This quotation originates in the preface to the Report from the International Law Association’s Hague Conference in autumn 1921, at the end of which most of the substantial provisions of the Rules had been agreed upon. Indeed, the Hague Rules, signed in Brussels 1924, did receive the international recognition that was hoped for. Much has changed however, over the approximate 80 years that the
... [Show full abstract] Hague Rules have been in force, and several provisions have long since been criticised for being out of date, despite an update of the Rules through the 1968 Visby Protocol. Two later attempts to modernise the international law relating to sea borne trade have been made through the 1978 Hamburg Rules and the 2009 Rotterdam Rules. So far, however, neither of those Conventions has achieved the international acceptance required to take the place of the Hague and the Hague-Visby Rules as the governing treaty. Therefore, while the Hague Rules regime remains as the central regulation, more and more jurisdictions are taking the matter in their own hands, introducing national law on legal matters which have arisen along with the technical and commercial developments in shipping or even abolishing outdated provisions (which, however, obviously requires a denunciation of the Hague Rules regime).