WITHDRAWN: Immobilisation and functional treatment for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ.
Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (Impact Factor: 6.03). 03/2013; 3(3):CD003762. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003762.pub2
Source: PubMed


Acute lateral ankle ligament injuries (ankle sprains) are common problems in acute medical care. The treatment variation observed for the acutely injured lateral ankle ligament complex suggests a lack of evidence-based management strategies for this problem.
The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of methods of immobilisation for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries and to compare immobilisation with functional treatment methods.
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group specialised register (December 2001); the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1966-May 2000), EMBASE (1988-May 2000), reference lists of articles, and contacted organisations and researchers in the field.
Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing either different types of immobilisation or immobilisation versus functional treatments for injuries to the lateral ligament complex of the ankle in adults were included. Trials which investigated the treatment of chronic instability or post-surgical treatment were excluded.
Data were independently extracted by two authors. Where appropriate, results of comparable studies were pooled using fixed effects models. Individual and pooled statistics were reported as relative risks with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous outcomes and weighted (WMD) or standardised (SMD) mean differences and 95% confidence intervals for continuous outcome measures. Heterogeneity between trials was tested using a standard chi-squared test.
Twenty-one trials involving 2184 participants were included. The mean validity score of the included trials increased from 9.1 (SD 3.0) to 10 (SD 2.9) after retrieving further information (maximum 18 points). Statistically significant differences in favour of functional treatment when compared with immobilisation were found for seven outcome measures: more patients returned to sport in the long term (relative risk (RR) 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 2.86); the time taken to return to sport was shorter (WMD 4.88 (days), 95% CI 1.50 to 8.25); more patients had returned to work at short term follow-up (RR 5.75, 95% CI 1.01 to 32.71); the time taken to return to work was shorter (WMD 8.23 days, 95% CI 6.31 to 10.16); fewer patients suffered from persistent swelling at short term follow-up (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.59); fewer patients suffered from objective instability as tested by stress X-ray (WMD 2.60, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.96); and patients treated functionally were more satisfied with their treatment (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.07). A separate analysis of trials that scored 50 per cent or more in quality assessment found a similar result for time to return to work only (WMD (days) 12.89, 95% CI 7.10 to 18.67). No significant differences between varying types of immobilisation, immobilisation and physiotherapy or no treatment were found, apart from one trial where patients returned to work sooner after treatment with a soft cast. In all analyses performed, no results were significantly in favour of immobilisation.
Functional treatment appears to be the favourable strategy for treating acute ankle sprains when compared with immobilisation. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, as most of the differences are not significant after exclusion of the low quality trials. Many trials were poorly reported and there was variety amongst the functional treatments evaluated.

33 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Snijders EM, Thomas S, Verhagen AP. Assessment of the effectiveness of conservative treatment of acute ankle sprain. A review of the literature. Huisarts Wet 2008:51(1):17-23. Introduction In this literature review our aim was to assess the effectiveness of conservative treatments of acute ankle sprain. Methods We searched Medline and the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews and randomised studies of conservative treatment of acute ankle sprains. Included were articles scoring the following outcome measures: pain, return to work or sport or recurrence of injury. Reasons for exclusion were recurrent injuries or fractures. Results Except for medication, there is little or no evidence for the added value of any treatment versus placebo or no treatment. There is, however, strong evidence that as regards the group of functional treatments (a form of external support), a brace is more effective than a bandage. Furthermore, there is strong evidence that a functional treatment is more effective than immobilisation, and that physiotherapy is more effective than simply instructions or an elastic bandage. There is limited evidence that combining the use of an elastic bandage and a brace is more effective than merely using a brace. The thesis that additional physiotherapy is more effective than only functional treatment is also supported by limited evidence. Compared to placebo, there is limited evidence for the use of piroxicam and Wobenzym. Conclusion For the treatment of pain, medication is the preferred intervention. It is not known whether any intervention is better than no treatment for return to work or sport. If a functional treatment is chosen, it seems to be: ’the more support, the better’. Additional physiotherapy shortens the time to return to sport. To prevent re-injury, physiotherapy is the best intervention. There is no place for physical interventions, operation or immobilisation, no matter how severe the sprain is.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2008 · Huisarts en wetenschap
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Van Rijn RM, Van Os AG, Kleinrensink GJ, Bernsen RMD, Verhaar JAN, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA. Oefentherapie bij volwassenen met een acuut lateraal enkeltrauma. Huisarts Wet 2008;51(7):330-3. Inleiding Enkeltrauma’s zijn een van de meest voorkomende blessures aan het bewegingsapparaat. Het is niet duidelijk of de standaardzorg na een inversietrauma moet worden gecombineerd met oefentherapie onder begeleiding van een fysiotherapeut. Methode We vroegen volwassenen met een inversietrauma aan de enkel die zich bij de huisarts of bij de SEH meldden deel te nemen aan het onderzoek. We verdeelden de patiënten at random over een groep met standaardzorg en een groep die naast de standaardzorg gedurende de eerste weken na het trauma oefentherapie van een fysiotherapeut kreeg. De primaire uitkomstmaten waren herstel en het aantal recidieven na 3 en 12 maanden follow-up. We verzamelden de gegevens door middel van vragenlijsten, die werden afgenomen bij intake, en 4 weken, 8 weken, 3 maanden en 1 jaar na het oplopen van het trauma. Resultaten We verdeelden 102 patiënten at random over de twee behandelgroepen. Tussen de twee behandelgroepen vonden we geen significante verschillen na 3 en 12 maanden follow-up in herstel of het aantal recidieven. Conclusie Tijdens het eerste jaar na een inversietrauma leidt standaardzorg gecombineerd met oefentherapie onder begeleiding, vergeleken met alleen standaardzorg, niet tot verschillen in herstel en aantal recidieven voor de gemiddelde patiënt met een acute laterale enkeldistorsie. enkel-oefentherapie-onderzoek
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2008 · Huisarts en wetenschap
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many assume that outcomes from physical therapy research in one country can be generalized to other countries. However, no well designed studies comparing outcomes among countries have been conducted. In this exploratory study, our goal was to compare patient demographics and treatment processes in outpatient physical therapy practice in the United States, Israel and the Netherlands. Cross-sectional data from three different clinical databases were examined. Data were selected for patients aged 18 years and older and started an episode of outpatient therapy between January 1st 2005 and December 31st 2005. Results are based on data from approximately 63,000 patients from the United States, 100,000 from Israel and 12,000 from the Netherlands. Age, gender and the body part treated were similar in the three countries. Differences existed in episode duration of the health problem, with more patients with chronic complaints treated in the United States and Israel compared to the Netherlands. In the United States and Israel, physical agents and mechanical modalities were applied more often than in the Netherlands. The mean number of visits per treatment episode, adjusted for age, gender, and episode duration, varied from 8 in Israel to 11 in the United States and the Netherlands. The current study showed that clinical databases can be used for comparing patient demographic characteristics and for identifying similarities and differences among countries in physical therapy practice. However, terminology used to describe treatment processes and classify patients was different among databases. More standardisation is required to enable more detailed comparisons. Nevertheless the differences found in number of treatment visits per episode imply that one has to be careful to generalize outcomes from physical therapy research from one country to another.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2008 · BMC Health Services Research
Show more