Content uploaded by Ricardo M Trigo
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ricardo M Trigo on Jan 15, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Click
Here
for
Full
A
rticl e
On the origin of continental precipitation
Luis Gimeno,
1
Anita Drumond,
1
Raquel Nieto,
1
Ricardo M. Trigo,
2,3
and Andreas Stohl
4
Received 22 April 2010; revised 2 June 2010; accepted 7 June 2010; published 7 July 2010.
[1] About 9 ou t of 10 liters of water evaporated from the
oceans e very year precipitates back on to oceans. However,
the remaining 10% that get transported to continents play an
irreplaceable role feeding the land branch of the hydrological
cycle. Here we use an objective 3‐D L agrangian model
(FLEXPART) to detect major oceanic moisture source
areas and the associated continental regions significantly
influenced by each moisture source. Our results reveal a
highly asymmetrical sup ply of oceani c moistur e to the
continents, with the Northern Atlantic subtropical ocean
source impacting the continents considerably more than the
large Southern Indian and North Pacific sources. Also, the
small Medite rranean Sea and Red Sea ba sins are important
moisture source s for relatively la rge land areas. The Indian
subcontinent receives moisture from six different major
oceanic source re gions. Future changes in meteorological
conditions over the oceanic moisture source regions may
have an impact on water availability for many river basins.
Citation: Gimeno, L., A. Drumond, R. Nieto, R. M. Trigo, and
A. Stohl (2010), On the origin of continental precipitation, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 37, L13804, doi:10.1029/2010GL043712.
1. Introduction
[2] The global hydrological cycle is supplied annually
with circa 500 000 km
3
of water evaporated from the
Earth’s surface, with the bulk of this volume evaporating
from the oceanic surface (86%) and only 14% from con-
tinents [Oki, 2005]. The vast majority of the water evapo-
rated from the oceans (90%) precipitates back onto oceans
while the remaining 10% is transported to continents where
it precipitates. About two thirds of the latter are recycled
over the continents and only one‐third runs off directly
to the ocean. Ultimately, despite the continental recycling
component, all water used by available to land ecosystems
and human socio‐economic activities has its origins in the
oceans.
[
3] In this context, the relentless upward trend in tem-
perature observed in recent decades, that is expected to
continue towards a warmer world, may pose an additional
burden on the reliability of moisture sources in the future.
Modeling studies suggest that the high sensitivity to tem-
perature of saturation vapor pressure will result in increases
of evaporation and precipitation leading to an exacerbation
of the water cycle [ Held and Soden, 2006]. The volume of
water evaporating will depend largely on changes of sea and
air temperatures and winds over major moisture source re-
gions and these changes are bound to influence specific
regions over continents.
[
4] Thus, identification of regions particularly vulnerable
to changes in the hydrological cycle requires locating all
oceanic moisture sources and, additionally, to pin down
where exactly water evaporating from these sources pre-
cipitates over land. While major oceanic source sectors have
been relatively well identified recently [Trenberth and
Guillemot, 1998], their contribution towards precipitation
over continental land masses has not been equally well
established.
[
5] Here we used the 3‐D Lagrangian transport model
FLEXPART based on meteorological analysis data and a
moisture tracking scheme to identify where continental
regions are affected by precipitation originating f rom spe-
cific oc eanic regions. Several such methods have recen tly
been dev eloped by Stohl and James [20 04, 2005] (the one
used in our study), Sodemann et al. [2008a, 2008b] and
Dirmeyer an d Brubaker [2007] to diagnose the net water
vapor changes along a la rge number of bac k trajectories to
infer the moisture sources for precipitation falling in a target
region. Recently, these methodshavebeenusedbysome
of us to identify and quantify t he moisture sources i n dif-
ferent climatic regions such as the Sahel [Nieto et al.,2006],
CentralBrazilandLaPlataBasin[Drumond et al.,2008],
the Antarctic [Sodemann and Stohl, 2009] or the Ib erian
Peninsula [Gimeno et al., 2010].
2. Methods
2.1. Method to Identify the Main Moisture Source
Regions
[
6] Moisture source regions are defined as maxima of
vertically integrated moisture flux divergence (i.e., E‐P)
[Trenberth and Guillemot, 1998]. The vertically integrated
moisture transport is defined as 1/g
R
0
Ps
qvdp,whereg is
the acceleration due to gravity, q is the specific humidity,
P
s
is the surface press ure, and v is the horizontal wind
vector. ECMWF re‐analysis (ERA‐40) data on a 2.5° × 2.5°
grid was used to compute f lux dive rgences for th e 44‐year
long period spanning from January 1958 to December 2001.
Figure 1 shows the annual mean vertically integrated
moisture flux divergence field, where values higher than
250 mm/yr are shown in gray scale , and the interv al
between the isolines is 250 mm/yr. The areas inside the red
contour lines indicate the spatial extent of all major mois-
ture sourc e regions used i n the forward integra tions. These
source regions were defined based on the threshold of
750 mm/yr for the oceanic sources (Figure 1, top) and
500 mm/yr for the land sources (Figure 1 (middle) and 1
(bottom)). As a supplement for Fig ure 1 we have inc luded
in the auxiliary material (Figures S1 and S2) global dis-
1
EPhysLab, Facultade de Ciencias, Universidade de Vigo, Ourense,
Spain.
2
CGUL, IDL, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
3
Departamento de Engenharias, Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon,
Portugal.
4
Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway.
Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.
0094‐8276/10/2010GL043712
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 37, L13804, doi:10.1029/2010GL043712, 2010
L13804 1of7
tributions of continental precipitation (Che n et a l., 20 02) fo r
annual and seaso nal basis.
1
2.2. Lagrangian Approach to Quantify
the Contribution of Each Moisture Source Region
to the Continental Precipitation
[
7] We make use of the metho d developed by Stohl and
James [2004, 2005], which relies on the Lagrangian parti-
cle dispersion model FLEXPART [Stohl et al., 2005]. Using
this model, the atmosphere is divided homogeneously into a
large number of virtual particles which have a constant
mass and then these particles are advected by the model
using three‐dimensional (3‐D) operat ional ECMWF [White,
2002] winds as well as superimposed stochastic turbulent
and convective motions. The particle positions and specific
humidity (q) are recorded every 6 hours. The increases
(evaporation, e) and decreases (precipitation, p)inmoisture
along the trajectory can be calculated from changes in (q)
with time e − p = m
dq
dt
,wherem is the mass of each particle.
Figure 1. Climatological (top) annual, (middle) JJA and (bottom) DJF vertically integrated moisture flux divergence (mm/
yr). Values higher than 250 mm/yr are in gray scale, with an interval between isolines of 250 mm/yr. Areas inside the red
contour lines indicate the regions considered as moisture sources in the forward integrations. The areas were defined based
on the threshold of 750 mm/yr for the oceanic sources (CORALS, Coral Sea; NPAC, North Pacific; SPAC, South Pacific;
MEXCAR, Mexico Caribbean; NATL, North Atlantic; SATL, South Atlantic; ARAB, Arabian Sea; ZAN, Zanzibar Cur-
rent; AGU, Agulhas Current; IND, Indian Ocean) and 500 mm/yr for the land sources (WAF, Winter Africa; WSA, Winter
South America; SAHEL, Sahel). Two boxes were also defined using the physical boundaries of oceanic b asins (MED,
REDS). Data: ERA40 (1958–2001).
1
Auxiliary materials are available in the HTML. doi:10.1029/
2010GL043712.
GIMENO ET AL.: ORIGIN OF CONTINENTAL PRECIPITATION L13804L13804
2of7
When adding ( e − p) for all th e particles in the atmosph eric
column over an area, we c an obtain (E‐P), where the surface
freshwater flux (E) is the e vaporation and (P) is the pre-
cipitation rate per unit area. The method can also track (E‐P)
from any specific region backwards or forwards in time
along the trajectories, allowing to diagnose the relation-
ships between net moisture source and net moisture sink
regions. Full details of the method and its limitations are
described by Stohl a nd James [2004, 2005].
[
8] In the work reported here we used the tracks of 1.3
million particles over a 5‐year period (2000–2004), com-
puted using ECMWF operational analyses available every
6 hours (00, 06, 12 and 18 UTC) plus short‐term forecasts
available at intermediate times (3, 9, 15, 21 UTC) at a 1° × 1°
resolution in latitude and longitude on 60 vertical levels.
[
9] A database of trajectories (position and q interpolated
from ECMWF data) emanating from each source region
identified in Figure 1 was constructed. We traced (E‐P) for-
wards from each source region limiting the transport time
to 10 days, which is the average time that water vapour resides
in the atmosphere [Numaguti, 1999], assessing the location
of the most important sinks of moisture associated to each
Figure 2. DJF fields of (E‐P) integrated over 10 days for the period 2000–2004 calculated by forward tracking from the
moisture sources indicated by the pink lines and identified on the left bottom of each plot. Only negative values are plotted
and they were scaled by the different factors indicated in each plot in order to use the same colour bar.
GIMENO ET AL.: ORIGIN OF CONTINENTAL PRECIPITATION L13804L13804
3of7
source. Results were analyzed for the full annual period as
well as split into the four seasons defined as DJF, MAM, JJA
and SON.
3. Results
[10] Major sources of moisture can be identified as large
regions characterized with high values of vertically integrated
moisture flux divergence [Trenberth and Guillemot, 1998],
which is equivalent to net evaporation (E) minus precipitation
(P). We tracked more than one million virtual particles from
the identified source regions to the landmasses where most of
that water precipitates in the 10 days following evaporation.
Results are shown in Figures 2 and 3 for DJF and JJA
respectively, while results for transition seasons are shown in
Figures S3 and S4. At a global scale most of the evaporated
water has its origin in tropical and subtropical oceanic areas
(Figure 1). Seasonally, tropical continental areas over
America and Africa contribute, too. It could be that the
continental sources (mainly the Sahel moisture source) are
coming at least partially from analysis increments in soil
moisture. It should be stressed that most water evaporating
from the oceanic source regions precipitates back onto oceans
and only a minor, but vital, fraction precipitates over land. To
help readers to visualize the role of the atmospheric circula-
tion in the transport of moisture we have added maps of
Figure 3. The same as Figure 2, but for JJA.
GIMENO ET AL.: ORIGIN OF CONTINENTAL PRECIPITATION L13804L13804
4of7
surface wind for annual and seasonal basis in the electronic
online material (Figures S5 and S6).
[
11] The North Atlantic source (NATL) is the area pro-
viding the most moisture for precipitation over continents
among the regions defined in Figure 1. It provides moisture
for precipitation in Eastern North America, Central America
and Northern South America during JJA but it extends its
influence during DJF providing moisture also to Europe,
Northern Africa and central South America. These results
reflect the main physical mechanisms transporting moisture
to Europe during winter, the warm conveyor belt [Eckhardt
et al. , 2004] and the systems of low level jets in America:
Great Plains low level jet [Song et al., 2005], Caribbean
low level jet [Amador, 2008] and South America low level
jet [Marengo et al., 2004]. The importance of this source
has been well documented in previous analysis for Central
America [Durán‐Quesada et al., 2010] Central South
America [Drumond et al., 2008] and Europe [Gimeno et
al., 2 010]. The other source over the North Atlantic, the
Mexico‐Caribbean one (MEXCAR) does not provide mois-
ture to the South American low level jet and plays a relatively
minor role for the European continental moisture during
winter since most of the moisture falls over the North
Atlantic, so its influence is limited to Eastern North America
and Central America. The South Atlantic source (SATL) is
the second largest source of moisture for precipitation over
continents in the world, being the main source region for
precipitation in Eastern South America with the exception of
NE Brazil where flux diffluence associated to the transition of
the ITCZ complicates the moisture fluxes (A. Drumond et al.,
Lagrangian identification of the main sources of moisture
affecting northeastern Brazil during its pre‐rainy and rainy
seasons, submitted to PLoS ONE, 2010). The latitudinal
seasonal propagation of the ITCZ is clearly apparent in the
Figure 4. (a) Moisture source regions identified as maxima of vertically integrated moisture flux divergence in the period
1958–2001. The regions were defined based on the threshold of 750 mm/yr (500 mm/yr) for the oceanic (land) sources.
(b) (E‐P) contour of −0.05 × 10
−2
mm/day during JJA and (c) (E‐P) contour of − 0.05 × 10
−2
mm/day during DJF. (d) As
Figure 4c but expanded for Indian region. Contour colors in Figure 4b–4d correspond to the color scheme used in Figure 4a.
GIMENO ET AL.: ORIGIN OF CONTINENTAL PRECIPITATION L13804L13804
5of7
extension to the North during JJA of the pattern of E‐P over
Northern South America and in the influence of this source
during JJA for the precipitation over the Sahel [Nieto et al.,
2006].
[
12] Among the three Pacific sources, two of them, the
North Pacific source (NPAC) and the South Pacific source
(SPAC) provide moisture for precipitation over the latitu-
dinal extremes of the American continent, with a stronger
influence in the respective hemispheric winter. As com-
mented for Europe in respect to NATL the physical mecha-
nism responsible for this transport is the feeding of moisture
to extra‐tropical cyclones by the Warm Conveyor Belt sys-
tems [Koster, 1986]. During the Northern Hemisphere winter
the Eastern coast of North America receives moisture for
precipitation from the Atlantic (NATL and MEXCAR) and
the Pacific (NPAC), however the amount of moisture
received from the former is about 100 times higher than the
moisture received from the latter. The other Pacific source
(CORALS) is located in the Southern Hemisphere along the
eastern coast of Australia and it is the major source over
Oceania continent along the year.
[
13] The structure of Indian Ocean sources is much more
complex. During DJF the four sources, (IND, embracing
most of the oceanic areas between Australia and south
Africa; AGU, located over the Agulhas current; ZAN, sit-
uated over the Zanzibar Current and ARAB, placed on the
Arabian Sea) provide moisture for surrounding continental
areas of the African continent and the Arabian Peninsula;
however during the Southern Hemisphere winter (JJA) the
monsoon circulations transforms the four areas into sources
of moisture for precipitation falling over the Indian Peninsula
[Annamalai et al., 1999]. This unique situation implicates
that the Indian subcontinent receives moisture from 6 dif-
ferent major source regions during the Southern Hemisphere
winter, including the four I ndic ones plus th e Red Sea
(REDS) an d a co ntinental source over tropical Southern
Africa (WAF).
[
14] Despite their relatively small size the two inner Seas,
i.e., the Mediterranean (MED) and the Red Seas (REDS)
play an important role at a much larger scale. During the
Northern Hemisphere winter (DJF), both sources supply
moisture for precipitation on continental areas placed to
their Northeast. D uring JJA the Mediterranean provides
moisture to its surroundings extending to Northe rn Europe
while the Red Sea provides m oisture to the remote area
over the Indian Peninsula as commented before.
[
15] Although in a secondary way (after precipitation plus
further evaporation) there are two other important moisture
regions during the Southern Hemisphere winter (JJA), one
placed i n the tropical South A frica (WAF) and the other
over the Amazon (WSA) and one during the Nort hern
Hemisphere winter (DJF) over the Sahel (SAHEL). Their
evaporationissohighthatthey could be considered as
continental S eas [Dirmeyer and Brubake r, 2007]. They
provide moisture for most of the precipitation over impor-
tant areas of t he world s uch as the Parana, Orinoc o or Co ngo
river basins.
4. Summary and Discussion
[16] In this study we use an objective 3‐D Lagrangian
model (FLEXPART) to detect major oceanic moisture source
areas and to identify the associated continental regions sig-
nificantly influenced by each moisture source. To summarize
our results, Figure 4 illustrates the source regions (Figure 4a)
and compares their relative importance on the origin of
precipitation on continental landmasses by showing a single
contour line (E‐P=−0.05 × 10
−2
mm/day) for JJA (Figure 4b)
and DJF (Figure 4c).
[
17] Our results illustrate the highly asymmetrical role
of major oceanic moisture sources over continents. The
Northern Atlantic subtropical ocean source provides mois-
ture for precipitation over vast geographical areas in winter
(from Mexico to large parts of Eurasia), whereas the influ-
ence of other large oceanic sources is confined to much
smaller continental areas (e.g., Southern Indian and the North
Pacific oceans). The small enclosed Red Sea source provides
vast amounts of moisture that precipitate between the Gulf of
Guinea and Indochina (JJA) and the African great lakes and
Asia (DJF). Likewise vast continental areas lack appreciable
direct water transport from any major source regions, usually
corresponding to some of the most arid inland regions (e.g.,
inner Asian continent).
[
18] Our analysis further emphasizes that some land masses
obtain moisture from only one or two sources located in the
same hemisphere (e.g., Northern Europe or Eastern North
America), while others receive moisture from both hemi-
spheres with large seasonal variations (e.g., Northern South
America). Finally, the continental areas characterized by mon-
soon regimes (India, tropical Africa and the great lakes region)
benefit from a large number of source regions (Figure 4d)
which indicates the complex nature of precipitation.
[
19] Although further study on changes in water source
due to climate change is necessary it is obvious that changes
in the atmospheric circulation in a changing climate will
result in changes in circulation between source and sink
redirecting moisture in a different way. Those continental
regions receiving moisture from only one or two source
region(s) may be exposed more strongly to changes in the
water cycle due to a changing climate than regions that draw
on multiple moisture sources.
[
20] Acknowledgme nts. Authors tha nks the Spanish Ministry of
Science and FEDER for funding this res earch through the project MSM.
A. Stohl was supported by the Norwegian Research Council in the frame-
work of the WATER‐SIP project.
References
Amador, J. (2008), The Intra‐Americas Sea low‐ level jet, Ann. N. Y. Acad.
Sci., 1146, 153 –188, doi:10.1196/annals.1446.012.
Annamalai, H., J. M. Slingo, K. R. Sper ber, and K. Hodges (1999), The
mean evolution and variability of the Asian summer monsoon: Compar-
ison of ECMWF and NCEP‐NCAR reanalyses, Mon. Weather Rev., 127,
1157–1186, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<1157:TMEAVO>2.0.
CO;2.
Chen, M., P. Xie, J. E. Ja nowiak, and P. A. Arkin (2002), Globa l land
precipitation: A 50‐yr monthly analysis based on g auge observations ,
J. Hydrometeorol., 3,249– 266, doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2002)
003<0249:GLPAYM>2.0.CO;2.
Dirmeyer, P. A., and K. L. Brubaker (2007), Characterization of the global
hydrologic cycle from a back‐trajectory analysis of atmospheric water
vapor, J. Hydrometeorol., 8,20–37, doi:10.1175/JHM557.1.
Drumond, A., R. Nieto, L. Gimeno, and T. Ambrizzi (2008), A Lagrangian
identification of major sources of moisture over central Brazil and La Plata
Basin, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14128, doi:10.1029/2007JD009547.
Dur án‐Qu esada, A. M., L. Gimeno, J. A. Amador, and R. Nieto (2010),
Moisture sources for Central America: Identification of moisture sources
using a Lagrangian analysis technique, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D05103,
doi:10.1029/2009JD012455.
GIMENO ET AL.: ORIGIN OF CONTINENTAL PRECIPITATION L13804L13804
6of7
Eckhardt, S., A. Stohl, H. Wernli, P. James, C. Forster, and N. Spichtinger
(2004), A 15‐year climat olo gy of warm conveyor belts, J. Cl im., 17,
218–237, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0218:AYCOWC>2.0.
CO;2.
Gimeno, L., R. Nieto, R. M. Trigo, S. Vice nte‐Serrano, and J. I. López‐
Moreno (2010), Where does the Iberian Peninsula moisture come from?
An answer based on a Lagrangian approach, J. Hydrometeorol., 11, 421–
436, doi:10.1175/2009JHM1182.1.
Held, I. M., and B. J. Soden (2006), Robust responses of the hydrological
cycle to global warming, J. Clim., 19,5686–5699, doi:10. 1175/
JCLI3990.1.
Koster, R. (1986), Global sources of local precipitation as determined
by the NASA/GISS GCM, Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 121– 124,
doi:10.1029/GL013i002p00121.
Marengo, J. A., W. R. Soares, C. Saulo, and M. Nicolini (2004), Climatol-
ogy of the low‐ level jet east of the Andes as d erived from the NCEP
reanalyzes, J. Clim., 17, 226 1–22 80, doi:10.1175/1520-0442 (2004)
017<2261:COTLJE>2.0.CO;2.
Nieto, R., L. Gimeno, and R. M. Trigo (2006), A Lagrangian identification
of major sources of Sahel moisture, Geophys.Res.Lett., 33, L18707,
doi:10.1029/2006GL027232.
Numaguti, A. (1999), Origin and recycling processes of precipitating water
over the Eurasia n continent: Experiments using an atmospheric general
circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 1957–1972, doi:10.1029/
1998JD200026.
Oki, T. (2005), The hydrologic cycles and global circulation, in Encyclopedia
of Hydrologic al Sciences, edited by M. G. Anderson and J. McDonnell,
pp. 13–22, John Wiley, New York.
Sodemann, H., and A. Stohl (2009), Asymmetries in the moisture origin of
Antarctic precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L22803, doi:10.1029/
2009GL040242.
Sodemann, H., C. Schwierz, and H. Wernli (2008a), Interannual variability
of Greenland winter precipitation sources: Lagrangian moisture diagnos-
tic and North Atlantic Oscillation influence, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D03107, doi:10.1029/2007JD008503.
Sodemann, H., V. Mass on‐Delmotte, C. Schwierz, B. M. Vint her, and
H. Wernli (2008b), Interannual variability of Greenland winter precip-
itation sources: 2. Effects of North Atlant ic Osci llation variability on
stable isotopes in precipitation, J. Geophys. Res.
, 113, D12111,
doi:10.1029/2007JD00941 6.
Song, J., K. Liao, R. L. Coulter, and B. M. Lesht (2005), Climatology of
the low‐level jet at the southern Great Plains atmospheric boundary layer
experiments site, J. Appl. Mete orol., 44, 1593–1606, doi:1 0.1175/
JAM2294.1.
Stohl, A., and P. James (2004), A Lagrangian analysis of the atmospheric
branch of the g lobal wa ter cycle . Part I: Method descriptio n, valida-
tion, and demonstration for the August 2002 flooding in central Europe,
J. Hydrometeorol., 5, 656–678, doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0656:
ALAOTA>2.0.CO;2.
Stohl, A., and P. James (2005), A Lagrangian analysis of the atmospheric
branch of the global water cycle. Part II: Moisture transports between the
Earth’s ocean basins and river catchments, J. Hydrometeorol., 6, 961 –984,
doi:10.1175/JHM470.1.
Stohl, A., C. Forster, A. Frank, P. Seibert, and G. Wotawa (2005), Technical
note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, doi:10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005.
Trenberth, K. E., and C. J. Guillemot (1998), Evaluation of the atmospheric
moisture and hydro logical cycle in the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis, Clim.
Dyn., 14, 213–231, doi:10.1007/s003820050219.
White, P. W. (Ed.) (2002), IFS documentation, Eur. C ent. fo r Me dium‐
Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, U. K. (Available at http://www.
ecmwf.int)
A. Drumond, L. Gimeno, and R. Niet o, EPhysLab, Facultade de
Ciencias, Universidade de Vigo, Campus As Lagoas s/n, E‐ 32004
Ourense, Spain. (l.gimeno@uvigo.es)
A. Stohl, Norw egian Institute for Air Research, PO Box 100, N‐2027
Kjeller, Norway.
R. M. Trigo, CGUL, IDL, University of Lisbon, Campo Grande, Ed. C8,
Piso 6, P‐1749‐016 Lisbon, Portugal.
GIMENO ET AL.: ORIGIN OF CONTINENTAL PRECIPITATION L13804L13804
7of7