Article

Incremental cost-effectiveness evaluation of vaccinating girls against cervical cancer pre- and post-sexual debut in Belgium

Health Economics, GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Rue Fleming 20, B-1300 Wavre, Belgium. Electronic address: .
Vaccine (Impact Factor: 3.62). 06/2013; 31(37). DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Background:
Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) to prevent cervical cancer (CC) primarily targets young girls before sexual debut and is cost-effective. We assessed whether vaccination with the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine added to screening remains cost-effective in females after sexual debut compared to screening alone in Belgium. The role of protection against non-HPV-16/18 was also investigated.

Methods:
A published Markov cohort model was adapted to Belgium. The model replicated the natural history of HPV infection, the effects of screening, and vaccination. Vaccine efficacy (VE) included non-HPV-16/18 protection based on the PATRICIA clinical trial data. Pre- and post-HPV exposure VE were differentiated. Lifetime vaccine protection was assumed. Input data were obtained from literature review, national databases and a Delphi panel. Costing was from a healthcare payer perspective. Costs were discounted at 3% and effects at 1.5%. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and the number of lesions prevented with vaccination from age 12 to 40 was evaluated. The specific effect of non-HPV-16/18 protection was investigated. Univariate sensitivity analysis was performed on key variables.

Results:
The model estimated that vaccinating a cohort of 100,000 girls at age 12 would prevent 646 CC cases over a lifetime (102 non-HPV-16/18) with an ICER of €9171/QALY. Vaccinating at age 26 would prevent 340 CC cases (40 non-HPV-16/18) with an ICER of €17,348/QALY and vaccinating at age 40 would prevent 146 CC cases (17 non-HPV-16/18) with an ICER of €42,847/QALY. The ICER remained under the highly cost-effective threshold (1×GDP/capita) until age 33 years and under the cost-effective threshold (3×GDP/capita) beyond age 40.

Conclusion:
Extending HPV vaccination to females post-sexual debut could lead to a substantial reduction in CC-related burden and would be cost-effective in Belgium.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Nadia Demarteau, Sep 09, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The lifetime risk for acquiring a human papilloma virus (HPV) infection is 80% for sexually active people. High-risk HPVs are causally related to almost every case of cervical cancer, and to a subgroup of vaginal, vulvar, anal, penile and oral/oropharyngeal cancer. Low-risk HPVs are related to cutaneous, anogenital, and oral warts. Two prophylactic vaccines were launched in 2007: they were included in the national vaccination program in Belgium (2009) and in the Netherlands (2010). The objectives of the present study were to determine and compare knowledge and attitudes regarding HPV and vaccination among a study population in 2006 and in 2012. Shortly before the introduction, and three years after the inclusion, 715 (2006) and 678 participants (2012) were questioned. Participants were categorised as into non-medics, medics, or paramedics. In general, knowledge about HPV has increased over time (p<0.01). Well-known facts are the relationship of HPV with cervical cancer (>94% in 2006; >96% in 2012), and that an HPV infection might be asymptomatic (>95% in 2006; >99% in 2012). In 2012, versus in 2006, paramedics and non-medics (both p<0.01), were more likely to vaccinate all female teenagers. Medics were less likely to support this (p=0.001). More respondents agreed to vaccinate their daughters (p<0.01), as well as their sons (p<0.01). In 2012, when compared with 2006, less non-medics and medics (both p<0.01) and more paramedics (p=0.001) would accept a free catch-up vaccination. Arguments against catch-up vaccination reflected the belief not being at risk and doubts about the vaccines' safety. The facts that vaccination programs are regarded as being important, and that knowledge on HPV increased, do not automatically result in an increase in participation in HPV vaccination programs. To increase participation, information must be provided with arguments that cannot be misinterpreted.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2013 · Vaccine
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Due to cervical cancer screening the number of squamous cancer have declined. The number of adenocarcinomas (ADCs) does appear to be rising. ADCs are often missed and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing could be helpful in detecting these abnormalities earlier. A 36-year-old woman, who had a normal smear three years earlier, had a pap smear with atypical glandular cells. The L1 HPV test showed that there was no HPV infection. Other HPV tests which looked at E6 and E7 showed an infection with HPV 16. Due to unknown reasons, no action was taken regarding the atypical glandular cells. Two years later the patient was diagnosed with a FIGO Stage IVb ADC of the cervix. The L1 HPV test was still negative and the E6/E7 HPV test was still positive. Despite several multiple treatment modalities she succumbed of her disease two years later leaving behind a young family. HPV test looking only at L1 can give false negative results if the virus is integrated in the human genome.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2014 · European journal of gynaecological oncology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cervical cancer should be a historical disease, why are we not succeeding! The prophylactic vaccination will reduce cervical cancer by almost 80% in Belgium. Cervical cancer screening should therefore remain in order to prevent the remaining 20%. The current used Pap cytology test misses 50% of all clinically significant precancers and cancers at the time of testing. The test should remain but the analysis should be altered. The screening should be modified based on our knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) as causal factor. Instead of looking for a cell abnormality, one should look for the presence of HPV. Then depending on the test, only two to ten percent of all relevant lesions are missed. The introduction of the vaccination should lead to the re-introduction of the screening based on HPV. This will not only lead to a considerable reduction in morbidity and mortality, allow longer screening intervals, but it will also be more cost-effective. More for less should be the driving force in cervical cancer screening if we want to be successful.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2014 · European journal of gynaecological oncology
Show more