In this study, the history of cooling and denudation of the Northern Scandes range and the
adjacent Norwegian and Barents Sea margins is investigated. This is done with Fission Track
and (U-Th)/He thermochronology. Several other previously published studies have focused
at similar issues in other parts of Scandinavia. Both from the geomorphological record, as
well as from the offshore sedimentary record, it seems evident that the development of the
Northern Scandes differs in several respects from the development of its southern
counterpart, the Southern Scandes range. The history of cooling and denudation in northern
Scandinavia is presented first and is then compared to that of other North Atlantic margins,
with emphasis on the eastern North Atlantic margins.
Chapter 2 presents an overview of the Precambrian – Paleozoic evolution of the
Fennoscandian shield. The main structures and tectonic units and also the geomorphological
surfaces that are most relevant to the present study are introduced. The offshore basin
evolution of the Norwegian Sea and the Barents Sea is briefly summarized.
Chapter 3 offers an introduction to the theoretical backgrounds of Fission Track and (U-Th)/
He thermochronology. The different methods and techniques that have been applied in
the lab are outlined. The potential applications of both Fission Track and (U-Th)/He
thermochronology are discussed, as well as how one should interpret both types of data.
Electron microprobe data for a selected set of apatite samples are included in this chapter.
In Chapter 4 it is demonstrated that the pattern of Apatite Fission Track ages with respect to
distance to the northern Norwegian Atlantic margin is very similar to that of models of
passive margin evolution that represent a retreating scarp. On the margin itself the AFT ages
are as young as 90 – 100 Ma and further inland, right across the Northern Scandes mountain
range, the ages increase to more than 300 Ma on the gentle eastern flank of the range. Late
Cretaceous – Paleogene (U-Th)/He ages in a vertical profile on Kebnekaise, the highest peak
in the range, together with the observed age pattern suggest a rift shoulder origin for the
range. Nevertheless, other uplift mechanisms have played an important role in the later
development of the range. On the margin, the young AFT ages coincide spatially with a
strong, negative gravity anomaly. Inverse modeling histories here indicate an important
Neogene phase of denudation which is not recorded anywhere else in the mountain range by
the AFT or (U-Th)/He systems.
There is no clear pattern for the pattern of the AFT ages with distance to the southern
Barents Sea margin. This is discussed in Chapter 5. Only a clear difference between relatively
young ages (< 270 Ma) along the southwestern Barents Sea margin with respect to those
further east (> 270 Ma) has been identified. For the region along the southwestern Barents
Sea margin, inverse thermal histories provide a record of the Triassic and younger thermal
history, whereas samples along the eastern part of the southern Barents Sea margins reveal
the Paleozoic to Triassic thermal history only. Previously published apatite fission track and
zircon fission track ages from the Kola Super Deep Borehole are used in conjunction with
new apatite fission track data from surface samples.
In Chapter 6, differential vertical movements between, and within, the Lofoten and
Vesterålen domains are documented by the inverse thermal histories based on the new AFT
data from both domains and extrapolation of offshore sedimentary units over the archipelago.
Cooling and denudation on Vesterålen apparently was accompanied by Late Paleozoic –
Early Mesozoic sedimentation and burial in the Lofoten domain. Cooling and denudation of
the present-day Lofoten Ridge in the Jurassic and Cretaceous was contemporaneous with
deposition of a sedimentary cover in the Vesterålen area, again indicating differential vertical
movements between both domains. The boundary between both domains, which seems to be
the Vesterålen transfer zone, lines up with an oceanic fracture zone. The youngest ages in the
XII
region, ~120 Ma, in the southern part of the Lofoten domain, coincide with a strong, positive
gravity anomaly.
Different mechanisms for the uplift of the Northern Scandes mountain range are discussed
in Chapter 7. Asthenospheric diapirism has previously been proposed as an uplift mechanism
for both the Southern and Northern Scandes mountains, but the new observations from the
northern area do not satisfactorily fit the timing and pattern of cooling and denudation that is
predicted by this mechanism. The initial uplift of the Northern Scandes range seems to be
related to rift shoulder uplift, but a different mechanism must have been active as well in the
Neogene. An important factor seems to be a large, low density granitic body within the upper
crust, but the issue of what triggered the Neogene uplift in this region is not entirely clear yet.
Although the observations are clear, tectonic modeling is required to get a better
understanding of this phase.
This is a first order study and it provides clear indications for the direction that future
research into the low temperature evolution of the northern Scandinavian study area should
take. This study provides the basis on which future research on a more detailed, smaller scale,
can build further.