ArticlePDF Available

Limited utility of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b in assessing response to therapy in osteoporosis

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background: Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRACP5b) is a serum bone resorption marker. Our aim was to investigate its utility in monitoring metabolic bone disease. Methods: Serum TRACP5b, C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen, urine N-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen and free deoxypyridinoline were measured pre- and post-treatment with a parathyroid hormone analogue [PTH (1-34)] (n = 14) or a bisphosphonate (N-BP) (n = 8). TRACP5b, bone alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured in 100 osteoporosis patients on prolonged bisphosphonate therapy. Results: Changes in TRACP5b were smaller in magnitude but mimicked those of other bone resorption markers. Absolute changes in TRACP5b and the other resorption markers correlated significantly (p < 0.001). In patients on long-term bisphosphonates, TRACP5b and bone ALP levels were not suppressed. Vitamin D status was consistent with the level of supplementation. Conclusion: TRACP5b has limited utility as a single marker of metabolic bone disease treatment.
No caption available
… 
No caption available
… 
Content may be subject to copyright.
1 23
Irish Journal of Medical Science
ISSN 0021-1265
Volume 183
Number 1
Ir J Med Sci (2014) 183:47-52
DOI 10.1007/s11845-013-0970-6
Limited utility of tartrate-resistant acid
phosphatase isoform 5b in assessing
response to therapy in osteoporosis
J.J.Brady, R.K.Crowley, B.F.Murray,
M.T.Kilbane, M.O’Keane &
M.J.McKenna
1 23
Your article is protected by copyright and all
rights are held exclusively by Royal Academy
of Medicine in Ireland. This e-offprint is for
personal use only and shall not be self-
archived in electronic repositories. If you wish
to self-archive your article, please use the
accepted manuscript version for posting on
your own website. You may further deposit
the accepted manuscript version in any
repository, provided it is only made publicly
available 12 months after official publication
or later and provided acknowledgement is
given to the original source of publication
and a link is inserted to the published article
on Springer's website. The link must be
accompanied by the following text: "The final
publication is available at link.springer.com”.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Limited utility of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b
in assessing response to therapy in osteoporosis
J. J. Brady R. K. Crowley B. F. Murray
M. T. Kilbane M. O’Keane M. J. McKenna
Received: 8 January 2013 / Accepted: 22 May 2013 / Published online: 5 June 2013
ÓRoyal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2013
Abstract
Background Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform
5b (TRACP5b) is a serum bone resorption marker. Our aim
was to investigate its utility in monitoring metabolic bone
disease.
Methods Serum TRACP5b, C-terminal cross-linking tel-
opeptide of type I collagen, urine N-terminal cross-linking
telopeptide of type I collagen and free deoxypyridinoline
were measured pre- and post-treatment with a parathyroid
hormone analogue [PTH (1–34)] (n=14) or a bis-
phosphonate (N-BP) (n=8). TRACP5b, bone alkaline
phosphatase (bone ALP), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD)
and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured in 100
osteoporosis patients on prolonged bisphosphonate therapy.
Results Changes in TRACP5b were smaller in magnitude
but mimicked those of other bone resorption markers.
Absolute changes in TRACP5b and the other resorption
markers correlated significantly (p\0.001). In patients on
long-term bisphosphonates, TRACP5b and bone ALP
levels were not suppressed. Vitamin D status was consis-
tent with the level of supplementation.
Conclusion TRACP5b has limited utility as a single
marker of metabolic bone disease treatment.
Keywords TRACP5b Bisphosphonate Bone turnover
markers PTH Vitamin D
Introduction
In recent years, the safety and efficacy of bisphosphonates,
commonly used treatments for osteoporosis, have been
called into question [1,2]. An increased risk of atypical
femoral fractures, characterised as sub-trochanteric frac-
tures with breaking of the cortex, has been reported
in association with bisphosphonate use [3]. Amin-
obisphosphonates impair osteoclast cell function and
reduce bone remodelling rate. The explanation for this
fracture pattern is that bisphosphonates suppress bone
turnover and expose patients to the risk of fracture via
long-term accumulation of microdamage [4,5]. Measure-
ment of bone turnover markers (BTMs) is useful to track
suppression of bone turnover in patients on bisphospho-
nates [6].
Commonly used markers of bone resorption include
C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen
(CTX), free deoxypyridinoline (fDPD), and N-terminal
cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen (NTX), the
latter two of which are measured in urine. These markers
are subject to significant pre-analytical variability includ-
ing diurnal variation and food intake that necessitates
standardised collection protocols [6]. Urine collection is
cumbersome for the patient and volume or sample timing
may be inaccurate. Intra-individual variation of urinary
resorption markers has been reported to be high, thus
impacting on clinical utility [6,7]. The reproducibility of
J. J. Brady and R. K. Crowley are joint first authors.
J. J. Brady (&)B. F. Murray M. T. Kilbane M. O’Keane
M. J. McKenna
Metabolism Laboratory, St. Vincent’s University Hospital,
Dublin, Ireland
e-mail: jbrady@mater.ie
R. K. Crowley M. J. McKenna
St. Michael’s Hospital, Du
´n Laoghaire, Dublin, Ireland
M. J. McKenna
School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University College
Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
123
Ir J Med Sci (2014) 183:47–52
DOI 10.1007/s11845-013-0970-6
Author's personal copy
urine measurements is also significantly affected by the
variable ionic strength of samples and the need to correct
for creatinine excretion, which may introduce variability in
results [8].
The variability of bone resorption markers can be
reduced and their clinical utility improved by using a
marker unaffected by the limitations described. One such
serum marker is TRACP5b. This enzyme is present in the
osteoclast’s ruffled border membrane and in the resorptive
space [9]. Osteoclasts secrete TRACP5b into the circula-
tion as an active enzyme and serum levels act as a surro-
gate marker of osteoclast number [10]. TRACP5b is less
affected by feeding than CTX, NTX and fDPD. It has low
biological and analytical variability, and because it is
inactivated and degraded into fragments before it is
removed from the circulation, serum levels are not affected
by renal or hepatic failure [11].
Routine practice in our laboratory is to measure both
formation and resorption markers to monitor response or
adherence to treatment or identify non-responders in
patients on bone therapy. The purpose of this study was
twofold: firstly, to determine prospectively in a small
study of 22 patients, the clinical utility of TRACP5b in
comparison to other resorption markers (CTX, fDPD and
NTX) and formation markers (PINP and bone ALP) as a
tool for monitoring the response to either parathyroid
hormone [PTH (1–34)] or bisphosphonate therapy in
clinical practice; and secondly, to assess its utility as a
marker of bone turnover suppression in 100 patients on
prolonged bisphosphonate therapy. In the latter study,
TRACP5b, bone ALP, PTH and 25OHD levels were
determined; 25OHD served both as an estimate of vita-
min D status and as an indicator of compliance with
therapy.
Methods
The Ethics Committee of St Vincent’s University Hospital
approved the TRACP5b validation study. All patients
provided written informed consent. Two groups of patients
were recruited for the TRACP5b validation study; those
commencing PTH (1–34) for osteoporosis (n=14) and
those starting a bisphosphonate for either osteoporosis
(n=5) or Paget’s disease of bone (n=3). Patients pro-
vided fasting blood and second void urine samples for bone
biomarkers according to our laboratory protocol prior to
the treatment and approximately 16 weeks after com-
mencement of the treatment [12]. For the prolonged
bisphosphonate survey, 100 consecutive attendees on
prolonged bisphosphonate therapy for treatment of osteo-
porosis had blood drawn as part of their routine clinic visit;
so it was deemed that ethics approval was not required.
There were 89 women and 11 men. They were treated with
alendronate (n=41), risedronate (n=22), ibandronate
(n=21; intravenous form, n=10), etidronate (n=9),
zoledronic acid infusions (n=6), and pamidronate infu-
sions (n=1). Supplemental calcium and vitamin D intake
was as follows: none (n=9); vitamin D
3
only (n=2);
combined calcium and vitamin D
3
(n=89). Non-fasting
samples were drawn throughout the year for the estimation
of serum TRACP5b, bone ALP, 25OHD and PTH. In this
group, TRACP5b and bone ALP were compared with the
manufacturer’s reference range. Bone ALP and TRACP 5b
reference intervals were verified for use in-house in
accordance with IFCC and CLSI-C28 standard verification
protocols.
Samples were transported to the laboratory on ice
without delay, blood was centrifuged at 4 °C. Serum was
immediately separated and frozen at -80 °C until analysis.
Urine was stored at -30 °C prior to analysis. For the
TRACP5b validation study, serum TRACP5b, CTX, bone
ALP and PINP, and urine NTX, fDPD and creatinine were
measured. TRACP5b was measured by competitive
enzyme immunoassay (BoneTRAP
Ò
Assay, Immunodiag-
nostic Systems Ltd, Boldon, UK), on a Triturus automated
ELISA instrument. All patient samples were analysed in
duplicate and the mean of the results used; pre- and post-
treatment samples were measured in the same assay.
Within-run precision was \3.5 % (over TRACP5b con-
centration range 2.37–13.36 U/L); between-run precision
was \1.6 % (over range 1.46–4.18 U/L). Serum CTX,
bone ALP, PINP, 25OHD, PTH, and urine NTX and fDPD
were measured as previously described [12,13].
Descriptive statistics are presented as mean (standard
deviation) or median (interquartile range) as appropriate
for pattern of distribution. Analytical variability (CVa) of
TRACP5b was calculated as the mean CV of duplicate
measurements over two assays used in this study. The
intra-individual variability (CVi) was deduced from the
literature using a similar study group and time period [14].
The least significant change (LSC) was calculated from the
formula: 1.96H2H(CVa
2
?CVi
2
). Simple associations
were assessed by Pearson correlation coefficients or
Spearman rho coefficients, as appropriate. Results with
pvalues of \0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Stats
for Windows Version 20 (Armonk, New York).
Results
TRACP5b validation study
Following PTH (1–34) treatment, TRACP5b increased
from baseline in 12/14 (86 %) of patients (Table 1).
48 Ir J Med Sci
123
Author's personal copy
The median (IQR) percentage increases were 25 % (7–78 %)
for TRACP5b, 84 % (33–140 %) for fDPD/Cr, 69 %
(35–317 %) for NTX/Cr, 125 % (66–635 %) for CTX,
37 % (13–99 %) for bone ALP, and 246 % (138–670 %)
for PINP. Using a CVa of 1.54 % and CVi of 5.4 %, the
LSC for TRACP5b was calculated as 15.6 %, indicating
that while the change was smaller in magnitude than the
other markers, it was methodologically significant. In the
two cases where TRACP5b did not increase, there were
rises in CTX (0.12 and 0.17 lg/L, respectively), but min-
imal changes in either of the urinary markers. PINP
increased in both cases, by 26.8 and 44.3 lg/L, respec-
tively, suggesting that compliance was not an issue.
Following bisphosphonate treatment, TRACP5b and all
the other resorption markers decreased in all patients
(Table 1). In the bisphosphonate-treated group, the median
(IQR) percentage decrease from baseline for TRACP5b
was 27 % (16–32 %), for CTX was 76 % (45–94 %), for
fDPD/Cr was 38 % (11–68 %), for NTX/Cr was 87 %
(36–92 %), for bone ALP was 54 % (13–75 %) and for
PINP was 73 % (37–91 %).
There were highly significant correlations between
TRACP5b and all three resorption markers at baseline as
follows: with NTX/Cr (r=0.610; p=0.003), with fDPD/
Cr (r=0.762; p\0.001), and with CTX (r=0.780;
p\0.001). Following treatment, the absolute change in
TRACP5b levels correlated significantly with: NTX/Cr
(r=0.786; p\0.001) (Fig. 1), fDPD/Cr (r=0.784;
p\0.001) and CTX (r=0.918; p\0.001). The Spear-
man rho correlations for percent changes were even
higher: for fDPD/Cr (r=0.855; p\0.001), for NTX/Cr
(r=0.877; p\0.001) and for CTX (r=0.921;
p\0.001).
Prolonged bisphosphonate survey
The mean ±SD age of subjects was 70.7±10.8 years, and
the mean ±SD duration of bisphosphonate therapy at the
time of the study was 5.8 ±4 years. Serum TRACP5b was
determined in 99/100 patients recruited. The mean ±SD
concentration of TRACP5b was 2.92 ±0.92 U/L, and for
bone ALP was 12.0 ±4.2 lg/L. No patient had a level of
TRACP5b or bone ALP suppressed below the respective
reference ranges quoted by the manufacturer. Bone ALP
correlated with TRACP5b (r=0.371, p\0.001).
Median (IQR) 25OHD was 77 (61–96) nmol/L; 54
subjects had levels [75 nmol/L and only 13 had levels
\50 nmol/L, of which 8 were taking vitamin D
3
\400
IU/day (Fig. 2). Significantly more subjects who under-
went 25OHD sampling during the summer achieved serum
levels greater than 50 nmol/L (100 %), compared to
spring/autumn (85 %) or winter (63 %, p\0.001). Nine
subjects were not taking a vitamin D supplement. In a
stepwise linear regression model with dependent variable
(serum 25OHD) and independent variables (age, duration
of treatment, season of study, and vitamin D intake),
vitamin D intake was the sole predictor of serum 25 OHD
(r
2
=0.296; p=0.003). Median PTH was 41.1 (14.5–
153.6) ng/L, and correlated with 25OHD level (r=-0.445,
p\0.001).
Discussion
We have demonstrated that the TRACP5b response to PTH
(1–34) and bisphosphonate parallels other bone resorption
markers as demonstrated by the correlation coefficients. In
the PTH (1–34) group, the tightest correlation was between
TRACP5b and CTX similar to a previous report [15]. The
BTM response to PTH (1–34) has been studied at different
time points following the commencement of treatment. In a
28-day study by Glover et al. [16], whilst formation
markers increased, markers of bone resorption showed an
unexpected pattern with serum CTX and NTX decreasing
until 19 days of treatment, and a nadir between days 9 and
13. A similar rapid decrease in bone resorption was
observed in a previous study after the daily administration
of a PTH-related peptide in postmenopausal women. In that
study, circulating TRACP5b did not change significantly
[17,18].
Table 1 Bone marker concentrations at baseline and post-treatment with either PTH (1–34) or bisphosphonate
PTH (1–34) Bisphosphonate
Pre-treatment Post-treatment Pre-treatment Post-treatment
TRACP5b (U/L) 2.91 (2.35–3.51) 4.25 (2.84–5.34) 4.15 (2.98–5.10) 3.18 (2.13–3.75)
CTX (lg/L) 0.278 (0.110–0.423) 0.782 (0.269–1.38) 0.526 (0.299–0.866) 0.166 (0.038–0.345)
NTX/Cr (nmol BCE/mmol) 23.6 (16.4–47.6) 73.9 (31.6–112.3) 135.5 (41.1–324.4) 23.6 (8.3–34.5)
fDPD/Cr (nmol/mmol) 5.0 (4.1–6.5) 8.45 (7.25–13.75) 10.4 (5.9–13.8) 5.5 (3.8–7.4)
Bone ALP (lg/L) 14.8 (12.8–23.0) 27.45 (16.3–46.4) 45.6 (12.6–85.8) 12.8 (6.0–24.9)
P1NP (lg/L) 31.7 (20.8–47.9) 120.9 (56.2–234.4) 118.2 (31.6–250.9) 22.7 (14.5–34.7)
All results are expressed as median (IQR)
Ir J Med Sci 49
123
Author's personal copy
The major increases seen in BMD are thought to occur
early post-initiation of therapy, in ‘the anabolic window’.
In a review of the literature of the histomorphometric and
quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) changes
occurring in the first month of treatment, Compston [18]
found that modelling contributes up to one-third of the
bone formation, representing the laying down of new bone.
The observed lack of change of TRACP5b in two of the
patients following PTH (1–34) treatment, in contrast to a
rise in CTX was unlikely to be due to the lack of com-
pliance as PINP increased in both cases. It is possible that
there was a discrepancy between osteoclast number and
resorptive activity. Henriksen et al. [10] graphically
demonstrated discrepancies between the number of osteo-
clasts relative to the measured bone resorption where the
decrease in resorption was significantly greater than the
reduction in osteoclast number, highlighted particularly in
the case of several novel therapeutic compounds.
BTMs have been widely used in clinical practice to
assess patient adherence to bisphosphonates [6]. The
magnitude of change in serum TRACP5b in our study was
smaller than the other bone resorption markers; this
observation parallels findings in other studies [11,15].
However, these studies support the use of TRACP5b
measurement based on the finding that TRACP5b had
higher clinical sensitivity, and higher signal-to-noise ratio
than CTX. They conclude that the markers with the
greatest reduction are not necessarily the best markers for
monitoring the response to anti-resorptive treatment,
because of high analytical and biological variability.
TRACP5b, with its lower biological variation has a
number of theoretical advantages as a biochemical marker
of bone turnover, namely that it is less affected by feeding
and can be measured in a random blood sample, negating
the requirement for a urine collection. In addition, diurnal
variation of circulating TRACP5b is low and levels are not
affected by disorders of the kidney or liver [11]. The pri-
mary disadvantage of TRACP5b is its relative instability,
requiring serum samples to be stored at -20 °C initially
and at -80 °C if not assayed within 2 months of collection.
The facility of a -80 °C freezer may not be available in all
laboratories. The validation study demonstrated that
TRACP5b could be useful in an out-patient setting for
monitoring treatment of osteoporosis and Paget’s disease.
Fig. 1 Regression equation
between the change in
TRACP5b and change in NTX/
Cr: delta NTX/Cr =66.6 9
delta TRACP5b-39.4,
r=0.786, p\0.001
0
50
100
150
Serum 25OHD nmol/L
Fig. 2 Vitamin D status in osteoporosis patients indicating those
taking C400 IU/day (circles), those taking \400 IU/day (squares)
and those not on supplements (triangles). The horizontal lines
indicate different 25OHD thresholds according to the Institute of
Medicine report: 30–50 nmol/L indicates range of adequacy;
125 nmol/L indicates the limit above which harm is possible
50 Ir J Med Sci
123
Author's personal copy
In the assessment of 100 patients on long-term bis-
phosphonates, bone ALP and TRACP5b levels drawn in
the non-fasting state were not suppressed below the normal
reference range in any patient. Bone remodelling units
appear to be mostly randomly distributed throughout the
skeleton and may be triggered by microcrack formation or
osteocyte apoptosis [19]. One of the concerns about pro-
longed bisphosphonate therapy is that over-suppression of
remodelling activity may impair microdamage repair. A
possible explanation for the lack of suppression below the
reference interval could be that bone turnover in these
patients was not over-suppressed. Bone ALP within the
normal reference range might suggest normal bone
remodelling activity and repair of microdamage. A com-
bination of a bone resorption marker (such as CTX), a
marker of osteoclast number (such as TRACP5b) and a
bone formation marker (such as PINP) may provide more
information about osteoclast activity and bone turnover in
the setting of anti-resorptive therapies as has been recom-
mended by other studies [15].
One limitation of this part of the study is that baseline
levels of the BTMs were not measured and therefore the
magnitude of change from baseline to after treatment could
not be ascertained. Another limitation of this study is that
CTX was not measured due to the fact the samples were
from non-fasting patients. CTX is particularly susceptible
to a decrease following intake of food, a fact that is well
documented in the literature [20]. Collection of fasting
samples can be impractical in the out-patient setting, and
our study confirms that non-fasting samples for TRACP5b
and bone ALP are difficult to interpret, particularly in the
absence of a baseline sample. Urine samples were not
collected from this patient cohort as part of routine prac-
tice, therefore we were not in a position to measure other
resorption markers such as NTX or fDPD. A further limi-
tation is that we did not have data on bone mineral density
changes in these patients, however, bone mineral density
can take up to 2 years to show significant changes fol-
lowing treatment, therefore may not have added any extra
information in this cohort.
The great majority (87 %) achieved 25OHD levels
greater than 50 nmol/L, which corresponds to the recom-
mended daily allowance as set by the IOM report.
According to the IOM, only 2.5 % of the population need
levels in excess of 50 nmol/L for bone health, and the
majority need a level between 30 and 50 nmol/L [21,22].
We have previously shown that vitamin D status in Irish
adults is suboptimal, particularly during the winter months
[13]. The vitamin D status of our cohort suggests that
appropriate supplements were prescribed and that adher-
ence was excellent. In fact, the finding of a result below
50 nmol/L probably suggests that a patient is either non-
compliant or has not been recommended supplements
given the known dose response to low dose oral vitamin D
supplementation [23].
In conclusion, while TRACP5b mimics other bone
resorption markers post-treatment, in the non-fasting state
it has limited utility in the monitoring of bone remodelling
and compliance with medication particularly when baseline
measurements have not been taken. It would appear that
TRACP5b is more suited to the investigation of the
mechanisms underlying the effects of treatment on the
bone microenvironment. As such its use is more suited to
drug trials and new therapies. Its routine use in more
complex metabolic bone diseases remains to be investi-
gated. Low-dose vitamin D supplementation in osteopo-
rosis is safe and effective in meeting the IOM
specifications regarding dietary reference intakes.
References
1. Visekruna M, Wilson D, McKiernan FE (2008) Severely sup-
pressed bone turnover and atypical skeletal fragility. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 93(8):2948–2952. Doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2803
2. Neviaser AS, Lane JM, Lenart BA, Edobor-Osula F, Lorich DG
(2008) Low-energy femoral shaft fractures associated with
alendronate use. J Orthop Trauma 22(5):346–350. doi:10.1097/
BOT.0b013e318172841c
3. Shane E, Burr D, Ebeling PR, Abrahamsen B, Adler RA, Brown
TD, Cheung AM, Cosman F, Curtis JR, Dell R, Dempster D,
Einhorn TA, Genant HK, Geusens P, Klaushofer K, Koval K,
Lane JM, McKiernan F, McKinney R, Ng A, Nieves J, O’Keefe
R, Papapoulos S, Sen HT, van der Meulen MC, Weinstein RS,
Whyte M (2010) Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral
fractures: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone
and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 25(11):2267–2294. doi:
10.1002/jbmr.253
4. Mashiba T, Hirano T, Turner CH, Forwood MR, Johnston CC,
Burr DB (2000) Suppressed bone turnover by bisphosphonates
increases microdamage accumulation and reduces some biome-
chanical properties in dog rib. J Bone Miner Res 15(4):613–620.
doi:10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.613
5. Diab T, Condon KW, Burr DB, Vashishth D (2006) Age-related
change in the damage morphology of human cortical bone and its
role in bone fragility. Bone 38(3):427–431. doi:10.1016/j.bone.
2005.09.002
6. Szulc P, Delmas PD (2008) Biochemical markers of bone turn-
over: potential use in the investigation and management of
postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 19(12):1683–1704.
doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0660-9
7. Delmas PD, Eastell R, Garnero P, Seibel MJ, Stepan J (2000) The
use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis.
Committee of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteopo-
rosis Foundation. Osteoporos Int 11(Suppl 6):S2–S17
8. Garnero P, Borel O, Delmas PD (2001) Evaluation of a fully
automated serum assay for C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide
of type I collagen in osteoporosis. Clin Chem 47(4):694–702
9. Terreni A, Pezzati P (2012) Biochemical markers in the follow-
up of the osteoporotic patients. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab
9(2):80–84
10. Henriksen K, Tanko LB, Qvist P, Delmas PD, Christiansen C,
Karsdal MA (2007) Assessment of osteoclast number and
Ir J Med Sci 51
123
Author's personal copy
function: application in the development of new and improved
treatment modalities for bone diseases. Osteoporos Int 18(5):
681–685. doi:10.1007/s00198-006-0286-8
11. Hannon RA, Clowes JA, Eagleton AC, Al Hadari A, Eastell R,
Blumsohn A (2004) Clinical performance of immunoreactive
tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b as a marker of bone
resorption. Bone 34(1):187–194. pii:S875632820300379X
12. Nanda KS, Ryan EJ, Murray BF, Brady JJ, McKenna MJ, Nolan
N, O’Farrelly C, Hegarty JE (2009) Effect of chronic hepatitis C
virus infection on bone disease in postmenopausal women. Clin
Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(8):894–899. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.01.
011
13. Lonergan R, Kinsella K, Fitzpatrick P, Brady J, Murray B, Dunne
C, Hagan R, Duggan M, Jordan S, McKenna M, Hutchinson M,
Tubridy N (2011) Multiple sclerosis prevalence in Ireland: rela-
tionship to vitamin D status and HLA genotype. J Neurol Neu-
rosurg Psychiatry 82(3):317–322. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2010.220988
14. Hannon R, Blumsohn A, Naylor K, Eastell R (1998) Response of
biochemical markers of bone turnover to hormone replacement
therapy: impact of biological variability. J Bone Miner Res
13(7):1124–1133. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.7.1124
15. Nenonen A, Cheng S, Ivaska KK, Alatalo SL, Lehtimaki T,
Schmidt-Gayk H, Uusi-Rasi K, Heinonen A, Kannus P, Sievanen
H, Vuori I, Vaananen HK, Halleen JM (2005) Serum TRACP 5b
is a useful marker for monitoring alendronate treatment: com-
parison with other markers of bone turnover. J Bone Miner Res
20(10):1804–1812. doi:10.1359/JBMR.050403
16. Glover SJ, Eastell R, McCloskey EV, Rogers A, Garnero P,
Lowery J, Belleli R, Wright TM, John MR (2009) Rapid and
robust response of biochemical markers of bone formation to
teriparatide therapy. Bone 45(6):1053–1058. doi:10.1016/j.bone.
2009.07.091
17. Plotkin H, Gundberg C, Mitnick M, Stewart AF (1998) Disso-
ciation of bone formation from resorption during 2-week treat-
ment with human parathyroid hormone-related peptide-(1–36) in
humans: potential as an anabolic therapy for osteoporosis. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 83(8):2786–2791
18. Compston JE (2007) Skeletal actions of intermittent parathyroid
hormone: effects on bone remodelling and structure. Bone
40(6):1447–1452. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.008
19. Clarke B (2008) Normal bone anatomy and physiology. Clin J
Am Soc Nephrol 3(Suppl 3):S131–139. doi:10.2215/CJN.
04151206
20. Clowes JA, Hannon RA, Yap TS, Hoyle NR, Blumsohn A,
Eastell R (2002) Effect of feeding on bone turnover markers and
its impact on biological variability of measurements. Bone
30(6):886–890 pii:S8756328202007287
21. Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D
and Calcium, Institute of Medicine (2011) Dietary reference
intakes for calcium and vitamin D. The National Academies
Press, USA
22. Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM,
Clinton SK, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Gallagher JC, Gallo RL, Jones
G, Kovacs CS, Mayne ST, Rosen CJ, Shapses SA (2011) The
2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin
D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(1):53–58. doi:10.1210/jc.2010-2704
23. McKenna MJ, Murray BF (2013) Vitamin D dose response is
underestimated by Endocrine Society’s Clinical Practice Guide-
line. Endocrine Connections 2(2):87–95. doi:10.1530/ec-13-0008
52 Ir J Med Sci
123
Author's personal copy
... This is also the case for sCTx and uDPD/Cr [14]. uNTx and sCTx biomarkers are thought to be derived primarily from bone resorption, though DPD can be derived from other sources besides bone-specific resorption [15], and as a result may exhibit greater interindividual variability. ...
... The similarities in EC 50 and s values indicate that the overall potency and shape of the exposure-response relationships are consistent across the three biomarkers (Fig. 3). The mean (%CV) percent of maximal reduction was approximately 58% (18%) for uNTx/Cr, 70% (9%) for sCTx, and 39% (10%) for uDPD/ Cr, which is consistent with the known behavior of these biomarkers in the presence of anti-resorptive therapies [15,17,26,27]. While uNTx/Cr and sCTx levels are typically decreased approximately 60-90% by anti-resorptive therapies, uDPD/Cr levels are typically reduced to a lesser extent (* 40-50%). ...
... The relative contribution of bone versus non-bone sources appears to vary across the biomarkers. Notably, DPD can be derived from other sources besides bonespecific resorption [15]. Given the consistency of the drug effect parameters across the three biomarkers, it can be concluded that both uNTx/Cr and sCTx appear to be appropriate biomarkers for assessing overall inhibition of bone resorption by CatK inhibitors, despite being direct products of CatK cleavage. ...
Article
Full-text available
To develop a framework for evaluating the resorption effects of Cathepsin K (CatK) inhibitors and to inform dose regimen selection, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for odanacatib (ODN) was developed based upon data from Phase 1 studies. Pooled PK/PD data from 11 studies (N = 249) were fit reasonably to a population inhibitory sigmoid Emax model. Body weight on E0 (baseline uNTx/Cr, urinary N-terminal telopeptide normalized by creatinine) and age on Emax (fractional inhibition of the biomarker response) were significant covariates for biomarker response. Simulations of typical osteoporosis patients (by age, sex and weight) indicated minimal differences between sexes in concentration-uNTx/Cr relationship. There was no evidence that regimen (daily vs. weekly dosing) influenced the PK/PD relationship of resorption inhibition for odanacatib. PK/PD models based on data from odanacatib (ODN) Phase 1 studies demonstrated that uNTx/Cr was an appropriate bone resorption biomarker for assessment of the effects of a CatK inhibitor. The models also identified the determinants of response in the PK/PD relationship for ODN (body weight on E0 and age on Emax).
Article
Increasing innovation in rapid prototyping (RP) and additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, is bringing about major changes in translational surgical research. This review describes the current position in the use of additive manufacturing in orthopaedic surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:455-60.
Article
Context: We previously identified two Finnish families with dominantly inherited, low-turnover osteoporosis caused by mutations in WNT1 or PLS3. Objective: Design and Setting: This prospective, longitudinal, uncontrolled study was undertaken to evaluate whether patients with these mutations respond to teriparatide treatment. Patients and intervention: We recruited six adults (median age 54); three with a WNT1 missense mutation c.652T>G and three with a PLS3 splice mutation c.73-24T>A, to receive teriparatide 20 μg daily for 24 months. Five patients had previously been treated with bisphosphonates. Main outcome measures: Lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) by DXA, distal radius peripheral QCT, and spinal radiography at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Serum bone turnover markers at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Paired double-labeled iliac crest biopsies at baseline and 24 months. Results: All patients showed increases in formation markers P1NP (90-398%) and osteocalcin (50-280%) and in resorption markers CTX (58-457%) and Tracp5b (20-68%) during the first 3 to 6 months. Lumbar spine BMD increased 5.2% to 7.9% in five and femoral neck BMD 2.6% to 7.8% in four patients in 24 months. Distal radius cortical volumetric BMD decreased 5.4% to 26.1%. In histomorphometric analyses osteoid indices increased more consistently in patients with WNT1 vs. PLS3 mutation. Eroded surface decreased 44% to 100% in all patients. Adipocyte number increased in five patients studied. Conclusions: Patients with WNT1 or PLS3 mutation-related osteoporosis responded to teriparatide treatment. Future studies are needed to evaluate whether observed changes are translated to fracture resistance.
Article
Normocalcaemic hyperparathyroidism is a common biochemical finding, usually identified during an assessment of bone or renal health. Hypercalcaemia must be considered by calculation of adjusted calcium, and a careful history taken to assess dietary calcium intake and for the possibility of a malabsorption syndrome. 25OHD should be measured and replaced if indicated. The management plan for the patient is influenced by the context in which calcium and PTH were measured. In this brief review we describe the assessment of a patient with normocalcaemic hyperparathyroidism. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a process where a physical object is created from a three-dimensional computer model through successive material layering. 3D printing is used in many industries to design and manufacture new products. Creation of training models for use in medical education is now possible via adoption of medical 3D printing. This article presents a critical-realist review of the medical literature evaluating different ways 3D printing has been used to produce training models for medical education, with a special emphasis on transplantation medicine. From the 68 articles identified by this review, three themes emerged: (a) 3D printing of patient-specific models for preoperative planning, (b) printing training devices for direct use in simulation-based medical education, and (c) printing molds for simulation models that are then used to cast non-printable materials such as soft tissues. Only two reports were identified that described the use of 3D printing for education in transplantation medicine. Many opportunities exist for further research and advancement of 3D printing within the field of transplantation medicine.
Article
Full-text available
The recommended daily intakes of vitamin D according to the recent Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) of the Endocrine Society are three- to fivefold higher than the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report. We speculated that these differences could be explained by different mathematical approaches to the vitamin D dose response. Studies were selected if the daily dose was ≤2000 IU/day, the duration exceeded 3 months, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentrations were measured at baseline and post-therapy. The rate constant was estimated according to the CPG approach. The achieved 25OHD result was estimated according to the following: i) the regression equation approach of the IOM; ii) the regression approach of the Vitamin D Supplementation in Older Subjects (ViDOS) study; and iii) the CPG approach using a rate constant of 2.5 (CPG2.5) and a rate constant of 5.0 (CPG5.0). The difference between the expected and the observed 25OHD result was expressed as a percentage of observed and analyzed for significance against a value of 0% for the four groups. Forty-one studies were analyzed. The mean (95% CI) rate constant was 5.3 (4.4-6.2) nmol/l per 100 IU per day, on average twofold higher than the CPG rate constant. The mean (95% CI) for the difference between the expected and observed expressed as a percentage of observed was as follows: i) IOM, -7 (-16,+2)% (t=1.64, P=0.110); ii) ViDOS, +2 (-8,+12)% (t=0.40, P=0.69); iii) CPG2.5, -21 (-27,-15)% (t=7.2, P<0.0001); and iv) CPG5.0+3 (-4,+10)% (t=0.91, P=0.366). The CPG 'rule of thumb' should be doubled to 5.0 nmol/l (2.0 ng/ml) per 100 IU per day, adopting a more risk-averse position.
Article
Full-text available
Osteoporosis, a disease characterised by low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue, is viewed as an emerging medical condition. Bone mineral density (BMD) is considered the gold standard of bone status assessment, however it does not offer the timely response desirable for monitoring. Biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTMs) are claimed to be suitable for that purpose. There is not generalized agreement on which marker could be used in routine. The present paper reviews pros and cons of currently used BTMs and relative analytical methods. Several analytical issues, such as biological variability, molecules stability, lack of reference materials jeopardize the field and, consequently, recommendations are difficult to be drawn. Reference range can't be used to support clinical judgement and, in this view, Least Significant Change (LSC) is regarded as a way to improve the interpretation of analytical results.Bone alkaline phosphatase (bALP) is still a marker of interest and its use is widespread in clinical laboratories; Tartrate Resistant Acid Phosphatase band 5b (TRAP 5b) appears to be a promising marker. N-terminal propeptides of type I collagen (s-PINP) and beta-collagen 1 C-terminal cross linked telopeptides (s-CTX), given low biological variability and assay availability for automatised instruments, should be the marker of choice in future clinical trials, to overcome the paucity of uniform data and should be used in clinical routine, to monitor osteoporosis treatment. Finally, the lack of standardisation of currently available diagnostic methods, could be overcome by harmonisation.
Article
Full-text available
The relationship between prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) and latitude may be due to both genetic and environmental factors. The hypothesis that, in Ireland, MS prevalence is increasing and that north-south differences relate to variation in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels was tested in this study. Patients and matched control subjects were identified in counties Donegal, Wexford and South Dublin through multiple sources. Prevalence was determined. Blood samples were taken for serum 25(OH)D and serum intact parathyroid hormone measurement, and DNA was extracted. Prevalence in 2007 was significantly greater in Donegal (northwest) (290.3/105, 95% CI 262.3 to 321.7) compared with 2001 (184.6/105; 162 to 209.5). In Wexford (southeast), there was a non-significant increase in prevalence in 2007 compared with 2001. Prevalence was significantly higher in Donegal than in Wexford (144.8/105; 126.7 to 167.8, p<0.0001) and South Dublin (127.8/105; 111.3 to 148.2, p<0.0001). Overall, mean 25(OH)D levels were low and did not differ between patients (38.6 nmol/l) and controls (36.4 nmol/l) However, significantly more patients than controls had 25(OH)D levels <25 nmol/l (deficiency) (p=0.004). Levels of 25(OH)D (mean 50.74 nmol/l) were significantly higher in South Dublin (area with lowest prevalence) (p<0.0001) than in Donegal or Wexford. HLA DRB1*15 occurred most frequently in Donegal (greatest MS prevalence) and least frequently in South Dublin. Vitamin D deficiency is common in Ireland. Latitudinal variation in MS probably relates to an interaction between genetic factors and environment (25(OH)D levels), and MS risk may be modified by vitamin D in genetically susceptible individuals.
Article
Full-text available
This article summarizes the new 2011 report on dietary requirements for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine (IOM). An IOM Committee charged with determining the population needs for these nutrients in North America conducted a comprehensive review of the evidence for both skeletal and extraskeletal outcomes. The Committee concluded that available scientific evidence supports a key role of calcium and vitamin D in skeletal health, consistent with a cause-and-effect relationship and providing a sound basis for determination of intake requirements. For extraskeletal outcomes, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and autoimmune disorders, the evidence was inconsistent, inconclusive as to causality, and insufficient to inform nutritional requirements. Randomized clinical trial evidence for extraskeletal outcomes was limited and generally uninformative. Based on bone health, Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs; covering requirements of ≥97.5% of the population) for calcium range from 700 to 1300 mg/d for life-stage groups at least 1 yr of age. For vitamin D, RDAs of 600 IU/d for ages 1-70 yr and 800 IU/d for ages 71 yr and older, corresponding to a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of at least 20 ng/ml (50 nmol/liter), meet the requirements of at least 97.5% of the population. RDAs for vitamin D were derived based on conditions of minimal sun exposure due to wide variability in vitamin D synthesis from ultraviolet light and the risks of skin cancer. Higher values were not consistently associated with greater benefit, and for some outcomes U-shaped associations were observed, with risks at both low and high levels. The Committee concluded that the prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy in North America has been overestimated. Urgent research and clinical priorities were identified, including reassessment of laboratory ranges for 25-hydroxyvitamin D, to avoid problems of both undertreatment and overtreatment.
Article
Reports linking long-term use of bisphosphonates (BPs) with atypical fractures of the femur led the leadership of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) to appoint a task force to address key questions related to this problem. A multidisciplinary expert group reviewed pertinent published reports concerning atypical femur fractures, as well as preclinical studies that could provide insight into their pathogenesis. A case definition was developed so that subsequent studies report on the same condition. The task force defined major and minor features of complete and incomplete atypical femoral fractures and recommends that all major features, including their location in the subtrochanteric region and femoral shaft, transverse or short oblique orientation, minimal or no associated trauma, a medial spike when the fracture is complete, and absence of comminution, be present to designate a femoral fracture as atypical. Minor features include their association with cortical thickening, a periosteal reaction of the lateral cortex, prodromal pain, bilaterality, delayed healing, comorbid conditions, and concomitant drug exposures, including BPs, other antiresorptive agents, glucocorticoids, and proton pump inhibitors. Preclinical data evaluating the effects of BPs on collagen cross-linking and maturation, accumulation of microdamage and advanced glycation end products, mineralization, remodeling, vascularity, and angiogenesis lend biologic plausibility to a potential association with long-term BP use. Based on published and unpublished data and the widespread use of BPs, the incidence of atypical femoral fractures associated with BP therapy for osteoporosis appears to be very low, particularly compared with the number of vertebral, hip, and other fractures that are prevented by BPs. Moreover, a causal association between BPs and atypical fractures has not been established. However, recent observations suggest that the risk rises with increasing duration of exposure, and there is concern that lack of awareness and underreporting may mask the true incidence of the problem. Given the relative rarity of atypical femoral fractures, the task force recommends that specific diagnostic and procedural codes be created and that an international registry be established to facilitate studies of the clinical and genetic risk factors and optimal surgical and medical management of these fractures. Physicians and patients should be made aware of the possibility of atypical femoral fractures and of the potential for bilaterality through a change in labeling of BPs. Research directions should include development of animal models, increased surveillance, and additional epidemiologic and clinical data to establish the true incidence of and risk factors for this condition and to inform orthopedic and medical management. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Article
The aim was to analyse data on the use of biochemical bone turnover markers (BTM) in postmenopausal osteoporosis. We carried out a comparative analysis of the most important papers concerning BTM in postmenopausal osteoporosis that have been published recently. The BTM levels are influenced by several factors. They are moderately correlated with BMD and subsequent bone loss. Increased levels of bone resorption markers are associated with a higher risk of fracture. Changes in the BTM during the anti-osteoporotic treatment (including combination therapy) reflect the mechanisms of action of the drugs and help to establish their effective doses. Changes in the BTM during the anti-resorptive treatment are correlated with their anti-fracture efficacy. Biological samples should be obtained in a standardised way. BTM cannot be used for prediction of the accelerated bone loss at the level of the individual. BTM help to detect postmenopausal women who are at high risk of fracture; however, adequate practical guidelines are lacking. BTM measurements taken during the anti-resorptive therapy help to identify non-compliers. They may improve adherence to the anti-resorptive therapy and the fall in the BTM levels that exceeds the predefined threshold improves patients' persistence with the treatment. There are no guidelines concerning the use of BTM in monitoring anti-osteoporotic therapy in postmenopausal women.
Article
Since their introduction into clinical medicine, bisphosphonates have revolutionized clinical osteoporosis care. Ironically, in rare circumstances, long-term, combined anti-remodeling therapy may be associated with skeletal harm. We report atypical skeletal fragility in three subjects after long-term, combined anti-remodeling therapy. Three subjects experienced spontaneous or minimal-trauma chalk-stick type metadiaphyseal femoral fractures while on long-term bisphosphonate therapy. The fracture location, type, bilaterality, prodromal pain, and delayed healing were atypical for uncomplicated postmenopausal osteoporosis. All three subjects had concomitant circumstances (endogenous estrogen) or medications (glucocorticoids, hormone replacement therapy, and raloxifene) that likely suppressed bone remodeling beyond the effect of the bisphosphonate alone. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were very low or in the low premenopausal range. Double tetracycline-labeled bone biopsy showed very low activation frequency in one subject and limited single tetracycline label in a second consistent with severely suppressed bone turnover (SSBT). These three cases resemble previous descriptions of SSBT. Atypical skeletal fragility may signify SSBT in the setting of long-term, combined anti-remodeling therapy. We speculate that osteoclast tolerance for pharmacological suppression may vary among individual patients and that in some cases combined anti-remodeling therapy may result in skeletal harm.