ArticlePDF Available

Photovoltaic roof tiles: Design and integration in buildings

Authors:

Abstract

The integration of photovoltaics (PV) into building facades and roof structures can provide a significant contribution to electricity generation. A design for a PV roof tile is proposed which will enable seamless integration with standard tiles in a roof structure. The constraints imposed by this requirement are discussed along with aesthetic, commercial and regulatory issues. In order to develop a photovoltaic roof tile it is first necessary to understand current roofing practice and materials. In the U.K., roof tiles form the primary barrier to the elements. The tiles are laid on wooden battens which run along the roof and are attached by special clips or nails. The battens are in turn nailed onto the rafters of the roof structure. A secondary level of protection is provided by a sarking felt which is laid between the rafters and the battens. This material provides insulation, prevents dust and air entering the roofspace and provides an extra waterproof barrier. A cut through image of a standard roof is shown (Fig. 1).The degree to which rows of tiles must overlap is defined by U.K.
SUSTAINABLE BUILDING
A
BEPAC + EPSRC CONFERENCE, ABINGDON, ENGLAND 5/6 FEBRUARY 1997
Photovoltaic roof tiles : design and integration in buildings
A. S. Bahaj & P.A.B.James, University of Southampton
1
Abstract
The integration of photovoltaics (PV) into building facades and roof structures can provide a significant
contribution to electricity generation. A design for a PV roof tile is proposed which will enable seamless
integration with standard tiles in a roof structure. The constraints imposed by this requirement are
discussed along with aesthetic, commercial and regulatory issues.
Introduction
Building integrated photovoltaics has a vast potential market in developed countries. Both commercial
and residential buildings have large surface areas which are available for PV integration. In urban areas
where land space is at a premium, the harnessing of such large areas is especially attractive. Roofs in
particular provide an ideal site for photovoltaic electrical power generation. In general they represent
large, flat surfaces which are less prone to shading than walls and exhibit more favourable inclinations
for solar gain. A typical U.K. roof for example is pitched between 17.5 and 44 degrees. For optimum
recovery, solar panels should be inclined perpendicular to the sun's rays. Clearly, a fixed solar array,
such as a roof mounted structure cannot satisfy this criteria and so a tilt angle of near 45 degrees is
likely to represent a good compromise.
Several options are available to achieve the integration of PV into roofs. In its simplest form, standard
size modules can be mounted, i.e. "bolted on", to the top of the present roof structure. This crude
approach does not truly integrate the PV with the building and produces the aesthetically poor result of
a high value product being merely "tacked on" to the current structure. Moreover, it is widely recognised
that it is important to offset the costs of PV installations by utilising modules not only for electrical
generation but also for building cladding / roofing and as an architectural device.
As a first step to achieving this goal PV roofs have been installed using standard modules which are laid
side by side across a roof deck. A capping is placed between the modules to ensure a watertight seal.
This process however, requires a complex aluminum framing structure to be mounted onto a precisely
formed predeck. The savings which result from the dual use of the photovoltaics are negated by the
high cost of the framing and mounting structure. Although the finished roof, represents a major advance
aesthetically over earlier bolt on solutions, the stepped effect obtained with traditional roofs, made of
tiles is lost. The large size of the modules used (upwards of 50 x 100 cm) accentuates the inaccuracies
that are present in the rafter and batten layout of a household roof structure forcing the production of
the highly ordered predeck. The battens used for standard tiling could be applied to PV integration if
smaller modules were used. A progression would be the production of a photovoltaic roof tile, which
would be analogous with standard tiles.
In order to develop a photovoltaic roof tile it is first necessary to understand current roofing practice
and materials. In the U.K., roof tiles form the primary barrier to the elements. The tiles are laid on
wooden battens which run along the roof and are attached by special clips or nails. The battens are in
turn nailed onto the rafters of the roof structure. A secondary level of protection is provided by a
sarking felt which is laid between the rafters and the battens. This material provides insulation, prevents
dust and air entering the roofspace and provides an extra waterproof barrier. A cut through image of a
standard roof is shown (Fig. 1).The degree to which rows of tiles must overlap is defined by U.K.
1
Institute of Cryogenics, Southampton University, Highfield, Southampton SO9 5NH
SUSTAINABLE BUILDING
A
BEPAC + EPSRC CONFERENCE, ABINGDON, ENGLAND 5/6 FEBRUARY 1997
building regulations (minimum of 75 mm). The exposed length and width of the tile are known as the
gauge and cover width respectively. In the U.K. there are two main manufacturers of roof tiles, namely
Redland and Marley who produce not only a diverse range of tile sizes but also of styles (Fig. 2).
Several tiles have raised edges (Redland Delta and Renown) or are curved (Redland Regent and
Grovebury) and so are not suitable for PV integration due to the associated shading and the planar
nature of current photovoltaic cells.
Figure 1: Section of a standard UK roof
Figure 2: A selection of tile styles
In addition to the variability in tile size and style, the type of interlock used between tiles is tile specific.
Clearly, to design a tile which satisfies the requirement of matching all types is an impossible task. The
design of a variety of interlock connectors which could be mounted onto a template PV tile to produce
the required shape is a possible solution [1]. However, the authors believe that this approach would
raise the cost of the PV tile to a prohibitive level. Manufacturing a variety of linkages is detrimental to
economies of scale and such a design will lengthen installation times. A typical domestic roof is 6 m
deep and 8 m across. Approximately 500 standard tiles would be needed to cover this area at a tile
cost of about £250-00 (tiles excluding clips ~ 47 p each). If a photovoltaic roof tile is designed around a
SUSTAINABLE BUILDING
A
BEPAC + EPSRC CONFERENCE, ABINGDON, ENGLAND 5/6 FEBRUARY 1997
specific standard tile, the majority of retrofit applications will require the current roof tiles to be
discarded. The cost of discarding unsuitable tiles will represent a small fraction of the overall system
cost and so will not effect the commercial viability of retrofit applications for PV tiles.
PV roof tile design
Accepting the prerequisite of a planar tile for integration yields a variety of suitable tiles for the design
of an analogous PV tile. The PV tile must have the same depth and interlock as its standard counterpart
but may have a cover width that is an integer multiple of the standard tile (e.g. 2x, 3x, 4x). Table 1 lists
a range of suitable tiles and the resulting potential dimensions for a PV roof tile.
Table 1. Suitable roof tiles for PV integration
A standard roof has a lifetime in excess of 25
years. To successfully promote a photovoltaic roof
a comparable lifespan must be offered. At
present, photovoltaic technology is available in
three distinct types, thin film, amorphous and
monocrystalline. Monocrystalline technology is well
established and module lifetimes of 20 years plus
can confidently be expected. Both amorphous and
thin film technologies are the subject of intensive
research and potentially will provide significantly
cheaper cells and modules. However, both
technologies suffer from performance degradation
with use and lifetimes of only a few years can be
guaranteed. Monocrystalline therefore, represents
the current technology that a PV tile must embrace
to produce the required product. The dimensions
of monocrystalline cells produced by all
manufacturers are virtually identical being 100 -
104 mm square. An optimum size array of these cells
must be fitted into the exposed surface of the PV tile. Figure 3: Design of a tile with integral PV cells
Table 1 shows that a Redland Stonewold II tile for
example, of double the normal cover width
provides an exposed area of 355 mm by 686 mm.
A 5 by 3 array of PV cells occupies an area of 379
mm by 579 mm which neatly fits into the exposed
area, whilst retaining a sufficiently large surround
for structural integrity. The proposed design is for
a laminate to be formed of the 5 by 3 array of
cells which is then inserted into the plastic tile
surround from behind. The surround (a) and the PV
laminate (b) for a PV tile (c) based around a Redland Figure 3: PV cells integrated into a tile
SUSTAINABLE BUILDING
A
BEPAC + EPSRC CONFERENCE, ABINGDON, ENGLAND 5/6 FEBRUARY 1997
Stonewold II tile (2x cover width) is shown in Fig. 3.
The plastic laminate which holds the PV cells produces a robust surround which protects the cells from
damage. This contrasts with traditional glass sandwich type PV modules which are very fragile and
need careful handling.
Installation
Approximately 15% of the energy adsorbed by a monocrystalline PV cell is converted to electrical
energy. The majority of the absorbed sunlight is dissipated as heat. The efficient dissipation of this heat
represents a particular problem for roof integration. The sarking felt which sits on the rafters is
generally a bitumen based material which softens at about 80 oC. Studies have shown that in a
standard roof covered with ordinary PV modules temperatures can approach this level [2, 3]. The
efficiency of PV cells is temperature dependant, with a rise in temperature having a corresponding
reduction in cell efficiency. Therefore, control of the temperature of a PV roof is necessary in order to
maintain both satisfactory array performance and sarking felt integrity. To provide sufficient ventilation it
is necessary to increase the distance between the sarking felt and the rear of the PV tiles. A spacer
must be placed behind the battens to increase the tile - felt gap to approximately 10 cm. A convection
process can therefore, be established allowing air to enter through holes in the soffit and exit at the top
of the roof. An added benefit of PV tiles in this respect is that standard tiles specifically designed for
ventilation purposes can be used.
A typical photovoltaic household application is for a 3 kW system. Currently, standard PV modules cost
about $4.5/W (£3/W) although prices are continually falling. The cost of the photovoltaic material, for a
standard, module based system is nearly £10,000. In addition to this, metering, installation, cabling and
an inverter to convert the produced DC power to domestic rating AC is required. The total cost of a
system is approximately £15,000-20,000.
The payback times for PV systems in pure economic terms are very long at present. To maximise the
benefit of a PV system it is important that the user makes use of the 25 year working life. Modern life
however, is increasingly transient in nature, with the "job for life" expectations of previous generations
no longer holding true. Short term employment contracts lead to the frequent need to move in order to
find work. Traditional PV installations cannot easily be moved to another house as they are generally a
custom design for a specific building. It is highly unlikely that on the sale of a house anywhere near the
£15-20 K investment would be recovered. A PV system based on PV roof tiles offers a distinct
advantage in this respect. The tiles can simply be removed from the roof and replaced with the
analogous standard roof tiles with relative ease. The PV tiles can then be transported to the new house
for re-use. The universal application of PV tiles will also generate a market for "secondhand" tiles.
Conclusions
Continual improvements in cell efficiencies coupled with reductions in production costs through new
processes and economies of scale will enable PV to become an economic reality for urban power
generation in the near future. Photovoltaic roof tiles have the potential to bring PV to the largest U.K.
market, namely the home. A design such as that described in this paper, will enable PV to be integrated
in an aesthetically pleasing manner. This is crucial to the success of the product in a market where
consumers demand “green” energy alternatives but are reluctant to compromise their surrounding
environment as a result. In addition, unlike other forms of PV installation, specialist contractors will not
be needed for PV roof tile installations. A skilled roofing “trade” is readily available and would need no
extra training to commission PV tile roofs In essence, the PV roof tile represents the combination of a
mature tile industry, with state of the art plastic and photovoltaic technologies. In this way, a new
approach to the integration of photovoltaics in buildings can be realised.
SUSTAINABLE BUILDING
A
BEPAC + EPSRC CONFERENCE, ABINGDON, ENGLAND 5/6 FEBRUARY 1997
References
[1] Bahaj A.S. & Ward S.C.,
The SOLATILE : A fully adjustable and Integrated Photovoltaic Roof
tile
, Proceedings of 12th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, pp 1097-1100,
1994.
[2] Yang H.X., Marshall R.H. & Brinkworth B.J.,
An experimental study of the Thermal Regulation
of a PV-Clad Building Roof
, Proceedings of 12th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy
Conference, pp 1115-1118, 1994.
[3] Okuda N., Yagiura T., Morizane M., Ohnishi M. & Nakano S.,
A new type of Photovoltaic
Shingle
, Proceedings of the IEEE First World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion,
pp 1008-1011, 1994.
... The second system provides comparative analysis of the environmental impact associated with various module types used in rooftop vs ground mounted systems. Typically, for residential applications, 60-cell solar modules are preferred due to their reduced weight, and smaller physical dimensions, which eases installation (Sendy 2023 Photovoltaic roofing systems come in a variety of forms (Bahaj 2003), however here the most common type of PV roofing rack was selected. The aluminum framing system has been taken into consideration for the mounting system because the proposed system will be put on a sloped roof. ...
... Without damaging the roof membrane, the aluminum solar PV module mounting clamps are fastened to the rafters of the roof's under framework when the mounting system is installed. The modules are kept in place by the diamond fasteners (Bahaj 2003). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Both the capital cost and levelized cost of electricity of utility-scale ground-mounted solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are less than those of representative residential-scale solar rooftop systems. There is no life cycle analysis (LCA) study comparing the environmental impact of rooftop PV system and large utility-scale solar PV system. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap and provide a comprehensive LCA of a representative 7.4 kWp rooftop and 3.5 MWp utility-scale solar PV systems from cradle to grave. Methods The energy as well as CO2 and water footprint during the manufacture, use, and end of life of both systems will be quantified. The primary focus of this study will be on the LCA of racking/mounting systems as these are the greatest source of divergence between the two main system types. In addition, sensitivities are run on (1) PV module types, (2) footings for the ground-mounted systems, and (3) geographic locations in different states of the USA. Results Overall, the embodied energy per kWp of the rooftop-mounted PV system is 21–54% lower than that of the utility-scale ground-mounted PV system. The higher embodied energy of the ground-mounted systems is so much larger than the rooftop systems that even sub-optimally oriented rooftops still have substantially lower energy payback times in all regions. Similarly, the greenhouse gas emissions attributed to the ground-mount system with rack a is 2.5 times, and ground-mount system with rack b is 1.2 times greater per kWp than that of the rooftop system. A rooftop solar PV system requires 21 to 54% less input energy, emits 18 to 59% less CO2eq. of greenhouse gas emissions, and consumes a reduced quantity of water ranging from 1 to 12% per kWp. The energy payback time of rooftop solar systems is approximately 51 to 57% lower than that of ground-mounted solar systems across all locations. Conclusions Overall the CO2 payback time was 378 to 428% higher for ground-mounted PV compared to rooftop PV for the same modules and 125 to 142% higher for ground-mounted compared to rooftop PV for the most common modules used for both applications. Although water use is dominated by the PV modules themselves, it is important to note that the water consumption for the utility-scale ground rack is approximately 260 times (rack a) and 6 times (rack b) higher than that of the rooftop mounting structure.
... The output power will be proportional to the irradiance and the area of the panel (Equation 8). ...
... Based on the expression of the power as per Equation 8, the profiles of mentioned samples relative to a full day and the raw power that can be harvested over 1 m 2 area are shown in ...
Article
Full-text available
Efficiency is the standard metric used to quantify the performance of photovoltaic (PV) cells and panels. However, there is a paramount need to reflect on the optimal use of the available primary energy in the coverage of PV devices. This study introduces a new index referred to as energy reception ratio (ERR) which, jointly with the efficiency of solar cells would determine the overall performance of a PV device. The ERR was defined as the ratio of the energy captured by the sun-tracking configuration understudy over the energy captured by a flat panel sitting in the same surface area. The study explores statically-sun-tracking (SST) PV configurations as an alternative to dynamically sun-tracking which has been the leading technology currently used to improve the yield of PV devices. U and O-shaped PV configurations were considered to fulfill the duties of tracking the sun statically. Further indices were introduced to evaluate proposed SST configurations: Area ratio (AR) that is the PV area of the SST configuration over that of a flat reference panel, a regulation factor (RF) that indicates how close the average power harvested is to the maximum value The power profiles and the computation of evaluation parameters were performed in MATLAB environment based on novel algorithms and mathematical formulations describing the performance of proposed SST configurations. The outcomes of the study revealed that the ERR provided by U-shaped PV configurations could reach 1.28 with an AR of 1.57 and an RF of 81 %. As for the O-shaped PV configurations the ERR of 1.57 could be achieved along with an AR of 3.14 an RF of 100 % i.e. O-shaped configurations promise to produce a fully regulated power. The major advantage of these configurations lies in the quality and magnitude of the average received power. The findings of SST configurations were found to be useful in the field of space engineering as well as practical in disadvantaged communities that experience insufficiency in terms of electrification and roofing logistics.
... • The energy-efficient of walls such as Trombe walls [3], ventilated walls [4], ... • The performance of various fenestration technologies including aerogel [5], vacuum glazing [6] and frames [7], ... • The progress of roofs with low energy consumption including the contemporary of green roofs [8], photovoltaic roofs [9], ... ...
Article
Energy consumption in residential buildings Algerian very high, especially during the summer season. A comprehensive approach to designing low-energy buildings reduces the size of mechanical systems to offset the additional cost of energy efficiency features. The most important thing in the building is the building envelope and the components in which it was constructed. They contribute to improving thermal comfort. Usually, the external walls are made of heavy construction to avoid drastic temperature changes and save energy. The present paper describes a modelling and simulation for a single zone building, run by using TRNSYS software. The study devoted to calculate heating/cooling loads a single-zone building model in the Wilaya of Ain Temouchent (Algeria), exposed to a hot and subhumid climate. The good comprehension of the outcomes making know what heating and cooling capacity it should use for different components when it wants to design a heating/cooling system and what the technique it should be used to damping this fluctuation between the indoor and exterior?
Chapter
Full-text available
Efficiency is the standard metric used to quantify the performance of photovoltaic (PV) cells and panels. However, there is a paramount need to reflect on the optimal use of the available primary energy in the coverage of PV devices. This study introduces a new index referred to as energy reception ratio (ERR) which, jointly with the efficiency of solar cells would determine the overall performance of a PV device. The ERR was defined as the ratio of the energy captured by the sun-tracking configuration understudy over the energy captured by a flat panel sitting in the same surface area. The study explores statically-sun-tracking (SST) PV configurations as an alternative to dynamically sun-tracking which has been the leading technology currently used to improve the yield of PV devices. U and O-shaped PV configurations were considered to fulfill the duties of tracking the sun statically. Further indices were introduced to evaluate proposed SST configurations: Area ratio (AR), that is the PV area of the SST configuration over that of a flat reference panel, a regulation factor (RF) that indicates how close the average power harvested is to the maximum value The power profiles and the computation of evaluation parameters were performed in MATLAB environment based on novel algorithms and mathematical formulations describing the CHAPTER-19
Article
This paper describes a novel methodology to group building services into a single trunking system at minimal proximal distances between them. The study focused on solving the geometrical complexity encountered in conventional arrangements of building services, while taking into account thermo-physical and electromagnetic interactions between services together with building regulations. The potential solution for delivery and distribution of building services in any number of directions is an ‘onion layers’ type of design, using novel mathematical manipulations based on manifolds of spherical and cylindrical geometries joined using Bezier surfaces. Computer-aided design iterations were undertaken for channelling six building services into a single unit including water, air, electricity and data. It consists of concentric cylindrical-spherical shells superimposed at few millimetres gaps (channels) for which physical prototypes were produced. Practical application: Successfully integrating building services such as water, air, electricity and data into a single trunking delivery system would offer an important advancement in reducing services installation cost, maintenance and the running cost of a building. Current design tools and techniques do not offer any solution for such integration; hence the current development of a multi-services trunking system. Subject to satisfactory compliance with health and safety requirements, plus maintenance issues, the system is proposed for embedding into building construction walls, panels or for placement into a confined space as a first step towards next generation building service. It is foreseen that many industries and business will be involved in the early stage of this development.
Conference Paper
Photovoltaic (PV) laminates have no moving parts and last 25 years or more with no maintenance aside from the occasional cleaning. Historically PV systems have been `hard-wired' between junction boxes. The use of photovoltaics in buildings has necessitated the use of `push-fit' connectors to enable quick and easy connection between modules on roofs and facades. The PV industry is largely unaware however, of the potential for inter-module connector failure from the use of such push-fit connectors. An inclined roof is used to study the behavior of individual electrical contact resistances within a new type of PV shingle. The possible modes of connector failure in such a system are discussed
Conference Paper
Photovoltaic modules have no moving parts and last upwards of 25 years with no maintenance aside from occasional cleaning. The installation of modules in building facades and other structures has necessitated the use of push fit connectors to enable quick and easy inter-module DC electrical connection. New applications for photovoltaics such as roof shingles (tiles) place further performance demands on connectors. The day-night variation in temperature within a PV roof for example, creates component expansion. This paper details the behaviour of a tin plated copper photovoltaic connector under small amplitude fretting tests (10-100 μm) using a specially developed accelerated lifetime test rig. The mated connector creates a high force, multiple point contact between the male and female components by the use of a prestressed spring collar. The study shows that a transition amplitude exists (~13 μm) above which gross slip at the connector interface appears to occur. This causes a gradual linear increase in contact resistance, followed by a sudden change to rapid wearing of the tin plating on both the connector surfaces and spring collar, leading to connector failure. Below the transition amplitude, partial slip at the connector interface is observed which creates a stable, low contact resistance. The paper highlights the need to maintain a partial slip/stick condition within a PV connector for long term contact resistance stability. The implication of this requirement for photovoltaic connector design and application is discussed, considering the benefits of flexible connector housings and lubricants in particular
Conference Paper
The authors have proposed a new type of construction in which solar cells are unified with roofing materials. The photovoltaic (PV) shingle offers many features, such as low cost, simple construction and maintenance, good design, and fire resistance, compared with previous modules. The PV shingle was confirmed to have no major problems as a roofing material by environmental, waterproofing and installation tests
The SOLATILE : A fully adjustable and Integrated Photovoltaic Roof tile An experimental study of the Thermal Regulation of a PV-Clad Building Roof A new type of Photovoltaic Shingle
  • A S Bahaj
  • S C Ward
  • H X Yang
  • R H Marshall
  • B J Brinkworth
[1] Bahaj A.S. & Ward S.C., The SOLATILE : A fully adjustable and Integrated Photovoltaic Roof tile, Proceedings of 12th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, pp 1097-1100, 1994. Yang H.X., Marshall R.H. & Brinkworth B.J., An experimental study of the Thermal Regulation of a PV-Clad Building Roof, Proceedings of 12th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, pp 1115-1118, 1994. Okuda N., Yagiura T., Morizane M., Ohnishi M. & Nakano S., A new type of Photovoltaic Shingle, Proceedings of the IEEE First World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, pp 1008-1011, 1994
An experimental study of the Thermal Regulation of a PV-Clad Building Roof
  • H X Yang
  • R H Marshall
  • B J Brinkworth
Yang H.X., Marshall R.H. & Brinkworth B.J., An experimental study of the Thermal Regulation of a PV-Clad Building Roof, Proceedings of 12th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, pp 1115-1118, 1994.