Patients' perceptions of safety if interpersonal continuity of care were to be disrupted

Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53715, USA.
Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy (Impact Factor: 3.41). 01/2009; 11(4):400-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00503.x
Source: PubMed


To determine if patients vary in perceptions of safety if interpersonal continuity were to be disrupted. If so, which characteristics are associated with feeling unsafe?
The extent to which patients' preference for continuity with a personal physician is due to perceptions of safety is unclear.
Observational study (Wisconsin Longitudinal Study Graduate and Sibling Survey).
A total of 6827 respondents (most aged 63-66 years) who completed the 2003-06 survey round.
Age, gender, marital status, education, health insurance type, illnesses, medications, length of relationship with provider and place, personality type, decision-making preference and trust in physician deliberation.
Safety perception when visiting another doctor or clinic if own doctor were not available.
Twelve percent of respondents felt unsafe. After adjustment, as compared to those who felt safe, those who felt unsafe were more likely to be women (Odds ratio=1.65, 95% confidence interval=1.35-2.01), have more chronic conditions (1.27, 1.08-1.50) and have a longer relationship with a usual provider: 5-9 years (1.53, 1.11-2.10) 10-14 years (1.41, 1.02-1.95) and 15 or more years (1.62, 1.20-2.17) compared to 0-4 years. Those who preferred active participation in decision making and had trust in their physician were less likely to feel safe (1.63, 1.10-2.41).
Certain older adults perceive being unsafe if not seeing their usual physician. Further research should investigate reasons for perceptions of safety if continuity were disrupted and any implications for care.

Download full-text


Available from: Jessica R Malmstadt Schumacher

  • No preview · Article · Jan 2009 · Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Interpersonal continuity of care (consulting the same physician) is widely regarded as a core value of primary care and a crucial component of quality of care. Nonetheless, interpersonal continuity as experienced by patients remains a neglected topic in Arab countries including Oman. The aim of this study was to explore how patients view interpersonal continuity of care in the primary care setting in Oman. Four primary health centres (PHCs) were selected from two urban cities in Oman. In the period June to August 2008, adult patients were surveyed by questionnaire at their PHC while waiting to see their primary care physicians (PCPs). We interviewed 319 (71%) of enrolled participants. Their ages ranged from 18-70 years. The majority of patients (223 - 70%) thought interpersonal continuity was very important for them; 232 (73%) patients felt that they obtained better care with interpersonal continuity. 225 (71%) patients preferred interpersonal continuity if they had personal, family or social problems. Nonetheless, compared to male patients, female patients had less chance to maintain interpersonal continuity (p = 0.018). Interpersonal continuity increased as the number of consultations increased (p = 0.030). Preference for interpersonal continuity was associated with increasing age (p = 0.020) and with the presence of chronic illnesses (p = 0.001). Patients with chronic illnesses, who reported more preference for interpersonal continuity, were also found to be more compliant with medications and committed to carrying out recommended advice compared to patients without such illnesses (p = 0.027). Omani patients perceived interpersonal continuity as an important aspect of primary care. Health planners should note patients' preference for interpersonal continuity and take visible measures to support it. A larger study is needed to survey more of the PHCs of Oman.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2009 · Sultan Qaboos University medical journal
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study sought to describe the incidence of transitions into and out of Medicaid, characterize the populations that transition and determine if health insurance instability is associated with changes in healthcare utilization. 2000-2004 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) was used to identify adults enrolled in Medicaid at any time during the survey period (n = 6,247). We estimate both static and dynamic panel data models to examine the effect of health insurance instability on health care resource utilization. We find that, after controlling for observed factors like employment and health status, and after specifying a dynamic model that attempts to capture time-dependent unobserved effects, individuals who have multiple transitions into and out of Medicaid have higher emergency room utilization, more office visits, more hospitalizations, and refill their prescriptions less often. Individuals with more than one transition in health insurance status over the study period were likely to have higher health care utilization than individuals with one or fewer transitions. If these effects are causal, in addition to individual benefits, there are potentially large benefits for Medicaid programs from reducing avoidable insurance instability. These results suggest the importance of including provisions to facilitate continuous enrollment in public programs as the United States pursues health reform.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2010 · BMC Health Services Research
Show more