Pharmacology education currently lacks an agreed knowledge curriculum. Evidence from physics and biology education indicates that core concepts are useful and effective structures around which such a curriculum can be designed to facilitate student learning. Building on previous work, we developed a novel, criterion-based method to identify the core concepts of pharmacology education. Five novel criteria were developed, based on a literature search, to separate core concepts in pharmacology from topics and facts. Core concepts were agreed to be big ideas, enduring, difficult, applicable across contexts, and useful to solve problems. An exploratory survey of 33 pharmacology educators from Australia and New Zealand produced 109 terms, which were reduced to a working list of 26 concepts during an online workshop. Next, an expert group of 12 educators refined the working list to 19 concepts, by applying the five criteria and consolidating synonyms, and added three additional concepts that emerged during discussions. A confirmatory survey of a larger group resulted in 17 core concepts of pharmacology education. This list may be useful for educators to evaluate existing curricula, design new curricula, and to inform the development of a concept inventory to test attainment of the core concepts in pharmacology. K E Y W O R D S concept inventory, core concept, pharmacology education, postgraduate education, undergraduate education 2 of 13 | WHITE ET al. 1 | INTRODUC TI ON In the early 1990s, a startling, and very distressing discovery sparked an ongoing revolution in undergraduate physics education and subsequently biology education. Hestenes and his colleagues demonstrated that even the best prepared fourth-year students majoring in physics in elite US institutions were unable to apply key concepts. Their seminal work developing 1 and evaluating 2 the Force Concept Inventory found, for example, that while 80% of students could recite Newton's third law at the beginning of a course, less than 15% fully understood it at the end. These findings suggested that students had not developed the effective conceptual frameworks essential to human learning and application of knowledge. 3 Fortunately, the ability to measure students' conceptual understanding, as well as to identify the gap between what has been taught versus what was learned, has resulted in substantial advances in physics and biology education that have improved learning of these critical disciplines. The strides these educators made have yet to be applied systematically to the discipline of pharmacology. We argue that a consensus list of the core concepts of phar-macology education is well overdue. Over 30 years of educational research have established that the identification of core concepts, and the development of concept inventories to assess them, can be transformative innovations. Physics education innovators 1,4,5 were joined by a large, coordinated approach in biology education in the early 2000s. The US National Science Foundation and American Association of Advancement in Science brought together 500 educators to produce five core concepts in biology within a Vision and Change Manifesto. 6 Subsequently, resources have been developed to help biology educators to incorporate the teaching and assessment of core concepts into their curricula. 7 Sub-disciplines within biology, including physiology and microbiology, 7-11 and other disciplines such as information technology 12 and engineering statistics 13 have identified core concepts. In contrast, pharmacology education currently lacks an agreed set of core concepts.