Executive summary The development and operation of the built environment could play a key role in the mitigation efforts. However, the transition towards more sustainable settlements requires massive use of materials and energy in new energy efficient buildings, and supporting infrastructures. Traditionally the embodied emissions from materials have not been considered of high importance, but since the construction of energy efficient buildings and modern infrastructure causes more GHG emissions than conventional ones, the embodied emissions are becoming more crucial. However, evaluating the environmental burden of construction materials has proved problematic and despite the significant research around the world, the reliability of estimates is still highly questionable. Also, there is growing consensus among organizations committed to environmental performance targets that appropriate strategies and actions are needed to make construction activities more sustainable. The pace of actions towards sustainable application depends on decisions taken by a number of stakeholders in the construction process: owners, managers, designers, firms, etc. Careful selection of sustainable building materials has been identified as the easiest way for designers to begin incorporating sustainable principles in building projects. Yet, the selection of building materials is considered as a multi-criteria decision problem. Ideally, sustainability assessment would integrate social, technical, environmental and economic considerations at every stage in decision-making. The three objectives of the EmBED project were to: 1. improve the current assessment practices in the construction sector 2. provide reliable estimates for the embodied environmental impacts caused by the development of the built environment in Iceland 3. develop an assessment framework for construction materials based on Multi-criteria decision analysis approach We employ life cycle assessment (LCA), the most widely accepted and used assessment method in the construction sector for an integrated assessment of environmental impacts from cradle to grave (Heinonen et al., 2016; Suh et al., 2004a) for five case studies. LCA is a method to assess various aspects associated with development of a product and its potential impact throughout a product's life from raw material acquisition, processing, manufacturing, use and its disposal. Besides, based on Multi-criteria decision analysis approach, an assessment framework with multiple criteria for the selection of sustainable material for construction projects in Iceland has been developed. The purpose of case study 1 was to measure the environmental impacts from construction materials used in the Vaettaskóli-Engi school building, focusing on the influence of the source of materials (locally produced vs. imported). The system boundary covers four pre-use phase modules of A1-A4 as designated in the standard EN 15804. Total impacts per square meter of gross floor area from the materials employed in the building were estimated to be 255 kgCO2 eq/sqm, 1.36E-06 kg CFC 11 eq/sqm, 3.23E-05 CTUh/sqm, 0.88 Mole of H+ eq/sqm and 2.28 Mole of N eq/sqm. In addition, as expected, it was concluded that producing the cement in Iceland caused less environmental impacts in all five impact categories compared to the case in which the cement is imported from Germany. If the concrete was imported, total environmental impacts of the school would rise by 5.7% and 2.5% in terms of GWP and HT, while there would be no significant differences in terms of ODP impact. Also, a considerable rise (more than 50%) in terms of overall AP and EP would be expected. The additional impacts are all due to the transportation of cement to Iceland for concrete production. The study of two actual buildings (cases 2-3) has demonstrated how the estimates from the two most widely utilized LCA tools are incompatible for all studied impact categories other than Climate Change. The main conclusion is that without further development of the assessment methods and the databases, the results should not be utilized to support decision-making, except for Climate Change results. Similarly, it is not encouraged to use endpoint indicators or single-score indicators at all if the different impacts cannot be localized/contextualized according to the actual production and delivery chains of different components. Even then, it should be carefully tested if the outcome is similar for different buildings and when the processes are adjusted to the actual production places and technologies, transport distances, etc. Humanitarian refugee shelters (like case study 4), are environmental burdens because of their energy requirements and GHG emissions. Over the last decade, studies on LCA for post-disaster housing have grown rapidly. This trend is expected to continue in the near future because of the mounting demand for temporary housing. This study has shown a proof of concept example for a low-impact refugee house prototype using straw, reeds, clay, lime, and wood as the principal raw construction materials. Using natural materials, especially plant-based fibres, as the main construction materials, proved to achieve a minus carbon outcome over the life cycle of the building. The GWP of the shelter house without and with sequestration was found to be 254.7 kg CO2 eq/m 2 and-226.2 kg CO2 eq/m 2 , respectively. With the use of plant-based fibres in the construction of the building, passive and eco-cycle systems for the building's operation resulted in a negative GWP impact. Based on the results of the uncertainty importance analysis, the overall GWP impact without and with sequestration potential varied the most due to the variability of the GWP impact of wood fibre insulation. There is great potential in working with such eco-and low-impact design and construction methods for both temporary and permanent housing solutions to achieve a minus carbon footprint. The fifth study was set to assess a rough estimate for the GHG emissions from built environment development in Iceland. Typically building and infrastructure system assessments are done over the lifetime of the assessment object and to one object at a time, which gives little information about the overall annual GHG load from all building and infrastructure construction activities. This study thus provides one case example, which can in the future be used as a benchmark and complemented with other studies. It was found that the GHGs from built environment development should be taken into account when designing GHG mitigation strategies in the context of the built environment, such as building energy efficiency regulations and infrastructure development projects to facilitate low-carbon transport. Otherwise, it may happen that the "carbon investment" in the development phase is never paid back or the payback is longer than would be acceptable. After conducting stakeholder analysis, key stakeholders have been identified and classified into four groups. Besides, the decision criteria for the selection of sustainable material for construction have been documented. The questionnaire was designed to capture the preferences of different stakeholders on decision criteria and indicator and the pilot run shows the applicability and effectiveness of the questionnaire for this purpose.