Content uploaded by Pavol Elias
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Pavol Elias
Content may be subject to copyright.
21
Thaiszia - J. Bot., Košice, 19: 21-25, 2009
http://www.bz.upjs.sk/thaiszia/index.html
T H A I S Z I A
T H A I S Z I AT H A I S Z I A
T H A I S Z I A
JOU RNA L O F
JOU RNA L O F JOU RNA L O F
JOU RNA L O F
BOT ANY
BOT ANYBOT ANY
BOT ANY
First record of Euphorbia maculata L.
(Euphorbiaceae) in Slovakia
P
AVOL
E
LIÁŠ JUN
.
Department of Botany, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, SK-949 76 Nitra,
Slovakia; e-mail pelias@afnet.uniag.sk
Eliáš P. jun. (2009): First record of Euphorbia maculata L.
(Euphorbiaceae) in Slovakia. – Thaiszia – J. Bot. 19: 21-25. – ISSN
1210-0420.
Abstract: Euphorbia maculata, a new alien species of Slovak flora
was found near the Chatam Sófer memorial in Bratislava in July
2007. The species was growing in ruderal plant community of
trampled soil on broken stone ballast. Brief information on the
species distribution and origin is given.
Keywords: Euphorbia maculata, new alien species, Slovakia.
Introduction
Small procumbent annual Euphorbia taxa with stipules and asymmetrical leaf
base are included in subgenus Chamaesyce (e. g. S
MITH
&
T
UTIN
1968,
M
ULLIGAN
&
L
INDSAY
1978, R
OSTAŃSKI
1992,
G
ELTMAN
1996) or separated into
freestanding but never generally accepted genus Chamaesyce S. F. Gray (e. g.
C
HRTEK
&
K
ŘÍSA
1992,
B
ENEDI
&
O
RELL
1992,
H
ERNDON
1993,
H
ÜGIN
1998, 1999).
According to recent DNA studies by Steinmann & Porter (2002) and Bruyns
et al.
(2006) the first mentioned concept seems to be more acceptable nowadays.
The number of native and naturalized taxa of this subgenus in Europe
differentiate among authors who recognize from six (S
MITH
&
T
UTIN
1968) to
eleven species (H
ÜGIN
1998, 1999). One of them is Euphorbia maculata L. [syn.
Chamaesyce maculata (L.) Small; Euphorbia supina Rafin.]. After S
MITH
&
T
UTIN
(1968) E. maculata is an annual herb, 10-17 cm tall. Stem is prostrate, richly
branched, ca 1 mm thick. Leaves opposite, stipules forming prickles, ciliate, leaf
blade long elliptic to reniform-oblong, often with an oblong purple spot in middle,
abaxially light green or gray-green, purple spot easily seen when fresh, invisible
when dry, both surfaces glabrous, base obliquely slightly attenuate-rounded,
22
margin entire below middle, finely serrulate above, apex obtuse. Cyathia from
nodes, peduncle 1-2 mm long; involucres narrowly cuplike, 0.7-1 × ca. 0.5 mm,
white pubescent outside, marginal lobes 5, triangular-rounded; glands 4, yellow-
green, transversely elliptic, appendages white. Capsule is 3-angular-ovoid, ca. 2
× 2 mm, smooth, sparsely pilose. Other detail data and determination keys were
published by H
ÜGIN
(1998, 1999) and R
ÖTHLISBERGER
(2007).
The species is native to North America from north-eastern Canada to
southern USA (G
LEASON
&
C
RONQUIST
1991), naturalised in southern and central
Europe (S
MITH
&
T
UTIN
1968,
H
ÜGIN
1998) and also being found in Middle and
South America (Mexico, Argentina, Peru, Chile), the Middle East (Israel, Syria),
eastern Asia (China, Taiwan, Japan), New Zealand and Australia (H
OLM
et al.
1979,
E
SLER
&
A
STRIDGE
1987,
K
ARZON
&
B
ÖCKER
2006). It grows in open sunny
locations and a variety of soils, and frequently found as a weed of gardens and
fields (S
MITH
&
T
UTIN
1968,
U
VA
et al. 1997).
Material and methods
The phytosociological relevé was sampled according to the Zürich-Montpellier
approach using the adapted Braun-Blanquet’s scale (B
ARKMAN
et al. 1964). All
nomenclature taxa except E. maculata are in accordance with M
ARHOLD
&
H
INDÁK
(1998); while nomenclature of E. maculata follows S
MITH
&
T
UTIN
(1968).
Herbarium specimens of the species were studied in four main Slovak herbaria
(BRA, NI, SAV, SLO) and herbarium vouchers collected by the author are stored
in herbarium NI. The herbarium abbreviations used follow H
OLMGREN
et al.
(1990).
Results and discussion
In July 2007, several Euphorbia maculata plants (Fig. 1) were found in the
area of the Chatam Sófer memorial in Bratislava. Occurrence of this species has
not been previously reported from Slovakia (see C
HRTEK
&
K
ŘÍSA
1982,
D
OSTÁL
&
Č
ERVENKA
1991, M
ARHOLD
&
H
INDÁK
1998). Likewise, no herbarium voucher of
the species originated from Slovakia was found in the main Slovak herbaria
during this study. It is, however surprising, because the species had been
already recorded in all neighbouring countries (Austria, Czech Republic,
Hungary, Poland, Ukraine) ca 23 - 120 years ago (D
EGEN
1907,
Z
IMMERMANN
et
al. 1975, C
HRTEK
&
K
ŘÍSA
1992,
R
OSTAŃSKI
1992,
G
ELTMAN
1996), and the two
closest foreign locality, i.e. the settlements of Lednice in southern Moravia
(Č
ERNOCH
1955) and Gyır in north-western Hungary (S
CHMIDT
&
B
AUER
2005)
were revealed in 1950 and 2002 respectively.
The species was growing in ruderal plant community of trampled soil on
broken stone ballast. The vegetation composition is presented in the following
phytosociological relevé:
Slovakia, the Danube Lowland, Bratislava, trampled soil on broken stone
ballast in area of the Chatam Sófer memorial (48° 0 8` 30``N; 17° 05` 28``E),
sampled area 16 m
2
, 135 m s. l., E
1
10%, E
0
0%, July 16, 2007 (sampled by P.
23
E
LIÁŠ
jun.), E
1
: Euphorbia maculata 1, Convolvulus arvensis +, Polygonum
arenastrum +, Portulaca oleracea +, Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia +, Amaranthus
retroflexus r, Eragrostis minor r, Lactuca serriola r, Senecio vulgaris r.
Fig. 1. Herbarium specimen of Euphrobia maculata L. from Bratislava
24
The above mentioned vegetation is close to Euphorbia maculata-Portulaca
oleracea-community for the first time described by B
RANDES
(1993) from
Germany. Later, Č
ARNI
&
M
UCINA
(1998) evaluated it as an association
Portulaco-Euphorbietum maculatae belong to class Stellarietea mediae. The
association is characteristic for trampled and extremely warm sites in urban
areas and is found abundantly in Mediterranean Europe.
An origin of this species in Slovakia is still under speculation, but two possible
ways may be taken into consideration. Either spread by ornamental plants from
botanical gardens and/or by tourists. The spreading of E. maculata via an
American ornamental plant was firstly mentioned in 17. century in the London
botanical garden (Z
IMMERMANN
et al. 1975) and some authors regarded botanical
gardens as the main dispersal centres of E. maculata in Central Europe (G
ALERA
&
S
UDNIK
-W
ÓJCIKOWSKA
2004). The spreading by tourists can be connected with
railway traffic, since the species is very frequently found on railway stations and
rail lines (B
RANDES
1993).
Acknowledgements
My thanks are due to V.
F
ERÁKOVÁ
and M.
C
HYTRÝ
for help with species
determination and G.
K
IRÁLY
for valuable comments to the manuscript. The field
research was supported by grants of Scientific and Education Grant Agency of
Slovak Republic VEGA No. 1/0530/08 and 1/0086/08.
References
B
ARKMANN
J.J.,
D
OING
H.
&
S
EGAL
S. (1964): Kritische Bemerkungen und Vorschläge zur
quantitativen Vegetationsanalyse. – Acta Bot. Neerl. 13: 394-419.
B
ENEDI
C.
&
O
RELL
J.J. (1992): Taxonomy of the genus Chamaesyce S.F. G
RAY
(Euphorbiaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands. – Collectanea
Botanica 21: 9-55.
B
RANDES
D. (1993): Eisenbahnanlagen als Untersuchungsgegenstand der Geobotanik. –
Tuexenia 13: 415-444.
B
RUYNS
P.V.,
M
APAYA
R.
&
H
EDDERSON
T. (2006): The A new subgeneric classification for
Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) in southern Africa based on ITS and psbA-trnH
sequence data. –Taxon 55(2): 397-420.
Č
ARNI
A.
&
M
UCINA
L. (1998): Vegetation of Trampled Soil Dominated by C4 Plants in
Europe. – J. Veg. Sc. 9(1): 45-56.
Č
ERNOCH
F. (1955): Euphorbia maculata L. na jižní Moravě. – Preslia 27: 286.
D
EGEN
A. (1907): Az Euphorbia maculata L. (E. thymifolia Auct. Europ. Non Burm.)
hazánknak egy új bevándorolt gyomja. – Magyar Bot. Lapok, 6(1-4): 47-50.
D
OSTÁL
J.
&
Č
ERVENKA
M. (1991): Veľký kľúč na určovanie vyšších rastlín I. – SPN,
Bratislava, 775 pp.
E
SLER
A.
E.
&
A
STRIDGE
S.
J. (1987): The naturalisation of plants in urban Auckland, New
Zealand 2. Records of introduction and naturalisation. – New Zeal. J. Bot. 25: 523-
537.
G
ALERA
H.
&
S
UDNIK
-W
ÓJCIKOWSKA
B. (2004): Historyczne notowania chwastów
związanych z działalnością ogrodów botanicznych Europy Centralnej. – Fragm. Flor.
Geobot. Polonica 11(2): 293–317.
25
G
ELTMAN
D.
(1996): Euphorbiaceae Juss., p. 256-287. – In: T
ZVELEV
N.N. (ed.), Flora
Vostočnoj Evropy, Tom 9, SPb: Mir i semja-95, Sankt Peterburg.
G
LEASON
H.A.
&
C
RONQUIST
A. (1991): Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United
States and adjacent Canada, Ed. 2. – The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New
York, 910 pp.
H
ERNDON
A.
(1993): Notes on Chamaesyce (Euphorbiaceae) in Florida. – Rhodora 95:
365.
H
OLM
L.G.,
P
ANCHO
J.V.,
H
ERBERGER
J.P.
&
P
LUCKNETT
D.L. (1979): A Geographical Atlas
of World Weeds. – John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., New York, 391 pp.
H
OLMGREN
P.K.,
H
OLMGREN
N.H.
&
B
ARNETT
L.C. (eds.) (1990): Index Herbariorum. Vol. 1:
The herbaria of the World, Ed. 8. – New York, 693 pp.
H
ÜGIN
G. (1998): Die Gattung Chamaesyce in Europa. Bestimmungsschlüssel mit
taxonomisch-nomenklatorischen Anmerkungen. – Feddes Repert. 109(3–4): 189–
223.
H
ÜGIN
G. (1999): Verbreitung und Ökologie der Gattung Chamaesyce in Mitteleuropa,
Oberitalien und Südfrankreich. – Feddes Repert. 110(3–4): 225–264.
C
HRTEK
J.
&
K
ŘÍSA
B. (1982): Euphorbiaceae Juss., p. 406-462. – In: F
UTÁK
J.
&
B
ERTOVÁ
L. (eds.), Flóra Slovenska III, Veda, Bratislava.
C
HRTEK
J.
&
K
ŘÍSA
B. (1992): Euphorbiaceae, p. 318-346. – In: H
EJNÝ
S.
&
S
LAVÍK
B.
(eds.), Květena České Republiky 3. Academia, Praha.
K
ARZON
S.
&
B
ÖCKER
R.
(2006): Hemerochorous plants in the "Quercetea pubescentis"
forests: a comparative study of their southern (Syria) and northern (Germany)
borders, p. 166. – In: R
ABITSCH
W.,
K
LINGENSTEIN
F.
&
E
SSL
F. (eds.), Neobiota, From
Ecology to Conservation, Book of Abstracts from 4th European Conference on
Biological Invasions, Vienna (Austria), 27 - 29 September 2006.
M
ARHOLD
K.
&
H
INDÁK
F. (eds.) (1998): Checklist of nonvascular and vascular plants of
Slovakia. – Veda, Bratislava, 687 pp.
M
ULLIGAN
G.
A.
&
L
INDSAY
D.R. (1978): Euphorbia Subgenus Chamaesyce in Canada. –
Natur. Canad. 105: 37-40.
R
OSTAŃSKI
K. (1992): Euphorbia L., p. 140–168. – In: J
ASIEWICZ
A. (ed.), Flora Polski 3,
Polska Akademia Nauk, Kraków.
R
ÖTHLISBERGER
J.
(2007): Aktuelle Verbreitung der Gattung Chamaesyce
(Euphorbiaceae) in der Schweiz. – Bauhinia 20: 19-33.
S
CHMIDT
D.
&
B
AUER
N. (2005): Adatok a Kisalföld flórájának ismeretéhez I. – Bot.
Közlem. 92(1–2): 43–56.
S
MITH
A.R.
&
T
UTIN
T.G. (1968): Euphorbia L., p. 215-216. – In: T
UTIN
T.
G. et al. (eds.),
Flora Europaea 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
S
TEINMANN
V.W.
&
P
ORTER
J.M. (2002): Phylogenetic relationships in Euphorbieae
(Euphorbiaceae) based on ITS and ndhF sequence data. – Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.
89(4): 453-490.
U
VA
R.H.,
N
EAL
J.C.
&
D
I
T
OMASO
J.M. (1997): Weeds of the Northeast. – Cornell
University Press, Ithaca, New York, 397 pp.
Z
IMMERMANN
W.,
H
EGI
,
G.
&
B
ERGER
H. (1975): Euphorbiaceae, p. 113-193. – In: H
EGI
G.
(ed.), Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa. Ed. 2. V/1, Paul Parey, Berlin-Hamburg.
Received: December 1
st
2008
Revised: February 26
th
2009
Accepted: February 26
th
2009