Publish with Bio Med Central and every
scientist can read your work free of charge
"BioMed Central will be the most significant development for
disseminating the results of biomedical researc h in our lifetime."
Sir Paul Nurse, Cancer Research UK
Your research papers will be:
available free of charge to the entire biomedical community
peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance
cited in PubMed and archived on PubMed Central
yours — you keep the copyright
Submit your manuscript here:
BMC Public Health 2009, 9:56 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/56
Page 13 of 13
(page number not for citation purposes)
3. Cabinet Office: National Risk Register. [http://www.cabinetof
4. NHS Employers and Department of Health: Pandemic Influenza:
Human resources guidance for the NHS.
5. Scientific Pandemic Influenza Advisory Committee Subgroup on Mod-
elling (September 2008): Modelling Summary. [http://www.advi
6. Daniels N: Duty to treat or right to refuse? Hastings centre report
7. Annas GJ: Legal risks and responsibilities of physicians in the
HIV epidemic. Hastings Center Report 1988, 18(2):S26-32.
8. Freedman B: Health professionals, codes and the right to
refuse to treat HIV-infected patients. Hastings Center Report
9. Arras JD: The fragile web of responsibility: AIDS and the duty
to treat. Hastings Center Report 1988, 18(2):S10-20.
10. Zuger A, Miles SH: Physicians, AIDS, and occupational risk.
Historic traditions and ethical obligations. Journal of the Ameri-
can Medical Association 1987, 258(14):1924-192.
11. Ruderman C, Shawn Tracy C, Bensimon CM, Bernstein M, Hawryluck
L, Zlotnik Shaul R, Upshur REG: On pandemics and the duty to
care: whose duty? who cares? BMC Medical Ethics 2006, 7:5.
12. Bevan JC, Upshur RE: Anaesthesia, ethics and severe acute res-
piratory syndrome. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2003,
13. Hui E: The SARS epidemic in Hong Kong 2003: Interplay of
Law, Medicine and Ethics. In The Nexus of Law and Biology: New
ethical challenges Edited by: Hocking B. Ashgate Publishing ltd, forth-
coming December; 2008.
14. Tzeng H-M, Yin C-Y: Nurses' fears and professional obligations
concerning possible human-to-human avain flu. Nursing Ethics
15. Young C, Persell D: Biological, chemical, and nuclear terrorism
readiness: Major concerns and preparedness of future
nurses. Disaster Management & Response 2005, 2(4):109-114.
16. Shaw KA, Chilcott A, Hansen E, Winzenberg T: The GP's response
to pandemic influenza: a qualitative study. Family Practice 2006,
17. Ehrenstein BP, Hanses F, Salzberger B: Influenza pandemic and
professional duty: family or patient's first? A qualitative sur-
vey of hospital employees.
BMC Public Health 2006, 6:311.
18. Qureshi K, Gershon RRM, Sherman MF, Straub T, Gebbie E, McCol-
lum M, Erwin MJ, Morse SS: Healthcare workers' ability and will-
ingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters.
Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
19. Balicer RD, Omer SB, Barnett DJ, Everly GS Jr: Local public health
workers' perceptions toward responding to an influenza pan-
demic. BMC Public Health 2006, 6:99.
20. Yee Wong T, Koh G, Kwing Yong S, Sundram M, Koh K, Eng Chia S,
Koh D: A cross-sectional study of primary care physicians in
Singapore on their concerns and preparedness for an avian
influenza outbreak. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore 2008,
21. Kreuger RA, Casey MA: Focus Groups. London; Sage; 2000.
22. Kitzinger J, Barbour R: Introduction: The Challenge and Prom-
ise of Focus Groups. In Developing Focus Group Research: Politics,
Theory and Practice Edited by: Barbour R, Kitzinger R. London; Sage;
23. Morgan D, Kreuger RA: When to use focus groups and why. In
Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art Edited by: Morgan
D. London; Sage; 1993.
24. Bloor M, Frankland J, Thomas M, Robson K: Focus Groups in
Social Research. London; Sage; 2001.
25. Silverman D: Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analys-
ing talk, text and interaction. Sage; London; 2004.
26. Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative Research, Grounded
Theory Procedures. London; Sage; 1990.
27. Finch H, Lewis J: Focus Groups. In Qualitative Research Practice: A
guide for Social Science Students and Researchers Edited by: Ritchie J,
Lewis J. Sage; London; 2005.
28. Bowling A: Research Methods in Health: Investigating health
and health services. 2nd edition. OUP;Maidenhead; 2004.
29. Draper H, Wilson S, Ives J, Gratus C, Greenfield S, Parry J, Petts J,
Sorell T: Healthcare worker's attitudes to working during
pandemic influenza: A multi-method study. BMC Public Health
30. Department of Health: Pandemic Influenza: Guidance on Pre-
paring Acute Hospitals in England. 2007 [http://
31. Department of Health: Responding to pandemic influenza. The
ethical framework for policy and planning. 2007
32. Wong L, Kolditz T, Millen R, Potter T: Why they fight: combat
motivation in the Iraq war. DIANE publishing; 2003.
33. MacCoun R, Kier E, Belkin A: Does social cohesion determine
motivation in combat? An old question with an old answer.
Armed Forces and Society 2005, 32(1):1-9.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed