Title of the paper: Assessment of the naturalness of the
red deer management in Central European national
parks.
National parks, as a category for protected areas, are a
relatively recent creation. With the exception of the
Swiss National Park (1914), all other European national
parks were established after 1970. According to proclaimed
goals, natural processes in the national parks
are to be allowed to develop free of human interference.
The methods by which these aims are to be achieved in
respect to the management of large wild animals are a
subject of much controversy: hunting traditions and
forestry practices play important roles and generally
accepted management standards are nonexistent. In
view of these facts, we undertook this project to develop
a set of criteria that can be used to assess methods for
the management of red reer in regard to their approximation
of natural conditions and that are suited to evaluate
the quality of protected areas. Near natural areas
are defined as areas in which the animals are not fed,
hunting is not allowed, and populations are regulated by
natural processes. In order to assess the current situation
in the central European national parks, questionnaires
were sent to 20 national park administrations in
countries that have red deer populations. A total of 16
national parks took part in the study (table 1). Questions
focused on features of the protected area, the red deer
population characteristics, types of management measures,
and related general conditions. Red deer managemanagement
practices (table 4) in the individual protected areas
were then evaluated with the aid of criteria that had
been developed for determining the degree to which they
emulate natural conditions (table 2). As indicated by the
results, red deer are managed to a great or very great
degree in most of the protected areas (figure 2). This is
not in accordance with the proclaimed goals of national
parks. With the exception of the Swiss National Park,
red deer Populations are strongly manipulated in all of
the other protected areas that participated in this study,
especially in regard to population development (regulatory
culling, feeding), spatial-temporal behaviour (stress
due to hunting and recreational activities), and genetics
(selection as an effect of hunting). In contrast, mechanisms
of natural regulation, such as those caused by the
presence of large predators, have only been of subordinate
significance.