A pathogenic picornavirus acquires an envelope by hijacking cellular membranes

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7292, USA.
Nature (Impact Factor: 41.46). 03/2013; 496(7445). DOI: 10.1038/nature12029
Source: PubMed


Animal viruses are broadly categorized structurally by the presence or absence of an envelope composed of a lipid-bilayer membrane, attributes that profoundly affect stability, transmission and immune recognition. Among those lacking an envelope, the Picornaviridae are a large and diverse family of positive-strand RNA viruses that includes hepatitis A virus (HAV), an ancient human pathogen that remains a common cause of enterically transmitted hepatitis. HAV infects in a stealth-like manner and replicates efficiently in the liver. Virus-specific antibodies appear only after 3-4 weeks of infection, and typically herald its resolution. Although unexplained mechanistically, both anti-HAV antibody and inactivated whole-virus vaccines prevent disease when administered as late as 2 weeks after exposure, when virus replication is well established in the liver. Here we show that HAV released from cells is cloaked in host-derived membranes, thereby protecting the virion from antibody-mediated neutralization. These enveloped viruses ('eHAV') resemble exosomes, small vesicles that are increasingly recognized to be important in intercellular communications. They are fully infectious, sensitive to extraction with chloroform, and circulate in the blood of infected humans. Their biogenesis is dependent on host proteins associated with endosomal-sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT), namely VPS4B and ALIX. Whereas the hijacking of membranes by HAV facilitates escape from neutralizing antibodies and probably promotes virus spread within the liver, anti-capsid antibodies restrict replication after infection with eHAV, suggesting a possible explanation for prophylaxis after exposure. Membrane hijacking by HAV blurs the classic distinction between 'enveloped' and 'non-enveloped' viruses and has broad implications for mechanisms of viral egress from infected cells as well as host immune responses.

Download full-text


Available from: Victoria J Madden, Feb 17, 2014
  • Source
    • "Additionally, the recent identification of specific regulators of autophagosome maturation, including STX17-SNAP29-VAMP8 and LC3-II-PLEKHM1-Rab7 complexes, may enable deeper understanding of mechanisms and roles of autophagy in enteroviral pathogenesis. The non-lytic spread of picornaviruses via exosomes was initially shown during hepatitis A infection, allowing hepatitis A virus to escape from neutralizing antibodies[71]. More recently, enteroviruses were discovered to transmit non-lytically via autophagosome-like vesicles, as populations of viral particles enwrapped in membranes of microvesicles[15]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Enterovirus genus of the Picornaviridae family comprises many important human pathogens, including polioviruses, rhinovirus, enterovirus A71, and enterovirus D68. They cause a wide variety of diseases, ranging from mild to severe life-threatening diseases. Currently, no effective vaccine is available against enteroviruses except for poliovirus. Enteroviruses subvert the autophagic machinery to benefit their assembly, maturation, and exit from host. Some enteroviruses spread between cells via a process described as autophagosome-mediated exit without lysis (AWOL). The early and late phases of autophagy are regulated through various lipids and their metabolizing enzymes. Some of these lipids and enzymes are specifically regulated by enteroviruses. In the present review, we summarize the current understanding of the regulation of autophagic machinery by enteroviruses, and provide updates on recent developments in this field.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016 · Viruses
  • Source
    • "The recent discovery of membrane-stealing picornaviruses, which now include hepatitis A (Feng et al., 2013), might point to a two-fold strategy for a family of viruses that can leave the host as a non-enveloped virion, as well as maintain a cloaked, enveloped form – at least after infection of certain host cells. Why might a virus utilize this dual strategy? "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Coxsackieviruses (CVs) are relatively common viruses associated with a number of serious human diseases, including myocarditis and meningo-encephalitis. These viruses are considered cytolytic yet can persist for extended periods of time within certain host tissues requiring evasion from the host immune response and a greatly reduced rate of replication. A member of Picornaviridae family, CVs have been historically considered non-enveloped viruses - although recent evidence suggest that CV and other picornaviruses hijack host membranes and acquire an envelope. Acquisition of an envelope might provide distinct benefits to CV virions, such as resistance to neutralizing antibodies and efficient nonlytic viral spread. CV exhibits a unique tropism for progenitor cells in the host which may help to explain the susceptibility of the young host to infection and the establishment of chronic disease in adults. CVs have also been shown to exploit autophagy to maximize viral replication and assist in unconventional release from target cells. In this article, we review recent progress in clarifying virus replication and dissemination within the host cell, identifying determinants of tropism, and defining strategies utilized by the virus to evade the host immune response. Also, we will highlight unanswered questions and provide future perspectives regarding the potential mechanisms of CV pathogenesis. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2015 · Virology
  • Source
    • "While enteroviruses have historically been considered non-enveloped (i.e., lacking a hostderived membrane bilayer around their capsids) and thus rely on cell lysis to exit, recent reports of extracellular Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) being present in vesicles (Robinson et al., 2014) and PV being able to spread non-lytically among host cells (Bird et al., 2014) have raised important questions regarding the extracellular nature of enteroviral particles and the significance of non-lytic exit in the viral life cycle. Moreover hepatitis A, hepatitis E and blue tongue viral particles, all long considered non-enveloped , have been observed surrounded by membranes (Feng et al., 2013; Takahashi et al., 2008; Owens et al., 2004). A central paradigm in virology is that viruses behave as independent infectious units (Flint et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A central paradigm within virology is that each viral particle largely behaves as an independent infectious unit. Here, we demonstrate that clusters of enteroviral particles are packaged within phosphatidylserine (PS) lipid-enriched vesicles that are non-lytically released from cells and provide greater infection efficiency than free single viral particles. We show that vesicular PS lipids are co-factors to the relevant enterovirus receptors in mediating subsequent infectivity and transmission, in particular to primary human macrophages. We demonstrate that clustered packaging of viral particles within vesicles enables multiple viral RNA genomes to be collectively transferred into single cells. This study reveals a novel mode of viral transmission, where enteroviral genomes are transmitted from cell-to-cell en bloc in membrane-bound PS vesicles instead of as single independent genomes. This has implications for facilitating genetic cooperativity among viral quasispecies as well as enhancing viral replication. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2015 · Cell
Show more