Article

New developments in the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: A focus on apremilast

The Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, London, UK.
Drug Design, Development and Therapy (Impact Factor: 3.03). 03/2013; 7:201-10. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S32713
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease, most commonly resulting in the occurrence of red and silver scaly plaques. About 30% of psoriasis sufferers develop psoriatic arthritis (PsA), a disorder that presents with additional joint inflammation and other clinical features. At present, the most effective treatment for moderate and severe psoriasis and PsA are biologics such as antitumor necrosis factor alpha therapy. Biologics are costly and typically require repeated injections; hence, the development of novel, orally available, small molecular inhibitors that are less expensive to produce is highly desirable. The phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast is a small molecular inhibitor that acts by increasing cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels, ultimately suppressing tumor necrosis alpha production. Apremilast has been tested in a number of psoriasis and PsA pilot and Phase II trials to evaluate its efficacy and safety. More recently, three larger double-blinded, and randomized multicenter studies demonstrate that apremilast is efficacious in the treatment of psoriasis and PsA, with significantly higher numbers of apremilast-treated patients achieving endpoints of a 75% reduction compared to baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) or American College of Rheumatology-20 scores, relative to placebo. This encouraging data, along with a tolerable incidence of mild to moderate adverse events, has led to the initiation of several large Phase III trials that aim to further validate apremilast as a treatment for psoriasis and PsA. Here, we provide an overview of the current treatments for psoriasis and PsA, and summarize the findings from multiple Phase II clinical trials where the effects of apremilast in the treatment of psoriasis and PsA patients have been investigated.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Fiona E Mccann, Feb 03, 2014
  • Source
    • "Targeting PDE4 has been shown to reduce TNF in vitro via the protein kinase pathway (PKA) due to the elevation in cAMP (Seldon et al., 1995). Although their anti-inflammatory potential is promising, toxicity issues have stopped some PDE4 inhibitors from reaching the clinic (Palfreeman et al., 2013). Apremilast is a novel PDE4 inhibitor that has been investigated for its tolerability and efficacy in mouse CIA and collagen antibody induced arthritis (CAIA) and significantly reduced clinical score and joint pathology in both. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Animal models of arthritis are widely used to de-convolute disease pathways and to identify novel drug targets and therapeutic approaches. However, the high attrition rates of drugs in Phase II/III rates means that a relatively small number of drugs reach the market, despite showing efficacy in pre-clinical models. There is also increasing awareness of the ethical issues surrounding the use of animal models of disease and it is timely, therefore, to review the relevance and translatability of animal models of arthritis. In this paper we review the most commonly used animal models in terms of their pathological similarities to human rheumatoid arthritis as well as their response to drug therapy. In general, the ability of animal models to predict efficacy of biologics in man has been good. However, the predictive power of animal models for small molecules has been variable, probably because of differences in the levels of target knockdown achievable in vivo. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2015 · European journal of pharmacology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease, most commonly resulting in the occurrence of red and silver scaly plaques. Application of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) should be used as a new method to detect the different stages of the disease and to monitor medications with different anti-psoriatic drugs using patient’s blood plasma. The study included 72 white adults (35 men and 37 women; median age 56 years) with diagnosed psoriasis. According to the psoriasis area severity index (PASI) patients were selected into three groups: symptomless (PASI: 0), mild (PASI: 1–15), and serious symptoms (PASI: >15). According to medication patients were divided into untreated (n = 39) and treated (n = 33) groups. For systemic drug treatment cytostatic therapy (methotrexate, n = 12), retinoid treatment (acitretin, n = 10), and biologic response modifiers (adalimumab, n = 5; infliximab, n = 5; ustekinumab, n = 1) were applied. Denaturation of human plasma components were detected in Setaram Micro DSC II calorimeter. The patients had no third denaturation peak in the untreated mild and serious symptoms groups. In mild symptoms all the thermal parameters altered significantly, while in serious symptoms only the first melting and the calorimetric enthalpy altered significantly compared with symptoms-free states. In case of systematic cytostatic and retinoid drug treatment (methotrexate, n = 12; acitretin, n = 10) cases the DSC scans of patients with symptoms exhibited significant differences (p < 0.05) in melting temperatures and in calorimetric enthalpy compared with the untreated symptoms-free patients. Using biologic response modifier agents (adalimumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab) we had no enough samples for a statistical evaluation for each one, but after the intervention a stronger effect can be seen as in case of systematic drug treatment. In this study blood plasma measurement in psoriatic patients by DSC showed differences between untreated, conventional systemic drug treatment, and application of biologic response modifier agents, but further studies are needed to elucidate these relationships (supported by grant OTKA CO-272).
    No preview · Article · Dec 2013 · Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review focuses on the efficacy, safety and best use of biologic agents in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Recommendations from two recent guidelines are summarised. The NICE Guidelines 2012 provide recommendations on best practice for prescribing biologics. The German S3 Guidelines are based on a systematic review of published studies and report the efficacy of biologics and guidelines for treatment. Data on the safety of biologics are available for up to 5 years in psoriasis and are on the whole reassuring. Registry data is evolving and will provide data on safety to help inform long-term monitoring of patients with psoriasis on biologics agents. New anti-interleukin-17 (IL17) and anti-IL17RA biologics are in Phase 3 clinical trials and may prove to be more effective than existing biologics.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2013 · Expert Review of Clinical Immunology
Show more