole foods. This explains why no single antioxidant can replace the combination of natural phytochemicals in fruits and vegetables to achieve the health benefits. The evidence suggests that antioxidants or bioactive compounds are best acquired through whole-food consumption, not from expensive dietary supplements. We believe that a recommendation that consumers eat 5 to 10 servings of a wide variety of fruits and vegetables daily is an appropriate strategy for significantly reducing the risk of chronic diseases and to meet their nutrient requirements for optimum health.