Content uploaded by Russell B Clayton
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Russell B Clayton on Nov 09, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Cheating, Breakup, and Divorce:
Is Facebook Use to Blame?
Russell B. Clayton, MA,
1
Alexander Nagurney, PhD,
2
and Jessica R. Smith, MA
3
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between using the social networking site
known as Facebook and negative interpersonal relationship outcomes. A survey of 205 Facebook users aged 18–
82 was conducted using a 16-question online survey to examine whether high levels of Facebook use predicted
negative relationship outcomes (breakup/divorce, emotional cheating, and physical cheating). It was hypoth-
esized that those with higher levels of Facebook use would demonstrate more negative relationship outcomes
than those with lower use. The study then examined whether these relationships were mediated by Facebook-
related conflict. Furthermore, the researchers examined length of relationship as a moderator variable in the
aforementioned model. The results indicate that a high level of Facebook usage is associated with negative
relationship outcomes, and that these relationships are indeed mediated by Facebook-related conflict. This series
of relationships only holds for those who are, or have been, in relatively newer relationships of 3 years or less.
The current study adds to the growing body of literature investigating Internet use and relationship outcomes,
and may be a precursor to further research investigating whether Facebook use attributes to the divorce rate,
emotional cheating, and physical cheating.
Introduction
Relationships, both personal and impersonal, tran-
spire daily, and the dynamics of such relationships are
constantly changing and being influenced by numerous fac-
tors outside of the actual relationship itself. Social networking
sites (SNSs), such as Facebook, have provided a relatively new
platform for interpersonal communication. Research has
shown that Facebook is used most frequently to keep in touch
with others and to monitor regularly friends’ activities.
1
Ad-
ditionally, Facebook has been found to be used to monitor the
activities of current romantic partners.
2
Although monitoring
others’ activities has been cited to leading to negative rela-
tionship outcomes such as online and offline relational in-
trusion,
3
the current study’s aim is to examine whether
Facebook use may lead to negative relationship outcomes,
and whether those outcomes lead to emotional cheating,
physical cheating, breakup, and divorce.
SNSs Effects on Interpersonal Relationships
At the beginning of October 2012, the SNS Facebook
reached one billion monthly active users and 552 million daily
active users.
4
As a result of such popularity, Facebook has
become a major area of interest for researchers. The exploration
of the negative impacts of SNSs such as Internet addiction,
anxiety, jealousy, and its effects on normal human behavior in
general are a few areas that have become a major concern.
5–7
One study involving 2,368 college students found ‘‘a signifi-
cant negative relationship between frequency of engaging in
Facebook chat and time spent preparing for class,’’ which
suggest that online chatting may somehow detract from
learning and schoolwork.
8(p168)
A more severe or dangerous
concern as a result of the increasing popularity of SNSs is the
behavior associated with stalking. Facebook has been found to
facilitate behaviors that are symptomatic of personal intrusion,
which have consequences for users’ security and privacy.
9
Recently, one study found that exposure post-breakup to
an ex-partner’s Facebook profile may obstruct the process
of healing and moving on.
10
Moreover, previous studies
have shown that Facebook jealousy, partner survelliance,
ambigous information, compulsive Internet use, and online
portrayal of intimate relationships can be damaging to ro-
mantic relationships.
11–15
Internet use in general, not just
SNSs, have been shown to influence romantic relationship
quality negatively. Kerkhof
14
found that compulsive Internet
users reported greater conflict with their partners, more
feelings of exclusion and concealment in addition to lower
commitment, lower feelings of passion and intimacy, and less
1
Department of Journalism, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri.
2
Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii, Hilo, Hawaii.
3
Department of Marriage and Family Therapy, St. Mary’s University, San Antonio, Texas.
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY,BEHAVIOR,AND SOCIAL NETWORKING
Volume 16, Number 10, 2013
ªMary Ann Liebert, Inc.
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0424
717
disclosure. Additional research has found that monitoring an
ex-partner’s Facebook profile, such as viewing photos, sta-
tuses, and check-ins, is associated with an increased likeli-
hood of engaging in other obsessive behaviors.
3
SNSs enable romantic partners to have access to more in-
formation about their significant other.
11
Tokunaga
12
found
that interpersonal electronic surveillance is more likely to occur
in younger people, perhaps suggesting that younger individ-
uals who are in shorter or newer realtionships may use sur-
vallance strategies as an information-seeking technique toward
their partners. While this may serve as a positive influence in
getting to know one another and learning about each other’s
past, it may also provoke feelings of jealousy that could enter
into the relationship. Muise
13
found that Facebook use in-
creases jealousy amongst romantic partners in which ambi-
gous information discovered on a romantic partner’s profile
page induced romantic jealousy. Therefore, it may be possible
that Facebook induced jealousy may serve as a feedback loop
in which a romantic partner uses Facebook excessively to un-
cover additional information about their partner in order to
reduce ambiguity in the information they have uncovered.
Furthermore, research has been conducted to examine re-
lationship satisfaction through the use of Facebook amongst
dating partners and how they portrayed their intimate rela-
tionship and relationship status on their Facebook profiles.
15
Results revealed that disagreements over Facebook statuses
were associated with lower levels of relationship satisfaction,
but only for females.
15
In addition, Elphinston and Noller
16
discovered that Facebook intrusion, by means of surveillance
behaviors and jealous cognitions, was associated with rela-
tionship dissatisfaction for undergraduate college students
who were currently in romantic relationships.
The Current Study
The current research study hopes to add to the body of
literature pertaining to the effects of Facebook use on rela-
tionship outcomes. The researchers conceptualize Facebook-
related conflict as whether Facebook use increases relationship
complications in intimate romantic relationships. Negative
relationship outcomes were conceptualized as whether
Facebook use influences likelihood for emotional cheating,
physical cheating, relationship breakup, and divorce. As a
result, the researchers predicted that Facebook usage and
negative relationship outcomes will be positively related,
Facebook-related conflict and negative relationship out-
comes will be positively related, and that Facebook-related
conflict will mediate the relationship between Facebook
usage and negative relationship outcomes.
Given the prior research mentioned by Tokunaga,
12
the
researchers predicted that the length of relationship will
moderate the meditational effect of conflict such that this
mediated effect will only hold for those who are in shorter
duration relationships, since these relationships are those
considered to be most unstable and hence the most suscep-
tible to conflict.
H1: Facebook usage and negative relationship outcomes will
be positively related.
H2: Facebook-related conflict and negative relationship out-
comes will be positively related.
H3: Facebook-related conflict will mediate the relationship
between Facebook usage and negative relationship outcomes.
H4: Length of relationship will moderate the meditational
effect of Facebook-related conflict such that this mediated
effect will only hold for those who are in shorter duration
relationships.
Methods
Participants
Participants were 205 Facebook users. To obtain partici-
pants, the researchers updated their own Facebook profile
statuses with an online survey link created on www.qualtrics
.com. The convenience sample included, but was not limited
to, college-aged students. The researchers included a preface
to the survey link with a description of the study. The preface
included a statement informing participants that partici-
pation in the study was voluntary. The participants’ ages
ranged from 18 to 82 years old (M=33, SD =14.26). Most
participants (89%) were Caucasian, 7% were Hispanic, 2%
were African American, and 2% were Asian American. The
majority of participants (62%) were female.
Materials
Materials included a 16-question survey. The survey in-
cluded demographic questions, as well as questions about
participants’ perceived levels of Facebook use. Additionally,
the survey asked participants if they had encountered rela-
tionship conflict with their partner or former partner as a
result of high levels of Facebook use. Lastly, the survey asked
participants if high levels of Facebook use led to a breakup or
divorce, emotional cheating, and physical cheating with a
current or former partner.
Relationships. In order for the researchers to understand
to whom the participants’ answers were directed, the survey
instructed participants to answer the question, ‘‘Are you
currently in a romantic relationship?’’ If the participants an-
swered ‘‘Yes,’’ they were then asked to type how many
months or years they had been in that relationship. If the
participants answered ‘‘No,’’ the researchers analyzed their
data in correspondence to the former partner. In total, 144
participants (79%) responded that they were currently in a
romantic relationship, while 59 (21%) reported being cur-
rently single. The average relationship length for those who
reported being in a relationship was 103 months (SD =144
months).
Facebook use. High levels of Facebook use was opera-
tionally defined, in regards to the current study, as the
average of two questions developed by the researchers. The
questions asked, ‘‘How often do you use Facebook?’’
and ‘‘How often do you view friends’ profiles on Facebook?’’
Data were gathered using a Likert-type scale: A =‘‘never,’’
B=‘‘monthly,’’ C =‘‘weekly,’’ D =‘‘daily,’’ and E =‘‘hourly.’’
These questions were highly correlated, r(203) =0.48,
p<0.001, and were therefore combined into a single variable.
Facebook-related conflict. The researchers developed six
questions to measure negative relationship outcomes as a
result of Facebook use as a mediator variable. The six ques-
tions included such items as ‘‘How often do you have an
argument with your significant other as a result of excessive
Facebook use?’’ and ‘‘How often do you have an argument
718 CLAYTON ET AL.
with your significant other as a result of viewing friends’
Facebook profiles?’’ The questions were answered by using a
Likert-type scale: A =‘‘never,’’ B =‘‘monthly,’’ C =‘‘weekly,’’
D=‘‘daily,’’ and E =‘‘hourly.’’ Cronbach’s alpha for the scale
was 0.85.
Negative relationship outcomes. The researchers devel-
oped three questions to measure the criterion variable in the
current study, such as ‘‘Have you physically cheated on your
significant other with someone you have connected or re-
connected with on Facebook?’’ The researchers condensed the
answers into dichotomous yes/no answer choices. Once av-
eraged, the Kuder Richardson (KR-20) measure of reliability
was 0.70.
Results
Mediation
The mean for the Facebook-related conflict scale was 1.34
(SD =0.49), and the mean for the negative relationship out-
comes scale was 1.84 (SD =0.29). The mean of the Facebook
usage variable was 3.60 (SD =0.70). In order to test the hy-
pothesis that Facebook-related conflict would mediate the
relationship between Facebook usage and negative relation-
ship outcomes, regression analyses were conducted accord-
ing to the specifications set out by Andrew Hayes’ PROCESS
for SPSS using model four.
17
Facebook usage was entered as
the independent variable (X) and negative relationship out-
comes was entered as the outcome variable (Y). As a test of
mediation, Facebook-related conflict was entered as the me-
diator variable (M). A significant relationship emerged
(b=0.24, p<0.001), demonstrating a positive relationship be-
tween Facebook usage and Facebook-related conflict. A sec-
ond significant relationship emerged (b=0.37, p<0.001),
demonstrating a positive relationship between Facebook-re-
lated conflict and negative relationship outcomes. Finally, the
relationship between Facebook usage and negative relation-
ship outcomes became nonsignificant (b=0.02, p=0.370). This
pattern of results demonstrates that Facebook-related conflict
does mediate the relationship between Facebook usage and
negative relationship outcomes.
Moderation
In order to test the moderating effect of relationship length,
the sample was divided based upon a median split (medi-
an =36 months). Those participants who reported being in a
relationship of 36 months or less were categorized in the
shorter length group (n=133), whereas those who reported
being in relationships of longer than 36 months were placed
in the longer length group (n=72). A regression analysis was
conducted according to the specifications set out by Andrew
Hayes’ PROCESS for SPSS using model five.
17
For the shorter
length group, Facebook usage predicted Facebook-related
conflict (b=0.13, p<0.001), and Facebook-related conflict
predicted negative relationship outcomes (b=0.34, p<0.001).
The relationship between Facebook usage and negative re-
lationship outcomes became nonsignificant (b=0.08,
p=0.366). This pattern of results demonstrates that Facebook-
related conflict does mediate the relationship between Face-
book usage and negative relationship outcomes for those in
relatively shorter relationships. For the longer length group,
the relationship between Facebook usage and negative rela-
tionship outcomes was nonsignificant (b=0.05, p=0.726).
Therefore, further meditational analyses were not run for this
group.
Discussion
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the
relationship between high levels of Facebook use and nega-
tive relationship outcomes. The researchers hypothesized that
when an individual engages in high levels of Facebook use,
the effects of doing so may be damaging to the individual’s
interpersonal relationships. The researchers further proposed
that high levels of Facebook use could be attributed to Face-
book-related conflict and breakup/divorce. The results indi-
cated that high levels of Facebook usage is associated with
negative relationship outcomes (i.e., breakup/divorce and
cheating) and that this relationship is mediated by Facebook-
related conflict. However, these correlations only hold for
those who are in newer relationships.
The researchers hypothesized that high levels of Facebook
usage may be damaging to an individual’s interpersonal re-
lationships. ‘‘According to an article on PRNewswire,
roughly 81 percent of the United States’ most elite divorce
attorneys believe that the SNS Facebook plays a role in di-
vorce trials.’’
18(p4)
The current study’s results support this
belief. Individuals who are on Facebook may often be indi-
rectly neglecting their partner, directly neglecting their part-
ner by communication with former partners, and developing
Facebook-related jealousy or constant partner monitoring,
which may lead to future relationship conflict or separation.
High levels of Facebook use may also serve as an indirect
temptation for physical and/or emotional cheating. Conflict
or jealousy may arise from an individual learning that his or
her partner added an ex-partner or spouse as a friend on
Facebook. Moreover, conflict may arise if the user is exces-
sively viewing pictures of an ex-romantic partner or begins to
communicate via Facebook chat or messages with a past ro-
mantic partner. As a result, Facebook may lead to arguments
between couples where one or both of the individuals in the
relationship are on Facebook often, which may ultimately
lead to cheating or breakup.
The results of the current study indicate that individuals
who are currently in a relationship of 3 years or less are more
likely to experience negative relationship outcomes as a result
of Facebook-related conflict. This finding suggests that
Facebook may be a threat to relationships that are not fully
matured. On the other hand, participants who have been in a
relationship for longer than 3 years may not be as likely to be
on Facebook as often. Therefore Facebook may not be a
concern. The researchers also suspect that these findings may
be a generational issue given that older couples may not have
Facebook accounts. Due to the amount of accessibility to
connect with past partners using Facebook, and with the
current study’s findings, the researchers suspect that Face-
book may attribute to an increase in divorce rates and infi-
delity in the future.
Limitations and Implications for Further Research
The findings of the current study must be considered in the
context of several limitations. The sample included partici-
pants who were told before starting the survey that they
FACEBOOK USE AND NEGATIVE RELATIONSHIP OUTCOMES 719
would be answering questions regarding Facebook use and
relationship outcomes, and this may have skewed the data.
An additional limitation was that some items were left to
participants’ interpretation, such as the word ‘‘excessive’’
when answering questions about Facebook-related conflict.
Moreover, social desirability is an unavoidable issue when it
comes to self-reported data, particularly when the issues
under investigation are sensitive as in the current study.
Therefore, it is possible that social desirability effects may
have skewed the results of the study. The results should be
interpreted in light of this possibility. Since the online survey
link was distributed via the researchers’ Facebook statuses,
the current study’s sample is limited to only those who use
Facebook and who are Facebook friends (or friends of friends)
with one of the three researchers. This limitation significantly
limits the generalizations of the findings from the current
study. The scales used in this study had not been previously
validated, and although each scale reported an alpha reli-
ability coefficient of 0.70 or greater, previously validated
scales would have been preferred.
Future research should investigate whether engaging in
high amounts of other SNSs also predicts negative rela-
tionship outcomes. Additional future research should ex-
plore other mediators in the current study’s model.
Although a Facebook Connection Strategies scale exists,
which measures how individuals connect with others using
Facebook,
19
future research should explore connection
strategies as they relate to romantic relationships and what
behaviors are occurring on Facebook that may predispose
Facebook-related conflict.
Conclusion
To conclude, our results indicate that high levels of Face-
book use, when mediated by Facebook-related conflict, sig-
nificantly predict negative relationship outcomes. The current
study adds to the growing body of literature investigating
predictors of Internet use and relationship outcomes. Lastly,
the current study may be a precursor to further investigation
of whether Facebook use attributes to the divorce rate, emo-
tional cheating, physical cheating, and breakups.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
References
1. Joinson AN. (2008) ‘‘Looking at,’’ ‘‘looking up’’ or ‘‘keeping
up with’’ people? Motives and uses of Facebook. Proceedings
of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in
Computing Systems. New York: ACM, pp. 1027–36.
2. Marshall TC, Bejanyan K, Di Castro G, et al. Attachment
styles as predictors of Facebook-related jealousy and sur-
veillance in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships
2013; in press.
3. Lyndon A, Bonds-Raacke J, Cratty AD. College students’
Facebook stalking of ex-partners. CyberPsychology, Beha-
vior, & Social Networking 2011; 14:711–16.
4. Facebook. (2012) Newsroom: key facts. http://newsroom.fb
.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId =22 (accessed Oct.
7, 2012).
5. Das B, Sahoo JS. Social networking sites—a critical analysis
of its impact on personal and social life. International Journal
of Business & Social Science 2011; 2:222–8.
6. Clayton RB, Osborne R, Miller B, et al. Loneliness, anx-
iousness, and substance use as predictors of Facebook use.
Computers in Human Behavior 2013; 29:687–93.
7. Boyd DM, Ellison N. Social network sites: definition, history,
and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Commu-
nication 2008; 13:210–30.
8. Junco R. The relationship between frequency of Facebook
use, participation in Facebook activities, and student en-
gagement. Computers & Education 2012; 58:162–71.
9. Chaulk K, Jones T. Online obsessive relational intrusion:
further concerns about Facebook. Journal of Family Violence
2011; 26:245–54.
10. Marshall T. Facebook surveillance of former romantic part-
ners: associations with postbreakup recovery and personal
growth. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking
2012; 15:521–6.
11. Utz S, Beukeboom CJ. The role of social network sites in
romantic relationships: effects on jealousy and relationship
happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
2011; 16:511–27.
12. Tokunaga RS. Social networking site or social surveillance
site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic sur-
veillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human
Behavior 2011; 27:705–13.
13. Muise A, Christofides E, Desmarais S. More information
than you ever wanted: does Facebook bring out the green-
eyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychology & Behavior
2009; 12:441–4.
14. Kerkhof P, Finkenauer C, Muusses LD. Relational consequences
of compulsive Internet use: a longitudinal study among new-
lyweds. Human Communication Research 2011; 37:147–73.
15. Papp LM, Danielewicz J, Cayemberg C. ‘‘Are we Facebook
official?’’ Implications of dating partners’ Facebook use and
profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. CyberPsy-
chology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2012 15:85–90.
16. Elphinston RA, Noller P. Time to face it! Facebook intrusion
and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship
satisfaction. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Net-
working 2011; 14:631–5.
17. Hayes AF. (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and
conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New
York: Guilford Press.
18. Dolan E. Exploring Privacy on Online Social Networks. Pa-
per presented at the annual International Communication
Association Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, May, 2012.
www.icahdq.org/pubs/reports/Annual_Report_2012.pdf
(accessed June 17, 2012).
19. Ellison BN, Steinfield C, Lampe C. Connection strategies: social
capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication
practices. Journal of New Media & Society 2011; 6:873–92.
Address correspondence to:
Russell B. Clayton
University of Missouri-Columbia
Department of Journalism
120 Neff Hall
Columbia, MO 65211
E-mail: rclayton23@yahoo.com
720 CLAYTON ET AL.
