The primary purpose behind undertaking this research was peculiarity of life insurance
contract and secondarily it intended to understand role of financial literacy, saving
motives, insurance literacy in designing of insurance product preference.
This purpose led to natural but necessary to answer research questions: Is financial
literacy level similar across respondents of different age-group, gender, city,
education, occupation, income? Are saving motives (comprising of bequeath, wealth
accumulation, risk aversion, life style and precautionary motives) different among
respondents of different age-group, gender, city, education, occupation, income
similarly? Is insurance literacy level different for different age-group, gender, city,
education, occupation, income? Are there any underlying structures or dominating
factors in form of reasons responsible for life insurance consideration? Are financial
literacy, saving motives and insurance literacy resulting in varied product preferences?
How are product preferences associated with different demographic profiles of agegroup, gender, city, education, occupation, income?
Based on the above research questions, research hypotheses were formed. In the study,
financial literacy, saving motives, insurance literacy were in form of score of
statements individually ranked on likert scale of 1 to 5. These scores were falling in
interval category of data. Product preferences were obtained in form of rank of
preference representing ordinal data. Demographic and socio- economic variable were
continuous and nominal/ ordinal in nature. Based on this one way ANOVA tests were
run for comparing differences in financial literacy, saving motives and insurance
literacy scores for different demographic profiles and subsequently post hoc tests were
conducted in case of significance. Similarly for finding differences in life insurance
product preference for financial literacy, saving motives and insurance literacy scores,
one way ANOVA tests were conducted. Chi square tests were conducted for finding
association between ordinal data (product preference) and demographic profile
variables. Factor analysis was conducted to find presence of underlying structures and
load of various variables.
X
Based on this statistical treatment and analysis of data, it was found that there is citywise variation in financial literacy, saving motives, insurance literacy and product
preferences. Marital status, occupation, monthly income and expected changes in
income have resulted in major difference in financial literacy and insurance literacy.
Financial literacy was found to be varying with financial literacy. Major factors
affecting reason for consideration of life insurance were: child and parental
aspirations, capability building, contingency control, comfort and credit creation.
Life insurance responds to life cycle stage, perceived need for protection, and
realisation of risk and falling short in adverse situations. Life insurance goes hand
in hand with psychological input rather than financial logic. Consideration of life
insurance is contemplated to be a function of self-assessment.
Suggestions on the basis of this research were:
1 Making consumers realise insurance as distinct tool with immediate protection
rather than positioning as savings, investment etc.
2 Insurance awareness programs for making consumers aware of distinct role of life
insurance in financial and life style planning.
3 Visibility of financial need for different stages of life need to be created
4 Consumers should be provided with images of planned need / probable beneficiary
for better perception and better retention of logic followed during financial planning.
5 Differentiation to be made clear in minds of consumer pertaining to protection,
saving, investment need.