Justwhatallocation ruledoes, orshould, Isatypical urbangovernment service- predominate intheday-by-day decision fireorpolice protection, orgarbagere- makingisasubject thathasbeenrela- moval, forexample-being rendered evenly tively little explored, atleast byecono- throughout acity? Ifnot, whatalternative mists, compared withtheattention given rules arebeingfollowed? Decisions are tothedistribution ofa certain total of being madecontinually onthespatial al- taxation. Political scientists havebeen location ofinputs: thepolicemen, firemen, moreactive inthisfield, butforstate and sanitation workers. Whomakesthese de- local services asa whole, intheUnited cisions, andwhatrules havetheyadopted? States, theremarksmadetwenty-five Thesequestions haveattracted theatten yearsagostill apply: "Infact, little is - knownaboutdistribution ofgovernment tion ofafeweconomists, andofmanymore services by location, race, religion, in- political scientists. Answershavebeenin- comeclass, orothercategory. Thelaws ferred fromstatistical surveys, butalmost providing fortheservice aresilent inthis nooneseemstohavegonedirectly tothe respect; theauthorizing orappropriating rulemakers, whoever theymaybe,toas- committees oflegislatures donotdiscuss certain theprevailing allocation formulae. it;budgets submitted bytheexecutive say Thepresent papersummarizes themajor nothing abouthowagiven service istobe findings todateandoffers someapprais- distributed amongtheusers. Thissilence alsandsuggestions. reflects inpartasocial propensity todis- criminate covertly inwaysthatarenot 1.Distributing aFixedTotalofan tolerable intaxation" (Shoup, 1964, p.383). UrbanGovernmentService Among Partial exceptions tothis statement are Users tobefoundinthedispensing ofeducation andinprotection against crime. Thegreat Tthelocal level ofgovernment, and changes thathavebeenmadeinthedis- Ato alesser degree atthestate level, tribution ofeducation arewellknown, decisions mustbemadeonhowtodis- however farthatdistribution maystill be tribute afixed amountofacertain ser- fromsomespecific standard. Thedistri- vice, sayfire protection, amongusers. The bution ofprotection bypolice hasbeena decisions normally concern geographical lesspublicized issue, buta considerable groupsofusers, notindividual house- literature inscholarly journals andbooks holdsandbusiness firms.Protection hasdeveloped. Discrimination inthesup- against fire maybegreater orless inone plyofpublic housing, too,hasbeendis- neighborhood thaninanother, butnot cussed. Much,however,remainsun- usually foroneneighbor thanforanother. knownorunresolved, eveninthese fields, Thelevel ofprotection mightbemadethe withrespect totwobasic questions: What samefortwoneighborhoods byshifting rules canbeformulated? N"atrules are somefire-fighting inputs fromtheonearea infactbeingfollowed bythosewhode- totheother. Thismove,however, might termine thedistribution ofurbanser- result inanincrease intotal fire damage vices? overthetwoneighborhoods together, orit Someanswers tothese questions areof- mightbeinconsistent withanequal work- fered inSections IIandIIIbelow. InSec- loadrule, orwithsomeother distributive tion11,alternative rules fordistributing standard. urbanservices areanalyzed andevalu- *Professor Emeritus, ColumbiaUniversity-Cen ated. Thesearerules thathavebeenpro-