Article

Psychosocial Impact of Adolescent Gynecomastia: A Prospective Case-Control Study

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Impact Factor: 2.99). 04/2013; 131(4):890-6. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818ea8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

: The purpose of this study was to determine the physical and psychosocial impact of gynecomastia and its severity on adolescents seeking treatment as compared with healthy adolescent males.
: The following surveys were administered to adolescents with gynecomastia and healthy male controls, aged 12 to 21 years: Short Form-36 Version 2, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Eating Attitudes Test-26. Demographic variables were compared between the two groups, and controls were administered a short chest symptoms survey. Linear regression models, unadjusted and adjusted for body mass index category, were fit to determine the effect of case status and graded severity of gynecomastia on survey score.
: Forty-seven patients with gynecomastia and 92 male control subjects participated in this study. There was no difference in mean age between the groups, although patients with gynecomastia had a significantly higher body mass index. Gynecomastia subjects had three lower Short Form-36 domain and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale scores independent of body mass index category as compared with controls, although there was no difference in Eating Attitudes Test-26 scores between the groups. Graded gynecomastia severity had no effect on survey scores, all independent of body mass index category.
: Gynecomastia has a significant negative impact on primarily the psychosocial well-being of affected adolescent patients, specifically in regard to social functioning, mental health, and self-esteem. Psychosocial impact was not affected by graded severity of disease. Health care providers and patients should be aware of the psychosocial impairments associated with gynecomastia and consider early treatment for adolescents suffering from this condition, regardless of severity.
: Risk, II.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Heather Rosen Faulkner
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To assesse the clinical value of ultrasound in diagnosis of gynecomastia. Methods: Ultrasonographic characteristics of 106 gynecomastia patients confirmed pathologically or clinically during Jan 2005 to Dec 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided 5 groups according to the age, i.e. ≤19 years group, 20-39 years, 40-59 years, 60-79 years and ≥80 years group. Meanwhile, the patients were divided 4 groups according to the year of diagnosis: Jan 2005 to Dec 2006 group, Jan 2007 to Dec 2008 group, Jan 2009 to Dec 2010 group and Jan 2011 to Dec 2012 group. Data were analyzed with Chi-square analysis. Results: Ultrasound showed the thickened gland proliferation below the nipple or around the areola was well defined and hypoechoic or slightly hyperechoic, not encapsulated, well circumscribed from the anterior subcutaneous adipose tissue and the posterior pectoral muscle, the internal echogenicity was either homogeneous or heterogenous, no strong echo calcification presented. CDFI showed that there was light vascularity in and around the gland. Gynecomastia mostly occurred in 20-39 age and 2011-2012 year. Unilateral gynecomastia was most common (66/106, 62.26%). Conclusion: The incidence of gynecomastia has a growth trend in the past few years. Being an ideal inspection method, ultrasound has value in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of gynecomastia. Copyright © 2013 by the Press of Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology.
    No preview · Article · Nov 2013 · Chinese Journal of Interventional Imaging and Therapy
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Idiopathic gynecomastia is a common diagnosis in children and adolescents. Though medical treatments reveal potentially harmful side effects, surgical interventions are performable in numerous techniques. In children and adolescents, only minimal evidence exists. This retrospective study presents our experiences with two common surgical techniques, namely subcutaneous mastectomy and combination with liposuction. This retrospective study included all patients <18 years who underwent surgery due to idiopathic gynecomastia. Height, weight and grade of gynecomastia according to Simon's classification before surgery were reviewed in all patients' files. Additionally, duration of surgery, inpatient stay and postoperative complications were documented. Follow-up examinations were performed with assessment of scar formation, numbness and retraction of the nipple region. Furthermore, patients were asked to report on general satisfaction with surgery (satisfactory/not satisfactory) and esthetic outcome on a numeric scale (1 = good, 6 = bad). 37 patients underwent surgery for verified idiopathic gynecomastia. Grade of gynecomastia was I° in 13.5 % (n = 5), II° in 40.5 % (n = 15) and III° in 46 % (n = 17) of cases. Subcutaneous mastectomy was applied in 11 patients (group I, 30 %) and both subcutaneous mastectomy and liposuction in 26 patients (group II, 70.3 %). Postoperative complications occurred in two patients. Long-term follow-up was performed in 32 patients after a median of 34 months (range 6-96 months). Hypertrophic scar formation was seen in one patient (3 %) and nipple retraction in two patients (5 %). Recurrence of gynecomastia occurred in two patients (5 %). Patient rating was satisfactory in 9 % of cases and esthetic outcome was received with a median of 2.0 (1-5). In comparing both surgical techniques, combination of mastectomy and liposuction revealed better results in every measure except for surgical duration (median 73 vs. 90 min). Surgical correction of gynecomastia remains a purely elective intervention. In contrast to adults, skin in children and adolescents provides high retractability. Therefore, open reduction combined with minimally invasive liposuction was proven useful.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2014 · Pediatric Surgery International
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Action On Plastic Surgery (AOPS) criteria for funding of gynaecomastia surgery are: the patient should be post-pubertal, have a BMI ≤ 25kg/m(2), endocrine and drug causes and breast cancer should be excluded and the patient should demonstrate psychological distress. We evaluated how NHS funding for gynaecomastia surgery varies between Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England and whether there is a "postcode lottery". The gynaecomastia surgery policies for 211 CCGs in NHS England were reviewed against the AOPS criteria and grouped according to their funding policies: group 1 (if criteria met, funding approved); group 2, (if criteria met, prior approval required); group 3 (no criteria, individual funding request only) and group 4 (no funding). Policies were available for all CCGs. Fifty-nine (28.0%) CCGs were in group 1, 87 (41.2%) in group 2, 44 (20.9%) in group 3 and 21 (10.0%) in group 4. Of those in groups 1 and 2, five (3.4%) CCGs used all six AOPS criteria. Approximately 70% CCGs with criteria (in groups 1 and 2) stipulated that the patient should be post-pubertal, have a BMI ≤ 25 kg/m(2) and endocrine and drug causes should be excluded. Breast cancer should be excluded in 51.4% and the patient should show psychological distress in 13.7% CCGs. Of those in groups 1 and 2, 118 (80.8%) CCGs specified additional criteria. CCGs do not use the AOPS criteria uniformly and restrict surgery according to their own criteria. Overall, there is a "postcode lottery" for gynaecomastia surgery within NHS England. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    No preview · Article · May 2014 · European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Show more