[Glycemic control and cardiovascular morbimortality: What's new with the 2008 studies?]

ArticleinAnnales d Endocrinologie 70(1) · March 2009with7 Reads
Impact Factor: 0.87 · DOI: 10.1016/j.ando.2008.12.009 · Source: PubMed

    Abstract

    The year 2008 was full of learning experience and suspense in diabetologia. The past studies, the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) in type 2 diabetic patients and the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) in type 1 diabetic patients, have shown that intensive treatment during a short period did reduce the incidence of microvascular events, and in the long term, the incidence of macrovascular events linked to diabetes. The conclusions of recent studies quote, from Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group (ACCORD), an increased mortality in the type 2 diabetic patients using intensive therapy, from Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease, Perindopril and Indapamide Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE), a reduction of microvascular complications and, from Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT), no effect. The analysis of studies published in 2008 (ACCORD, STENO 2 post-trial, ADVANCE, VADT, UKPDS post-trial, Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications [EDIC]) brings lessons for the clinical practice: presence of glycemic memory, absence of tensional memory, usefulness of control of every cardiovascular risk factors, need of early treatment of diabetes. Moreover, to define HbA(1c) objective, age, duration of diabetes, presence of cardiovascular risk factors, former HbA(1c) level and potential undesirable effects, such hypoglycaemia must be considered. So, the management of type 2 diabetic patients requires an early, not too quick intensive treatment, which avoids hypoglycaemia and is combined with a strict control of cardiovascular risk factors.