Approach to the patient with transient alteration of consciousness

ArticleinNeurology: Clinical Practice (Print) 2(3):179-186 · September 2012with64 Reads
DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0b013e31826af1be · Source: PubMed
Abstract

Evaluating transient impairment of consciousness is critical to diagnose epileptic seizures, syncope, parasomnias, organic encephalopathies, and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Effective evaluation of episodic unconscious events demands interactive interviewing of the patient and witnesses of the events, with judgment as to historians' observational abilities. When generalized tonic-clonic seizures have been witnessed by medical staff or other reliable observers, a search for concomitant nonconvulsive events and for comorbid illnesses often elucidates diagnoses unsuspected by the referring physician. Consultation for stupor-coma should not miss a potentially reversible acute severe encephalopathy, particularly when reversibility requires timely therapy. Perspicacious analyses of complex cognitive-motor phenomena support judicious application of diagnostic procedures, including brief or prolonged EEG and video-EEG, EKG tilt-table testing, EKG loop monitoring, and brain imaging.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: To describe the electrographic and clinical features of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in the critically ill elderly and to identify potential predictors of outcome. We prospectively identified 25 episodes of altered mentation and NCSE in 24 critically ill elderly patients associated with generalized, focal, or bihemispheric epileptiform EEG patterns. Patients with anoxic encephalopathy were excluded. Of 25 hospitalizations, 13 (52%) resulted in death, and 12 (48%) patients survived to discharge. Death was associated with the number of acute, life-threatening medical problems on presentation (survivors, 1.8; fatalities, 2.8; p = 0.013) and with generalized EEG pattern (p = 0.017). Higher doses or greater number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) did not improve outcome. Treatment with intravenous benzodiazepines was associated with increased risk of death (p = 0.033). Ten patients with advance directives were managed outside the intensive care unit (ICU). Mean hospitalization was 39 days in the ICU group and 22 for those with advance directives (p = 0.017). Severity of illness correlates with mortality in critically ill elderly patients with NCSE. Treatment with intravenous benzodiazepines may increase their risk of death. Aggressive ICU management may prolong hospitalization at considerable cost, without improving outcome. It is unclear whether NCSE affects outcome in the critically ill elderly or is merely a marker for severity of disease in predisposed patients. The benefits of aggressive therapy are unclear. Carefully controlled, prospective trials will be necessary to determine the best therapies for NCSE in the critically ill elderly and the appropriate role of the ICU in their management.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 1998 · Epilepsia
    0Comments 198Citations
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) resemble epileptic seizures and are often misdiagnosed and mistreated as the latter. Occasionally, epileptic seizures are misdiagnosed and mistreated as PNES. 70% of PNES cases develop between the second and fourth decades of life, but this disease can also affect children and the elderly. At least 10% of patients with PNES have concurrent epileptic seizures or have had epileptic seizures before being diagnosed with PNES. Psychological stress exceeding an individual's coping capacity often precedes PNES. Clinicians can find differentiating between PNES and epileptic seizures challenging. Some clinical features can help distinguish PNES from epileptic seizures, but other features associated with PNES are nonspecific and occur during both types of seizures. Diagnostic errors often result from an overreliance on specific clinical features. Note that no single feature is pathognomonic for PNES. When typical seizures can be recorded, video-EEG is the diagnostic gold standard for PNES, and in such cases a diagnosis can be made with high accuracy. When video-EEG reveals no epileptiform activity before, during or after the ictus, thorough neurological and psychiatric histories can be used to confirm the diagnosis of PNES. In this article, we review the clinical features that can help clinicians differentiate between PNES and epileptic seizures.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2011 · Nature Reviews Neurology
    0Comments 46Citations
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Diagnosis of epileptic seizures is often based on temporal lobe epileptiform abnormalities appearing on interictal EEG, when reported ictal semiologies are consistent with temporal lobe seizures. It is unclear how often such patients have non-epileptic seizures. We studied 145 patients who had temporal interictal EEG spikes and reported ictal semiology characteristic of temporal lobe seizures, with long-term EEG-video-monitoring (LTM) for presurgical evaluation of medically refractory seizures. Nonepileptic seizures were unexpectedly recorded in 12 of these patients (8%). Outcomes after LTM in patients who had both epileptic seizures and nonepileptic seizures demonstrated that the epileptic seizures usually were controlled with medications. Our observations support LTM as useful in diagnosis of non-epileptic seizures in this group of patients. We suggest that ictal recordings always should be performed before epilepsy surgery, in part to avoid unintentional surgical treatment of nonepileptic seizures.
    No preview · Article · Jun 1997 · Neurology
    0Comments 26Citations
Show more