Article

Without time, no morality

January 2002

Source
RePEc

Authors:

Theory shows that voting is subject to paradoxes, while it also appears that a voting result is as much caused by the used procedure as by the voters’ preferences. From a moral point of view, the choice of the procedure naturally is the major issue. A key insight is that morality presumes time. In a static world everything is given, and there is no place for individuals who have to ponder their moral choices. The real world is dynamic however, and the most challenging voting paradoxes concern budget changes. The paper develops a new "Borda Fixed Point" mechanism that provides a better protection to surprises by such budget changes. The analysis is put into context with a review of the proper meaning of Kenneth Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem and a review of Donald Saari’s argument on symmetry. (This version has a formal appendix.)

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.

Article

The Paradox of New Members: Strategic Foundations and Experimental Evidence

January 2007 · SSRN Electronic Journal

Power indices suggest that adding new members to a voting body may affect the balance of power between the original members even if their number of votes and the decision rule remain constant. Some of the original members may actually gain even if voters are bargaining over a fixed budget. We show that this phenomenon can occur as an equilibrium of a non-cooperative bargaining game based on the ... [Show full abstract] Baron and Ferejohn (1989) model of legislative bargaining. We implement this game in the laboratory and find that power can be gained by adding new members as the theory predicts.

Article

Full-text available

Health care and human rights: against the split duty gambit

August 2016 · Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

Gopal Sreenivasan

There are various grounds on which one may wish to distinguish a right to health care from a right to health. In this article, I review some old grounds before introducing some new grounds. But my central task is to argue that separating a right to health care from a right to health has objectionable consequences. I offer two main objections. The domestic objection is that separating the two ... [Show full abstract] rights prevents the state from fulfilling its duty to maximise the health it provides each citizen from its fixed health budget. The international objection is that separating a human right to health care fails the moral requirement that, for any given moral human right, the substance to which any two right-holders are entitled be of an equal standard.

Chapter

Fiscal Aspects of Privatization: the Paradox of Privatization Revenues

January 2000

Dirck Süß

Since the middle of the 1980s, privatization has become a popular economic policy all over the world. Besides increasing efficiency and decreasing political influence in the economy, the restoration of public finances has always been an important argument for putting privatization on the agenda. Apart from more indirect effects like hardening the enterprises’ budget constraints and thus enabling ... [Show full abstract] politicians to cut subsidies, or higher tax proceeds due to more efficiency, the revenues from the sale of enterprises are generally seen as an important fiscal effect of privatization.

Chapter

Elections to the European Parliament

November 2017

Jean Rossetto

The European Parliament which is the only democratic EU institution, being elected by direct universal suffrage, has gained much influence over EU legislation, the EU budget and the nomination process of the President of the European Commission. Yet a closer look at the European Parliament’s electoral arrangements shows that European citizens are not equally represented. There is still no uniform ... [Show full abstract] process of electing MEPs apart from some common complex system of proportional representation. Paradoxically, the more powers the European Parliament has gained, the fewer European citizens have turned up to vote. Naturally, they tend to cast their votes on national political considerations rather than on European issues. Developing an educational approach could allow for better informed citizens. Part of the problem lies in the composition of the European Parliament where left-wing political groups favourable to more political and social European integration are on the decline while small far-right groups have emerged, reflecting the Eurosceptic climate prevailing in Europe.

Article

Full-text available

A Conexão Presidencial: Facções Pró e Antigoverno e Disciplina Partidária no Brasil

January 2001 · Dados

The article provides an explanation for the enormous variation in party discipline during the Brazilian democratic experience from 1946 to 1964. The argument is that party discipline is a function of the Presidents? strategies in forging coalitions in Congress. One of the main consequences of such strategies was the creation of two factions within parties, one for and the other against the ... [Show full abstract] President. The premise is that the size of each faction affects its level of discipline. According to an econometric analysis of 982 roll-call votes, crucial determinants of discipline in the larger parties were the amount of budget resources allocated to them by the President and the time remaining in the President?s term.

Chapter

Searching for the Social Issue

January 2009

Kevin J. McMahon

In many ways, it was an issue that was missing. For a generation of presidential campaigns, some type of social issue—whether “law and order,” or welfare reform, or abortion—had typically emerged as a significant electoral concern to the voters; often linked as James Sundquist has written, “by a common thread: the breakdown of family and social discipline, of order, of concepts of duty, of ... [Show full abstract] respect for law, of public and private morality.”1 Indeed, just four short years ago, quick analyses of the exit polls and voting results led commentators to dub the 2004 race as the “moral values” election. But in 2008, those who designed the exit poll did not even think to include “moral values”—or any other concern typically defined as a “social issue”—as a possible choice when asking voters about the most important issue of the election. With the economy so central to the race, it is easy to understand why they decided to exclude that option. Their decision to leave out a question on abortion, which had been part of many past exit surveys, is a little more perplexing. At the same time, it is quite telling, for it reveals the extent to which any social issue was seemingly absent from the presidential campaign of 2008. Still, I suggest that initial appearances are somewhat misleading; that upon closer inspection, there were at least four areas where social issues made an appearance and were somewhat significant to the final outcome; namely, the race for the Republican nomination, the future makeup of the Supreme Court, Republican John McCain’s selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate, and the ballot measures being considered in various states across the county. In this chapter, I explore these areas. Before doing so, I briefly revisit the electoral events from four years ago.

Article

What's in a vote?: Brexit beyond culture wars

April 2017 · American Ethnologist

Insa Koch

The result of the United Kingdom's EU referendum has been interpreted as evidence of a “culture war” between proponents of liberal cosmopolitanism and defenders of socially conservative values. According to this interpretation, voters on both sides are seen as driven by identity-based politics. But on a council estate (social-housing project) in England, what made the EU referendum different from ... [Show full abstract] an ordinary election was that citizens perceived it as an opportunity to reject government as they know it. Citizens’ engagements with the referendum constitute attempts to insert everyday moralities into electoral processes. They provide an opening into alternative, if yet unknown, futures that go beyond any singular narratives that divide the electorate into camps of so-called Leavers and Remainers.

Chapter

Five Voting Rules Susceptible to Types of Monotonicity Failure Under Both Fixed and Variable Elector...

February 2017

In voting theory, monotonicity is the axiom that an improvement in the ranking of a candidate by voters cannot cause a candidate who would otherwise win to lose. The participation axiom states that the sincere report of a voter’s preferences cannot cause an outcome that the voter regards as less attractive than the one that would result from the voter’s non-participation. This chapter identifies ... [Show full abstract] three binary distinctions in the type of circumstances in which failures of monotonicity or participation can occur under five voting procedures (Plurality with Runoff, Alternative Vote, Dodgson’s, Nanson’s, and Coombs’ methods) either when the electorate is of fixed or of variable size. The distinction that is unique to monotonicity is whether the voters whose changed rankings demonstrate non-monotonicity are better or worse off. The distinction that is unique to participation is whether the marginally participating voter causes his first choice to lose or his last choice to win. The overlapping distinction is whether the profile of voters’ ranking has a Condorcet winner or a cycle at the top. The chapter traces the occurrence of all the resulting combinations of characteristics in the voting methods that can exhibit failures of monotonicity.

Article

The New Dutch Law on Legalizing Physician-Assisted Death

February 2001 · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

On April 10, 2001, after extensive committee deliberations, the Second Chamber of the Dutch Parliament passed a bill that was introduced in August 1999 legalizing physician-assisted death. The bill is officially called It was passed by a majority vote in the Second Chamber of Parliament and was supported by the majority parties constituting the present coalition government (i.e., liberals and ... [Show full abstract] socialists). Opposition to the law came mainly from a minority of Christian parties. In this report we explore the meaning of this bill and describe some of its problematic and paradoxical items.

Article

Scheduling Auctions and Proto-Parties in Legislatures

January 2014

We consider the impact of the scarcity of plenary time in legislatures both on the outcome of the legislative bargaining process and the organization of the legislature itself. We do so by developing a novel model that we call scheduling auctions. In the model, the legislature is charged with allocating a fixed budget. Members can propose an allocation and the scheduling agent decides which one ... [Show full abstract] of the possible proposals will be considered by the entire legislature in plenary session for an up or down vote. We show in this simple setting that deciding which member should be selected as the scheduling agent endogenously induces the creation of nascent political parties that we call proto-parties. We also show that the these legislative structures have positive welfare implications.

Article

Outcome‐Based Perceptions of Morality and Support for Political Candidates

October 2018 · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

During the 2016 U.S. presidential election, Trump supporters expressed that they believed Trump was a moral candidate because of his past successes. Such statements are consistent with our argument that people judge others’ morality based on their success and failure‐related outcomes, even though these outcomes are usually associated with judgments of competence. Moreover, we argue that these ... [Show full abstract] outcome‐based perceptions of morality play a crucial role in responses to political candidates, independent of perceived competence. In three experiments, we manipulated a hypothetical candidate's outcomes (past successes vs. failures, or success in light of past misfortune vs. good fortune). We examined the effect of the manipulation on perceptions of the candidate's morality and competence, as well as support for the candidate (e.g., voting intentions). Across the three experiments, candidates’ outcomes affected not only perceptions of their competence, but also their morality. In turn, outcome‐based perceptions of competence and morality independently predicted candidate support. Our findings have implications for how people responded to the campaigns in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, especially the campaign run by Donald Trump.

Article

Full-text available

Sustainable Consumption Dilemmas

June 2017 · Sustainability

To examine which considerations play a role when individuals make decisions to purchase sustainable product varieties or not, we have conducted a large scale field experiment with more than 600 participating households. Households can vote on whether the budgets they receive should only be spent on purchasing the sustainable product variety, or whether every household in a group is free to spend ... [Show full abstract] their budget on any product variety. By conducting several treatments, we tested whether people tend to view sustainable consumption as a social dilemma or as a moral dilemma. We find little support for the hypothesis that social dilemma considerations are the key drivers of sustainable consumption behaviour. Participants seem to be caught in a moral dilemma in which they not only weigh their individual financial costs with the sustainable benefits but they also consider the consequences of restricting other people’s freedom of choice. Complementary survey results further substantiate this claim and show that many people are reluctant to impose restrictions on their peers, but, at the same time, our results also suggest substantial support for the government to regulate the availability of unsustainable product varieties.