ArticlePDF Available

Negotiating Technical and Ideological Standards for Agroecological Rice Production in Emerging Markets: The Case of Cambodia

Authors:

Abstract

This essay explores the ways in which the materiality of rice is encountered by agents along the production-consumption chain, from farmers to processors to urban consumers. Each agent, whether it is a farmer, miller, trader, consumer, or agronomic research agency, defines what is material (i.e., both tangible and discursively relevant) with respect to his or her relationship to rice. Materiality of rice is informally constituted by each actor in ideological standards that guide and configure how different aspects of rice, such as cultivation, milling, and variety, equate with quality and desirability. Technical standards, which originate from ideological standards and discursive norms, crystallize certain combinations of quality characteristics in space and time. Although technical standards initially exist as points of reference within more comprehensive ideological standards, they can multiply and increasingly dominate the material encounter with rice. Local actors, however, can contest this process by trying to bring technical standards more into line with ideological intentions. More specifically, I explore how a technical organic standard is situated within an ideological standard for natural in Cambodia, a country with strong historical and contemporary sympathies for ecological agriculture. I find that organic/natural is an important platform for promoting popular control over standardization and, more generally, over commoditization of food.
Negotiating Technical and Ideological Standards
for Agroecological Rice Production in Emerging Markets:
The Case of Cambodia
Hart N. Feuer
Received: 13 July 2010 / Accepted: 24 June 2011
qNational Science Council, Taiwan 2011
Abstract This essay explores the ways in which the materiality of rice is encountered
by agents along the production-consumption chain, from farmers to processors to
urban consumers. Each agent, whether it is a farmer, miller, trader, consumer, or
agronomic research agency, defines what is material (i.e., both tangible and discur-
sively relevant) with respect to his or her relationship to rice. Materiality of rice is
informally constituted by each actor in ideological standards that guide and configure
how different aspects of rice, such as cultivation, milling, and variety, equate with
quality and desirability. Technical standards, which originate from ideological stan-
dards and discursive norms, crystallize certain combinations of quality characteristics
in space and time. Although technical standards initially exist as points of reference
within more comprehensive ideological standards, they can multiply and increasingly
dominate the material encounter with rice. Local actors, however, can contest this
process by trying to bring technical standards more into line with ideological inten-
tions. More specifically, I explore how a technical organic standard is situated within
an ideological standard for natural in Cambodia, a country with strong historical and
contemporary sympathies for ecological agriculture. I find that organic/natural is an
important platform for promoting popular control over standardization and, more
generally, over commoditization of food.
Keywords Organicricestandardsmaterialitysustainable agriculture
Cambodia
1 Introduction
This paper sets out to explore ways in which the materiality of rice is encountered and
reshaped by the multitude of agents along the path from the field to the rice bowl. Each
H. N. Feuer (*)
Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management (ZEFc), Center for Development Research,
Walter-Flex-Strasse 3, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
e-mail: hfeuer@uni-bonn.de
East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal (2011) 5:441–459
DOI 10.1215/18752160-1458013
This file is only a stub. Please
download article from the journal
or contact the author with re-
quests for full-text.
agent, whether it is a farmer, miller, trader, consumer, or agronomic research agency,
defines what is material (i.e., both tangible and discursively relevant) with respect to
his or her relationship to rice. For example, each actor has somewhat different expec-
tations about what constitutes quality and suitability in each of his or her domains.
Generally, farmers tend to value farm system characteristics; traders and processors
value standards and marketability; consumers (which also include farmers) value
taste, texture, and fragrance; agronomic research institutions privilege productivity
and consistency. These actors exert their respective influence on the various configu-
rations of rice by demanding and transforming varieties, cultivation methods, and
standards that suit their evolving needs on the farm, in the test plot, in the marketplace,
and on the kitchen table. Farmers in agrarian societies, as the majority of producers and
consumers, historically have played the largest cumulative role in the formation of
tastes, farming systems, and processing. Urban consumers and traders, as well as
research institutions, also play a role in configuring production-consumption patterns
for rice in poor countries. However, with the onset of large-scale commoditization of
staple crops in the seventeenth century and the climax of the so-called Green Revolu-
tion in the mid-twentieth century,
1
the state and select international agencies have
typically become the dominant agents in many countries. They privilege a narrow
productivist experience with the materiality of rice and work to curtail the influence of
producers, traders, and consumers (Smith 2010;Courville 2006). However, with the
decline of the hegemony of green revolution agriculture in international development
discourse, localized food and agriculture systems, often with ecological character-
istics, have been increasingly reasserted by a wider stakeholder base.
Through a focus on the materiality of rice in Cambodia, I describe the locally
specific ways that commoditization and agrarian transformation are managed by
reconfiguring technical and ideological standards. Technical standards are a codifica-
tion of certain material aspects of rice that the private and public sectors deem worthy
of institutionalization and regulation (see, e.g., The´venot 2009;Hill 1990). Ideological
standards are informal, relational, and flexible guidelines for quality assessment root-
ed in experience that often overlap with technical standards but are defined in differ-
ent terms and experienced in different ways (e.g., sensory perception, in negotiation,
through measurement).
2
A relevant example is the technical standard organic and the
ideological standard natural. The former requires specific guidelines to be fulfilled;
the latter is broadly agreed upon in society but ultimately settled individually. In a
general sense, ideological standards are the antecedents of technical standards, though
the former has a much broader purview and can encompass characteristics that are not
easily defined or are symbolic (Appadurai 1986), such as tastiness, fragrance, texture,
and heritage value. Ideological standards are also relational and fluid, which is to say
that they do not judge one characteristic to the exclusion of others and that they are
1
By green revolution agriculture (lowercase), I refer primarily to a package of policy and technical
interventions referenced in modernist agricultural literature, including, but not limited to, government-
assisted land consolidation, widespread irrigation projects, varietal narrowing through external seed
input, and support (usually subsidies) for fertilizer and other agrochemicals (Kaosa-ard and Rerkasem
2000).
2
This conception of ideological standards is broadly consistent with French convention theory (notably
from Boltanski and The´venot 2006); differences are clarified further in the text.
442 H. N. Feuer
... However, even as the nominal levels of urbanization have increased, observers of Phnom Penh have, in fact, characterized the enduring rural character of the city (see Saphan, 2011;Simone, 2008), describing it as having the atmosphere of a large village. In previous work (Feuer, 2011), I have also outlined how the farming background of most current city dwellers in Cambodia is associated with greater appreciation of food variety, the quality of produce, and the sanctity of balanced meals. This is necessarily associated with the way in which cuisine in the city is understood, negotiated, and evaluated. ...
... In general, this capacity to critique food and agriculture is widespread in Cambodia, owing largely to the rural background of most city dwellers. As depicted in Saphan (2011) andFeuer (2011), the re-population of Cambodian cities after the forced ruralization of people during the Democratic Kampuchea period (ending primarily in 1979) has meant that most urban dwellers, and almost all recent urban migrants, have an agricultural background. This tends to equip diners to assess raw ingredients and the food they receive with considerable nuance (see Feuer, 2013, pp. ...
Article
Full-text available
Pre-prepared food venues (or soup-pot restaurants) in Cambodia and other Asian countries make their decisions about what to cook in a complex food-society nexus, factoring in their culinary skill, seasonality of ingredients, and diners' expectations for variety. As such, soup-pot restaurants exist as tenuous brokers between rural food customs and the prevailing expectations of city dwellers. In urban areas, they are a transparent window into seasonality and market cycles, as well as an opportunity to encounter culinary diversity and participate in the consolidation of an everyday 'national cuisine'. Soup-pot restaurants, in contrast to other restaurant formats, craft an experience that balances the agricultural and social dynamics of rural eating customs with city comforts. Typically, soup-pot restaurants can accomplish this while also serving as a space of dietary learning, providing meals that are culturally understood to be balanced and nutritious, and garnering support for local cuisine from across the socio-economic spectrum. As a site of research, these restaurants can be seen as potential innovators for managing the consequences of industrialization on food and agriculture, facilitating democratic daily practices of food sovereignty.
... In other work, I have shown how the technology of modern-day ecological agriculture in Cambodia struggles to escape from the alienation of technique 35 but that, in contrast to industrial methods, ecological cultivation approaches are more easily adapted to alternative valuation and direct contact with nature. 36 It is in this contested space that experiments in resolving the spiritual crisis of contemporary agricultural sustainability find fertile soil. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Many facets of globalisation are contested on ethical or humanitarian grounds but the defence of local food and agriculture often borders on the spiritual. In particular, the decline or homogenisation of local food and agriculture is often acutely felt because it embodies a spiritual violation of cultural identity and sacredness of the land. The essence of this crisis has been newly characterised in Pope Francis’ latest encyclical Laudato si’, which captures the spiritual relevance of agriculture by characterising the human response to contemporary ecological decline and culinary shifts. In trying to understand how we arrived at our present state, sociologists of faith, such as the late Jacques Ellul have long described how technology comes to dominate over nature in processes such as agricultural development. In his argument, by incrementally drawing humans away from nature and into technological spheres (by engineering tractors, producing agri-chemicals, and genetically modifying plants), alienation from nature is amplified and the scope of ecological crisis broadens. This phenomenon is not new; indeed, most religious texts and creation myths caution against this alienation through parables and commandments. In light of the new public attention being drawn to the spiritual dimension of the ecological crisis, this chapter explores content from Judeo-Christian texts and Cambodian myths that specifically speaks to this phenomenon. The valorisation of the land found, for example, in the book of Exodus referencing Israel as the ‘land flowing with milk and honey’, is typical of religious and pseudo-religious narrative that are integrated with political narratives such as nationalism and cultural patrimony. In this chapter, I address how national metanarratives built on these spiritual-historic characterisations play a role in shaping agriculture and food policy and evaluate the spiritual dimension of a few Cambodian initiatives that attempt to moderate the alienation brought about by industrialisation and globalisation.
... As the majority of farmers make production decisions oriented towards supporting their family and farm, and not to anonymous consumers in the market, why do they cultivate a grain they have no wish to consume? This is perhaps best explained by Feuer's (2011) insight that "the more intrusive the technical standard, the more material facets of rice are fixed and removed from ideological interpretation and material encounter" (457). Such a perspective explains why farmers provided almost solely with information that emphasises the importance of grain yield (the technical standard) learn to dismiss many of their ideological preferences (for agro-ecological cultivation), even to their own disservice. ...
Article
Full-text available
Joe K. W. Hill investigates the role that agricultural scientists are playing in addressing the problem of how rice production should be improved and increased in developing countries such as India through the cultivation of hybrid rice. This is an important issue, which continues to be debated and contested in academic and civil society spheres. The biotech industry and its academic allies maintain emphasize on yield increases, rationalized by abstract policy calculations that compare steadily declining crop yield growth with rapidly increasing population growth. The agro-industrial and agro-ecological camps have conducted research on F1 hybrid rice in eastern India to achieve these objectives.
... It is in their nature for technical standards to oversimplify: to privilege one characteristic, such as short growing season or sugar content, to the exclusion of others, such as resilience or taste. Feuer (2011) documents how even organic certification, a technical standard one might expect to be more sensitive to local demands, often fixates on the characteristic of natural production at the cost of many others in Cambodia, including varietal diversity, place of origin, cooking quality, and storability. Buyers do often consider the characteristics that are traditionally standardized (such as milling quality, polish, moisture content, etc.), but they prioritize these and other characteristics without a consistent hierarchy in society (Straughan and Roberts 1999). ...
Thesis
Full-text available
The environmental movement, which picked up steam from the 1960s in many rich countries, is manifested in modern-day green politics, pollution regulation, nature protection, the re-emergence of renewable energy, and organic agriculture. Discursively, this was, and still is, a post-industrial movement that arose out of atavistic notions of ‘returning’ to the land and reversing toxic pollution and human alienation from nature. Since the mid-1990s, this discourse has penetrated into theory and practice for development in pre-industrial countries, presenting new and often contradictory lessons for modernization. In particular, the concept of ‘ecological modernization’, which was used starting in the early 1980s to describe technology-based efforts to clean up the pollution and reconcile industrial development with higher environmental expectations, is turned on its head when applied to developing countries, as the focus shifts from intervention to prevention. In developing countries, however, prevention does not strictly correspond with a transfer of Western protocols for, among others, environmental regulation, organic agricultural production and sustainable wild harvesting. Instead, prevention is more about proactive engagement with contemporary agricultural discourses and adaptation of technical advancements that provides a basis for novel and more culturally-embedded food and medicine systems. This dissertation looks at the ‘capability’ (following Amartya Sen) of Cambodian society to reflexively interact with the pressures and opportunities presented by the commodification of food and medicine in light of ongoing discursive debates between industrial and alternative agriculture. It looks at assets available to Cambodians, including the ‘agro-social skill’ arising from rural experience that maintains a differentiated appreciation of agricultural products, as well as the role of historical narratives in creating a common basis of understanding agricultural modernization. Specifically, the dissertation explores the experience of three agricultural product types that are undergoing a contested commodification, namely organic/natural rice, sugar palm products, and traditional medicine. This work evaluates how these traditional product forms are socially reconstructed as heritage or ecological products throughout their commodification by analyzing the ways in which they are marketed, integrated into cultural politics and development, and perceived by rural and urban consumers. The primarily qualitative analysis of trends in production and consumption is also informed by economic analyses of farm productivity and marketing dynamics using a unique method of natural experimentation developed for this work. In conclusion, this dissertation outlines the evolving successes and dilemmas of various initiatives for promoting ecological and heritage products and uncovers mechanisms by which societal ‘capability’ for proactively encountering agricultural modernization and commodification is either eroded or buttressed. The author suggests that the precondition for successful initiatives in the long-term is the preservation and reproduction of agro-social skill, which provides the reflexivity and ideological motivation to consciously direct commodification of heritage culture and, in broader terms, provide agency in managing the encroachment of capitalist relations.
Article
The comprehensive uptake of geographical indication (GI) worldwide suggests that global trade is at the threshold of mainstreaming protections for heritage agri-food specialties. The European GI model is in ascendance thanks to a campaign of institutional entrepreneurship that engendered a powerful macro-organization leading the rapid diffusion of sui generis GI. Through its success in recruiting the intellectual property regimes of most East Asian countries into the European orbit of trade and cultural production, it has become hegemonic, with the potential for ‘crowding out’ useful pre-existing mechanisms of heritage food protection or displacing exchange in agri-food specialties still embedded in the moral economy. Although this new global standard is shaped by the process of integration into new milieux, this paper finds that latent post-colonial tendencies in the European GI model and its poor capacity at self-reflection in the face of inefficiency compromises its potentially unifying role in the heritage food world order.
Article
Full-text available
Initiatives intended to create alternatives to the conventional, industrialized, global food system are now emerging. Conceptual framings of alternative food systems have been based principally on the reflections of academics and policy specialists rather than on the views of the producers and eaters who constitute the bulk of the food localization movement. At a conference hosted by the Michael Fields Agricultural Institute, we explored the attributes of food system sustainability with 125 persons representing a broad cross section of the alternative farm/food community. Dividing into five discussion groups, participants were asked what the characteristics of a sustainable food system would be. From their statements we abstracted a set of attributes. Participants envisioned a sustainable food system as relational, proximate, diverse, ecologically sustainable, economically sustaining, just/ethical, sacred, knowledgeable/communicative, seasonal/temporal, healthful, participatory, culturally nourishing, and sustainably regulated. We explain these attributes and note their complementarities and tensions.
Chapter
This book documents current practices in organic agriculture and evaluates their strengths and weaknesses. All major aspects of organic agriculture are explored including historical background and underlying principles, soil fertility management, crop and animal production, breeding strategies, crop protection, animal health and nutrition, animal welfare and ethics, economics and marketing, standards and certification, environmental impacts and social responsibility, food quality, research, education and extension. The book has 18 chapters and a subject index. A special feature of this book is a series of 5 'Special Topics', smaller sections that address key questions or challenges facing organic agriculture. These sections are intended to provide a more detailed analysis of specific issues that cannot be covered as sufficiently in the larger general chapters.
Chapter
Components of rice known and referred to as grain quality largely determine market price and consumer acceptance. The most important factors plant breeders consider in developing new rice varieties are grain quality and yield. If consumers do not like the flavor, texture, taste, aroma, appearance, cookability, or processability of a newly developed rice, any other outstanding attribute of the variety may be worthless (IRRI 1985).
Article
La mecanisation et l'utilisation des techniques chimiques de fertilisa- tion du sol d'abord et l'introduction d'hybrides du mais ensuite, ont fini par avoir un effet defavorable sur la qualification des agriculteurs ame- ricains