Content uploaded by Gudrun Marteinsdottir
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Gudrun Marteinsdottir on Mar 19, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Mar Ecol Prog Ser
Vol. 362: 261–277, 2008
doi: 10.3354/meps07409
Published June 30
INTRODUCTION
Fish condition is influenced by the combined effects
of physiological and environmental factors (Cui &
Wootton 1988) and follows seasonal and annual cycles
in cod (Lambert & Dutil 1997a, Schwalme & Chouinard
1999, Lloret & Rätz 2000, Yaragina & Marshall 2000),
reflecting patterns of energy accumulation and deple-
tion during periods of intense feeding, maturation,
reproduction, migration and over-wintering (Eliassen
& Vahl 1982a,b, Holdway & Beamish 1984, Lambert &
Dutil 1997a). Simple metrics of condition, such as the
commonly utilised Fulton’s K and hepatosomatic index
(H), are based only on length and weight data, but
have been found to be reliable indicators of biochemi-
cal composition and energy reserves (those stored in
muscle proteins and liver lipids respectively) of
Atlantic cod (Lambert & Dutil 1997b).
Condition has been shown to influence or be corre-
lated with most life history parameters, notably those
linked with energetic processes, and has the potential
to provide important information about the productiv-
ity and reproductive potential of a stock. In Atlantic
cod Gadus morhua, condition is related to fecundity,
fertilisation success, egg size, larval quality and viabil-
ity, atresia and the probability of skipped spawning
(e.g. Kjesbu et al. 1991, Marteinsdóttir & Steinarsson
1998, Rakitin et al. 1999, Lambert & Dutil 2000, Ride-
out et al. 2000, Marteinsdóttir & Begg 2002, Rose &
O’Driscoll 2002, Yoneda & Wright 2004, 2005a). How-
ever, other studies (e.g. McIntyre & Hutchings 2003,
Koops et al. 2004) have found contrasting evidence for
such relationships. Condition was found to influence
recruitment in the Northeast Arctic cod stock (Mar-
shall et al. 1999, 2000), the risk of post-spawning mor-
tality in Atlantic cod (Lambert & Dutil 2000) and the
probability of being mature in Atlantic cod (Marteins-
dóttir & Begg 2002, Dutil et al. 2006), walleye Stizoste-
dion vitreum (Henderson & Morgan 2002) and female
American plaice Hippoglossoides platessoides (Mor-
© Inter-Research 2008 · www.int-res.com*Email: heidi@hafro.is
Spatial and temporal trends in condition of Atlantic
cod Gadus morhua on the Icelandic shelf
Heidi Pardoe
1, 2,
*
, Gudmundur Thórdarson
1
, Gudrun Marteinsdóttir
2
1
Marine Research Institute, Skúlagata 4, PO Box 1390, 121 Reykjavik, Iceland
2
Institute of Biology, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
ABSTRACT: Interannual (1993 to 2006), spatial and bathymetric trends in the hepatosomatic index
(H) and relative body condition index (Kr) of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua in Icelandic waters were
investigated from data collected during annual spring (March) groundfish surveys. Individual stom-
ach content data were analysed to assess the relationship between condition and consumption of
capelin Mallotus villosus. Liver condition was found to vary with region and depth, tending to be
highest in deeper water and in the northern and eastern regions; where temperatures were relatively
cold and capelin consumption relatively high. A continuous decline in condition of cod in waters off
the east coast was observed throughout the study period. Mature cod were found to be in signifi-
cantly better condition than immature cod of the same age, and mature females were in better condi-
tion than mature males. Different patterns emerged from the 2 condition indices; little variation in Kr
was observed whereas H was found to be a dynamic index of condition, suggesting that these met-
rics are not equivalent measures of cod bioenergetic condition.
KEY WORDS: Cod · Iceland · Liver condition · Body condition · Spatial variation · Bathymetric
variation · Capelin · Stomach content
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 362: 261–277, 2008
gan 2004). Furthermore, positive correlations between
growth rate and condition have been detected (Hold-
way & Beamish 1984, Björnsson 2002, Rätz & Lloret
2003), and poor condition may result in increased rates
of natural mortality through greater vulnerability to
disease, predation and reduced capability to catch
mobile prey (Dutil & Lambert 2000, Dutil et al. 2006).
Features of the environment which influence physio-
logical condition, such as temperature and food supply
(Krohn et al. 1997), are likely to vary within the geo-
graphic area inhabited by a stock. The hydrography of
the waters surrounding Iceland has been described
by several authors (see Vilhjálmsson 2002 for an over-
view). The system is characterised by several currents,
linked to bottom topography, which generate spatial
and temporal differences in the water masses around
Iceland. The south and west coasts are influenced by
Atlantic water of relatively high temperature, salinity
and stability, in contrast to the northern and eastern
areas, where polar water transported by the more vari-
able East Greenland and East Icelandic currents pre-
dominates (Vilhjálmsson 2002). Capelin Mallotus villo-
sus is the most important prey item of Icelandic cod
(Magnússon & Pálsson 1989, 1991), and its migrations
and distribution on the Icelandic shelf and in the Ice-
land Sea are closely linked to this system of ocean cur-
rents, and are highly sensitive to environmental fluctu-
ations (Vilhjálmsson 2002).
Traditionally, biological sampling schemes for stock
assessments have, in addition to catch and effort data,
only required information on length and age (Sparre &
Venema 1998). The additional effort and resources
required to obtain weight data means that the informa-
tion necessary to systematically or even accurately
estimate trends in condition using established simple
metrics is lacking for most fish stocks, particularly for
long-term studies. In Iceland, such data for cod have
been routinely collected during spring groundfish sur-
veys. Here we analyse these data to produce a compre-
hensive report on the potential variation in condition
that has existed within the Icelandic cod stock during
the period 1993 to 2006, and to assess the influence of
water temperature, bathymetry and feeding (by analy-
sis of stomach content data) on the emergent patterns.
An important part of the study was to examine the
effect of age, sex and maturity status on H and the
relative body condition index (Kr).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data were obtained from the annual (1993 to 2006)
spring groundfish survey conducted by the Marine
Research Institute, Iceland. The surveys were con-
ducted in March, overlapping with the beginning of
the spawning season for cod (Pálsson et al. 1989). More
than 550 fixed-location stations, covering the area of
the continental shelf of Iceland occupied by cod, were
sampled each year using a bottom trawl with 40 mm
mesh size in the codend (our Fig. 1; Pálsson et al. 1989).
At most stations a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 25
fish were sampled randomly, for which total length (L)
was measured to the nearest 1 cm, and body, gutted
(GW) and liver weights (LW) were determined to the
nearest 1 g. Otoliths were collected for identification of
individual age, sex was recorded and maturity stage
(1: immature, 2: ripening, 3: spawning, 4: spent) was
determined macroscopically according to the stages
defined in Powles (1958). In the present study, we
chose to focus on those age classes where both imma-
ture and mature cod are represented. Therefore data
for immature (n = 9907) and mature cod (n = 7354)
aged 5 yr (5I, 5M respectively) and 6 yr (6I, 6M respec-
tively) were selected.
The data were divided geographically into 4 regions;
south (S), west (W), north (N) and east (E) (Fig. 1) based
on hydrographical and ecological differences, as well
as the approximate location of the 2 frontal zones: west
of Iceland’s northwest peninsula (between regions W
and N) and in the southeast (between regions E and S).
Tagging studies (Pálsson & Thorsteinsson 2003) have
revealed at least 2 groups of Icelandic cod based on
their foraging strategies: those which almost exclu-
sively inhabit shelf waters above 200 m, and deep-
water cod which spend variable periods of time outside
of the spawning season in deeper, cooler waters and
increase their vertical movement. Therefore, the data
were separated at the 200 m depth contour and classi-
fied as either shallow or deep. Sample sizes by age,
maturity, region and depth are provided in Appendix 1.
262
Fig. 1. Station locations of Icelandic spring groundfish surveys
(1993 to 2006) for 4 statistical regions: W, N, E and S. Marked
are the 200 and 500 m depth contours
Pardoe et al.: Condition of Icelandic cod
Condition. Trends in condition were investigated
using H and Kr (Le Cren 1951), calculated as:
(1)
(2)
where GW
pred
is the predicted GW from a
length/weight relationship of the form:
GW = exp (α + β log L) (3)
where GW and L are measurements from individual
cod sampled during the period 1993 to 2006. Rather
than the custom linear regression on log-transformed
length/weight data, the relationship was estimated
using a generalised linear model (GLM) with a log link
function and gamma distribution, as GLMs avoid the
use of correction factors when backtransforming. The
gamma distribution was chosen partly because of
increasing variation in the data with length (Gud-
mundsdóttir & Steinarsson 1997, Begg & Marteins-
dóttir 2003). A single length/weight relationship (Eq. 3)
was estimated for the whole dataset so that Kr would
be comparable across ages, sexes, maturity, regions
and years. Cod of length >90 cm (n = 179) were
excluded from the analyses due to their disproportion-
ate increase in weight (Begg & Marteinsdóttir 2003),
resulting in a poor fit of the estimated length/weight
relationship to these large individuals. The condition
indices were calculated using GW rather than total
weight to ensure a more accurate assessment of trends
in condition as feeding intensity and gonad maturation
can vary significantly between individuals, locations
and years (Lambert & Dutil 1997a).
We did not use the more familiar Fulton’s K as a met-
ric of body condition as it showed an increasing trend
with length, and more importantly, the assumption of
isometric growth (b
3
in the formula K = W/L
3
) was not
satisfied despite values for slopes of L/GW relation-
ships in the range 2.95 to 3.13 (t-test; H
0
slope (b) = 3:
p > 0.05 females 5M and 6M, p < 0.05 5I, 6I, males 5M
and 6M). To test for dependency of the chosen condi-
tion indices on size, linear regressions with length
were performed. For H, the regressions were signifi-
cant (p < 0.001) for 5I (F = 44.67, 6655 df), 6I (F = 110.6,
3248 df), 5M (F = 94.36, 3093 df) and 6M (F = 108.1,
4257 df); however, all slopes were ≤0.016, and in fact
negative for 5I and 6I, along with all values of the coef-
ficient of determination being very low (r
2
< 0.03).
Length–Kr regressions were significant (p < 0.001) for
5I (F = 32.07, 6655 df) and 6I (F = 103, 3248 df) with
slopes of 0.0004 and 0.0009 and r
2
values of 0.005 and
0.03 respectively, but nonsignificant for 5M (F = 0.003,
3093 df, p = 0.95) and 6M (F = 1.735, 4257 df, p = 0.19).
The large amount of data (Appendix 1) and resultant
high statistical power likely explains the statistical sig-
nificance of these otherwise very weak relationships.
Consequently, the use of H and Kr as metrics of condi-
tion for the present study was deemed acceptable.
Stomach content analysis. Cod stomach content data
have been collected in Icelandic waters since 1979
(Pálsson & Björnsson 1993). After 1996, stomachs were
removed from most individuals for which otoliths were
sampled and therefore we examined data for the
period 1996 to 2006. Because capelin is the most
important prey item of Icelandic cod (Magnússon &
Pálsson 1989, 1991) and has been estimated to con-
tribute 80 to 90% by weight to the diet of cod in March
(Pálsson 1997), analyses of cod stomach content data
were restricted to this prey species.
In accordance with Stefánsson & Pálsson (1997),
empty stomachs were considered separately to the
amount of capelin observed in non-empty stomachs.
To account for differences in fish size, a fullness index
(FI; Schwalme & Chouinard 1999, Björnsson 2002) was
calculated for each non-empty stomach as:
(4)
where W
cap
is the weight (g) of capelin in the stomach of
an individual cod. For the annual analysis of FI, ages
5 and 6 yr were combined in order to increase the num-
ber of data points. The proportion of capelin in cod stom-
achs (P
cap
) for each region and year was estimated as:
(5)
where W
prey
is the total stomach content weight (g) and
n is the total number of non-empty stomachs in a given
region and year (Yaragina & Marshall 2000).
Statistical analysis. Individual condition data were
square-root transformed as this provided the most suc-
cessful normalisation, an assumption of ANOVA. For
these data, 1-way ANOVAs, followed by Tukey’s hon-
estly significant difference (HSD) multiple comparison
tests (where applicable), were used to identify differ-
ences in H and Kr between (1) regions, (2) depth strata,
(3) sexes of immature (5I, 6I) and mature cod (5M, 6M)
and (4) maturity status of age 5 and 6 yr cod. Tests were
performed separately for the appropriate combinations
of age, maturity status, sex and region, on combined
data for all years.
In addition, ANOVAs were used to examine the
combined influence of depth strata, region, year, bio-
logical characteristics and 4 first-order interaction
terms on average condition. Another assumption of
ANOVA is independence of observations. Intrahaul
P
W
W
cap
cap
n
prey
n
=
⎛
⎝
⎜
⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟
⎟
∑
∑
100
FI
W
GW
cap
=
⎛
⎝
⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟
Kr
GW
GW
pred
=
⎛
⎝
⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟
H
LW
GW
=
⎛
⎝
⎞
⎠
100
263
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 362: 261–277, 2008
correlation associated with fisheries data is likely to
invalidate this to some extent (Stefánsson & Pálsson
1997 and references therein). In order to help alleviate
this problem, and reduce the likelihood of obtaining
significant effects due to the large amount of data
alone (Appendix 1), mean condition was modelled
rather than the individual observations. This data is
essentially that presented below (see Figs. 2 & 3) with
the exception that, because of their high similarity,
only combined data for immature males and females
are shown. The final models were:
mean H = μ + M
i
+ D
j
+ R
k
+ S
n
+ Y
p
+ A
q
+ (DR)
jk
+
(MR)
ik
+ (RY)
kp
+ (RA)
kq
(6)
mean Kr = μ + D
j
+ A
q
+ R
k
+ S
n
+ Y
p
+ M
i
+ (DR)
jk
+
(MR)
ik
+ (RY)
kp
+ (RA)
kq
(7)
where H and Kr are the indices of condition, μ is the
mean effect, M
i
is the maturity effect, D
j
is the depth
strata effect, R
k
is the region effect, S
n
is the sex effect,
Y
p
is the year effect, A
q
is the age effect and DR, MR,
RY and RA are first-order interactions between the
main effects. Temperature was not included in Eqs. (6)
and (7) as the combination of depth, region and year
can be thought of as a proxy for this environmental
characteristic (see Fig. 4). An additional measure of
model fit was based on a pseudo-coefficient of deter-
mination (pR
2
) which was the fraction of the total ‘vari-
ation’ explained by the model:
(8)
where deviance was analogous to the residual sums of
squares (Swartzman et al. 1995). The contribution of
each effect to the total pR
2
was also calculated.
The relationship between mean annual P
cap
and con-
dition of immature and mature cod (ages 5 and 6 yr
combined) in shallow (<200 m) and deep (>200 m)
water by region was examined using linear regression
analysis. Prior to 2002, mean weight-at-age of cod
aged 5 to 8 yr in the winter was positively related to
abundance of adult capelin in the previous summer
(Vilhjálmsson 2002). Therefore linear regression
analysis was used to determine whether similar rela-
tionships between annual mean condition of age 5 and
6 yr cod (in March) and annual adult capelin stock bio-
mass and abundance (in both August of the previous
year and January of the same year) exist.
RESULTS
Interannual variation in condition
The H and Kr time series (1993 to 2006) showed
rapid fluctuations which were often synchronous
across ages, maturity and sexes (Figs. 2 & 3). In region
W, mean annual H was relatively stable during 1993 to
2000 with values in the approximate ranges of 2–5,
4–6 and 6–8% for 5I, male 5M/6M and female 5M/6M
respectively. There was no consistent trend in Kr dur-
ing this period. A significant peak in H and Kr was
observed in region W in 2001; H reached >6% and
>10% for most immature and mature cod respectively.
By 2002–2003 condition had returned to values similar
to those observed previously, followed by a general
improvement in the most recent years. In region N,
there was an overall decline in liver condition between
1993 and 1999–2001, despite a peak of variable magni-
tude in 1996–1997. In the latter part of the time period,
an improvement in Kr was seen across most age/matu-
rity groups, whereas H was more variable and even
decreased after an additional peak in 2002–2003. In
region E there was an overall decline in condition from
1993 to 2006. Mean H of female and male 6M
decreased from 13–14 and 9–11%, respectively, to
nearer age-specific average values of 6–8%, accompa-
nied by comparable declines in the other age/maturity
groups (Fig. 2). Fish with GW > GW
pred
, GW = GW
pred
or GW < GW
pred
at a given L will have a Kr > 1, Kr = 1
and Kr < 1 respectively. In region E, mean Kr was most
often >1 prior to 2001, but values <1 were more fre-
quent in the latter part of the time period (Fig. 3). Con-
dition was most variable in region S, with the excep-
tion of 6M in shallow waters, for which H was
relatively stable during the time period (excluding the
peak in 2002) at approximately 6% and 8.5% for males
and females respectively. The greater fluctuation in
this region may be explained in part by the low sample
sizes in some years, particularly for immature cod. This
inconsistency in interannual variation across the
regions is supported by the significant interactions
between region and year in ANOVAs which model
mean H and Kr as a function of spatial, temporal and
biological characteristics (Table 1).
Variation in condition with sex, age and
maturity status
Although condition (H) of immature and mature cod
overlapped greatly, H of mature female and male cod
was significantly (p < 0.05; Fig. 2) higher than that of
immature cod for all ages and regions. Moreover,
maturity was found to be the most important factor in
an ANOVA on modelled averages (Table 1). The effect
of maturity on H was dependent to a small degree on
the region in which the cod were located, shown by the
significant interaction term (Table 1) and through com-
parison of, for example, differences in mean H of
immature and mature age 6 yr cod in shallow waters of
pR
2
1=−
⎡
⎣
⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥
Residual deviance
Null deviance
264
Pardoe et al.: Condition of Icelandic cod
regions N and E (Fig. 2). For immature cod, no signifi-
cant differences in H or Kr were detected between the
sexes (p > 0.05). However, age 5 and 6 yr mature
female cod had significantly (p < 0.001; Fig. 2) higher H
than mature males of the same age in all regions. This
was reflected in the multiple-factor ANOVAs; sex
significantly affected mean H and Kr, although it
accounted for a low proportion of the variation relative
to the other factors. Age did not significantly explain
any of the variation in mean H (Table 1).
It is important to note that despite the high degree of
significance of most individual factors in both ANOVA
models, the fraction of variation in mean Kr accounted
for by the total model (pR
2
= 0.39) was approximately
265
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
93 95 97 99 01 03 05
(a)
Shallow
Shallow
93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
93 95 97 99 01 03 05
(b)
Deep
93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
93 95 97 99 01 03 05
(c)
93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
93 95 97 99 01 03 05
(d)
Deep
93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05
Yea r
Mean H (%)
Region W Region N Region E Region S
Age 5
Age 5
Age 6
Age 6
Fig. 2. Gadus morhua. Interannual (1993 to 2006) and spatial variation of mean hepatosomatic index (H, %) of; age 5 yr immature
(
s sexes combined) and mature (females M and males ✳) cod in (a) shallow (<200 m) and (b) deep (>200 m) water, and age 6 yr
immature (
s sexes combined) and mature (females M and males ✳) cod in (c) shallow and (d) deep water. The horizontal dashed
line shows the overall mean for the age present in each plot
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 362: 261–277, 2008
half that explained in mean H (pR
2
= 0.78, Table 1). In
contrast to mean H, maturity did not explain any of the
variation in mean Kr (p > 0.05, Table 1). On a regional
and age basis, however, Kr of mature female and male
cod in regions N and E was significantly (p < 0.05)
higher than that of immature cod. In regions S and W,
several comparisons were also significant (region W: 6I
and male 6M; region S: 5I and male 5M, 6I and female
and male 6M) but were actually the result of immature
cod with higher mean Kr than mature cod (Fig. 3). Kr
was significantly different among the sexes of age 5 yr
mature cod in regions E and S (p < 0.05) and age 6 yr
266
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05
93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05
93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05
93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 93 95 97 99 01 03 05
Region W Region N Region E Region S
(a)
Shallow
Shallow
(b)
Deep
(c)
(d)
Deep
Yea r
Mean Kr
Age 5
Age 5
Age 6
Age 6
Fig. 3. Gadus morhua. Interannual (1993 to 2006) and spatial variation of mean relative condition factor (Kr) of age 5 yr immature
(
s sexes combined) and mature (females M and males ✳) cod in (a) shallow (<200 m) and (b) deep (>200 m) water, and age 6 yr
immature (
s sexes combined) and mature (females M and males ✳) cod in (c) shallow and (d) deep water. The horizontal line
shows Kr = 1.0
Pardoe et al.: Condition of Icelandic cod
mature cod in regions W (p < 0.001), N and S (p < 0.05).
Age was a relatively important explanatory factor for
the variation in mean Kr (p < 0.0001, Table 1).
Spatial and bathymetric trends in condition
Spatial variability in H of Icelandic cod was evident
throughout the time period (1993 to 2006) (Fig. 2),
although annual variability obscured the differences
between regions in some years, an interaction that was
also detected statistically (Table 1). Together with
maturity and depth, region explained 55% of the total
variation in mean H (Table 1). Differences in Kr
between regions were more poorly defined (Fig. 3). In
general, cod were found to be in best condition in
region E despite the overall decline in condition in this
region, with H and Kr of both immature and mature
cod being above the age-specific average or 1.0
respectively for the majority of years. On the whole,
the poorest condition was observed in region W. Dif-
ferences in H between the west and east were signifi-
cant for all age/maturity groups (Tukey’s HSD, p <
0.05). Nonsignificant comparisons for H were those
between regions N and S for 6I, 5M and 6M and
between regions W and S for 6I. This may be due to
low numbers of 6I cod on the main spawning grounds
in the south and southwest. However, regions W and S
did show the most overlap in condition (Fig. 2). Spatial
differences in Kr were also statistically less well
defined than H; region explained a small fraction of the
total variation in mean Kr (Table 1) and significant
region comparisons showed no consistent trend be-
tween age/maturity groups. When all ages were com-
bined, however, Kr of immature fish was significantly
different between all regions whereas for mature cod
this was only true between regions W and E (Tukey’s
HSD, p < 0.05).
Cod in deep water (>200 m) had significantly better
mean H than those at depths <200 m (p < 0.05; Fig. 2),
with the only exception being 6I in region S, for which
few data were available. However, for Kr the trend was
the opposite: mean Kr was significantly higher in shal-
low water (p < 0.05; Fig. 3). Nonsignificant compar-
isons of mean Kr between the depth strata were found
for 5I in region N and 6I in region E. Additionally,
depth strata was an important contributing factor to
the explanation of total variation in mean H, and to a
lesser extent mean Kr (Table 1). The effect of depth on
mean H and Kr was somewhat dependent on the
region, as shown by the significant interaction terms
(Table 1).
Environmental effects
From measurements made during the survey, annual
mean near-bottom temperature was calculated and
showed an increasing temporal trend in all regions
(Fig. 4). All regions, particularly in the east, were char-
acterised by interannual fluctuations in temperature,
which were more or less synchronous between the
depth strata. In region W, the deep water (>200 m) was
warmer than the shallow water (<200 m) throughout
the study period, whereas in region E the opposite was
true. Temperature differences between the depth
strata in regions N and S were less well defined, with
the exception of the most recent years in the north
when the deep water remained approximately 1°C
cooler. In accordance with the known hydrographic
conditions of Icelandic waters, mean temperature was
highest in region S and decreased in a clockwise direc-
tion. Comparison of the time series of mean condition
(Figs. 2 & 3) and bottom temperature (Fig. 4) did not
reveal any obvious overlaps in interannual trends.
Prominent differences in average P
cap
between years
and particularly regions were observed. This variation
was generally similar between ages 5 and 6 yr; there-
fore the averaged trends are presented (Fig. 5). In a
given region, year and depth stratum, the magnitude
of P
cap
was generally quite similar for immature and
267
Source df SS F pR
2
H
Maturity 1 1192.13 831.90** 0.232
Depth 1 513.83 358.57** 0.100
Region 3 1131.98 263.31** 0.221
Sex 1 173.83 121.30** 0.034
Year 13 206.52 11.09** 0.040
Age 1 0.91 0.64
ns
0.000
Region × Depth 3 137.58 32.00** 0.027
Region × Maturity 3 133.95 31.16** 0.026
Region × Year 39 472.51 8.45** 0.092
Region × Age 3 13.89 3.23* 0.003
Residual error 806 1155.01 0.775
Kr
Depth 1 0.15 98.83** 0.074
Age 1 0.06 36.57** 0.028
Region 3 0.08 17.85** 0.040
Sex 1 0.01 6.16* 0.005
Year 13 0.09 4.45** 0.044
Maturity 1 0.00 1.35
ns
0.001
Region × Depth 3 0.10 21.70** 0.049
Region × Maturity 3 0.08 17.89** 0.040
Region × Year 39 0.22 3.74** 0.110
Region × Age 3 0.00 0.70
ns
0.002
Residual error 806 1.24 0.393
Table 1. Gadus morhua. Multiple-factor ANOVA examining
the influence of main effects and first-order interaction terms
on average condition (hepatosomatic index, H and relative
condition factor, Kr) of Icelandic cod from 1993 to 2006. *p <
0.05, **p < 0.0001, ns = not significant
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 362: 261–277, 2008
mature cod. Feeding on capelin, at the
time of the survey, was highly variable
in region W. For immature and mature
cod in shallow (<200 m) water, good
capelin feeding years in this region
(‘good’ defined here as P
cap
≥ 40%)
were 1997, 2001 and 2002 along with
1996 for mature individuals. In deep
(>200 m) water, this can only be said
for immature cod in 2001. For the
majority of cod in region W,
1998–1999 and 2003–2005 were very
poor (P
cap
< 10%) capelin feeding
years, along with 2006 in deep water.
Feeding on capelin, particularly in
deep water, was markedly lower in
region S than regions N and E in
almost all years. In region S, P
cap
was
consistently ≥30% and <12% in shal-
low and deep water, respectively. In
region N, P
cap
of immature cod in shal-
low and deep water ranged between
8–100% and 32–100%, respectively,
and P
cap
of mature cod varied between
268
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
Region W
Mean temperature (°C)
Shallow
Deep
93 949596 97 989900 010203 0405 06
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Region N
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Region E
93 949596 97 989900 010203 0405 06
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
Region S
Yea r
Fig. 4. Annual (1993 to 2006) mean (± 95% CI) near-bottom water temperature
(°C) of 2 depth strata (shallow: <200 m, deep: >200 m) in 4 statistical regions of
the Icelandic shelf. Note different scales on y-axes
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
(a) Immature, shallow
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Region W
Region N
Region E
Region S
(b) Immature, deep
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
(c) Mature, shallow
*
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
(d) Mature, deep
Year
P
cap
(%)
Fig. 5. Gadus morhua. Time series (1996 to 2006) of average proportion of capelin (P
cap
) in stomachs of immature Icelandic cod in
(a) shallow (<200 m) and (b) deep (>200 m) water, and mature Icelandic cod in (c) shallow and (d) deep water in 4 regions
(W, N, E and S) of the Icelandic shelf.
*
Missing data for 1996 (c)
Pardoe et al.: Condition of Icelandic cod
1–83% and 27–98%, respectively. Similarly, P
cap
of
immature cod in shallow and deep water of region E
ranged between 17–71% and 12–70%, respectively,
and P
cap
of mature cod varied between 20–64% and
12–72%, respectively. Annual mean capelin feeding in
region N was quite stable, with good capelin feeding
predominating in the majority of years, particularly in
deep water. Overall, P
cap
in the north was lowest from
1999–2001, but was particularly good (>50%) in 1996
in both depth strata, along with 2005–2006 in shallow
water. A general decline in capelin feeding in region E
was observed, perhaps with the exception of mature
cod in shallow water. In 1996–1997, P
cap
of immature
cod in shallow water was >63%, and in deep water
was >70% and >49% for immature and mature cod
respectively. However, by 2005–2006 P
cap
had fallen to
<27% for immature cod in shallow water and <32%
for immature and mature cod in deep water.
Interestingly, significant (p ≤ 0.05) positive relation-
ships between mean annual condition (H and Kr) and
mean annual P
cap
of immature and mature cod in shal-
low (<200 m) and deep (>200 m) water existed only in
regions N and E (Table 2). Such a relationship was not
found between the capelin stock and overall condition
of Icelandic cod; all regressions of mean annual condi-
tion (H and Kr, all regions combined) of age 5 and 6 yr
cod and annual adult capelin stock biomass or abun-
dance (for both August of the previous year and Janu-
ary of the same year) were nonsignificant (p > 0.4).
Analysis of relative capelin biomass in stomachs (FI,
%) revealed pronounced interannual and spatial varia-
tion in capelin consumption by immature and mature
cod (Fig. 6). Although unequal sample coverage makes
it difficult to make systematic comparisons, it could be
concluded that on the whole FI of immature cod was
greater than that of mature cod. Feeding on capelin
appeared to be most intensive at or
near the 200 m contour line in the
northwest and beyond this depth in
the north and east. For both immature
and mature cod, FI was particularly
high in the northwest from 2005–2006,
coinciding with a ‘good’ P
cap
year in
region N as well as a general improve-
ment in Kr after 2003–2004 (Figs. 3, 5
& 6). Patterns of FI in the east did not
clearly follow those observed for con-
dition and P
cap
; it could be interpreted
that the number of cod with empty
stomachs increased in region E during
the time period (Fig. 6), but as with all
interpretation of this stomach content
data, interannual and spatial variabil-
ity in the distribution of data points
would need to be taken into account
before such a conclusion could be made reliably. Cod
feeding on prey species other than capelin did not
show any notable spatial or temporal trends.
High densities of cod with empty stomachs or those
that had not eaten any capelin (Fig. 6) might explain
the relatively poor condition in the west throughout the
time series. FI was particularly low in 1998, 1999, 2004
and 2005; Kr of mature 6 yr old cod also reached low-
est values in shallow water of region W in 1999, but
there were no other distinctive correlations between FI
and condition in these years. The peak in condition
(Figs. 2 & 3) and P
cap
(Fig. 5) in region W in 2001 does
correspond to an atypical number of samples with FI >
10% in depths of <200 m. However, a similar event oc-
curred in 1997 but H and Kr did not improve markedly
in this year.
DISCUSSION
We observed high interannual variability in H of Ice-
landic cod, along with variation associated with geo-
graphic location, depth and temperature. Surprisingly,
H and Kr showed very little agreement. Consumption
of capelin was found to be related to some of these
temporal and spatial trends. In addition, significant
relationships between H and biological characteristics
were detected; mature cod were found to be in signifi-
cantly better condition than immature cod of the same
age, and the mean H of mature females was greater
than that of mature males. Conversely, many of these
trends were much weaker or not detected by Kr.
Capelin is the most important prey item of Icelandic
cod (Magnússon & Pálsson 1989, 1991), although its
contribution by weight to their diet varies between 80
and 90% during the capelin spawning season in
269
Condition Maturity Region Depth Regression r
2
p
index
H (%) I N S H = 2.17 + 0.05 × P
cap
0.68 <0.01
H (%) I E S H = 4.66 + 0.05 × P
cap
0.57 <0.01
H (%) I N D H = 4.14 + 0.07 × P
cap
0.64 <0.01
H (%) M N S H = 4.82 + 0.02 × P
cap
0.40 0.05
H (%) M N D H = 7.13 + 0.04 × P
cap
0.51 <0.05
Kr I N S Kr = 0.95 + 0.001 × P
cap
0.74 <0.001
Kr I E S Kr = 0.95 + 0.001 × P
cap
0.71 <0.01
Kr I E D Kr = 0.95 + 0.001 × P
cap
0.35 0.05
Kr M N S Kr = 0.97 + 0.001 × P
cap
0.62 <0.01
Kr M E S Kr = 0.98 + 0.001 × P
cap
0.37 <0.05
Kr M N D Kr = 0.94 + 0.001 × P
cap
0.52 <0.05
Table 2. Gadus morhua. Regression equations for significant relationships
between the mean annual (1996 to 2006) proportion of capelin in stomachs (P
cap
)
and mean annual condition (hepatosomatic index, H and relative condition
factor, Kr) of Icelandic cod (I = immature, M = mature) in 2 depth strata (S =
shallow, <200 m and D = deep, >200 m)
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 362: 261–277, 2008270
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
E
EE
EEEEE
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
*
****
*
*
*
**
*
*
****
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
***
*
****
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
***
*
**
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
******
**
***
1996
E
EEE
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
EE
EE
E
EE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EEEE
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
EEEE
E
EEEEEE
E
E
E
EEE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EEE
EEE
EE
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
E
E
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
***
*
**
**
*
*
*
***
**
**
*
*
**
*
**
*********
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
**
***
*
***
*
***
*
*
***
*
*
*
***
**
***
*
*
***
*
**
*
*
*
*
***
**
**
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
**
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
**
***
*
*
***
**
**
*
***
*
**
**
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
1997
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
EE
E
E
EE
E
EEE
E
E
EE
E
EEEE
EE
E
E
EE
EE
E
E
EEE
E
EEE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
EEEE
EE
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
E
EE
EEE
E
E
EE
EEEEEE
E
EE
EE
EE
E
EE
EEEEEEEE
EE
E
E
E
E
EEEEE
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
EEEEE
E
E
E
EEE
E
EE
E
E
EE
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
EEEEEE
E
EEE
EEEE
E
E
E
EEEEEEEEE
E
E
EE
E
EEE
*
**
*
***
*
**
*
***
*
*
**
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
****
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
***
**
*
**
*
***
**
*
*
*
*********
*
**
*
*
**
*
***
***
***
*
**
**
*
***
***
*
*
**
***
****
**
*
****
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
****
**
*
*
**
***
**
*
**
***
*
*
**
**
*
**
*
*
*
**
***
***
***********
****
**
**
*********
**
*
*
*****
***********
*
*
*
****
*
**************
***********
*
*
**
*
*
*****
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
****
*
**
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1
5
1998
EE
EE
EEE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
EE
E
E
EEE
E
E
EE
EEE
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
*
*
**
****
*
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
***
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
***
***
*
*
***
****
*
***
*
***
*
**
*
*
**
**
*
**
***
*
***
**
*
**
*
*
****
*
*
*
*
*
*
*******
***
*
****
*
******
***
*
***
**
**
****
*
*
*****
*
*
**
*
*
**
**
**
**
*
***********
*
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
******
**
*
**
**
*
*
*
**
*
*
**
******
*
*
*
******
*
**
****
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
**
****
*
*
*
*
*
*
***
*
*
1999
E
E
E
E
E
EE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EEEEE
EEE
E
E
EE
EEE
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
EE
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
E
E
EE
EE
E
EE
E
EEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EEEE
EE
EEEE
EEEE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EE
EE
E
E
E
EE
E
E
EEE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
EE
E
E
E
EE
EEEE
E
EEE
E
E
EEE
E
E
EE
EE
E
**
**
**
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
***
*
*
**
**
*
**
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
*
**
*
**
***
**
***
*
*
*
*
*
**
**
**
***
*
*
****
*
*
**
**
*****
*
***
**
***
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
**
**
*
***
*
*
*
**
**
*
*
**
**
*
**
*
****
*
*
***
*
**
**
*
*
*
**
*
**
****
****
**********
**
**
****
****
****
****
********
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
****
**
**********
****
****
****
****
**
**
****
**
****************
************
**********
**
**
****
**
**
**********
**
****
**
**
*
**
****
**
*****
******
*
****
*
**
****
*
****
***
***
**
*
*
*
**
*
**
****
**
*
**
**
****
*
*
*******
***
*
****
*
*
*
*
**
**
***
**
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
****
*
****
**
*
****
*
**
**
***
**
*
*
*
****
*
**
***
***
*
***
**
*
*
***
***
*
*
*
2000
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
***
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
***
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
***
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
**
*
2001
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
EEE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
EE
E
E
EEE
EEEEE
E
E
E
EE
EE
EE
E
EEEE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EE
E
E
**
*
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
**
**
***
**
*
*
*
*
**
**
**
*
**
***
**
***
*
**
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
***
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
*
*
*******
****
**
*
**
***
*
****
*
*****
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
**
***
*
*
**
*
***
**
*
*
**
2002
E
E
EE
E
E
EE
EE
EEEE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
EEEE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
EEE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
EE
EE
EEE
EEE
EEE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
EEE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
EE
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EEEE
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EEEE
EEEE
E
E
EE
EEEEEEEE
EEEEE
EEEE
E
E
EEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEE
EE
EEE
EEEE
EE
EEEE
E
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
*
*
*
**
**
*
***
**
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*****
*
**
**
**
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
***
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
***
**
*
*
**
*
***
*
*
**
*
*
***
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
***
*
*
**
**
*
*
**
**
*
*
***
*
******
*
*
*
**
**
*
**
***
**
***
*
*
******
*
**
*
*
**
*
*
**
**
*
*******
**
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
*
******
*
**
*
******
*
**
*
*
***
*
*
***********
*
*
**
*
****
*
**
*
***
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
***
*
*
*
***
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
2003
E
E
EE
E
EE
E
EE
EE
EEE
E
E
E
EEEEE
EEE
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EE
E
EE
E
EE
E
E
EE
EE
EEE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
EEEEEE
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
EE
EEEEE
E
E
EE
EE
EE
E
EE
E
E
E
EEE
EE
E
E
EEE
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EEE
E
E
EE
E
EEE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
E
E
E
EE
EE
EE
E
EE
EE
E
E
*
***
*
***
*****
*
**
*
*
**
*
****
*
***
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
**
*
**
*
*****
*
*
**
**
*
***
***
*
*
**
*
*
*
**
*****
*
***
*
*
**
**
*
***
*
**
***
*
**
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
***
*
**
*
*
*
**
**
**
*******
*
*
***
*
*
*
*
*****
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
****
**
*
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
*
*****
*
***
*
**
**
*
*
**
*******
*************
*
*
*******
**
**
****
**
*******
**
**
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
***
***
*
*
*
**
**
**
**
*
**
**
****
*
****
*
**
***
***
**
*
**
***
*****
*
**
**
*
*******
***
***********
**
*
*
2004
24°W 18° 12°
EE
EE
EEE
E
EEE
E
E
EEEE
E
EE
E
E
EEE
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
EEE
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
EEEE
EEEEEEE
EE
EEE
E
E
EE
E
EEEE
EE
E
E
EEE
E
E
EEE
EEE
E
EE
EEE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EE
EE
EE
E
EE
E
EEE
EE
EE
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
EEEE
E
EE
E
EEEE
E
E
EEEEEE
EE
EEEEEEE
EEE
E
EE
E
E
E
EEE
E
EEE
E
EE
EE
EE
E
E
E
E
EEEE
E
E
E
EE
E
EEEEEEEEE
EE
EEE
EEE
E
E
EEEE
E
E
E
EEE
EEE
EE
EEE
EEEEEE
E
EE
E
E
EEEEEEEEEEE
EE
EEEEEE
EEE
EE
EEE
E
EEEEEEEE
EEEE
EEE
E
E
EEEEE
E
E
EEEE
E
EEEE
E
EEE
E
E
EEEEEE
EEEEE
EEEEEE
EE
E
E
*
*
****
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
**
*
*
**
**
*
***
*
*
**
*
*
**
*
*
***
*
**
**
****
*
***
***
*
*
*
**
*
**
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
***
*
*
*
*
*
************
*****
*
******
*
**
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
**
****
*
***
*****
**
*
**
*
*
*
***
**
*
*
*
********
*
*
*
****
*
**
*
***
*
*
*
****
*
**
*
*
****
*
*
**
***
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
*
*******
**
**
*
**
*
*****
*
*
*****
*
****
*
**
*
****
*
***
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
**
****
*
***
***
***
*****
***
*
*
**
*
*
*
2005
24°W 18°
12°
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
E
EE
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EE
EE
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
E
E
EE
E
E
EEE
E
EEE
E
EEE
E
EEEEEEEEE
E
EE
EEEEEEE
E
EE
EEEEEEEE
E
E
E
EE
EE
E
EEEEE
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
E
EE
EE
E
E
E
E
EEE
EEE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EEEEEEEEEE
E
E
EEEE
EEE
E
E
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
*
***
*
*
*
***
*
**
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*****
*
**
**
*
*
**
***
*
***
*
***
*
******
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
**
**
**
*
*
*
*
**
**
**
*
*
*
*
***
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
**
*
***
*
**
*
*
*
***
*
***
*
*******
*******
*****
*
***
****
**
********
**
******
***
****
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
****
*
**
**
**
******
*
***
*
*
**
*
**
2006
24°W 18° 12°
24°W 18° 12°
(a) Immature
10
50
63°
64°
65°
66°
67°
63°
64°
65°
66°
67°
63°
N
64°
65°
66°
67°
Fig. 6. Gadus morhua. Annual relative capelin biomass (FI: fullness index, %) in non-empty stomachs of (a) immature and (b) mature Icelandic cod. *Cod with non-empty
stomachs but FI = 0. E = cod with empty stomachs. The 200 m contour line is marked
Pardoe et al.: Condition of Icelandic cod
271
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EEEE
E
E
E
EE
EEE
E
E
E
EE
EE
EEEE
E
EE
E
EE
EEEE
EEEE
EE
EEEEE
E
EEEEE
EEEEEEE
E
EEE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
**
*
*
*
*
**
*******
**
*
*
*
*
**
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
***
*
**
**
*
*
**
****
*****
****
**
****
***
**
**
**
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
*
**
1996
63°
64°
65°
66°
67°
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
EEE
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
EEE
E
EE
E
E
E
E
EEE
EE
E
E
E
E
EE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
**
**
**
*
*
*
*
**
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
***
*****
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
***
**
*
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
*