ArticlePDF Available

We Already Grow Enough Food for 10 Billion People … and Still Can't End Hunger

DOI:10.1080/10440046.2012.695331
Authors:
Eric Holt-Giménez at Institute for Food and Development Policy
Eric Holt-Giménez
  • Institute for Food and Development Policy
Annie Shattuck
Annie Shattuck
Annie Shattuck
  • This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
Miguel A. Altieri at University of California, Berkeley
Miguel A. Altieri
Hans Herren
Hans Herren
Hans Herren
  • This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
Show all 5 authorsHide
Download full-text PDF
Read full-text
Download citation
Content uploaded by Eric Holt-Giménez
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Eric Holt-Giménez on May 07, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
This article was downloaded by: [Mr Eric Holt-Gimenez]
On: 01 August 2012, At: 11:02
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered
office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture
Publication details, including instructions for authors and
subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wjsa20
We Already Grow Enough Food for 10
Billion People … and Still Can't End
Hunger
Eric Holt-Giménez
a
, Annie Shattuck
b
, Miguel Altieri
b
, Hans
Herren
c
& Steve Gliessman
d
a
Food First, Oakland, CA
b
University of California, Berkeley, CA
c
Millennium Institute, Washington, DC
d
University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
Version of record first published: 24 Jul 2012
To cite this article: Eric Holt-Giménez, Annie Shattuck, Miguel Altieri, Hans Herren & Steve Gliessman
(2012): We Already Grow Enough Food for 10 Billion People … and Still Can't End Hunger, Journal of
Sustainable Agriculture, 36:6, 595-598
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2012.695331
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation
that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any
instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary
sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings,
demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 36:595–598, 2012
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 1044-0046 print/1540-7578 online
DOI: 10.1080/10440046.2012.695331
EDITORIAL
We Already Grow Enough Food for 10 Billion
People ... and Still Can’t End Hunger
A new a study from McGill University and the University of Minnesota pub-
lished in the journal Nature compared organic and conventional yields from
66 studies and 316 trials (Seufert et al. 2012). Researchers found that organic
systems on average yielded 25% less than conventional, chemical-intensive
systems—although this was highly variable and context specific. Embracing
the current conventional wisdom, authors argue for a combination of con-
ventional and organic farming to meet “the twin challenge of feeding a
growing population, with rising demand for meat and high-calorie diets,
while simultaneously minimizing its global environmental impacts” (Seufert
et al. 2012, 3).
Unfortunately, neither the study nor the conventional wisdom addresses
the real cause of hunger.
Hunger is caused by poverty and inequality, not scarcity. For the past
two decades, the rate of global food production has increased faster than
the rate of global population growth. According to the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations (2009a, 2009b) the world produces
more than 1
1
/
2
times enough food to feed everyone on the planet. That’s
already enough to feed 10 billion people, the world’s 2050 projected pop-
ulation peak. But the people making less than $2 a day—most of whom
are resource-poor farmers cultivating un-viably small plots of land—cannot
afford to buy this food.
In reality, the bulk of industrially produced grain crops (most yield
reduction in the study was found in grains) goes to biofuels and confined
animal feedlots rather than food for the one billion hungry. The call to
double food production by 2050 only applies if we continue to prioritize the
growing population of livestock and automobiles over hungry people.
Actually, what this new study does tell us is how much smaller the yield
gap is between organic and conventional farming than what critics of organic
agriculture have assumed. Smil’s (2001) claim that organic farming requires
twice the land base has become a conventional mantra. In fact, when we
unpack the data from the Nature study, we find that for many crops and
in many instances, the reported yield gap is minimal. With new advances
in seed breeding for organic systems, and with the transition of commercial
595
Downloaded by [Mr Eric Holt-Gimenez] at 11:02 01 August 2012
596 E. Holt-Giménez et al.
organic farms to diversified farming systems that have long been shown to
“over-yield” in comparison to monocultures, this yield gap will close even
further (see Vandermeer 1989).
The longest running side-by-side study comparing conventional chemi-
cal agriculture with organic methods (over 30 years) found organic yields
match conventional in good years and outperform them under drought
conditions and environmental distress (Rodale Institute 2012)—a critical
property as climate change increasingly serves up extreme weather condi-
tions. A major study carried out in Africa by the United Nations Development
Program concluded that organic methods lowered costs and provided more
economic benefits to farming communities than conventional agriculture
(Pretty et al. 2008). Moreover, farming like a diversified ecosystem renders
a higher resistance to extreme climate events, which translates into lower
vulnerability and higher long-term farm sustainability (Holt-Giménez 2002;
Philipott et al. 2009; Rosset et al. 2011).
The Nature article examined yields in terms of tons per acre and did
not address efficiency (i.e., yields per units of water or energy) nor environ-
mental externalities (i.e., the environmental costs of production in terms of
greenhouse gas emissions, soil erosion, biodiversity loss, etc.) and fails to
mention that conventional agricultural research enjoyed 60 years of massive
private and public sector support for crop genetic improvement, dwar fing
funding for organic agriculture by 99 to 1.
The higher performance of conventional over organic methods may
hold between what are essentially both mono-cultural commodity farms.
This misleading comparison sets organic agriculture as a straw man to be
knocked down by its conventional counterpart. But for the 1.5 billion sub-
sistence farmers working small plots—producing around half the world’s
food—monocultures of any kind are unsustainable. Noncommercial poly-
cultures are better for balancing diets, reducing risk, and thrive without
agrochemicals. Agroecological methods that emphasize rich crop diversity
in time and space conserve soils and water and have proven to produce
the most rapid, recognizable and sustainable results among poor farm-
ers (Altieri 2002). In areas in which soils have already been degraded by
conventional agriculture’s chemical “packages,” agroecological methods can
increase productivity by 100–300% (Bunch 1985; Natarajan and Willey 1996;
Holt-Giménez 2006).
This is why the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food released
a report advocating for structural reforms and a shift to agroecology (De
Schutter 2010). It is why the 400 experts commissioned for the four-
year International Assessment on Agriculture, Science and Knowledge for
Development (IAASTD 2008) also concluded that agroecology and locally
based food economies (rather than the global market) where the best
strategies for combating poverty and hunger.
Downloaded by [Mr Eric Holt-Gimenez] at 11:02 01 August 2012
Editorial 597
Raising productivity for resource-poor farmers is one piece of ending
hunger, but how this is done—and whether these farmers can gain access to
more land—will make a big difference in combating poverty and ensuring
sustainable livelihoods. The conventional methods already employed for
decades by poor farmers have a poor track record in this regard.
Can conventional agriculture provide the yields we need to feed 10 bil-
lion people by 2050? Given climate change, the answer is an unsustainable
maybe. The more important question is, at what social and environmental
cost? To end hunger we must end poverty and inequality. For this chal-
lenge, agroecological approaches and structural reforms that ensure that
resource-poor farmers have the land and resources they need for sustainable
livelihoods are the best way forward.
Eric Holt-Giménez, Food First, Oakland, CA
Annie Shattuck, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Miguel Altieri, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Hans Herren, Millennium Institute, Washington, DC
Steve Gliessman, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA; JSA, Editor
REFERENCES
Altieri, M. A. 2002 Agroecology: the science for natural resource management for
poor farmers living in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and
Environment 93: 1–24.
Bunch, R. 1985. Two ears of cor n: A Guide to people-centered agricultural
improvement. Oklahoma City, OK: World Neighbors.
De Schutter, O. 2010. Agroecology and the right to food. United Nations Office of
the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food. A/HRC/16/49. http://www.srfood.
org/images/stories/pdf/officialreports/20110308_a-hrc-16-49_agroecology_en.
pdf (accessed March 24, 2012).
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2009a. 1.02 billion
hungry. Available from: http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/20568/icode/
(accessed 28 June 2010).
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2009b. The state of
food insecurity in the world. Rome, Italy: Economic and Social Development
Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Holt-Giménez, E. 2002. Measuring farmers’ agroecological resistance after Hurricane
Mitch in Nicaragua: a case study in participatory, sustainable land management
impact monitoring. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 93: 87–105.
Holt-Giménez, E. 2006. Campesino a Campesino: Voices from Latin America’s farmer
to farmermovement for sustainable agriculture. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.
International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology
for Development. 2008. IAASTD reports. http://www.agassessment.org/index.
cfm?Page
1
/
4
IAASTD%20Reports&ItemID
1
/
4
2713 (accessed 16 October 2008).
Downloaded by [Mr Eric Holt-Gimenez] at 11:02 01 August 2012
598 E. Holt-Giménez et al.
Natarajan, M., and R. W. Willey. 1996. The effects of water stress on yields
advantages of intercropping systems. Field Crops Research 13: 117–131.
Philpott, S. M., B. B. Lin, S. Jha, and S. J. Brines. 2009 A multiscale assessment of hur-
ricane impacts on agricultural landscapes based on land use and topographic
features. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 128(1–2), 12–20.
Pretty, J., R. Hine, and S. Twarog. 2008. Organic agriculture and food security
in Africa. UNEP-UNCTAD Capacity-Building Task Force on Trade. New York
and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development/United
Nations Environment Programme.
Rodale Institute. 2012. The farming systems trial: celebrating 30 years.Emmaus,PA:
Rodale Press.
Rosset, P. M., B. Machín-Sosa, A. M. Roque-Jaime, and D. R. Avila-Lozano. 2011. The
Campesino-to-Campesino agroecology movement of ANAP in Cuba. Journal of
Peasant Studies 38: 161–191.
Seufert, V., N. Ramankutty, and J. A. Foley. 2012. Comparing the yields of organic
and conventional Agriculture. Nature DOI:10.1038/nature11069
Smil, V. 2001. Enriching the earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch and the transformation
of world food production. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Vandermeer, J. 1989. The ecology of intercr opping. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Downloaded by [Mr Eric Holt-Gimenez] at 11:02 01 August 2012
... Some studies indicate that agricultural production would still need to increase by 70% (nearly 100% in developing countries) by 2050 to cope with a 40% increase in the world population and raise average food consumption to 3130 kcal per person day [8]. On the other hand, some studies showed that there was already enough food in 2012 to feed 10 billion people (the world's 2050 projected population peak) [9]. However, the number of undernourished people worldwide has been on the rise since 2014, after a prolonged decline. ...
... Numerous authors have examined the levels of food security of different regions using food security dimensions. The general conclusion is that there is enough food in the world for the entire population [5,9,21]. However, according to Jambor and Babu (2017) [5], food availability does not always guarantee a high food security level. ...
Determining Food Security in Crisis Conditions: A Comparative Analysis of the Western Balkans and the EU
Article
Full-text available
  • Nov 2020
The right to food is a fundamental one, and the optimization between human needs and available resources is a challenge in all countries. The main goal of this study is to find the factors that determine food security and to determine the level of food security in the Western Balkans while undergoing the process of European Union (EU) integration. In order to achieve this, four Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) dimensions of food security are analyzed: stability, availability, access, and utilization. The Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) method is then used to rank Western Balkan and EU countries according to food security. The results show a significant difference among these countries in terms of their levels of food security, which is a consequence of Western Balkan countries' significant lag in economic development in comparison to the EU. Although the level of food security in Western Balkan countries is lower than in EU countries, it is not endangered. However, it can become endangered under crisis conditions (like the COVID-19 pandemic). The main reasons for this discrepancy are high food supply variability, dependence on cereal import, and lower Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in these countries than in EU.
... Dengan demikian diakhir 2020 sebanyak 773-822 juta penduduk mengalami kelaparan. Produksi dan simpanan pangan di dunia saat ini sebenarnya telah cukup untuk 10 milyar penduduk dunia di 2050 (Holt-Giménez et al., 2012). Namun, mengapa masih terjadi kelaparan -hampir sepersepuluh penduduk dunia mengalami kelaparan. ...
Pemanfaatan Informasi Geospasial untuk Ketahanan Pangan Saat Pandemi Covid-19
Conference Paper
Full-text available
  • Apr 2021
Pandemi Covid-19 berdampak besar pada ketahanan pangan. Karantina wilayah dan pembatasan aktivitas sebagai langkah pencegahan penyebaran virus SARS-CoV-2 mendisrupsi sistem produksi dan distribusi pangan. Krisis pangan yang telah ada diperparah dengan kejadian pandemi Covid-19 menambah jumlah kasus kelaparan hingga 132 juta orang di seluruh dunia. Peningkatan ketahanan pangan tidak dapat menunggu hingga pandemic selesai. Paper ini membahas tentang kontribusi utama informasi geospasial dalam kaitannya dengan ketahanan pangan saat pandemi Covid-19. Dua hal utama yang membutuhkan informasi geospasial, dimana sumber makanan dan bagaimana cara mendapatkannya. Adopsi geospasial membantu dalam monitoring rantai suplai makanan dan mendukung penjualan makanan tanpa kontak (daring). Peningkatan penggunaan akses geospasial dalam aplikasi teknologi informasi mampu memberi dampak terhadap penanganan pandemic Covid-19. Kasus hasil panen yang tidak terjual dapat dihindarkan dengan adopsi informasi geospasial yang menghubungkan produsen dan konsumen. Selain itu, prediksi dampak perubahan iklim seperti kekeringan membantu penataan suplai makanan agar tidak terjadi krisis pangan.
... It combines different analytical approaches-political economy, ecological and historical-to explore the relationship between the reproduction of global capitalism and the relations of power entrenched in food production and consumption patterns, and conditions of food vulnerability and rural poverty. For a more in depth discussion on the food regime concept, the specificities of the current neoliberal or 'corporate' food regime and food regime analysis, see McMichael and Friedmann (1989), Friedmann (1993) and McMichael (2009; prevailing corporate food regime has failed to create sustainable and dignified livelihoods for the vast majority of the world's family farmers 2 and to provide adequate food security for the growing contingent of extremely poor and hungry people (MADELEY, 2002;HOLT-GIMÉNEZ;SHATTUCK, 2011;PATEL, 2012;MCMICHEAL, 2013). ...
ADDRESSING RURAL POVERTY AND FOOD INSECURITY THROUGH LOCAL FOOD PURCHASING AND SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAMS: PAA AFRICA, PRONAE AND THE CREATION OF INSTITUTIONAL MARKETS IN MOZAMBIQUE (Abordando a pobreza no meio rural e a insegurança alimentar através da ...)
Article
  • Jun 2015
In Brazil, the Food Acquisition Program (PAA), implemented in 2003 under the administration of the former president Lula, is a two-pronged public policy which creates rural employment while reducing food insecurity among vulnerable segments of the Brazilian population. Since 2012, small-scale pilot projects inspired by PAA have been implemented in five African countries, including Mozambique, under the PAA Africa initiative with the support of the Brazilian government. Based on interviews and fieldwork conducted in Mozambique, this article examines the PAA pilot project in Tete province - implemented by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Food Program (WFP). The program's implementation process, its relationship to the PRONAE (school lunch) pilot projects, as well as its main achievements, benefits and challenges are highlighted. The author holds that the creation of institutional markets in Mozambique through local food-purchasing and school-feeding programs, like the PAA and PRONAE, promotes an endogenous and sustainable form of rural development that has considerable potential to reduce rural poverty and food insecurity in a far-reaching manner in the long term. Considerations for the future of the PAA are also discussed.
... Additionally, there are many cases where even yields of single crops are higher in agroecological systems than in conventional crops [29]. Finally, hunger is caused by poverty and inequality, not scarcity, and the world currently already produces enough food to feed 10 billion people, the world´s 2050 projected population peak [30]. ...
Introducing a Degrowth Approach to the Circular Economy Policies of Food Production, and Food Loss and Waste Management: Towards a Circular Bioeconomy
Article
Full-text available
  • Mar 2021
There is a growing debate surrounding the contradiction between an unremitting increase in the use of resources and the search for environmental sustainability. Therefore, the concept of sustainable degrowth is emerging aiming to introduce in our societies new social values and new policies, capable of satisfying human requirements whilst reducing environmental impacts and consumption of resources. In this framework, circular economy strategies for food production and food loss and waste management systems, following the Sustainable Development Goals agenda, are being developed based on a search for circularity, but without setting limits to the continual increase in environmental impacts and resource use. This work presents a methodology for determining the percentage of degrowth needed in any food supply chain, by analyzing four scenarios in a life cycle assessment approach over time between 2020 and 2040. Results for the Spanish case study suggested a degrowth need of 26.8% in 2015 and 58.9% in 2040 in order to achieve compliance with the Paris Agreement targets, highlighting the reduction of meat and fish and seafood consumption as the most useful path.
... The world population is expected to reach 10 billion people by 2050 (Holt-Giménez et al. 2012) and global consumption of ruminant meat (beef, lamb and goat) is projected to increase by 88% between 2010 and 2050 (Ranganathan et al. 2018), a growth rate in excess of the 50% increase in global population. Each year, half the total world food production (amounting to 1.6 billion tons) is wasted (Ishangulyyev et al. 2019). ...
Key traits for ruminant livestock across diverse production systems in the context of climate change: perspectives from a global platform of research farms
Article
Full-text available
Ruminant livestock are raised under diverse cultural and environmental production systems around the globe. Ruminant livestock can play a critical role in food security by supplying high-quality, nutrient-dense food with little or no competition for arable land while simultaneously improving soil health through vital returns of organic matter. However, in the context of climate change and limited land resources, the role of ruminant-based systems is uncertain because of their reputed low efficiency of feed conversion (kilogram of feed required per kilogram of product) and the production of methane as a by-product of enteric fermentation. A growing human population will demand more animal protein, which will put greater pressure on the Earth’s planetary boundaries and contribute further to climate change. Therefore, livestock production globally faces the dual challenges of mitigating emissions and adapting to a changing climate. This requires research-led animal and plant breeding and feeding strategies to optimise ruminant systems. This study collated information from a global network of research farms reflecting a variety of ruminant production systems in diverse regions of the globe. Using this information, key changes in the genetic and nutritional approaches relevant to each system were drawn that, if implemented, would help shape more sustainable future ruminant livestock systems.
... Moreover, it stresses that the global food production systems should be able to support the feeding of more individuals than current systems allow. However, such systems must be updated to minimize the impact on the environment while supporting the world's biocapacity to sustain the production of food in the future ( Holt-Giménez et al., 2012 ). ...
The Monetarized Footprint Index of Paprika
Article
  • Jan 2021
The Monetarized Footprint Index (MFI) of paprika powder grown in either Israel or India and packed in plastic jars or bags in Israel was obtained from land, water and carbon footprints under a life-cycle perspective. It was found that although the shipment distance of the paprika powder from India to Israel is relevant, a high demand for irrigation water in Israel plus the fact of the water's source from a relevant carbon footprint reverse-osmosis desalination process led to higher footprints of the Israeli products cultivated and packed there compared to India. In addition, packaging in jars required much more PET compared to bags. Thus, the growth of the pepper in India and the use of PET bags instead of jars was the best scenario, yielding MFI of 0.51 €•kg⁻¹. Moreover, considering the difference in cost-of-living and environmental performance between the two countries led to significant differences between the normalized MFI values of the Israeli and the Indian-sourced product. For example, normalizing the MFI based on the Gross Domestic Product per capita gives results which reveal that all the scenarios have similar scaled normalized values (167±17). In contrast, the use of Big Mac Index and Environmental Performance Index for normalization highlights the scenario of growth of the pepper in India and use of PET bags as the clear best performer.
Participatory analysis and action to promote agroecological food systems -methodological insights from a three-country initiative: Nicaragua, Senegal and England
Article
Full-text available
Understanding and seeking to change complex systems requires approaches which can adequately respond to complexity and which undermine rather than reinforce dominant power structures. This paper presents and reflects on a par-ticipatory methodology developed and applied to transition food systems in England, Nicaragua and Senegal to align better with agroecological principles. The methodology combines participatory research, complex systems mapping and deliberation to understand and respond to the complexities of food systems in an integrated and transdisciplinary way. Where this methodology distinguishes itself from other participatory research approaches is the explicit focus on the multiple dimensions of food systems in an integrative way, which was possible through a deliberative process and by involving various stakeholders, but continuing to privilege (yet also challenge) the voices of marginalised producers. Our experience indicates that the methodology could be used and adapted for various complex topics and contexts in which social change is sought.
Local Food as Social Change: Food Sovereignty as a Radical New Ontology
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2020
Local food projects are steadily becoming a part of contemporary food systems and take on many forms. They are typically analyzed using an ethical, or socio-political, lens. Food focused initiatives can be understood as strategies to achieve ethical change in food systems and, as such, ethics play a guiding role. But local food is also a social movement and, thus social and political theories provide unique insights during analysis. This paper begins with the position that ontology should play a more prominent part in the analysis of local food movements, as this lens could provide unique insights into basic commitments guiding such initiatives. The paper presents the argument that ontological analyses are imperative for fully understanding local food movements. It then provides an overview of the justice frameworks and ontological orientations that guide two dominant types of initiatives: Those committed to increasing food security and those committed to food sovereignty. The paper ends with the argument that food sovereignty projects are revolutionary, not only because they challenge us to change industrial food practices, but also because they are built on a radical new political ontology, and co-constitutive food-focused orientation, that forms the foundation for alternative social and political structures.
Sharing economics in the concept of Smart City
Article
  • Jan 2019
Social movements in the transformation of food and agriculture systems
Chapter
  • Jan 2021
The radical transformation of our food systems is necessary to address the social and environmental crises of our time. This can only be led by grassroots social movements, as the solutions that come from corporate, governmental, and philanthropic actors are false solutions that maintain the status quo. They find legitimacy by misportraying the nature of the problems to be solved and promoting deeply entrenched narratives of lack. This chapter explores these and counters that we already have the solutions to create sustainable, ecological food systems. It advocates for a transition to a food system based on vegan agroecology, where nonhuman animals are included in our circle of moral concern, and speaks of the stirrings of a new movement: the veganic farming movement.
Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture
Article
Full-text available
Numerous reports have emphasized the need for major changes in the global food system: agriculture must meet the twin challenge of feeding a growing population, with rising demand for meat and high-calorie diets, while simultaneously minimizing its global environmental impacts. Organic farming—a system aimed at producing food with minimal harm to ecosystems, animals or humans—is often proposed as a solution. However, critics argue that organic agriculture may have lower yields and would therefore need more land to produce the same amount of food as conventional farms, resulting in more widespread deforestation and biodiversity loss, and thus undermining the environmental benefits of organic practices. Here we use a comprehensive meta-analysis to examine the relative yield performance of organic and conventional farming systems globally. Our analysis of available data shows that, overall, organic yields are typically lower than conventional yields. But these yield differences are highly contextual, depending on system and site characteristics, and range from 5% lower organic yields (rain-fed legumes and perennials on weak-acidic to weak-alkaline soils), 13% lower yields (when best organic practices are used), to 34% lower yields (when the conventional and organic systems are most comparable). Under certain conditions—that is, with good management practices, particular crop types and growing conditions—organic systems can thus nearly match conventional yields, whereas under others it at present cannot. To establish organic agriculture as an important tool in sustainable food production, the factors limiting organic yields need to be more fully understood, alongside assessments of the many social, environmental and economic benefits of organic farming systems.
A multi-scale assessment of hurricane impacts based on land-use and topographic features. Agric Ecosyst Environ
Article
Full-text available
Agricultural systems are increasingly vulnerable to the effects of extreme climate events. Yet strategies to reduce risk and vulnerability have not been greatly explored. Here, we examine the vulnerability of coffee agroforestry systems varying in management intensity (e.g. land use) and topographic features to disturbance related to Hurricane Stan in Chiapas, Mexico—a hurricane categorized by heavy rains and mild winds. An approximately 50 km2 area was chosen within a coffee-growing region where data were collected on a variety of topographic and landscape features (aspect, slope, elevation, distance to river) and vegetation characteristics (canopy cover, vegetation structure, tree density) as predictive factors of vegetation, economic, and landslide damage at three distinct spatial scales. At the plot level, we collected vegetation data later compiled into a vegetation complexity index. At the farm level, we collected data to understand the effect of the hurricane on economic damage and farm area affected by landslides. We also recorded number and volume of roadside landslides as a measure of post-hurricane disturbance. We then conducted a geo-spatial analysis to determine which factors contribute most to landslide occurrence at landscape scales. We found no effect of coffee management on vegetation damage or on economic losses at the plot or farm scale. At the farm scale, increasing management intensity (i.e. reduction in vegetation complexity) correlated with increased proportion of farm area affected by landslides (P = 0.014). Additionally, reduction in vegetation complexity was correlated with increased number (P = 0.0224) and volume (P = 0.062) of roadside landslides at the landscape level. Topographic and landscape features, such as distance to river (P = 0.004) and wind exposure/aspect (P = 0.044) strongly influenced landslide frequency at the landscape scale. Forest proximity and proportion of forest cover did not significantly influence the frequency or extent of landslide damage. We created hazard maps using the vegetation complexity index, distance to river, and wind exposure as the heaviest weighted factors to assess areas of the terrain with the greatest vulnerability. These maps present a practical result of this study, and offer a template in which land management policy can develop to lower regional vulnerability to landslide risk. These results show that farmers may be able to reduce vulnerability to extreme storm events by carefully managing their farms. Although farmers may not be able to control negative topographic features of their farms, increasing vegetation complexity within farms may be an efficient strategy to reduce some susceptibility to hurricane disturbance.
The Campesino-to-Campesino Agroecology Movement of ANAP in Cuba: Social Process Methodology in the Construction of Sustainable Peasant Agriculture and Food Sovereignty
Article
Full-text available
Agroecology has played a key role in helping Cuba survive the crisis caused by the collapse of the socialist bloc in Europe and the tightening of the US trade embargo. Cuban peasants have been able to boost food production without scarce and expensive imported agricultural chemicals by first substituting more ecological inputs for the no longer available imports, and then by making a transition to more agroecologically integrated and diverse farming systems. This was possible not so much because appropriate alternatives were made available, but rather because of the Campesino-a-Campesino (CAC) social process methodology that the National Association of Small Farmers (ANAP) used to build a grassroots agroecology movement. This paper was produced in a 'self-study' process spearheaded by ANAP and La Via Campesina, the international agrarian movement of which ANAP is a member. In it we document and analyze the history of the Campesino-to-Campesino Agroecology Movement (MACAC), and the significantly increased contribution of peasants to national food production in Cuba that was brought about, at least in part, due to this movement. Our key findings are (i) the spread of agroecology was rapid and successful largely due to the social process methodology and social movement dynamics, (ii) farming practices evolved over time and contributed to significantly increased relative and absolute production by the peasant sector, and (iii) those practices resulted in additional benefits including resilience to climate change.
Enriching the Earth. Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production
Article
The industrial synthesis of ammonia from nitrogen and hydrogen has been of greater fundamental importance to the modern world than the invention of the airplane, nuclear energy, space flight, or television. The expansion of the world's population from 1.6 billion people in 1900 to today's six billion would not have been possible without the synthesis of ammonia. In Enriching the Earth, Vaclav Smil begins with a discussion of nitrogen's unique status in the biosphere, its role in crop production, and traditional means of supplying the nutrient. He then looks at various attempts to expand natural nitrogen flows through mineral and synthetic fertilizers. The core of the book is a detailed narrative of the discovery of ammonia synthesis by Fritz Haber -- a discovery scientists had sought for over one hundred years -- and its commercialization by Carl Bosch and the chemical company BASF. Smil also examines the emergence of the large-scale nitrogen fertilizer industry and analyzes the extent of global dependence on the Haber-Bosch process and its biospheric consequences. Finally, it looks at the role of nitrogen in civilization and, in a sad coda, describes the lives of Fritz Haber and Carl Bosch after the discovery of ammonia synthesis.
The effects of water stress on yield advantages of intercropping systems
Article
Two experiments are reported in which a line-source irrigation system was used to study the effects of a range of moisture regimes (S1 to S5 in order of increasing stress due to insufficiency of moisture) on sole crops of sorghum, millet and groundnut, and intercrops of 1 row sorghum : 2 rows groundnut (SGG), 1 row sorghum : 3 rows groundnut (SGGG), 1 row millet : 1 row groundnut (MG), 1 row millet : 2 rows groundnut (MGG), 1 row millet : 3 rows groundnut (MGGG), and 1 row sorghum : 1 row millet (SM). The dry matter yield advantages of intercropping compared with sole cropping ranged from 8 to 30% for the millet/groundnut systems, 0 to 19% for the sorghum/groundnut systems and 5 to 15% for the sorghum/millet system; moisture stress had no consistent effect on these dry matter advantages. For reproductive yields, all the intercropping systems showed some increase in relative advantages with increase in stress because of higher harvest indices in intercropping than in sole cropping. Largest advantages were 93% for SGG at S5 moisture regime and 78% for MGG at S4 moisture regime, both of these being significantly greater than advantages at S1. The level of stress giving peak advantages depended on crop combination and crop proportions.It is emphasised that all intercropping treatments were of ‘replacement’ type in which the plant population of each crop was only a proportion of that of its sole crop and total population was equivalent to that in either of the sole crops. It is suggested that if total populations in the intercrops are higher than in the sole crops then, under stress conditions, intercropping yields could well be less than sole crop yields because of increased competition for moisture.
Agroecology: The Science of Natural Resource Management for Poor Farmers in Marginal Environments
Article
Throughout the developing world, resource-poor farmers (about 1.4 billion people) located in risk-prone, marginal environments, remain untouched by modern agricultural technology. A new approach to natural resource management must be developed so that new management systems can be tailored and adapted in a site-specific way to highly variable and diverse farm conditions typical of resource-poor farmers. Agroecology provides the scientific basis to address the production by a biodiverse agroecosystem able to sponsor its own functioning. The latest advances in agroecological research are reviewed in order to better define elements of a research agenda in natural resource management that is compatible with the needs and aspirations of peasants. Obviously, a relevant research agenda setting should involve the full participation of farmers with other institutions serving a facilitating role. The implementation of the agenda will also imply major institutional and policy changes.
Measuring Farmers' Agroecological Resistance after Hurricane Mitch in Nicaragua: A Case Study in Participatory, Sustainable Land Management Impact Monitoring
Article
A study using a participatory research approach and simple field techniques found significant differences in agroecological resistance between plots on “conventional” and “sustainable” farms in Nicaragua after Hurricane Mitch. On average, agroecological plots on sustainable farms had more topsoil, higher field moisture, more vegetation, less erosion and lower economic losses after the hurricane than control plots on conventional farms. The differences in favor of agroecological plots tended to increase with increasing levels of storm intensity, increasing slope and years under agroecological practices, though the patterns of resistance suggested complex interactions and thresholds. For some indicators agroecological resistance collapsed under extreme stress.
The Ecology of Intercropping Systems
Article
Two Ears of Corn: A Guide to People-Centered Agricultural Improvement
Article
  • Jan 1982
Enriching the Earth : Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production / V. Smil.
Article
  • Jan 2001
Contenido: 1) El nitrógeno en la agricultura; 2) Caminos tradicionales del nitrógeno; 3) Nuevos caminos de los nutrientes; 4) Un descubrimiento brillante; Creación de una industria; 6) Evolución de la síntesis del amoníaco; 7) Fertilizantes sintéticos; 8) Nuestra dependencia del nitrógeno; 9) Consecuencias de la dependencia; 10) Nitrógeno y civilización.