Current steering to control the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Brain Stimulation (Impact Factor: 4.4). 02/2008; 1(1):7-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2007.08.004
Source: PubMed


Over the last two decades, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a recognized and effective clinical therapy for numerous neurological conditions. Since its inception, clinical DBS technology has progressed at a relatively slow rate; however, advances in neural engineering research have the potential to improve DBS systems. One such advance is the concept of current steering, or the use of multiple stimulation sources to direct current flow through targeted regions of brain tissue. The goals of this study were to develop a theoretical understanding of the effects of current steering in the context of DBS, and use that information to evaluate the potential utility of current steering during stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus.
We used finite element electric field models, coupled to multi-compartment cable axon models, to predict the volume of tissue activated (VTA) by DBS as a function of the stimulation parameter settings.
Balancing current flow through adjacent cathodes increased the VTA magnitude, relative to monopolar stimulation, and current steering enabled us to sculpt the shape of the VTA to fit a given anatomical target.
These results provide motivation for the integration of current steering technology into clinical DBS systems, thereby expanding opportunities to customize DBS to individual patients, and potentially enhancing therapeutic efficacy.

Download full-text


Available from: Christopher R Butson
    • "comparing these and other emerging strategies to shape the DBS electrical field to optimize battery longevity, clinical efficacy, and potential stimulation side effects such as speech, gait, and cognitive dysfunction [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]. Furthermore, more direct comparisons of monopolar and bipolar stimulation mode should be evaluated for both short and longer term efficacy and tolerability. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: DBS is an effective treatment for movement disorders, but it is relatively complex, invasive, and costly. Little is known about whether stimulation mode alters pulse generator (battery) longevity in routine clinical care. The aim of this study was to compare battery longevity during monopolar versus bipolar stimulation in patients who underwent DBS for movement disorders. We evaluated 2,902 programming adjustments and calculated the average stimulator settings for 393 batteries in 200 unique patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). We classified the pulse generators into different stimulation modes (monopolar, bipolar, tripolar, and double monopolar) and compared battery longevity with Kaplan–Meier's survival analyses using the log-rank test. We exclusively implanted the Medtronic 3387 lead with adjacent electrode contacts separated by 1.5 mm. Mean pulse generator longevity was 47.6 ± 1.6 months regardless of diagnosis or stimulation mode. Bipolar stimulation mode was associated with greater longevity than monopolar stimulation (56.1 ± 3.4 vs. 44.2 ± 2.1 months; P = 0.006). This effect was most pronounced when stimulation parameters were at low-to-moderate intensity settings. Double monopolar configuration was associated with less pulse generator longevity than conventional stimulation modes (37.8 ± 5.6 vs. 49.7 ± 1.9; P = 0.014). Implanted pulse generators initially programmed in bipolar mode provided 1 year of additional battery longevity versus monopolar mode in this large, retrospective series of patients with ET and PD. Given satisfactory efficacy for motor symptoms, bipolar stimulation mode is a feasible alternative programming strategy at the initiation of DBS therapy.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2016
  • Source
    • "In order to enhance the reliability and tolerability of tDCS, we describe a novel method called Within Electrode Current Steering (WECS). This concept is distinct from (across electrode) current steering, as developed for implanted devices such as Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), where current is steered between electrodes that are each in contact with tissue, with the goal of changing desired brain regions that are activated [2]. WECS adjusts current between electrodes not in contact with tissue but rather embedded in an electrolyte on the body surface. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Within Electrode Current Steering (WECS) is a novel method that enhances reliability and tolerability of tDCS. The underlying assumption of WECS is steering current within electrodes but without altering current distribution in brain target. Through an exemplary case example of a realistic electrode and head geometry (FEM), we demonstrated how current flow in the brain is independent of current steering at the electrode. Three current split cases (even, partially uneven, and fully uneven), keeping total current (1 mA) fixed within the electrodes are tested. At the electrode-assembly interface with the skin, the current density distribution varied only incrementally across conditions (e.g. less than would be expected with even minor changes in electrode assembly or skin properties. There was no difference in the predicted electric filed at the brain target under all three cases. Thus, with such electrode assembly design, current steering to any functional electrode would not significantly increase current density in the skin (enhance tolerability during tDCS).
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2015 · Journal of Medical Devices
  • Source
    • "The model described by Mädler and colleagues is a quite simple model that has proven to estimate robust results of the VAT and takes only the parameter voltage gain and impedance into consideration. More advanced models use neural network modeling techniques (Chaturvedi et al., 2013) or take patient-specific diffusion based MR data (Butson and McIntyre, 2008) into account to model the VAT more accurately. We plan to further optimize and extend the functionality of the toolbox such that other models can be implemented, too. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine placement of electrodes after deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, a novel toolbox that facilitates both reconstruction of the lead electrode trajectory and the contact placement is introduced. Using the toolbox, electrode placement can be reconstructed and visualized based on the electrode-induced artifacts on post- operative magnetic resonance (MR) or computed tomography (CT) images. Correct electrode placement is essential for efficacious treatment with DBS. Post-operative knowledge about the placement of DBS electrode contacts and trajectories is a promising tool for clinical evaluation of DBS effects and adverse effects. It may help clinicians in identifying the best stimulation contacts based on anatomical target areas and may even shorten test stimulation protocols in the future. Fifty patients that underwent DBS surgery were analyzed in this study. After normalizing the post-operative MR/CT volumes into standard Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI)-stereotactic space, electrode leads (n = 104) were detected by a novel algorithm that iteratively thresholds each axial slice and isolates the centroids of the electrode artifacts within the MR/CT-images (MR only n = 32, CT only n = 10, MR and CT n = 8). Two patients received four, the others received two quadripolar DBS leads bilaterally, summing up to a total of 120 lead localizations. In a second reconstruction step, electrode contacts along the lead trajectories were reconstructed by using templates of electrode tips that had been manually created beforehand. Reconstructions that were made by the algorithm were finally compared to manual surveys of contact localizations. The algorithm was able to robustly accomplish lead reconstructions in an automated manner in 98% of electrodes and contact reconstructions in 69% of electrodes. Using additional subsequent manual refinement of the recon- structed contact positions, 118 of 120 electrode lead and contact reconstructions could be localized using the toolbox. Taken together, the toolbox presented here allows for a precise and fast reconstruction of DBS contacts by proposing a semi-automated procedure. Reconstruction results can be directly exported to two- and three- dimensional views that show the relationship between DBS contacts and anatomical target regions. The toolbox is made available to the public in form of an open-source MATLAB repository.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2014 · NeuroImage
Show more