Classification of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Using American Society of Echocardiography Guidelines: Agreement among Echocardiographers

ArticleinEchocardiography 30(9) · April 2013with144 Reads
DOI: 10.1111/echo.12185 · Source: PubMed
Guidelines for assessing diastolic function by echocardiography are continually being updated. Our ability to use available guidelines effectively has not been completely investigated. Six trained echocardiographers were asked to interpret 105 echocardiograms using current American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) algorithms for interpretation of diastolic grade and estimation of left atrial (LA) pressure. Diastolic grade was categorized as normal, mild, moderate, or severe dysfunction. The presence or absence of elevated LA pressure was determined using a second ASE algorithm. As a reference comparison for level of agreement, left ventricular ejection fraction was visually determined. By the ASE algorithm, 29 subjects (28%) met all measurement criteria in their assigned grade and 57 subjects (55%) met all or all but one criterion of their assigned grade. Of the 45 subjects (43%) for whom the guidelines disagreed by more than 1 criterion, the readers debated between normal and moderate dysfunction in 22% or mild and moderate diastolic dysfunction in 31%. Percent inter-reader agreement and kappa values were 76% (0.7) for determining diastolic grade, 84% (0.67) for determining elevated LA pressure, and 84% (0.67) for estimation of ejection fraction, the reference standard. For all subjects, if multiple echocardiographic criteria failed to fit into the proposed guidelines, agreement fell to 66% (0.58) for determining diastolic grade and 74% (0.48) for determining LA pressure. There is reasonable agreement estimating diastolic grade and LA pressure using current guidelines. Further refinements in the definition of mild and moderate dysfunction may improve agreement.
    • "Symptoms of heart failure result from an increased LV pressure that is transmitted to the pulmonary veins via an opened mitral valve during diastole accounting for pulmonary congestion and dyspnea. Although echocardiographic criteria, basically including the transmitral flow pattern, have been identified for clinical use [6] [7], the diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction remains challenging. Ventricular wall stress is fundamentally involved in cardiac function. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Introduction: Heart failure can be caused by systolic or diastolic dysfunction. Diagnosing diastolic dysfunction remains challenging, although several criteria have been identified. Ventricular wall stress is crucially involved. It is hypothesized whether increased end-diastolic and end-systolic ventricular wall stress as assessed by the wall stress index is associated with cardiac dysfunction and thus provide novel diagnostic criteria. Methods: 1050 consecutive patients with suspected non-ischemic heart failure covering a broad spectrum from normal to severely impaired cardiac function were observed. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed to assess left ventricular (LV) volumes, myocardial mass, peak ejection (PER) and filling rate (PFR). Results: A reduced PFR was found in 348 patients (33.1%), which resulted from 275 of 422 patients (65.2%) with reduced and from 73 of 628 patients (11.6%) with preserved LVEF (p<0.0001). Increased LV volume and mass was correlated with reduced PER and PFR (p<0.0001). Increased end-diastolic wall stress was the strongest predictor of a reduced PER (OR 4.5 [2.6 to 7.8], p<0.0001) and increased end-systolic wall stress predicted a reduced PFR (OR 1.2 [1.1 to 1.3], p<0.0001). Increased end-systolic wall stress was correlated with increased pulmonary pressure (p<0.0001). Normal end-systolic wall stress <18kPa had a favorable predictive value for the absence of an impaired filling and increased pulmonary capillary pressure. Conclusion: Increased end-diastolic wall stress precedes a reduced ventricular ejection rate and increased end-systolic wall stress determines an impaired diastolic filling. It is thus suggested to add assessment of ventricular wall stress as diagnostic criterion of heart failure.
    Article · Sep 2015
    • "However, given the relatively small sample size of that study (n = 50), we were unable to fully adjust for other potential confounders, such as kidney function and echocardiographic parameters. Additionally , it is important to note that the diagnosis of LVDD using only an altered E/e' ratio and not accounting for other echocardiographic parameters could be challenged [16,24]. To our knowledge, this is the largest cross-sectional study aimed at examining the association between NAFLD and LVDD in an outpatient sample of type 2 diabetic individuals. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Accumulating evidence suggests that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in nondiabetic individuals. To date, there are very limited data on this topic in patients with type 2 diabetes and it remains uncertain whether NAFLD is independently associated with the presence of LVDD in this patient population. We performed a liver ultrasonography and trans-thoracic echocardiography (with speckle-tracking strain analysis) in 222 (156 men and 66 women) consecutive type 2 diabetic outpatients with no previous history of ischemic heart disease, chronic heart failure, valvular diseases and known hepatic diseases. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between NAFLD and the presence/severity of LVDD graded according to the current criteria of the American Society of Echocardiography, and to identify the variables that were independently associated with LVDD, which was included as the dependent variable. Patients with ultrasound-diagnosed NAFLD (n = 158; 71.2% of total) were more likely to be female, overweight/obese, and had longer diabetes duration, higher hemoglobin A1c and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) than those without NAFLD. Notably, they also had a remarkably greater prevalence of mild and/or moderate LVDD compared with those without NAFLD (71% vs. 33%; P<0.001). Age, hypertension, smoking, medication use, E/A ratio, LV volumes and mass were comparable between the two groups of patients. NAFLD was associated with a three-fold increased odds of mild and/or moderate LVDD after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes duration, hemoglobin A1c, eGFR, LV mass index and ejection fraction (adjusted-odds ratio 3.08, 95%CI 1.5-6.4, P = 0.003). In conclusion, NAFLD is independently associated with early LVDD in type 2 diabetic patients with preserved systolic function.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: A hallmark characteristic of heart failure (HF) is reduced physical activity (PA) patterns. The relationship between key cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) variables and PA patterns has not been investigated. Therefore, we evaluated PA patterns in patients with ischemic HF and its relationship to peak oxygen consumption (VO2), the minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2) slope, and the oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES). Sixteen patients with HF wore an accelerometer for six days to measure total steps/day as well as percentage of time at light, moderate, and vigorous PA. Symptom-limited CPX was performed on a treadmill using a ramping protocol. Total steps correlated with VO2 (r = 0.64 P < .05), the VE/VCO2 slope (r = -0.72; P < .05), and the OUES (0.63; P < .05). The percentage of time at light-intensity PA correlated with the VE/VCO2 slope (r = 0.58; P < .05) and the OUES (r = -0.51; P < .05). The percentage of time at vigorous-intensity PA correlated with peak VO2 (r = 0.55; P < .05) and the VE/VCO2 slope (r = -0.52; P < .05). PA assessed by accelerometer is significantly associated with key CPX variables in patients with HF.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2013
Show more