Article

Impact on Caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): A multicentre randomised controlled trial

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (Impact Factor: 2.19). 05/2013; 13(1):105. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-105
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sterile water injections have been used as an effective intervention for the management of back pain during labour. The objective of the current research is to determine if sterile water injections, as an intervention for back pain in labour, will reduce the intrapartum caesarean section rate.Methods/design DESIGN: A double blind randomised placebo controlled trialSetting: Maternity hospitals in AustraliaParticipants: 1866 women in labour, >=18 years of age who have a singleton pregnancy with a fetus in a cephalic presentation at term (between 37 + 0 and 41 + 6 weeks gestation), who assess their back pain as equal to or greater than seven on a visual analogue scale when requesting analgesia and able to provide informed consent.Intervention: Participants will be randomised to receive either 0.1 to 0.3 millilitres of sterile water or a normal saline placebo via four intradermal injections into four anatomical points surrounding the Michaelis' rhomboid over the sacral area. Two injections will be administered over the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and the remaining two at two centimetres posterior, and one centimetre medial to the PSIS respectively.Main outcome measure: Proportion of women who have a caesarean section in labourRandomisation: Permuted blocks stratified by research site.Blinding (masking): Double-blind trial in which participants, clinicians and research staff blinded to group assignment.Funding: Funded by the National Health and Medical Research CouncilTrial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (No ACTRN12611000221954). DISCUSSION: Sterile water injections, which may have a positive effect on reducing the CS rate, have been shown to be a safe and simple analgesic suitable for most maternity settings. A procedure that could reduce intervention rates without adversely affecting safety for mother and baby would benefit Australian families and taxpayers and would reduce requirements for maternal operating theatre time. Results will have external validity, as the technique may be easily applied to maternity populations outside Australia. In summary, the results of this trial will contribute High level evidence on the impact of SWI on intrapartum CS rates and provide evidence of the analgesic effect of SWI on back pain.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Michael Beckmann
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the spring of 2013, the association of Dutch midwifes announced that midwifes would be offering sterile water injections for women in pain during labour. Shortly afterwards, the Dutch associations of gynaecologists and anaesthesiologists criticized this step, as the evidence for this intervention was considered insufficient. We reviewed the literature by critically appraising two recent systematic reviews. Although the overlap of included randomized trials was considerable, the reviews came to different conclusions regarding the primary outcome of one of the reviews, i.e. the proportion of unplanned caesarean sections. The order of magnitude of the effect estimated was similar, but in only one of the reviews the confidence interval encompassed 'no difference'. This discrepancy between the reviews was caused by a small difference in included trials. The results of planned and ongoing trials may reveal whether sterile water injections deserve a place in guidelines.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2013 · Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This systematic review of the literature reports studies published over the last five years (2008-2013) about interventions during labor and normal delivery. The points made concerning active management of labor, interventions aimed at improving maternal comfort, management of occiput posterior fetal presentations, management of second stage of labor and prevention techniques for perineal lesions. Although obstetrics remains an "art" to which training is mainly based on experience and clinical expertise, this "art" at present cannot live without the evidence-based medicine. Numerous randomized trials published and in process, demonstrate awareness of this reality in our specialty.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2014 · Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This systematic review of the literature reports studies published over the last five years (2008–2013) about interventions during labor and normal delivery. The points made concerning active management of labor, interventions aimed at improving maternal comfort, management of occiput posterior fetal presentations, management of second stage of labor and prevention techniques for perineal lesions. Although obstetrics remains an “art” to which training is mainly based on experience and clinical expertise, this “art” at present cannot live without the evidence-based medicine. Numerous randomized trials published and in process, demonstrate awareness of this reality in our specialty.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2014 · La Revue Sage-Femme