Article

Health Disadvantage in US Adults Aged 50 to 74 Years: A Comparison of the Health of Rich and Poor Americans With That of Europeans

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.55). 02/2009; 99(3):540-8. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.139469
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

We compared the health of older US, English, and other European adults, stratified by wealth.
Representative samples of adults aged 50 to 74 years were interviewed in 2004 in 10 European countries (n = 17,481), England (n = 6527), and the United States (n = 9940). We calculated prevalence rates of 6 chronic diseases and functional limitations.
American adults reported worse health than did English or European adults. Eighteen percent of Americans reported heart disease, compared with 12% of English and 11% of Europeans. At all wealth levels, Americans were less healthy than were Europeans, but differences were more marked among the poor. Health disparities by wealth were significantly smaller in Europe than in the United States and England. Odds ratios of heart disease in a comparison of the top and bottom wealth tertiles were 1.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.69, 2.24) in the United States, 2.13 (95% CI = 1.73, 2.62) in England, and 1.38 (95% CI = 1.23, 1.56) in Europe. Smoking, obesity, physical activity levels, and alcohol consumption explained a fraction of health variations.
American adults are less healthy than Europeans at all wealth levels. The poorest Americans experience the greatest disadvantage relative to Europeans.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Johan Mackenbach, Feb 26, 2014
  • Source
    • "These experiences lead to the current high rates of racial and ethnic health disparities within the United States. 3 Although poor health follows a social gradient, deteriorating U.S. health cannot be fully explained by the health disparities that exist among people who are uninsured or poor; in fact, even the health of relatively elite Americans—those who are White, insured, and college educated, as well as those with high income—is worse than that of their peers in other industrialized countries (Avendano, Glymour, Banks, & Mackenbach, 2009;Institute of Medicine, 2013). Despite these downward trends, health research in the United States lags behind international research efforts to focus on upstream social and economic determinants of health. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dramatic health inequalities in the United States exist by race, ethnicity, gender, age, disability status, geography, sexual and gender identity, and socioeconomic status. Despite increased attention, our health system has made insufficient progress in reducing these disparities and creating greater health equity. Too little attention has focused on the social determinants of health—economic, social, and environmental factors—whereby health disparities take root, inequalities grow, and inequities reproduce. The American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare believes that social work is well positioned to lead several multisectoral and transdisciplinary priorities for action to dramatically reduce inequities within one generation. Priorities for action include focusing on settings to improve conditions of daily life, advancing community empowerment for sustainable health, cultivating innovation in primary care, promoting full access to health care, generating innovations in research on social determinants of health inequities, fostering interprofessional workforce development, and stimulating multisectoral advocacy to promote health equity policies.
    Full-text · Technical Report · Jan 2016
  • Source
    • "Additionally, greater egalitarianism does not raise the population's health levels but does weaken the wealthehealth gradient (Semyonov et al., 2013). Another study by Avendano et al. (2009) shows that health tends to increase with wealth among populations over the age 50 in the United States and Europe. Although their analysis focuses on the wealthehealth gradient, it does not classify countries by healthcare system types, and treats 10 European countries uniformly, disregarding possible country-specific effects. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study provides a comparative analysis of the association between wealth and health in six healthcare systems (Sweden, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Czech Republic, Israel, the United States). National samples of individuals fifty years and over reveal considerable cross-country variations in health outcomes. In all six countries wealth and health are positively associated. The findings also show that state-based healthcare systems produce better population health outcomes than private-based healthcare systems. The results indicate that in five out of the six countries studied, the wealth–health gradients were remarkably similar, despite significant variations in healthcare system type. Only in the United States was the association between wealth and health substantially different from, and much greater than that in the other five countries. The findings suggest that private-based healthcare system in the U.S. is likely to promote stronger positive associations between wealth and health.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2014 · Social Science & Medicine
    • "These studies focused mainly on media use, but some mentioned other channels, such as health care and informal networks. Replicating such studies among different ethnic groups within European countries seems worthwhile, as health care systems and migration histories of ethnic groups living in these countries are different from those in the USA (Starfield and Shi 2002; Avendano et al. 2009; Kumanyika et al. 2012). Therefore, to gain more insights into the need for channel segmentation, we investigated similarities and differences in the use and perception of communication channels within three ethnic minority groups living in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To explore similarities and differences in the use and perception of communication channels to access weight-related health promotion among women in three ethnic minority groups. The ultimate aim was to determine whether similar channels might reach ethnic minority women in general or whether segmentation to ethnic groups would be required. Design: Eight ethnically homogeneous focus groups were conducted among 48 women of Ghanaian, Antillean/Aruban, or Afro-Surinamese background living in Amsterdam. Our questions concerned which communication channels they usually used to access weight-related health advice or information about programs and whose information they most valued. The content analysis of data was performed. Results: The participants mentioned four channels - regular and traditional health care, general or ethnically specific media, multiethnic and ethnic gatherings, and interpersonal communication with peers in the Netherlands and with people in the home country. Ghanaian women emphasized ethnically specific channels (e.g., traditional health care, Ghanaian churches). They were comfortable with these channels and trusted them. They mentioned fewer general channels - mainly limited to health care - and if discussed, negative perceptions were expressed. Antillean women mentioned the use of ethnically specific channels (e.g., communication with Antilleans in the home country) on balance with general audience-oriented channels (e.g., regular health care). Perceptions were mixed. Surinamese participants discussed, in a positive manner, the use of general audience-oriented channels, while they said they did not use traditional health care or advice from Surinam. Local language proficiency, time resided in the Netherlands, and approaches and messages received seemed to explain channel use and perception. Conclusions: The predominant differences in channel use and perception among the ethnic groups indicate a need for channel segmentation to reach a multiethnic target group with weight-related health promotion. The study results reveal possible segmentation criteria besides ethnicity, such as local language proficiency and time since migration, worthy of further investigation.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2014 · Ethnicity and Health
Show more