Hominid mandibular corpus shape variation and its utility for recognizing species diversity within fossil Homo. Journal of Anatomy, 213, 670-685

Natural Sciences & Mathematics, The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, Pomona, NJ 08240-0195, USA.
Journal of Anatomy (Impact Factor: 2.1). 01/2009; 213(6):670-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00989.x
Source: PubMed


Mandibular corpora are well represented in the hominin fossil record, yet few studies have rigorously assessed the utility of mandibular corpus morphology for species recognition, particularly with respect to the linear dimensions that are most commonly available. In this study, we explored the extent to which commonly preserved mandibular corpus morphology can be used to: (i) discriminate among extant hominid taxa and (ii) support species designations among fossil specimens assigned to the genus Homo. In the first part of the study, discriminant analysis was used to test for significant differences in mandibular corpus shape at different taxonomic levels (genus, species and subspecies) among extant hominid taxa (i.e. Homo, Pan, Gorilla, Pongo). In the second part of the study, we examined shape variation among fossil mandibles assigned to Homo (including H. habilis sensu stricto, H. rudolfensis, early African H. erectus/H. ergaster, late African H. erectus, Asian H. erectus, H. heidelbergensis, H. neanderthalensis and H. sapiens). A novel randomization procedure designed for small samples (and using group 'distinctness values') was used to determine whether shape variation among the fossils is consistent with conventional taxonomy (or alternatively, whether a priori taxonomic groupings are completely random with respect to mandibular morphology). The randomization of 'distinctness values' was also used on the extant samples to assess the ability of the test to recognize known taxa. The discriminant analysis results demonstrated that, even for a relatively modest set of traditional mandibular corpus measurements, we can detect significant differences among extant hominids at the genus and species levels, and, in some cases, also at the subspecies level. Although the randomization of 'distinctness values' test is more conservative than discriminant analysis (based on comparisons with extant specimens), we were able to detect at least four distinct groups among the fossil specimens (i.e. H. sapiens, H. heidelbergensis, Asian H. erectus and a combined 'African Homo' group consisting of H. habilis sensu stricto, H. rudolfensis, early African H. erectus/H. ergaster and late African H. erectus). These four groups appear to be distinct at a level similar to, or greater than, that of modern hominid species. In addition, the mandibular corpora of H. neanderthalensis could be distinguished from those of 'African Homo', although not from those of H. sapiens, H. heidelbergensis, or the Asian H. erectus group. The results suggest that the features most commonly preserved on the hominin mandibular corpus have some taxonomic utility, although they are unlikely to be useful in generating a reliable alpha taxonomy for early African members of the genus Homo.

Download full-text


Available from: Brian G. Richmond
  • Source
    • "It should be noted that Taylor and Groves (2003) and Schmittbuhl et al. (2007) in their discriminant function (DF) analyses separated the P. troglodytes specimens into subspecies for comparison with P. paniscus, while in this study and that of Lague et al. (2008) all P. troglodytes subspecies were grouped together. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this research is to determine whether geometric morphometric (GM) techniques can provide insights into how the shape of the mandibular corpus differs between bonobos and chimpanzees and to explore the potential implications of those results for our understanding of hominin evolution. We focused on this region of the mandible because of the relative frequency with which it has been recovered in the hominin fossil record. In addition, no previous study had explored in-depth three-dimensional (3D) mandibular corpus shape differences between adults of the two Pan species using geometric morphometrics. GM methods enable researchers to quantitatively analyze and visualize 3D shape changes in skeletal elements and provide an important compliment to traditional two-dimensional analyses. Eighteen mandibular landmarks were collected using a Microscribe 3DX portable digitizer. Specimen configurations were superimposed using Generalized Procrustes analysis and the projections of the fitted coordinates to tangent space were analyzed using multivariate statistics. The size-adjusted corpus shapes of Pan paniscus and Pan troglodytes could be assigned to species with approximately 93% accuracy and the Procrustes distance between the two species was significant. Analyses of the residuals from a multivariate linear regression of the data on centroid size suggested that much of the shape difference between the species is size-related. Chimpanzee subspecies and a small sample of Australopithecus specimens could be correctly identified to taxon, at best, only 75% of the time, although the Procrustes distances between these taxa were significant. The shape of the mandibular symphysis was identified as especially useful in differentiating Pan species from one another. This suggests that this region of the mandible has the potential to be informative for taxonomic analyses of fossil hominoids, including hominins. The results also have implications for phylogenetic hypotheses of hominoid evolution.
    Preview · Article · Jun 2012 · Journal of Human Evolution
  • Source
    • "(ZYB, measured as the distance between the most lateral aspects of the right and left zygomatic arches) and upper facial height (NPH, measured as the distance between nasion and prosthion). Due to their simplicity, these variables allow to incorporate in the analyses a relatively high number of fossil specimens (Lague et al., 2008). In this study, only those crania of the human fossil record preserved relatively complete were used. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is probably no paleoanthropological issue with deeper disagreements than the taxonomic status of the Early–Middle Pleistocene members of the genus Homo One reason could be the difficulty of estimating the relationship between morphological and taxonomic diversity. In an attempt to contribute new evidence to this debate, bootstrapping techniques are used for analyzing the cranial variability of Homo. The results indicate that: (i) the size of the neurocranium relative to the viscerocranium discriminates better among extant hominoid species than skull size; (ii) no cluster of fossil specimens of Homo exceeds the morphological variability of Gorilla gorilla, with the only exception of the one that comprises all members of Homo except modern humans; and (iii) some clusters are taxonomically more consistent than others, as long as they show a range of morphological variability similar to that found in both Pan troglodytes and Homo sapiens. According to these results, three taxa are tentatively suggested for Homo: (i) anatomically modern humans; (ii) an “erectine” morphotype plus Neanderthals; and (iii) a “habiline” cluster. Finally, the results indicate a greater taxonomic affinity for the human population involved in the first dispersal “Out of Africa” with the “habiline” group, which agrees with the early age reported for Dmanisi (1.77Ma), a Georgian site placed at the gates of Europe.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2011 · Quaternary International
  • Source

    Full-text · Article ·
Show more