Article

Incidence of Pseudotumor and Acute Lymphocytic Vasculitis Associated Lesion (ALVAL) Reactions in Metal-On-Metal Hip Articulations: A Meta-Analysis

University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
The Journal of arthroplasty (Impact Factor: 2.67). 05/2013; 28(7). DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.027
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

We systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature to determine a pooled estimate of the incidence of pseudotumor and acute lymphocytic vasculitis associated lesions (ALVAL) in adult patients with primary metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty or resurfacing. Fourteen eligible articles were identified, with a total of 13,898 MoM hips. The incidence of pseudotumor/ALVAL ranged from 0% to 6.5% of hips with a mean follow-up ranging from 1.7 to 12.3years across the studies. The pooled estimated incidence of pseudotumor/ALVAL is 0.6% (95% CI: 0.3% to 1.2%). The rate of revision for any reason ranged from 0% to 14.3% of hips, with a pooled estimate of 3.9% (95% CI: 2.7% to 5.3%).

0 Followers
 · 
22 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteoporosis is a common condition. As the population ages, more patients with osteoporosis will require orthopedic procedures, including arthroplasty. Adverse outcomes are more likely for patients with osteoporosis requiring orthopedic procedures, for example those with intraoperative fractures, periprosthetic osteolysis with implant migration, and postoperative periprosthetic fractures. Cemented prosthetic hip replacements may be more successful among patients with poor bone quality. Femoral neck fracture is a concern during hip resurfacing among patients with osteoporosis. Vitamin D deficiency is common among patients undergoing joint arthroplasty and the ideal vitamin D level for joint arthroplasty has yet to be determined. Both bisphosphonates and teriparatide may aide successful osteointegration among patients undergoing noncemented joint arthroplasty. Focusing on bone health perioperatively should result in better outcomes for orthopedic procedures.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2013 · Current Rheumatology Reports
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Metal-on-metal (MoM) tribological pairing results in less volumetric abrasion than pairing with the conventionally used polyethylene and is associated with a lower risk of material failure compared to other hard-hard pairings. An increased frequency of problem cases in recent years has led to a great increase in uncertainty. Against this background in this article the current aspects of epidemiology, etiology, diagnostics and treatment of complications in MoM hip joint endoprostheses will be discussed. Based on the results from national endoprosthesis registers and selected clinical studies an evaluation of the rate of local complications from MoM tribological pairings was undertaken. A differentiation was made between MoM pairings in pedicled small head prostheses (≤ 32 mm), large head (> 32 mm) and surface replacement (OFE) endoprostheses. Each year MoM endoprostheses release on average 10(12)-10(14) cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) nanoparticles per patient. This release of metal ions and particles can lead to a variety of tissue reactions. A differentiation must be made between regular routine diagnostics within the framework of implant follow-up screening and specific investigations due to the occurrence of complaints. The diagnostics for patients treated with MoM hip endoprostheses consists of a standardized step-wise approach considering possible differential diagnoses and the utilization of modern laboratory chemical and radiological methods. When problems occur, a differentiation should preferentially be made between complaints not caused by metal and mechanical problems (e.g. prosthesis loosening and impingement) and symptoms due to periprosthetic infections. The normal standards for hip endoprosthetics are also valid for periprosthetic infections, fractures and other general complications. Specific measures are, however, necessary for complications due to metal-specific risks.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2013 · Der Orthopäde
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the 1950s, metal-on-metal (MoM) articulations started being used in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Poor clinical results due to loosening and mechanical failure led to the discontinuation of MoM and the use of metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) and ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) articulating partners. Both MoP and CoP had high failure rates due to osteolysis and bone destruction induced by wear particles. In the 1980s, the second generation of MoM, with improved materials, design factors, and manufacturing technique, was introduced. Today there are many different MoM designs with various metallurgies available. These differences have led to variable clinical performance.
    No preview · Chapter · Jan 2014
Show more