Article

Food and eating as social practice - Understanding eating patterns as social phenomena and implications for public health

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Canada.
Sociology of Health & Illness (Impact Factor: 1.88). 04/2009; 31(2):215-28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01128.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Globally, public health agencies recognise obesity trends among populations as a priority. Explanations for population obesity patterns are linked to obesogenic environments and societal trends which encourage patterns of overeating and little physical activity. However, obesity prevention and nutrition intervention focus predominantly on changing individual level eating behaviours. Disappointingly, behaviour-based nutrition education approaches to changing population eating patterns have met with limited success. Sociological perspectives propose that underlying social relations can help explain collective food and eating patterns, and suggest an analysis of the sociocultural context for understanding population eating patterns. We propose a theoretical framework for the examination of eating patterns as social phenomena. Giddens' structuration theory, in particular his concept of social practices understood as an interplay of 'agency' and 'social structure' (rules and resources), is used to study food choice patterns. We discuss the application of these concepts for understanding routine food choice practices of families, elaborating how rules and resources configure the enabling or constraining conditions under which actors make food choices. The framework assists in characterising how social structural properties are integral to food choice practices, and could direct attention to these when considering nutrition interventions aimed at changing population eating patterns.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Treena Delormier
  • Source
    • "Therefore, how mealtimes are performed is the result of a complex interplay of context, constraints, values, compromises, tastes and identities. Understanding variations in the internalised logic, which informs family meal practices is a useful way of exploring this interplay (Delormier, Frohlich, & Potvin, 2009;Schubert, 2008). This paper examines one ABSTRACT Family meals, as acts of domestic food provisioning, are shaped by the competing influences of household resources, food preferences and broader cultural norms around dietary practices. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Family meals, as acts of domestic food provisioning, are shaped by the competing influences of household resources, food preferences and broader cultural norms around dietary practices. The place of children’s food tastes in family meal practices is particularly complex. Food tastes stand in a reciprocal relationship with family food practices: being both an influence on and a product of them. This paper explores how parents think about and respond to their children’s food preferences in relation to family meal practices. A qualitative study was conducted with residents of Sandwell, UK. The results presented here are based on the responses of nine key participants and their families. Photo elicitation methods generated participant food photo diaries that were used to inform subsequent interviews. A thematic analysis revealed two contrasting ways of incorporating children’s tastes into family meal routines: (1) ‘what we fancy’ and (2) ‘regulated’. The former entails repeatedly consulting and negotiating with children over what to cook for each meal. It is supported by the practical strategies of multiple and individually modified meals. The latter relies upon parents developing a repertoire of meals that ‘work’ for the family. This repertoire is performed as a series of ‘set meals’ in which any requests for variation are strongly resisted. Our findings add to the small body of literature on household food provisioning and suggest that achieving the idealised ritual of the family meal is underpinned by a range of values and strategies, some of which may run counter to health messages about nutrition.
    Preview · Article · Oct 2015 · Critical Public Health
  • Source
    • "Due to the nature of the ketogenic diet, foods are selected primarily for their nutritional content . Although individuals not on a specific diet may give consideration to nutritional content when making food choices, this is not the principal way in which foods are usually selected (Beardsworth and Keil 1997); rather, food choice is largely a result of the meanings attached to foods and the social context in which they are eaten (Delormier et al. 2009, DeVault 1991, Wills et al. 2011). Indeed, there are norms related to when, where and with whom we eat (Counihan 1999, DeVault 1991, James et al. 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ketogenic diet is a high-fat diet used to treat drug-resistant childhood epilepsy. Given that negative meanings tend to be attached to fatty foods and children's food consumption is seen to be the responsibility of parents, the ketogenic diet may be problematic for parenting identity. This article draws upon in-depth semi-structured interviews with 12 parents from 10 families that have a child whose epilepsy is being treated with the ketogenic diet. The main focus of the article is the meanings these parents attached to foods and how they were drawn upon or altered to overcome some of the contradictions presented by the diet. It will be argued that the diet was medicalised and parents came to view food as medicine. When viewing food in this way, negative associations with fat were reversed. Furthermore, parents also used food as a symbol of inclusion and prioritised portion size or the child's enjoyment of food in order to use food as a symbol of love. In turn this enabled parents to feel they were being good parents. Overall, it seems that diet can be medicalised and the identity of the good parent maintained if dietary treatment is successful.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2015 · Sociology of Health & Illness
    • "For example, not everyonehas the necessary skills, economic resources and/or social support to take responsibility for their health. Eating is a social practice where people show group belonging, which means that deviating from a norm can be difficult (Delormier et al., 2009;Fischler, 1988;Lupton, 1996), but the individualistic Discourse is so wide-spread that it may marginalise knowledge about these social aspects. Thus the 'responsible' choice to reduce meat consumption may be made more difficult for people whose culture centres on meat (Dagevos & Voordouw, 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to describe Discourses on meat in the school subject Home and Consumer Studies in five different northern Swedish schools. Fifty-nine students and five teachers from five different schools were recorded and in some cases video-taped during lessons. Results indicate that meat was seen as central to nutritional health, sensory experience, culture and social relationships. This positive view was challenged by an alternative Discourse where meat was threatening to health, sensory experience and psychological comfort, but this was not strong enough to affect centrality. Even when participants sought to promote the health advantages of reducing meat consumption, the dominant centrality Discourse was strengthened. This implies that the possible tension between physical and psychosocial/emotional health can make the benefits of a reduction difficult both to convey and accept. A form of critical food literacy may help teachers deconstruct the arbitrary power of the centrality Discourse, but it may also strengthen meat-eater identities because the social norms that guide food choice become salient. A redesign of Discourses might facilitate a reduction in meat consumption, but such a paradigm shift is dependent on the development of society as a whole, and can only be briefly touched upon within the limited time frames and resources of Home and Consumer Studies. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2015 · Appetite
Show more