... Thus, ideologies evidenced in everyday and institutional discourse are assumed to both establish and maintain power relationships. 42 Disrupting dominant discourses about autism, primarily controlled by those in positions of power, is therefore necessary to change 99 Areas of interest or areas of expertise, focused, intense, or passionate interests Special needs 98,100,101 Description of specific needs and disabilities Challenging behavior/disruptive behavior/problem behavior 7,37,102,103 Meltdown (when uncontrollable behavior), stimming (when relevant), specific description of the behavior (e.g., selfinjurious or aggressive behavior) Person-first language (to refer to autism) 8,17,65,72,[104][105][106][107] Identity-first language; ''on the autism spectrum'' Medicalized/deficit-based language High/low functioning; high/low severity or support needs 9,17,84,85 Describe specific strengths and needs, and acknowledgment that the level of support needs likely varies across domains (e.g., requires substantial support to participate in unstructured recreation activities, but minimal support to complete academic work) ''At risk'' for ASD 73 Increased likelihood/chance of autism Burden of/suffering from autism 108 Impact, effect Co-morbid 109,110 Co-occurring Autism symptoms 17 Specific autistic characteristics, features, or traits Treatment Support, services, educational strategies (when applicable) Healthy controls/normative sample 111,112 Nonautistic (if determined via screening), neurotypical (if determined via extensive screening ruling out most forms of neurodivergence), comparison group (with description of relevant group characteristics) Psychopathology 98 Neurodevelopmental conditions, neuropsychiatric conditions, developmental disabilities, mental illnesses (or specific mental health condition) Ableist discourses: ways of discussing autism not relegated to the use of particular terms, that reflect and/or contribute to dehumanization, oppression, or marginalization of autistic people Discussions about economic impacts of autism that situate costs in the existence of autistic people themselves, or compare the costs to those of potentially fatal diseases/conditions such as cancer or stroke. 113 Discussions about economic impacts of autism that situate costs in society's systemic failure to accommodate autistic people and that recognize the people most affected by oppression due to this failure are autistic people themselves (not ''taxpayers'') Interpretations of all group differences between autistic and nonautistic groups as evidence of autistic deficits 20,22,29,114 Interpretations of group differences that consider the possibility that autistic people may have relative strengths over nonautistic people or that differences between groups are value-neutral unless actively demonstrated otherwise Cure/recovery/''optimal outcome'' rhetoric. ...