ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

The impact of diversity on group functioning is multifaceted. Exploring the impact of having a newcomer join a group, the authors conducted a 2 (social similarity of newcomer to oldtimers; in-group or out-group) x 3 (opinion agreement: newcomer has no opinion ally, one opinion ally, or two opinion allies) interacting group experiment with four-person groups. Groups with out-group newcomers (i.e., diverse groups) reported less confidence in their performance and perceived their interactions as less effective, yet they performed better than groups with in-group newcomers (i.e., homogeneous groups). Moreover, performance gains were not due to newcomers bringing new ideas to the group discussion. Instead, the results demonstrate that the mere presence of socially distinct newcomers and the social concerns their presence stimulates among oldtimers motivates behavior that can convert affective pains into cognitive gains.
229 Opinion Allies of Newcomers 1
Running head: OPINION ALLIES OF NEWCOMERS
KEYWORDS: Newcomers, Social Categorization, Opinion Diversity
The pain is worth the gain:
The advantages and liabilities of agreeing with socially distinct newcomers
Katie Liljenquist
Kellogg Graduate School of Management
Northwestern University
k-liljenquist@northwestern.edu
and
Katherine W. Phillips
Kellogg Graduate School of Management
Northwestern University
kwp@kellogg.nwu.edu
and
Margaret A. Neale
Graduate School of Business
Stanford University
maneale@New-Pound.stanford.edu
229 Opinion Allies of Newcomers 2
Abstract
The impact of newcomer’s social similarity and opinion agreement with oldtimers is
examined. Much of the research about newcomers has ignored the role of social similarity,
generally conflating newcomer status with out-group status. The current investigation addresses
this confound by manipulating the social similarity of the newcomer to oldtimers, as well as the
level of opinion agreement among the two. We find that there is a divergence between how
socially validated oldtimers feel and their performance. In groups with in-group newcomers
those that ally with the newcomer feel socially validated, yet perform worse than those who do
not ally with the newcomer, whereas allies of out-group newcomers feel less socially validated,
but actually perform quite well. We argue that allying with an out-group newcomer can
represent a threat to one’s social relationships with fellow in-group members (Phillips, 2003),
which leads to an increased task focus that results in superior performance for oldtimers in the
group. Implications for understanding the impact of newcomers on groups will be discussed.
Key words: newcomers, social similarity, opinion ally
229 Opinion Allies of Newcomers 3
The pain is worth the gain:
The advantages and liabilities of agreeing with socially distinct newcomers
Across many species of pack animals, biologists have observed a fierce intolerance
towards newcomers. Packs of gray wolves, for example, are known to chase and attack any
foreign wolf that intrudes upon their territory, sending a clear message that the newcomer is not
welcome. Although organizational newcomers aren’t likely to receive such hostile welcomes,
they, too, often face difficulty integrating themselves into a functioning group. At other times,
however, groups are eager to harness the new ideas and skills that newcomers offer. In both
cases, reactions to newcomers often depend on the ways in which they differ from existing group
members (Williams & O’Reilly, 1998). For example, “oldtimers” may categorize newcomers
based on whether they agree or disagree with their opinions (see Prislin & Christensen, 2002, for
a discussion of newcomers as a function of their impact on the majority-minority coalitions of a
group). Reactions to these potential opinion alliances can further vary according to whether
oldtimers view the newcomer as socially similar or distinct from themselves.
Unfortunately, much of the research about the impact of newcomers has ignored the role
of social similarity, generally conflating newcomer status with out-group status. This confound
leads to the question of whether oldtimers’ reactions to newcomers are due to their newcomer
status or to the fact that they belong to a social out-group. Ziller (1965) has documented that
newcomers often induce a task orientation among the groups they join, but it is unclear whether
this is merely because they are newcomers or because they are perceived as a social out-group.
The current investigation addresses this confound by manipulating the social similarity of the
newcomer. Furthermore, we look at the impact of opinion agreement among newcomers and
oldtimers. Because newcomers may differentially influence subjective (e.g., social validation
229 Opinion Allies of Newcomers 4
and social identification) and objective (e.g., performance) outcomes, both criteria are examined
as we consider the influence of newcomers on group interactions.
We expect allies of in-group newcomers to feel validated by opinion agreement with a
socially similar other and become further entrenched in their views. Consequently, they will
regard their experiences in the group positively and place more esteem on their personal
contributions. However, in this state of contentment and confidence, we believe allies of in-
group newcomers will be less motivated to reconcile the disparity of opinions between
themselves and other group members, ultimately resulting in sub-par performance.
In contrast, allies of out-group newcomers may feel uncomfortable with a link that ties
them to an out-group member and differentiates them from their fellow in-group members.
Although social risks may be attached to allying with socially distinct newcomers, the ensuing
discomfort may have positive implications. More specifically, we predict that allies of socially
distinct newcomers will be motivated to retain their social bond with other in-group members.
They could ostensibly approach this in one of two ways—they could sever their alliance with the
newcomer by reneging their prior opinion. This may be difficult to do after publicly stating their
opinion. More likely, they would reconcile the opinion difference between themselves and their
in-group colleagues by trying to uncover the reasons for the disparity in their opinions.
Motivated to act, this drive towards reconciliation will transition the individual’s previous social
focus to one that is more task-oriented, yielding superior levels of performance. In sum, we
anticipate an overall divergence between social validation and performance; allies of in-group
newcomers are expected to feel the best, yet perform the worst, whereas allies of out-group
newcomers will feel the worst, but actually perform the best.
229 Opinion Allies of Newcomers 5
Methods
The study involved 242 active members of sororities and fraternities at Northwestern
University. The current study utilized a 2 (social similarity; in-group vs. out-group) X 3 (opinion
agreement; newcomer has no opinion ally, 1 opinion ally, or 2 opinion allies) between-subjects
design (see Figure 1). Only members of two sororities or two fraternities participated at any
given time, yielding groups that were always of the same gender. Participants’ distinct social
identities were made salient by large banners with their sorority/fraternity names posted on
opposite walls of the laboratory and by requiring participants to sit on the side of the room
corresponding to their sorority/fraternity. To further reinforce their unique identities,
participants also wore nametags with their sorority/fraternity name written on them.
Upon entering the lab, participants were presented with the Murder Mystery task (Stasser
& Stewart, 1992) in which they were given twenty minutes to examine evidence and make an
individual decision regarding the most likely suspect. Participants were asked to abstain from
any discussion before meeting with their groups. After making their individual decision, the
experimenter assigned the participants to three-person groups of a shared social identity and told
them they would have twenty minutes to come to a group decision regarding the most likely
suspect; after five minutes, a fourth person, the newcomer, joined the discussion. Social
similarity (in-group vs. out-group) was manipulated according to whether the newcomer joining
the group was from the same or different sorority/fraternity as the other three group members.
Opinion agreement was operationalized as whether newcomers joined groups in which they had
zero, one, or two opinion allies concerning who they chose as the most likely suspect.
Once the group reached a decision, each of the group members individually completed a
post-discussion questionnaire, assessing their opinions of other group members, perceptions
229 Opinion Allies of Newcomers 6
about the group discussion process, levels of social identification with their sorority/fraternity,
and their final belief regarding who really committed the murder.
Results
Of 242 participants, 50 viable 4-person groups were composed that adhered to the
experimental conditions. Drawn from the relevant conditions of the 2 X 3 design, we examined
the 150 “oldtimers” that were either allies or non-allies of the newcomer based on whether they
agreed in their pre-discussion choice of the murder suspect. This distinction (ally vs. non-ally),
as well as the social similarity of the newcomer (in-group vs. out-group), comprised the two
between-subjects factors in our analyses below.
Four measures of social validation capturing both perceptions of interpersonal validation
and opinion validation (i.e., perceived acceptance, personality conflict, how interested the group
was in what they had to say, and the importance of their contributions to the group discussion),
were collapsed into a combined variable representing the individual’s perception of social
validation (SV) by peers in the group (α=.71). Four social identification measures were also
combined to create a new variable representing the individual’s overall degree of social
identification with their fraternity or sorority (α=.89), (see Table 1 for cell means).
To compare the subjective and objective outcomes of the group discussion process, we
transformed the combined measure of social validation and final decision accuracy to z scores.
The z scores were submitted to a 2 (opinion: ally vs. non-ally of the newcomer ) X 2 (social
identity of newcomer: in-group vs. out-group) X 2 (social validation vs. performance) mixed
model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with repeated measures on the third factor.
Prediscussion decision accuracy was used as a covariate in the analysis and was a significant
predictor (F(1,143) = 18.38, p .0001) of the repeated measures. A significant social similarity
229 Opinion Allies of Newcomers 7
by repeated measures interaction, F(1,145) = 5.67, p .02, was qualified by a significant three-
way interaction, F(1,143) = 6.72, p .01.
Separate two-way interactions between social similarity and opinion agreement were
conducted on performance and social validation. For performance there was only a significant
main effect for social similarity F(1,143) = 4.95, p .05, such that significantly more oldtimers
in the out-group-newcomer condition were correct (69.01%) than oldtimers in the in-group-
newcomer condition (55.84%). For SV, there was a significant main effect of social similarity,
such that oldtimers in the in-group-newcomer condition (M = 6.03, SD = .73) felt more socially
validated than oldtimers in the out-group-newcomer condition (M = 5.84, SD = .91), F(1,145) =
4.28, p <.05. In addition, there was a marginally significant interaction effect, F(1,145) = 3.63,
p < .06. To explicate the meaning of this interaction, we conducted focused, planned contrasts
(see Table 1 for mean values). Looking within the in-group-newcomer condition, there was no
difference in SV for allies versus non-allies (t < 1); however, allies were less accurate in their
final decision than non-allies, t(75) = 1.89, p .03 (one-tailed, controlling for individual
prediscussion accuracy). In the out-group-newcomer condition, the contrast revealed that allies
of the newcomer experienced less SV than non-allies, t(70) = 2.06, p .02 (one-tailed,
controlling for individual prediscussion accuracy), yet there was no difference between them in
terms of final decision accuracy (t < 1). Oldtimers’ feelings of social identification with their
sorority/fraternity mirrored the trends of SV. Within the in-group-newcomer condition, there
was no difference between allies and non-allies (t < 1), whereas allies of an out-group newcomer
identified with their sorority/fraternity significantly less than the non-allies, t(70) = 2.75, p
.005 (one-tailed).
229 Opinion Allies of Newcomers 8
Discussion
The previous analyses reveal the provocative paradox that while allies and non-allies of
in-group newcomers enjoy greater social validation, they are least likely to solve the murder
mystery. In contrast, allies of out-group newcomers feel least validated, but are more likely to
arrive at the correct answer. What can account for the concomitant drop in SV and social
identification, yet simultaneously explain the superior performance of allies of out-group
newcomers? We believe that allying with an out-group newcomer can represent a threat to one’s
social relationships with fellow in-group members (Phillips, 2003). This threat was manifested
by these allies’ insecurity regarding the value of their opinions and the stability of their
interpersonal relationships. Seeking to protect those valued relationships, allies are thus
motivated to reconcile the opinion difference that exists between themselves and the other in-
group members, facilitating a more concerted task focus. Although agreeing with an out-group
newcomer may be socially painful, the task-focus induced by the alliance ultimately yields
greater accuracy, not just for the ally but for all group members. In essence, non-allies reap the
benefits of the ally’s social discomfort, thus accounting for the finding that non-allies experience
greater levels of social validation and identification than the ally, yet still solve the task with the
same level of accuracy.
In contrast, allies of an in-group newcomer appreciate the validation of their socially
similar ally. They become further entrenched in their views and overconfident of their opinions.
In fact, the data reveal that within the in-group-newcomer condition, allies believed that they
contributed significantly more than the non-allies. Perhaps this self-importance reinforced their
commitment to potentially flawed opinions, explaining why allies’ decisions were significantly
less accurate than non-allies’ opinions. Social identification did not suffer for allies in this
229 Opinion Allies of Newcomers 9
circumstance because their disparate opinions were aligned with a member of their social in-
group. Lacking the social threat of allying with an out-group member, they were less motivated
to reconcile the clash of opinions between themselves and other group members, resulting in
sub-par performance.
Taken together, our findings suggest that the pasture is greenest for non-allies of out-
group newcomers. Within their groups, these individuals are insulated from the social threats of
allying with a socially distinct newcomer, but can depend on the troubled ally to act as
taskmaster and lead their group to victory. For all others, however, there appears to be a trade-
off between the social comfort afforded by allying with an in-group member and the liability that
such security poses in terms of performance. Consequently, while allies of out-group
newcomers may experience distress, when it comes to mastering the task, the pain is worth the
gain.
229 Opinion Allies of Newcomers 10
References
Phillips, K.W. (2003). The effects of categorically based expectations on minority
influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 3-13.
Prislin, R., & Christensen, N.C. (2002). Group conversion versus group expansion as
modes of change in majority and minority positions: All losses hurt but only some gains gratify.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1095-1102.
Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making
groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 57: 67-78.
Williams, K.Y., & O’Reilly, C.A. 1998. Forty years of diversity research: A review. In B. Staw &
L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 20: 77-140. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Ziller, R.C. (1965). Toward a theory of open and closed groups. Psychological Bulletin,
64, 164-182.
229 Opinion Allies of Newcomers 11
Figure 1
Experimental design of original 2X3 study: Social identity X Number of opinion allies
and loyalty (L)
Newcomer’s # of Opinion Allies
0 allies 1 ally 2 allies
In-group
Social Identity of Newcomer
Out-group
I1I1I1 I2
1
I1I1I2 I2
2
I1I2I2 I2
3
I1I1I1 O2
4
I1I1I2 O2
5
I1I2I2 O2
6
229 Opinion Allies of Newcomers 12
Table 1
Performance, Social Validation and Social Identification by Opinion Agreement and Social
Similarity
Note: Performance is presented in terms of the percentage of oldtimers that chose the correct
suspect. Standard deviations are in parentheses.
In-group Newcomer Out-group Newcomer
Opinion Agreement Ally Non-ally Ally Non-ally
Performance 50.0% 58.8% 73.9% 66.7%
Social Validation 6.13 (0.71) 5.98 (0.75) 5.56 (1.16) 5.98 (0.73)
Social Identification 6.11 (1.05) 6.34 (0.80) 5.57 (1.41) 6.30 (0.84)
... Negli ultimi anni, una delle voci più influenti sulla diversità nelle dinamiche di gruppo e il suo impatto sulla performance innovativa è stata quella di Katherine W. Phillips: il suo lavoro complessivo ha evidenziato come la diversità, sia culturale che di genere, migliori la creatività, portando a risultati aziendali superiori K.W. Phillips et al., 2014;K.W. Phillips et al., 2009. Nel suo contributo dal titolo "How Diversity Works", Phillips 2014 analizza i meccanismi attraverso i quali la diversità influisce positivamente sulle dinamiche di gruppo e sull'innovazione. ...
... The advantages and liabilities of agreeing with socially distinct newcomers", scritto insieme alle autrici Liljenquist e Neale 2009, Phillips esamina i vantaggi e le sfide connesse alla diversità nei team: la presenza di individui con visioni diverse può inizialmente creare tensioni o difficoltà nella comunicazione ma i nuovi arrivati con background sociali differenti apportano prospettive innovative, migliorando così il processo decisionale e promuovendo soluzioni più creative. Le autrici pervengono, così, alla conclusione che i benefici a lungo termine della diversità superino le difficoltà iniziali, rendendo la diversità un vantaggio competitivo per i gruppi K.W. Phillips et al., 2009. Un altro Autore ad aver sottolineato che la diversità di pensiero all'interno dei team è un potente catalizzatore della creatività è Scott Page, economista noto per il suo approccio interdisciplinare, che combina economia, sociologia e scienze cognitive per studiare i sistemi complessi e l'emergere di fenomeni collettivi [S.E. ...
Book
Il tema dell'alterità è diventato negli ultimi anni centrale nel dibattito pubblico e privato: organizzazioni complesse, imprese, agende politiche dei governi e finanche gli Obiettivi di Sviluppo Sostenibile delle Nazioni Unite, in vario modo alludono alla diversity o al binomio diversity & inclusion, ad essa sovente collegato, sottolineando l'importanza di creare ambienti rispettosi e inclusivi. Il libro guarda al fenomeno, di grande attualità, della diversità come da un prisma che ne illumina due principali facce: una costruttiva, o legata al suo potenziale di innovazione; l’altra distruttiva, o connessa al suo potenziale di conflitto; e preferisce usare il termine 'alterità', a sottolineare che ogni individuo è unicum et ineffabile, e perciò stesso alter rispetto ad ogni altro. L’alterità è osservata, quindi, nel mondo delle organizzazioni, cui è connaturata e, in particolare, del workplace, e qui collegata, da un lato, alla creatività e innovazione e, dall’altro, al conflitto. L’analisi è, pertanto, condotta, anche attraverso una rassegna della letteratura, a livello micro-organizzativo, pur avendo risvolti più ampi e generali, che inquadrano le tematiche trattate in una cornice interdisciplinare: evidenti, infatti, sono i rimandi alle scienze psico-sociologiche, ma soprattutto a quelle aziendalistiche e manageriali. Il lavoro ha, così, un’imprescindibile anima organizzativa, ma anche una manageriale: non solo per il mondo del business, ma anche per quello pubblico e del terzo settore, diviene fondamentale governare tutta la diversità presente; a ciò si rivelano indispensabili alcune doti peculiari del leader, un leader viepiù inclusivo e partecipativo. Il risultato è una monografia dal respiro teorico, ma anche dal taglio pragmatico, che ambisce ad offrire riflessioni e soluzioni al problema, altamente complesso, del governo e della capitalizzazione della diversità, e, per queste ragioni, si rivolge a manager e dirigenti, esperti e pratictioners organizzativi, oltre che naturalmente agli studenti e studiosi della tematica, nelle sue più ampie declinazioni. Per chi invece per la prima volta si addentrasse nei meandri dell’alterità, questo libro è un po' un viaggio che conduce, ad un certo punto, il lettore ad una sorta di bivio, da cui si biforcano la via della creatività e innovazione, e la via del conflitto. Ciò che rileva è, ancora una volta, l’abilità del management e della leadership per un governo efficace, efficiente ed equo dell’ineliminabile alterità
... In theory, diversity is thought to spur productive discussions because different individuals can offer different perspectives.However,according to research,this is only the case if team members are open to differing views and are accepting of different people (i.e., are inclusive) and provide equitable opportunities for those people to contribute to the team. 21 In the 2021 AAPM EDI Climate Survey, 3 75% (657/876) of AAPM Full Members identified as being white and 61% (845/1385) as men. If, as an example, we take race/ethnicity and gender as the predominant descriptors of demographic homogeneity, we note that to this day, the majority of AAPM chapter leaders have self -identified as men (76%: 196/258), as shown in F I G U R E 5 Specialty of leaders by AAPM chapter. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) recently shared results and recommendations from its first Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) Climate Survey, which was designed to assess the climate at the workplace, the AAPM organization, and the AAPM regional chapter level. This work further explores the status of EDI at the regional chapter level. Methods AAPM's EDI Survey was distributed to 5500 members and had a response rate of 25%. In the survey, three open‐ended comment boxes were provided for feedback, including one for regional AAPM members. Sixty‐four percent of respondents indicated they were part of a regional chapter, and 6% provided written responses to the regional chapter question. Responses were analyzed using a mixed methods approach with an exploratory sequential design. Two phases were conducted; the first relied on a Grounded Theory quantitative systemic approach, and the second applied qualitative analysis. Chapter member demographic data were collected to support findings. Results Survey respondents provided open comments and feedback on their regional chapter's climate. Data are summarized as five themes: positive experiences, negative experiences, challenges within chapters, diversity and inclusion, and changes observed. Experiences of regional chapters were rated positively by 75% of respondents. Respondents found their chapters were welcoming, and some noted their great chapter leadership. A number of incidents of sexual harassment, bullying, and discrimination incidences were also shared. Other respondents observed exclusion based on their gender, race, highest degree, and medical physics specialty. Chapter leadership data aligned with these claims, with most leaders to‐date being white males, doctoral degree holders, and/or specializing in radiation therapy. Conclusion AAPM chapters provide rewarding professional opportunities. This study has highlighted positive and negative experiences reported by its members. The major themes identified can guide chapter leaders to continue to cultivate welcoming communities for regional AAPM members.
... Politically diverse collaborations are not without costs. One major obstacle to creating well functioning, diverse teams is that such teams produce outputs that may appear worse to the team members themselves [42]. Membership in homogeneous teams also feels better as participation affirms prior beliefs [43] and shelters contributors from aggressive interaction. ...
Preprint
As political polarization in the United States continues to rise, the question of whether polarized individuals can fruitfully cooperate becomes pressing. Although diversity of individual perspectives typically leads to superior team performance on complex tasks, strong political perspectives have been associated with conflict, misinformation and a reluctance to engage with people and perspectives beyond one's echo chamber. It is unclear whether self-selected teams of politically diverse individuals will create higher or lower quality outcomes. In this paper, we explore the effect of team political composition on performance through analysis of millions of edits to Wikipedia's Political, Social Issues, and Science articles. We measure editors' political alignments by their contributions to conservative versus liberal articles. A survey of editors validates that those who primarily edit liberal articles identify more strongly with the Democratic party and those who edit conservative ones with the Republican party. Our analysis then reveals that polarized teams---those consisting of a balanced set of politically diverse editors---create articles of higher quality than politically homogeneous teams. The effect appears most strongly in Wikipedia's Political articles, but is also observed in Social Issues and even Science articles. Analysis of article "talk pages" reveals that politically polarized teams engage in longer, more constructive, competitive, and substantively focused but linguistically diverse debates than political moderates. More intense use of Wikipedia policies by politically diverse teams suggests institutional design principles to help unleash the power of politically polarized teams.
... A positive association has been noted between the proportion of post-secondary STEM students from under-represented racial groups and the academic achievement of all students in the class (Bowman et al., 2023). In the workplace context, improved creativity, problem-solving, and financial performance have been reported when teams are more diverse (Baten et al., 2021;Phillips et al. 2009;Sommers, 2006). ...
Article
Full-text available
The STEM Explorers outreach project, headed by a Faculty of Education at a University in Ontario, Canada, brings free, hands-on, and in-community science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) outreach events to children and their families from groups under-represented in STEM education and careers. The project provides pre-service teachers with experience facilitating inclusive approaches to STEM education and also creates a context to explore their conceptions of activism. The purpose of this phenomenographic research is to describe the experiences of these aspiring teachers to better understand the ways that outreach initiatives can impact their role as STEM education activists. Findings suggest that a positive STEM educator identity, a program of integrated and student-centered STEM learning, and possessing an activist sense of purpose, contribute to the degree to which pre-service teachers regard themselves as STEM education activists.
... Engaging in polarized co-production, however, is not a straightforward pathway to positive outcomes. It entails navigating a complex landscape where the benefits of enriched content come at the potential cost of participant displeasure, a factor that cannot be understated [52]. The existing literature illustrates that homogeneous collaborations foster agreement and shield individuals from confrontational engagements. ...
Article
Full-text available
The global influence of climate change has become increasingly noticeable during recent years. A deeper understanding of human collective behavior’s role in mitigating climate change necessitates the provision of high-quality knowledge to the public. In the modern society, the Internet has emerged as the primary knowledge source, raising concerns about the quality of information provided by online communities. Understanding the mechanisms of online knowledge co-production is crucial for enhancing information quality. Prior research has highlighted the substantial influence of group-level political polarization on online knowledge production, though there is disagreement about whether its impact is positive or negative. This study proposed the co-production pattern, which reflects how participants with differing political preferences collaborated with each other, as a mediator and analyzed its impacts on co-production process of climate change knowledge in Wikipedia. To this end, the research amassed two datasets including over 1.3 million entries documenting editing behaviors in English-language articles on climate change hosted on Wikipedia, encompassing nearly ten thousand Wikipedia editor teams. The results empirically demonstrated the positive impacts of polarized teams in preventing vandalism and boosting reliability when knowledge co-production occurs between participants with different political viewpoints. These insights suggest strategies for effectively producing and improving climate change knowledge by leveraging polarized online communities.
... Um estudo realizado pela Harvard Business Review 4 mostra isso indicando que o conceito de trabalho em equipe veio para ficar e que é importante que as instituições criem equipes nas quais os profissionais busquem maior parceria em busca de um bem comum, em oposição ao incentivo à competitividade pelo sucesso individual. Quando ocorre em equipes diversas, a parceria é mais esperta, pois grupos diversos podem superar os homogêneos na tomada de decisão porque processam as informações com mais cuidado [5]. ...
Article
Full-text available
O artigo apresenta alguns benefícios fundamentais para as organizações acolherem equipes mais diversas e, principalmente, para as pessoas se engajarem definitivamente nessas ações.
Article
Full-text available
The Equality Act of 2010 provides a legal framework promoting diversity and equity within UK higher education. The Act aims to eliminate unlawful discrimination and ensure fairness, equity, and inclusivity in the United Kingdom. However, several studies have revealed discrimination and a lack of diversity in UK higher education. This study examined the state of diversity and inclusion in the field of economics in UK universities, a discipline highly influential in global policy formulation, using secondary data from the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). The importance of having a diversified economics profession cannot be overemphasized. Greater diversity in economics provides opportunities for people of diverse backgrounds to contribute new and innovative ideas to tackle the ever-changing challenges facing the economy and society. The findings from this study however show that that economics lacks diversity relative to other disciplines such as Law, Art and humanities, languages, management, and social sciences. The field of study is still male-dominated, and the BAEM groups and people from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are also underrepresented. This paper therefore aligned with the call for a targeted mentorship programme for the underrepresented groups in economics, decolonisation and internationalisation of economics curriculum, broadened and inclusive admission policies for economics, and stronger collaboration with specific organisation hiring economics graduates to organise industry-specific workshops on practical industry-relevant skills.
Article
Full-text available
Workforce diversity is increasing across the globe, while organizations strive for equity and inclusion. Therefore, research has investigated how team diversity relates to performance. Despite clear arguments why diversity should enhance (some types of) performance, and promising findings in individual studies, meta-analyses have shown weak main effects. However, many meta-analyses have failed to distinguish situations where diversity should have a positive impact from those where its impact is more likely to be negative, leaving boundary conditions unclear. Here, we summarized the growing literature across disciplines, countries, and languages through a reproducible registered report meta-analysis on the relationship between diversity and team performance (615 reports, 2638 effect sizes). Overall, we found that the average linear relationships between demographic, job-related and cognitive diversity, and team performance are significant and positive, but insubstantial (|r|< .1). Considering a wide range of moderators, we found few instances when correlations were substantial. However, context matters. Correlations were more positive when tasks were higher in complexity or required creativity and innovation, and when teams were working in contexts lower in collectivism and power distance. Contrary to expectations, the link between diversity and performance was not substantially influenced by teams’ longevity or interdependence. The main results appear robust to publication bias. Further research is needed on how diversity climates and team cultures affect these relationships, and when there may be non-linear relationships—yet for the moment, promises of wide-spread performance increases may not be the strongest arguments to promote diversity initiatives. We discuss further implications for researchers and practitioners, and provide a web app to examine subsets of the data: https://lukaswallrich.shinyapps.io/diversity_meta/.
Article
Full-text available
Two studies examined the effects of stable, partially changed, and completely changed majority and minority positions within a group on perception and evaluation of the group. It was hypothesized that loss of majority position (majority-to-minority change) would have stronger effects than gain of majority position (minority-to-majority change). The hypothesized asymmetrical effect was demonstrated in that loss of majority position decreased perception of group–self similarity, group attraction, and expectations for positive interactions with the group, whereas a corresponding gain of position did not increase them. Thus immediately following changes, the group is especially fragile because disintegrative forces created by the loss of majority position are stronger than integrative forces created by the gain of majority position.
Article
Full-text available
This study examined reactions to minority and majority positions that were either stable or reversed through group conversion that transformed opponents (supporters) of the minority (majority) into supporters (opponents) or through group expansion that brought new supporters (opponents) for the minority (majority) into the group. Minorities who became majorities through group expansion, compared with those who changed through group conversion, perceived their supporters and the overall group as significantly more similar to the self, and had significantly higher expectations for future positive interactions within the group. Perception of similarity with the supporters mediated the effect of the experimental conditions on perception of the overall group-self similarity. Implications of changes through conversion and expansion for the functioning of social groups are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Three experiments explored the role of negotiator focus in disconnecting negotiated outcomes and evaluations. Negotiators who focused on their target prices, the ideal outcome they could obtain, achieved objectively superior outcomes compared with negotiators who focused on their lower bound (e.g., reservation price). Those negotiators who focused on their targets, however, were less satisfied with their objectively superior outcomes. In the final experiment, when negotiators were reminded of their lower bound after the negotiation, the satisfaction of those negotiators who had focused on their target prices was increased, with outcomes and evaluations becoming connected rather than disconnected. The possible negative effects of setting high goals and the temporal dimensions of the disconnection and reconnection between outcomes and evaluations are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
The authors elaborate the complications and the opportunities inherent in the statistical analysis of small-group data. They begin by discussing nonindependence of group members’ scores and then consider standard methods for the analysis of small-group data and determine that these methods do not take into account this nonindependence. A new method is proposed that uses multilevel modeling and allows for negative nonindependence and mutual influence. Finally, the complications of interactions, different group sizes, and differential effects are considered. The authors strongly urge that the analysis model of data from small-group studies should mirror the psychological processes that generate those data.
Chapter
Full-text available
A multilevel model is presented to describe how socialization processes within work teams are affected by team demographics, for it is during socialization that team norms are established and behavior becomes routinized. Several proposition are offered concerning the relationships between (a) individual, interpersonal and team attributes, (b) interpersonal communications and relationships, and (c) subsequent outcomes such as performance, power and influence dynamics, development, and membership stability.
Article
A model of individual socialization into organizations is presented and tested. The model (a) identifies three distinct stages of socialization, (b) specifies the activities engaged in by an individual at each stage, and (c) specifies the personal and organizational contingencies that control an individual's movement through the stages. Interview and questionnaire data collected from 118 hospital employees - nurses, nurse's aides, radiology technologists, tradesmen, and accounting clerks - were used to develop, refine, and test the model. The model basically was supported by the data. Four variables are identified as possible outcomes of the socialization process: general satisfaction, mutual influence, internal work motivation, and job involvement. Two of these variables - general satisfaction and mutual influence - are empirically linked with important aspects of the socialization process, and are shown to increase steadily as individuals progress through socialization. The differences between the socialization experiences of professional, paraprofessional, and nonprofessional workers are identified and explained, and implications for the conduct of socialization programs are drawn.