Article

Alternative Activation of Macrophages: An Immunologic Functional Perspective

Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom.
Annual Review of Immunology (Impact Factor: 39.33). 04/2009; 27(1):451-83. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132532
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Macrophages are innate immune cells with well-established roles in the primary response to pathogens, but also in tissue homeostasis, coordination of the adaptive immune response, inflammation, resolution, and repair. These cells recognize danger signals through receptors capable of inducing specialized activation programs. The classically known macrophage activation is induced by IFN-gamma, which triggers a harsh proinflammatory response that is required to kill intracellular pathogens. Macrophages also undergo alternative activation by IL-4 and IL-13, which trigger a different phenotype that is important for the immune response to parasites. Here we review the cellular sources of these cytokines, receptor signaling pathways, and induced markers and gene signatures. We draw attention to discrepancies found between mouse and human models of alternative activation. The evidence for in vivo alternative activation of macrophages is also analyzed, with nematode infection as prototypic disease. Finally, we revisit the concept of macrophage activation in the context of the immune response.

  • Source
    • "Circulating monocytes released from the bone marrow migrate to the intestine where they differentiate into resident macrophages under the influence of local cytokine milieu [24]. Recruited monocytes or resident macrophages can then be polarized to either classically activated (M1) or alternatively activated (M2) macrophages in response to LPS/IFN-c or IL-4/IL-13, respectively [28] [29] [30] [31]. M1 macrophages are characterized as inflammatory macrophages due to their high capacity in producing proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-a, IL-1b, IL-12, IL-23 and iNOS [29,32]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a pleiotropic cytokine best known for its role in promoting the generation and function of neutrophils. G-CSF is also found to be involved in macrophage generation and immune regulation; however, its in vivo role in immune homeostasis is largely unknown. Here, we examined the role of G-CSF in dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced acute colitis using G-CSF receptor-deficient (G-CSFR−/−) mice. Mice were administered with 1.5% DSS in drinking water for 5 days, and the severity of colitis was measured for the next 5 days. GCSFR−/− mice were more susceptible to DSS-induced colitis than G-CSFR+/+ or G-CSFR−/+ mice. G-CSFR−/− mice harbored less F4/80+ macrophages, but a similar number of neutrophils, in the intestine. In vitro, bone marrow-derived macrophages prepared in the presence of both G-CSF and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) (G-BMDM) expressed higher levels of regulatory macrophage markers such as programmed death ligand 2 (PDL2), CD71 and CD206, but not in arginase I, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, Ym1 (chitinase-like 3) and FIZZ1 (found in inflammatory zone 1), and lower levels of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), CD80 and CD86 than bone marrow-derived macrophages prepared in the presence of M-CSF alone (BMDM), in response to interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/interferon (IFN)-γ, respectively. Adoptive transfer of G-BMDM, but not BMDM, protected G-CSFR−/− mice from DSS-induced colitis, and suppressed expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-1β and iNOS in the intestine. These results suggest that G-CSF plays an important role in preventing colitis, likely through populating immune regulatory macrophages in the intestine.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · Cytokine
    • "- CSF is a member of a discrete family of cytokines which also includes IL - 3 and IL - 5 which regulate the growth , differentiation , migration and effector function activities of many hematopoietic cells and leukocytes with receptors com - prised of a cytokine - specific alpha chain ( CSF2R ) and a shared beta chain ( CSF2 - R ) for signaling ( Martinez et al . , 2009 ) . Although this cytokine family appears very poorly conserved ( Huising et al . , 2006 ) , the existence of CSF2 - R in fish genomes has been previously described ( Liongue and Ward , 2007 ) . Only recently , can - didates for IL - 3 / IL - 5 / GM - CSF family members have been identified in the elephant shark genome ( Dijkstra , 2014"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this review, we support taking polarized immune responses in teleost fish from a 'macrophage first' point of view, a hypothesis that reverts the dichotomous T helper (TH)1 and TH2 driving forces by building on the idea of conservation of innate immune responses in lower vertebrates. It is plausible that the initial trigger for macrophage polarization into M1 (inflammation) or M2 (healing) could rely only on sensing microbial/parasite infection or other innate danger signals, without the influence of adaptive immunity. Given the long and ongoing debate on the presence/absence of a typical TH1 cytokine environment and, in particular, TH2 cytokine environment in fish immune responses, it stands out that the presence of macrophages with polarized phenotypes, alike M1 and M2, have been relatively easy to demonstrate for fish. We summarize in short present knowledge in teleost fish on those cytokines considered most critical to the dichotomous development of TH1/M1 and TH2/M2 polarization, in particular, but not exclusively, interferon-γ and interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13. We review, in more detail, polarization of fish immune responses taken from the macrophage point of view for which we adopted the simple nomenclature of M1 and M2. We discuss inducible nitric oxide synthase, or NOS-2, as a reliable M1 marker and arginase-2 as a reliable M2 marker for teleost fish and discuss the value of these macrophage markers for the generation of zebrafish reporter lines to study M1/M2 polarization in vivo.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2015 · Molecular Immunology
  • Source
    • "M2 macrophages, together with Th2 cells, remove parasites and toxins by releasing IL-4, which promotes the activation of B-cells and the production of antigen-specific antibodies [8] [33]. In addition, M2 macrophages participate in tissue repair, angiogenesis, and phagocytosis of apoptotic cells [34] [35] [36]. Thus, the reprogramming of macrophages causes changes not only in the functioning of the macrophages themselves but also in the functioning of other immune cells, thus providing the required plasticity of the immune response required for eliminating pathogenic factors. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Macrophages play a key role in immunity. In this review, we consider the traditional notion of macrophage plasticity, data that do not fit into existing concepts, and a hypothesis for existence of a new switch macrophage phenotype. Depending on the microenvironment, macrophages can reprogram their phenotype toward the proinflammatory M1 phenotype or toward the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Macrophage reprogramming involves well-coordinated changes in activities of signalling and posttranslational mechanisms. Macrophage reprogramming is provided by JNK-, PI3K/Akt-, Notch-, JAK/STAT-, TGF- β -, TLR/NF- κ B-, and hypoxia-dependent pathways. Posttranscriptional regulation is based on micro-mRNA. We have hypothesized that, in addition to the M1 and M2 phenotypes, an M3 switch phenotype exists. This switch phenotype responds to proinflammatory stimuli with reprogramming towards the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype or, contrarily, it responds to anti-inflammatory stimuli with reprogramming towards the proinflammatory M1 phenotype. We have found signs of such a switch phenotype in lung diseases. Understanding the mechanisms of macrophage reprogramming will assist in the selection of new therapeutic targets for correction of impaired immunity.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2015
Show more