ArticlePDF Available

Daytime and nighttime activity at a breeding colony of Great Blue Herons in a nontidal environment

Canadian Science Publishing
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Authors:
  • Environment Canada, Québec, QC Canada

Abstract

It is generally admitted that in coastal areas, herons of the genus Ardea adjust their foraging time according to the tidal cycle. However, to what extent do tides control the herons' daily rhythm of activity? To answer this question, we present the day and night activity patterns of Great Blue Herons (Ardea herodias) arriving to feed their young at a heronry located in a nontidal environment in southern Quebec. Herons were about half as active at night as during the day. Therefore, although significantly less than diurnal activity, nocturnal activity was not negligible, and consequently the tide cycle is not the only factor controlling the daily rhythm of the herons' activity. Those breeding pairs that were most active during the day were no more or less active at night. Diurnal activity was more closely correlated with the number of young that fledged than was nocturnal activity. Thus, night activity was not necessarily important for the survival of young herons, but it could be explained by other factors such as the greater availability of certain prey at night.
Daytime and nighttime activity at a breeding colony of Great Blue Herons
in a nontidal environment
RAYMOND MCNEIL
AND
REJEAN BENO~T
DPpartement de sciences biologiques, UniversitP de MontrPal, C.P.
6128,
succursale
A,
MontrPal, (QuPbec),
Canadu H3C 3J7
AND
JEAN-LUC DESGRANGES
Environnement Canada, Service canadien de la Faune, C.P.
10100,
Ste-Foy, (QuPbec), Cunada
GIV
4H.5
Received April 15, 1992
Accepted November 30, 1992
MCNEIL, R., BENOPT, R., and DESGRANGES, J.-L. 1993. Daytime and nighttime activity at a breeding colony of Great Blue
Herons in a nontidal environment. Can. J. Zool. 71: 1075
-
1078.
It is generally admitted that in coastal areas, herons of the genus Ardea adjust their foraging time according to the tidal
cycle. However, to what extent do tides control the herons' daily rhythm of activity? To answer this question, we present
the day and night activity patterns of Great Blue Herons (Ardea herodias) arriving to feed their young at a heronry located
in a nontidal environment in southern Quebec. Herons were about half as active at night as during the day. Therefore,
although significantly less than diurnal activity, nocturnal activity was not negligible, and consequently the tide cycle is not
the only factor controlling the daily rhythm of the herons' activity. Those breeding pairs that were most active during the
day were no more or less active at night. Diurnal activity was more closely correlated with the number of young that fledged
than was nocturnal activity. Thus, night activity was not necessarily important for the survival of young herons, but it could
be explained by other factors such as the greater availability of certain prey at night.
MCNEIL, R., BENO~T, R., et DESGRANGES, J.-L. 1993. Daytime and nighttime activity at a breeding colony of Great Blue
Herons in a nontidal environment. Can. J. Zool. 71
:
1075
-
1078.
I1 est generalement admis que les herons du genre Ardea ajustent leurs periodes d'alimentation selon le cycle des marees
dans les regions catikres. Cependant, jusqu'a quel point les marees contralent-elles le cycle d'activite des herons? Pour
repondre a cette question, nous presentons les patrons d'activite diurne et nocturne de Grands Herons (Ardea Iterodias) revenant
a leur nid pour nourrir leurs jeunes dans une colonie du sud du Quebec, situee dans un milieu non soumis a l'action des
marees. Les herons ont CtC moitik aussi actifs la nuit que le jour. Quoique significativement inferieure a l'activiti diurne,
I'activite nocturne n'a donc pas kt6 negligeable et, en consequence, le cycle des marees n'est pas le seul facteur a contraler
le cycle journalier d'activiti des herons. Les couples les plus actifs de jour n'ont kt6 ni plus ni moins actifs de nuit. L'activite
diurne a semble avoir une influence plus grande que I'activite nocturne sur le nombre de jeunes a I'envol. L'activite diurne
n'a donc pas CtC particulikrement importante pour la survie des jeunes, mais elle peut s'expliquer par d'autres facteurs, tels
la plus grande disponibiliti de certaines proies la nuit.
Introduction
A
number of species of Ciconiiformes, in particular the
ardeids, are known to feed almost as commonly at night as
during the day (Bent 1963; Hancock and Kushlan 1984; McNeil
et al. 1993). In coastal habitats, it is generally recognized that
herons of the genus Ardea, like other ardeids in intertidal
environments, adjust their foraging activities according to food
availability and predictability influenced by the tidal cycle, so
as to be in their feeding area at times when fishing or preying
is most likely to be successful (Hancock and Kushlan 1984).
However, to what extent do tides control the daily rhythm
of herons' activity? The daily feeding cycle of the Great Blue
Heron (Ardea herodias) appears to be influenced by the tidal
cycle in coastal areas (Dennis 1971; Krebs 1974; Brandman
1976; DesGranges 1981; Drapeau 1982; Black and Collopy
1982). However, in freshwater areas far inland in Oregon, the
Great Blue Heron seems to display a strictly diurnal pattern in
feeding its young, typical of many avian species, with peak
periods of feeding in the mornings and evenings (Horvath and
Moholt 1986). The study by Horvath and Moholt (1986) sug-
gests that Great Blue Herons adjust their feeding cycle depend-
ing on whether or not they are in a tide-controlled environment,
but unfortunately,
it
did not include a representative sample of
24-h observations
(04:OO
to 22:OO PST).
Nevertheless, Horvath and Moholt (1986) appear to be the
only researchers to have dealt with the daily feeding cycle of
Great Blue Herons in nontidal areas. The main purpose of this
article, with samples distributed over 24-h observation sessions,
is to compare the day and night timing of arrivals (hereafter
called activity) of Great Blue Herons at the nest site in a river-
ine lake near MontrCal, Quebec, to see if they feed their young
nocturnally in a nontidal environment as do Grey Herons (Ardea
cinerea) (Marion 1984; van Vessem and Draulans 1986, 1987).
This study also assesses the relative importance of night- and
day-time feedings to young herons aged 4 weeks or older.
Study area and methods
This study was carried out in the Montreal area, at the Great Blue
Heron colony on ile (island) Saint-Bernard on the southern edge of
lac Saint-Louis (45
"23'40"N, 73 "45'30"W) in Quebec. Lac Saint-
Louis is a riverine lake, formed by a natural widening of the St.
Lawrence River. This heronry contained 169 occupied nests (i.e.,
with either eggs or chicks) and the area observed corresponded to the
northern tip of the colony. Nests sampled were about 8 -25 m above
the ground.
Data were collected during observation sessions about 4 days apart
between 4 June and 3 July, 1987, from a 7-m tower located about
100 m from the closest nests. The eight observation sessions each
lasted 24 consecutive h, from 05:00 to 05:00
(EDT)
the following
Printed ~n Canada
1
Impr~mc au Canada
Can. J. Zool. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Depository Services Program on 06/04/13
For personal use only.
CAN.
J.
ZOOL.
VOL.
71,
1993
=
Night
04/06 10/06 12/06 14/06 18/06 22/06 24/06 28/06
Day
I
month
Time (EDT)
FIG. 2. Average number (+_SD) of day and night arrivalslh at the
28 nests observed during 24-h periods.
FIG. 1. Variation in the average number of arrivalsl(2 h) at the
28 nests observed during 24-h periods.
TABLE 1. Suearman's rank correlations
(P
5
0.05) between mean
day. Two observers were always present in the morning (05:00 to daily, diurnal, and nocturnal activity per 2-h period and fledging suc-
09:00), in the evening (17:00 to 21:00), and at night from 21:00 to cess at the 28 nests observed during 24-h periods at ile Saint-Bernard
05:00. On several occasions, only one observer was present during Activity
the remaining periods (09:00 to 1790). Nighttime observations were Fledging
made using a MK303A
(X
60
000)
light intensifier (Star-tron Tech- Daily Diurnal Nocturnal success
nology Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pa.). During the night, one of the
observers constantly scanned the nest area by means of the intensifier.
Both at night and during the day, the approach call of adults normally
signalled the arrival of an adult at its nest. There is no doubt that most
nocturnal arrivals at the nest were to feed the young. In many cases,
the actual prey given to the young was not seen at night, but the
characteristic movements of the heron's neck as the heron regurgi-
tated food to the young were detectable.
The present data are incidental to a study of the patterns of arrival
and departure of Great Blue Herons nesting at ile Saint-Bernard
(Benoit 1991). For that reason, observations on the feeding grounds
were not feasible. Data collection at the colony began when the young
herons were 3-4 weeks old. Observations ceased when the young
fledged. We recorded arrival and departure times to the nearest minute
and the identity of the nests involved. However, we did not use depar-
ture data from these nests in the present study, since these movements
were not always detectable at night. The main flight directions of
herons at the colony were already known, so the observation tower
was located to minimize its impact on the movements of herons
around the colony. The adults did not appear to be disturbed by the
presence of observers during observation sessions.
In analyzing nocturnal and diurnal activity of the colony as a whole
and of selected breeding pairs, we confined ourselves to the number
of arrivals per 2-h period (12 periods for each 24-h observation session)
at a group of 28 nests that we could observe both by night and by day.
The diurnal period of activity included the dusk and dawn hours.
Results
Some 1220 arrivals were recorded at the 28 nests during
the eight 24-h periods, 951 during the day and 269 at night.
This corresponds to an average of 14.9
+
6.6
(x
)
SD)
arrivalsl(2 h) and 8.4
(
_+
3.9) arrivalsl(2 h) during the day and
night, respectively, for all 28 nests (Fig. 1). The most intense
diurnal activity took place at dawn (23.4
f
8.1 /(2 h)) and
at dusk (16.4
f
6.6/(2 h)). The lowest activity was in mid-
morning and during the afternoon (12.6
+
4.2/(2 h)), and in
the middle of the night (8.4
f
3.9/(2 h)).
In general, the frequency of diurnal arrivals for the entire
sampling period was significantly greater than that of nocturnal
arrivals (Fig. 2; Student's paired t-test, t
=
7.712; df
=
27;
P
<
0.001). The number of diurnal arrivals (Mann-Whitney
U-test, U
=
0;
P
<
0.05), but not the relative magnitude of
Daily activity
1
.OO 0.80 0.55 0.3
1
Diurnal activity 1.00 ns 0.39
Nocturnal activity 1.00 ns
Fledging success
1
.OO
diurnal activity (U
=
3;
P
>
0.05), was greater after 14 June.
Nocturnal activity clearly took place throughout the entire
sampling period.
Spearman's rank correlation tests (P
5
0.05; Table 1) on
the frequency of arrivals per 2-h period for the whole sample
(n
=
28) showed that, of diurnal (r,
=
0.80) and nocturnal
activity (r,
=
0.55), it was diurnal activity that appeared to
form the greater component of the total day's activity (24 h).
The activity of a pair during the day showed no correlation
with the pair's activity at night (r, ns).
Diurnal activity was correlated with the fledging success
of pairs (r,
=
0.39; n
=
28), but there was no correlation
between nocturnal activity and fledging success (Table 1 and
Fig. 3). In addition, for pairs feeding the largest broods
(4-5 young), the frequency of diurnal activity (0.55
+
0.11)
was greater than that of nocturnal activity (0.29
+
0.12)
(Wilcoxon signed-ranks test; T
=
3; n
=
19;
P
<
0.05), but
no such difference was observed in pairs rearing smaller
broods (T
=
7; n
=
9;
P
>
0.05).
Discussion
Total diurnal and nocturnal arrivals were more numerous
at sunrise and sunset. This largely corresponds to what was
reported by Horvath and Moholt (1986) and van Vessem and
Draulans (1986, 1987). The frequency of nocturnal activity at
the colony of ile Saint-Bernard accounted for, on average, 63
%
of the activity observed during the preceding diurnal periods
for the eight sampling sessions. The intensity of nocturnal
activity on 1 day was even greater than that of diurnal activity.
Therefore, although significantly less than diurnal activity, noc-
turnal activity was not negligible. The activity pattern of the
Great Blue Heron was similar to that of the Grey Heron,
though Owen (1955) observed a colony of Grey Herons in
Can. J. Zool. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Depository Services Program on 06/04/13
For personal use only.
MCNEIL ET AL.
1077
00
oqya rao
no
a
0
a anaa
l
o
nno
a
7
FIG. 3. Relationship between the number of fledged young and the
mean number of arrivalsl(2 h) during the day and night, respectively.
which activity was more nocturnal on certain days, while
van Vessem and Draulans (1986) observed that these Euro-
pean herons were sometimes just as active at night as during
the day.
The Great Blue Herons most active during the day were not
necessarily those that were least active at night and vice versa.
On the whole, nesters spent more time and effort feeding their
broods during the daytime period. Daytime activity was greater
after 14 June probably because young herons require more and
more food as they grow.
According to Hancock and Kushlan (1984), the nocturnal
activity of Great Blue Herons in the colony occurs more com-
monly in marine environments owing to the tide cycle, and
Brandman (1976) expected that nocturnal activity in the con-
tinental region would
be
half as intense (50%) as during daylight.
This is what we observed for the colony at ile Saint-Bernard.
Consequently, the tide cycle is not the only factor controlling
the herons' daily rhythm.
The number of daytime feeding arrivals was significantly
higher in nesting pairs with larger broods. These results con-
cur with those of van Vessem and Draulans (1986) and Sullivan
(1988). They also bear out the predictions of Lack (1968)
regarding the influence of food on fledging success. Brandman
(1976) observed that the number of feedings given to young
Great Blue Herons during the day and at night in coastal areas
varied with the size of the brood, but he did not assess the
importance of the contribution of night feeding to the fledging
success of herons. Our results also support the idea of Drent
and Daan (1980) and Collopy (1984) who explained differences
in fledging success between broods by variations in the parental
ability to feed the young. For the Great Blue Heron in particu-
lar, Sullivan (1988, p. 224) concluded that "broods fledging
4 or more nestlings were raised by adults which were able to
provide food more frequently than most pairs." The amount
of food brought to the nest during the very 1st week after
hatching must be essential and of great influence on the final
breeding success of herons. Unfortunately, we do not have
data for the period between hatching and the age of 3 -4 weeks,
and we have not measured the actual quantity of food brought
to the young. However, this ability of good providers is borne
out in our study by the number of arrivals on the nest to feed
young aged 4 weeks or older.
As mentioned above, no observation was made on the feed-
ing grounds. However, the decrease in activity observed at
night in this colony did not necessarily mean that adults were
less active on feeding sites at night. Indeed, Black and Collopy
(1982) observed greater use of feeding sites by Great Blue
Herons at night than during the day. Furthermore, Draulans
and van Vessem (1985) reported ,that Grey Herons are more
abundant on feeding sites at night, but they referred to the
winter period and not to the breeding season, and secondly
they dealt mainly with the situation on a fish farm. For Grey
Herons, the vertical migration of fish toward the surface dur-
ing the night would explain the nocturnal activity observed by
Draulans and van Vessem (1985) in artificial basins. These
authors suggested that this migration is also likely in natural
conditions and might influence use of feeding areas. In addi-
tion, diurnal horizontal feeding migrations are very clearly
marked in many freshwater fishes that live in midstream by
day and enter creeks at night where there is usually a rich
invertebrate fauna on which they feed (Nikolsky 1963, p. 254).
In lac Saint-Louis, fish are known to make a nocturnal horizontal
migration between the pelagic zone of the lake and the shore-
line marshes (Ferraris and Lessard 1988). Finally, it may also
be that herons forage at night on sites and on prey that are not
used during the day. The diet of Great Blue Herons, like that
of many other ardeids (Hancock and Kushlan 1984), includes
frogs, worms, and insects that could be more abundant or
more active, and thus more available, at dusk and during dark-
ness. In contrast to activity in coastal marine environments,
which is linked to the rhythm of tides, the nocturnal activity
of Great Blue Herons in a riverine nontidal lake environment
is possibly related to the activity of prey.
Acknowledgements
This study was financed partly by the Canadian Wildlife
Service, and partly by the Province of Quebec Society for the
Protection of Birds through an agreement with Employment and
Immigration Canada. We thank Pierre Drapeau and Alain Leduc
for help with statistical analysis, Diane Dauphin, Sharon David,
Linda Herwood, Stacy Hewitson, Colin McGowan, Louis
Panneton, and Jean Rodrigue for assisting in fieldwork, and
Janine van Vessem for valuable suggestions for improving the
manuscript.
Benoit, R. 199 1. Axes de vol et activitC diurne et nocturne du Grand
HCron (Ardea herodias) au lac Saint-Louis, QuCbec. MCmoire de
M.Sc., DCpartement de sciences biologiques, UniversitC de Mon-
trial, MontrCal, Quebec.
Bent, A. C. 1963. Life histories of North American marsh birds.
Dover Publications, New York.
Black, B. B., and Collopy, M.
W.
1982. Nocturnal activity of Great
Blue Herons in a north Florida salt marsh. J. Field Ornithol.
53:
403 -406.
Brandman, M. 1976. A quantitative analysis of the annual cycle of
behavior in the Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias). Ph.D. thesis,
Department of Zoology, University of California, Los Angeles,
Calif.
Collopy, M.
W.
1984. Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden
Eagle nestlings. Auk,
101:
753 -760.
Dennis, C. J. 1971. Observations on the feeding behavior of the
Great Blue Heron. Passenger Pigeon,
33:
166
-
172.
DesGranges, J.-L. 1981. Observations sur I'alimentation du Grand
HCron (Ardea herqdias) au QuCbec (Canada). Alauda,
49:
25 -34.
Drapeau, P. 1982. Ecologie de la reproduction et de l'alimentation
du Grand HCron (Ardea herodias) aux iles de la Madeleine, QuCbec.
MCmoire de M.Sc., DCpartement de sciences biologiques, Univer-
site de MontrCal, MontrCal, Quebec.
Can. J. Zool. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Depository Services Program on 06/04/13
For personal use only.
1078
CAN.
I.
ZOOL. VOL.
71,
1993
Draulans, D., and van Vessem, J.
1985.
Age related differences in
the use of time and space by radio-tagged Grey Herons
(Ardea
cinerea)
in winter. J. Anim. Ecol. 54:
771 -780.
Drent, R. H., and Daan, D.
1980.
The prudent parent: energetic
adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea, 68:
225 -252.
Ferraris, J., and Lessard, M.
1988.
Etude de la fraykre du ruisseau
Saint-Jean par l'analyse exploratoire multidimensionnelle des fac-
teurs biologiques et environnementaux. Ministkre du Loisir, de la
Chasse et de la Peche, Service de la Faune, Montreal, Quebec.
Hancock, J., and Kushlan, J.
1984.
The herons handbook. Croom
Helm Ltd., London, U. K.
Horvath, E. G., and Moholt, R. K.
1986.
Diurnal feeding cycle at
an inland great blue heron colony. Murrelet, 67:
27 -28.
Krebs, J. R.
1974.
Colonial nesting and social feeding as strategies for
exploiting food resources in the Great Blue Heron
(Ardea herodias).
Behaviour, 51:
99- 131.
Lack, D.
1968.
Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen
Ltd., London,
U.K.
Marion, L.
1984.
Mise en evidence par biotClCmttrie de territoires
alimentaires individuels chez un oiseau colonial, le Heron cendre
Ardea cinerea.
Mtcanisme de rtpartition et de regulation des effectifs
des colonies de herons. Oiseau Rev. Fr. Ornithol. 54:
1-78.
McNeil, R., Drapeau, P., and Pierotti, R.
1993.
Nocturnality in
colonial waterbirds: occurrence, special adaptations, and suspected
benefits.
In
Current ornithology. Vol.
10.
Edited
by
D. M. Power.
Plenum Press, New York. pp.
187 -246.
Nikolsky, G. V.
1963.
The ecology of fishes. Academic Press,
London. U.K.
Owen, D. F.
1955.
The food of the heron
Ardea cinerea
in the breed-
ing season. Ibis, 97:
276-295.
Sullivan, J. P.
1988.
Effects of provisioning rates and number fledged
on nestling aggressions in Great Blue Herons. Colon. Waterbirds,
11:
220-226.
van Vessem, J., and Draulans, D.
1986.
Factors affecting the length
of the breeding cycle and the frequency of nest attendance by Grey
Herons
Ardea cinerea.
Bird Study, 33:
98
-
104.
van Vessem, J., and Draulans, D.
1987.
Patterns of arrival and
departure of Grey Herons
Ardea cinerea
at two breeding colonies.
Ibis, 129:
353
-
363.
Can. J. Zool. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by Depository Services Program on 06/04/13
For personal use only.
... Great blue herons may forage nocturnally (Brandman 1976; Black and Collopy 1982; Rojas et al. 1999), but due to visibility constraints we could only identify prey and estimate the size of prey during daylight hours. Diel patterns have been observed in a number of fish species (e.g., Sjö berg 1989; Heggenes et al. 1993), so shifts in prey availability could alter great blue heron diets where nocturnal foraging occurs (McNeil et al. 1993). The nocturnal foraging patterns among great blue herons are varied; in some systems the rate of nocturnal foraging activity is equal to the rate of diurnal foraging activity (Black and Collopy 1982), while in other systems nocturnal foraging in great blue herons is absent (Gawlik 2002). ...
... Austin (1996) suggested that bottom-dwelling prey species were only available during low tides, thus prey availability influenced nocturnal foraging patterns in great blue herons. McNeil et al. (1993) monitored nocturnal activity patterns in a riverine lake formed by a widening in the St. Lawrence River. The great blue herons using this system were not exposed to tidal cycles, and nocturnal activity accounted for 63% of the rate of diurnal activity (McNeil et al. 1993), suggesting that nocturnal foraging may be important in some nontidal areas. ...
... McNeil et al. (1993) monitored nocturnal activity patterns in a riverine lake formed by a widening in the St. Lawrence River. The great blue herons using this system were not exposed to tidal cycles, and nocturnal activity accounted for 63% of the rate of diurnal activity (McNeil et al. 1993), suggesting that nocturnal foraging may be important in some nontidal areas. We do not know if great blue herons forage nocturnally in our study area. ...
Article
Full-text available
Fisheries managers seldom have adequate information to assess their stock losses to avian piscivores, which function as apex predators in many aquatic food webs. Our primary objective was to estimate the number of stocked rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss consumed by great blue herons Ardea herodias on the Bull Shoals and Norfork tailwaters of north-central Arkansas. Between November 2000 and December 2001, we periodically surveyed great blue herons along 150.7 river km on the tailwaters of the Bull Shoals and Norfork dams. Heron density (number/km) in or along the river ranged from 0 to 4/km per survey, with the highest mean number located near the Bull Shoals Dam (2.31 herons/km). We recorded 467 prey captures by herons during 202 observation hours. Sculpin Cottus spp. were the most common prey (N = 120). Most prey (87%) measured 14 cm or less in length, and most captured live trout (85.4%) fell between 10.5 and 28.0 cm in length. While live trout represented only 48 of 359 identifiable prey items (13%), they comprised an estimated 62.8% of heron diet biomass. We developed a bioenergetics model that combined our observations with published metabolic coefficients and relationships to estimate heron energy demand during breeding and nonbreeding seasons. This analysis revealed that trout comprised an estimated 67% of heron daily energy demand in the study area. Heron daily energy demand peaked during the breeding season (March–May). Based on a mean monthly population estimate of 227 great blue herons requiring 156 million kJ of total energy/year, we calculated that herons consumed just under 50,000 catchable-sized stocked trout annually. This loss to great blue herons represents an estimated 2.4% of the approximately 2 million trout stocked in the study area. Thus, great blue heron predation likely represents only a minor source of trout mortality in the Bull Shoals and Norfork tailwaters.
... Consequently, most animals have evolved internal biological clocks and circadian activity rhythms that ultimately enhance their fitness by, for example, exploiting temporal niches with lower predation risk (Botts et al., 2020;Monterroso et al., 2013;Tambling et al., 2015). For instance, nocturnal birds typically face high predation risk during daylight hours and prefer to forage at night (Kotler et al., 1991;McNeil et al., 1993;Metcalfe et al., 1998). Similarly, zooplankton species commonly exhibit daily migration patterns across the water column that are driven by predator avoidance strategies (Haney, 1988;Fischer and Visbeck, 1993). ...
... Previous nighttime surveys of foraging Great Blue Herons (A. herodias) indicate that nighttime foraging does occur (Black andCollopy 1982, Powell 1987), but we could not quantify this effort because surveys were limited to the daytime. Daytime vs. nighttime foraging abundance differs markedly in some species of water birds (Robert et al. 1989), and therefore, it is possible that nighttime feeding affects feeding patterns at other times (McNeil et al. 1993). Our simplifying assumption was that resource selection during the daytime was independent of resource selection during the nighttime. ...
Article
Full-text available
In dynamic environments, resource availability may change by several orders of magnitude , over hours to months, but the duration of resource availability is not often included as a characteristic attribute of resources even though temporal resource dynamics might limit patterns of use. In our study of wading birds foraging in intertidal areas, tides cause large changes in the areal extent of shallow-water foraging habitat (i.e., the resource), but tides also constrain the duration of availability, which is often overlooked. We hypothesized that temporal constraints on habitat availability from tides would be reflected in patterns of habitat use by foraging birds. We estimated the time-integrated habitat availability and compared it to traditional habitat attributes (seagrass cover, substrate type, instantaneous water depth, and proximity to mangrove islands or deep water) that have strong eviden-tial support for influencing patterns of use. To evaluate our hypotheses, we quantified habitat attributes at intertidal areas in the Florida Keys, USA, where wading birds were observed foraging (Little Blue Heron, Egretta caerulea: N = 183; Great White Heron, Ardea herodias occidentalis: N = 162). We tested for nonrandom use by sampling habitat attributes at two spatial scales around the observed feeding locations and we analyzed the data using a conditional logistic regression model. There was no evidence that seagrass cover or substrate explained patterns of use. The proximity of foraging locations relative to mangroves and to deep water were important at both spatial scales but had lower effect sizes (odds ratios) than time-integrated habitat availability and water depth, and the latter may only serve as a physical constraint on access. We found support that time-integrated habitat availability was a distinct resource attribute, had the greatest effect size (four-to eightfold change in relative probability of use), and best explained patterns of habitat use at the largest spatial scale. In studies of resource use where changes in resource availability are nonlinear or when strong constraints on access are imposed by behavior, incorporating time-integrated estimates of resource availability into analyses can improve insights into spatiotemporal patterns of resource use.
... Great White Herons actively forage at night (Powell 1987), which may explain patterns in daytime abundance not captured in our study (Robert et al. 1989). Most of the evidence from the literature points to daytime foraging by Great Blue Herons being complementary to daytime feeding, as opposed to a preferential behavior for fulfilling energetic requirements (Black and Collopy 1982, McNeil et al. 1993, Martin and Raim 2014, but it is unclear to what extent day versus nighttime foraging habits are exhibited in our study area. ...
Article
Full-text available
In intertidal zones, tidal cycles reduce water depths and provide areas of shallow water where wading birds can forage for aquatic prey (water depths 0-50 cm). However, a bird that forages diurnally can make use of only a portion of the tidal cycle, which can limit fulfillment of energetic demands. Furthermore, daily and biweekly (spring-neap) tides may compound effects on shallow-water availability for foraging birds. However, the relative effects of daily and biweekly tidal periodicities on the foraging ecology of wading birds are seldom investigated due to a lack of appropriate tools. Therefore, we developed a tidal simulation model to provide dynamic spatiotemporal estimates of the availability of water depths that are within the upper and lower bounds of the birds' foraging water depth limits ("shallow-water availability"). We studied two wading bird species, the Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea), a daytime-only forager, and the Great White Heron (Ardea herodias occidentalis), which feeds both diurnally and nocturnally, to evaluate the relative effects of daily and biweekly tides on shallow-water availability and on patterns in abundance of foraging birds. Seasonal foraging surveys (n = 38; 2011-2013) were conducted by boat along a 14-km transect adjacent to extensive intertidal flats in the lower Florida Keys, USA. For both species combined, biweekly tides resulted in a 0.61-to 6.09-fold change in abundance, whereas daily tides resulted in a 1.03-to 5.81-fold change in abundance. Diurnal shallow-water availability was not consistently correlated in magnitude or direction with spring-neap tidal cycles because differences in tide height between consecutive low tides were larger than changes in tidal amplitude from spring-neap tide cycles. Thus, the strong response by birds to the spring-neap tide was likely driven by mechanisms other than diurnal shallow-water availability alone.
... Nocturnal or crepuscular foraging is common in ardeid species such as herons of the genus Ardea (Cramp & Simmons 1977;Van Vessem & Draulans 1986;McNeil et al. 1993McNeil et al. , 1999Black & Collopy 2002). Herons feed opportunistically on various types of prey (fishes, amphibians, invertebrates, mammals, birds: Cramp & Simmons 1977;Fasola 1994). ...
... either morning or afternoon) and the species followed was alternated so that birds of one species were followed in the morning and the other in the afternoon. The time of day when a flight was made, however, was probably unimportant because Great Blue Herons feed throughout the day (McNeil et al. 1993). In Belgium, radio-marked Grey Herons ( Ardea cinerea ) flew directly from the colony to a feeding site and remained there until they returned to the colony (Van Vessem et al. 1984). ...
Article
Full-text available
Great Blue Herons (Ardea herodias) and Great Egrets (Casmerodius albus) partitioned feeding habitat based on wetland size at Peltier Lake rookery in east central Minnesota. Great Blue Herons preferred large waterbodies (350 ha), whereas Great Egrets fed most often at small ponds (<25 ha). Forty-nine percent of Great Blue Herons used wetlands 301-400 hectares in size and 83% of Great Egrets fed in wetlands <100 ha in size. Great Blue Herons selected large wetlands more often than expected both at the regional (30-km radius) and local (4-km radius) scales. Habitat use by Great Egrets was in proportion to availability at the regional scale, but they selected smaller wetlands for feeding more often than expected at a local scale. The median flight distance of Great Blue Herons was 2.7 km, similar to distances reported elsewhere. Great Egrets flew farther to feeding sites than Great Blue Herons, and flew farther (median = 13.5 km) than reported in other geographic areas.
Article
Full-text available
Waterbirds cause substantial fish-stock losses in open aquaculture systems, particularly in developing countries where fish-ponds are smaller and predator control methods largely manual or under-resourced. This study: (1) used three fish-pond treatment meassures to assess their efficiencies in deterring predation pressure by four piscivorous waterbird families in small tilapia and catfish farms in western Kenya; and (2) distinguished bird group(s) most effectively deterred by these measures. The treatment measures were: coarse-grid wire mesh barriers; finer-grid wire barriers; and enhanced pond fertilization. Twelve fish-ponds were randomly sampled to assess birds' pond-neigborhood assemblages and their predation deterrence responses to pond treatment effects. Bird species richness was not affected by pond cover status, enhanced pond fertilization or type of pond cover barrier. However, pond-cover status, singularly and interactively with enhanced fertilization, reduced bird encounter rates while cover barrier type did not. Conversely, cover status, cover barrier type and fertilization each separately but not interactively contributed to improved deterrence to bird predation rates overall. However, while predation by families of larger birds was effectively reduced by enhancing pond fertilization or cover barriers, predation by families of smaller birds was prevented only by fine-grid chicken-mesh barriers. These results demonstrate that using enhanced fertilization and physical barriers can significantly contribute to reduction in predation pressure on open-culture pond-fish by most piscivorous birds, but may not always be effective if used separately. Effectiveness of combination of measures chosen will depend on types of target bird species and their feeding habits. The results constitute additional knowledge on field techniques useful in diversifying solution options for minimizing impacts of vertebrate predation on pond-fish stocks toward promoting sustainable aquaculture production and improving rural human nutrition.
Article
Full-text available
Multiple lineages of birds have independently evolved foraging strategies that involve catching aquatic prey by striking at them through the water’s surface. Diurnal, visual predators that hunt across the air-water interface encounter several visual challenges, including sun glint, or reflection of sunlight by the water surface. Intense sun glint is common at the air-water interface, and it obscures visual cues from submerged prey. Visually-hunting, cross-media predators must therefore solve the problem of glint to hunt effectively. One obvious solution is to turn away from the sun, which would result in reduction of glint effects. However, turning too far will cast shadows over prey, causing them to flee. Therefore, we hypothesized that foraging herons would orient away from, but not directly opposite to the sun. Our ability to understand how predators achieve a solution to glint is limited by our ability to quantify the amount of glint that free-living predators are actually exposed to under different light conditions. Herons ( Ardea spp.) are a good model system for answering questions about cross-media hunting because they are conspicuous, widely distributed, and forage throughout a variety of aquatic habitats, on a variety of submerged prey. To test our hypothesis, we employed radiative transfer modeling of water surface reflectance, drawn from optical oceanography, in a novel context to estimate the visual exposure to glint of free-living, actively foraging herons. We found evidence that Ardea spp. do not use body orientation to compensate for sun glint while foraging and therefore they must have some other, not yet understood, means of compensation, either anatomical or behavioral. Instead of facing away from the sun, herons tended to adjust their position to face into the wind at higher wind speeds. We suggest that radiative transfer modeling is a promising tool for elucidating the ecology and evolution of air-to-water foraging systems.
Article
We examined in selected wading bird species if diurnal or nocturnal foraging and the use of visual or tactile feeding strategies could be correlated with retinal structure and function. The selected species were the Yellow-crowned Night Heron (Nycticorax violaceus), a crepuscular and nocturnal forager, the Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias), a mainly crepuscular, but also diurnal and nocturnal feeder, the Roseate Spoonbill (Ajaia ajaja), a mainly crepuscular feeder which forages more at night than during the day, the Cattle (Bubulcus ibis) and Tricolored (Egretta tricolor) egrets and the American White Ibis (Eudocimus ruber) which forage only during daytime. Herons and egrets are visual foragers; ibises and spoonbills are tactile feeders. Electroretinograms were obtained from anesthetized birds in photopic and scotopic conditions to a wide range of light intensities, following which the retinae were processed for histological analysis. Based on rod densities and rods:cones ratios, nocturnal vision capability is greater in the Yellow-crowned Night Heron, followed by the Great Blue Heron and the spoonbill, then by the egrets and the ibis. Visual feeders that forage near dawn or dusk or at night have a higher rods:cones ratio, and consequently a greater night vision capability, than visual feeding species which forage only during daytime. Visual nocturnal feeders have a night vision capability greater than tactile diurnal as well as tactile nocturnal feeders. However, based on maximum scotopic b-wave amplitudes, all species studied have roughly comparable night vision capability. The factor that best discriminates between wading bird species appears to be the daytime visual capabilities. Indeed, the diurnal ibis and egrets have similar cone densities, cones:rods ratios, and photopic a-wave amplitudes, values which are greater than those measured in the two nocturnally active heron species.
Article
Full-text available
A field study of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) nesting in and near the Snake River Birds of Prey Area was conducted during 1977-1979. Patterns of parental care differed between female and male eagles during incubation and chick rearing; males consistently captured more food throughout all phases of brood rearing (1.2 vs. 0.6 prey/day), while females typically fed and tended the offspring. During the 7th through 9th week of chick rearing, when the food requirements of nestlings were greatest, the female contributed 43% of the prey biomass. No differences were observed in mean daily capture rates between 1978 and 1979 or between parents of one-chick broods and parents of two-chick broods. Although there were no differences between the sexes in the mean weight of prey captured, there were significant differences among pairs, suggesting differences in prey availability or hunting ability. The daily food consumption of eaglets increased as chick rearing progressed and peaked between the 7th and 9th week. Comparisons between eaglets in different-sized broods revealed that individuals in multiple-chick broods received more food from adults than those in one-chick broods. Late in chick rearing, however, those chicks competing with siblings for food had lower consumption rates.
Article
Full-text available
A description of the spacial and temporal strategies involved in the occupation of foraging areas by breeding, colonial Grey Herons Ardea cinerea and proposition of a mode! for colony size and spacial regulation on these birds ; using observa-tions of the colony at the Lac de Grand-Lieu, France, Europe's largest colony (1 300 pairs). Nine breeding adults werc tracked by radio-telemetry for a total of 2050 hrs. (411 days-ind.). Their behavior and activity patterns arc compared with those of severa! hundred other birds from the colony observed for a total of 6 130 hrs: a years). Each bird has a lirnited foraging zone between 2 and 38 km from the colony, it covers only 0.03% of the space available to the colony and is used throughout the breeding cycle. Two strategies exist ; most birds actively defenà a specifie territorial << feeding zone », others use severa! non-territorial << feeding zones » including « communal » or « neutra! feeding areas » and occasionally parasiting the territories of territorial birds. In each « feeding area » ex.ist from 3 to 11 favourite watching posts. Two spacio-temporal strategies occur; birds arriving at their << feeding area » return to the watching post used at the end of theprevious trip (Home-bird Strategy), less frequently birds change watchi.ng post between successive feeding trips but generally stay at that one post for the complete feeding trip (Exploring Strategy). Flights occur throughout the 24 hrs but are more• frequent in the morning and evening. Trips last between 2 h 17 mn and 26 h 30 mn~ independantly of the distance to the feeding area. Each bird has regular and rectilinear flight lines used to visit his individual feeding zones, flight gatherings are fortuitous. The mean flight distance of feeding trips never exceeded 50 kms in the radio-tracked birds. Total distance flown during the breeding cycle varied between 400 and 6 400 kms , two or three times that travelled throughout the rest of the year. Individual mean flight speed varies between 35 and 50 kms/hr which allows compensation for the longer feeding trips. The height of travel varies according to prevailing meteorological conditions. A literature review shows that « feeding territory » is often confused with aggressive individual distance. Nevertheless, the great similarity of breeding and feeding behaviour in the 21 species of colonial Ardeidae suggest most would have similar spacio-temporal feeding strategies and that interspecific competition for feeding territories may occur (Ardea cinerea and A. purpurea ?). From this spacio-temporal feeding strategy a model of the annual regulation of resource utilization and population regulation for breeding colonies is constructed. lt appears that territorial and non-territorial strategies are related to ecological feeding arca parameters : distance from nest, stability and richness of available food, human disturbancc, defendability against other herons, and to return migration chronology : the earliest breeding birds occupy the better feeding sites ; later breeders using less productive, more distant, recently available or vacated sites. Social behaviour, as weil as annual adult mortality, by acting on the proportion of adults that breed is a major factor in population regulation. Differences in the repartition and size of Grey Heron colonies (numerous and small in Britain and Holland, few and large in western France) are discussed ; as is the « system of territorial feeding within individuals of a breeding colony » Î7l herons and avocets, and the classical contrast between colonial and territorial birds and its socio-biological effects.
Article
Nocturnality, the habit of being active during darkness, has traditionally been viewed as characteristic of a minority of bird species, with the great majority being considered entirely diurnal. Primary examples of activity at night are found in the Apterigiformes, Strigiformes, Caprimulgiformes, and Apodiformes (Thomson, 1985; Martin, 1990). In the waterbirds (marine, freshwater, and marsh birds), excluding species that are crepuscular (i.e., active at dusk or dawn only), members of eight orders and 27 families are regularly or strictly active at night (Table I). Some seabirds are nocturnal in nest exchanges and chick feedings (e.g., storm petrels, shearwaters, diving petrels, small alcids) but to a large extent diurnal in their search for food. Many aquatic and wading birds (e.g., herons, ducks, shorebirds) are partly or mainly nocturnal, showing considerable activity by night, even during very dark nights. The Limpkins (Aramus aramus) and most rails and coots (Rallidae) are somewhat crepuscular or nocturnal; many species vocalize extensively at night (Bent, 1926; Van Tyne and Berger, 1976).
Article
(1) Spatial distribution and time budgets of first-year and adult grey herons (Ardea cinerea) were analysed to answer the question whether age-related differences in the use of time and space by piscivorous predators exist, which could affect the foraging success and survival of the birds. (2) First-year grey herons, compared with adults, were radio-tracked proportionally more on a fish-farm, and on roosts around the farm and proportionally less on fish-ponds. Mean length of a stay on foraging grounds was shorter for this age-group, which, however, compensated through more daily visits to feeding sites. Data on variation in the rate of fishing success indicate that first-year grey herons, more than adults, improve their foraging efficiency by visiting a fish-farm. (3) First-year grey herons showed more variation in spatial distribution in the course of a season, between seasons and according to weather conditions than adults did. Variations in the use of time, on the other hand, were much larger for the adult birds. In the course of the day, the proportion of locations on foraging grounds did not vary much for first-year grey herons, in contrast with what was found for the adults. The latter seemed to select the most profitable periods of the day to forage, as far as fishing success is concerned. (4) Our data suggest that young birds are less flexible with regard to their use of time, but adopt more easily a change in spatial distribution. First-year grey herons seem to forage more on less typical areas and in less suitable periods of the day, due to either a lack in skill in hunting and in selecting the best time and place to forage, or due to exclusion from better periods and place to forage by adults.
Article
During 1984 and 1985, rates of parental provisioning to nestlings and number of young fledged were compared to frequencies of 13 behavioral interactions among nestlings at 51 Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias) nests in northern Utah. Only the unranked provisioning rate by number fledged comparison was found to have a regression slope significantly different from zero. No significant correlation was found between provisioning rate and any nestling interaction. Significant correlations and regression slopes were found between some nestling interactions and number fledged. Sibling aggression did not appear to be a means to bring about brood reduction. Parental provisioning rates had little effect on sibling aggression, whereas number of young per nest appeared to have been the most important factor.
Article
In this paper I present data collected to test certain predictions arising from the hypothesis that colonial nesting and social feeding in birds are adaptations that enhance the efficiency of exploitation of unpredictable food supplies. The hypothesis suggests that individuals benefit from nesting in colonies because they have the opportunity to learn about good feeding areas by following other birds from the nesting colony to the feeding grounds. If a bird is unsuccessful on one foraging trip, it will observe and follow more successful birds on subsequent trips; in this way the colony acts as an 'information centre'. I collected two types of data to test this idea as applied to the Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias). (i) I recorded flights of parent birds. (ii) I measured the rate of food intake of birds hunting for food in flocks of different sizes. The analysis of foraging flights from the colony showed the following: (a) The birds used different feeding grounds on different days; this suggests that the food supply is ephemeral. (b) The birds tended to leave the colony in groups, which would be expected if they were following each other. (c) Birds from neighbouring nests tended to use the same feeding grounds and tended to leave the colony in groups (within the overall grouping of the colony as a whole). This would be expected if birds mainly copy their near neighbours. All these results support the idea of an information centre. I did not collect any data on whether successful birds were being followed by unsuccessful ones, but the data do seem to show that birds follow one another. On the feeding grounds, I showed by use of models that herons are attracted to feed in areas where there are other birds, and that they are more attracted by a group than by a single bird. If flock feeding helps in locating good feeding places, we can expect that flock birds would do better in terms of food intake than solitary individuals. A step-wise multiple regression showed that rate of food intake of a bird (grams of fish caught per minute) is an asymptotic function of flock size. A bird in a flock of 20 gets about 5 times as much food per minute as a solitary bird. Further, the percent success (i.e. strikes resulting in a capture) is higher in flocks, and the coefficient of variation of feeding rate is lower. Thus flock birds get more food for relatively less effort and stand a smaller chance of doing very badly in terms of food intake. I discuss various possible explanations of the advantage of the flock birds, and conclude that it is not a result of searching harder, less 'nervousness' of predators or stirring up the fish to make them easy to catch. It is a consequence of the fact that flocks only build up where feeding conditions are good. I present a simple graphical model to show how this happens. In conclusion, my results support the idea that colonial nesting and social feeding are adaptations concerned with finding food, but there are also other factors involved in the evolution of sociality in ardeids and other birds.