Article

Effects of News Media Messages About Mass Shootings on Attitudes Toward Persons With Serious Mental Illness and Public Support for Gun Control Policies

American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 12.3). 03/2013; 170(5). DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13010014
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Objective:
In recent years, mass shootings by persons with serious mental illness have received extensive news media coverage. The authors test the effects of news stories about mass shootings on public attitudes toward persons with serious mental illness and support for gun control policies. They also examine whether news coverage of proposals to prevent persons with serious mental illness from having guns exacerbates the public's negative attitudes toward this group.

Method:
The authors conducted a survey-embedded randomized experiment using a national sample (N=1,797) from an online panel. Respondents were randomly assigned to groups instructed to read one of three news stories or to a no-exposure control group. The news stories described, respectively, a mass shooting by a person with serious mental illness, the same mass shooting and a proposal for gun restrictions for persons with serious mental illness, and the same mass shooting and a proposal to ban large-capacity magazines. Outcome measures included attitudes toward working with or living near a person with serious mental illness, perceived dangerousness of persons with serious mental illness, and support for gun restrictions for persons with serious mental illness and for a ban on large-capacity magazines.

Results:
Compared with the control group, the story about a mass shooting heightened respondents' negative attitudes toward persons with serious mental illness and raised support for gun restrictions for this group and for a ban on large-capacity magazines. Including information about the gun restriction policy in a story about a mass shooting did not heighten negative attitudes toward persons with serious mental illness or raise support for the restrictions.

Conclusions:
The aftermath of mass shootings is often viewed as a window of opportunity to garner support for gun control policies, but it also exacerbates negative attitudes toward persons with serious mental illness.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Emma E Mcginty, Oct 28, 2015
  • Source
    • "Additionally, the researchers found that those who followed violent news were significantly more likely to support the concealed carrying of guns on campus versus those who did not follow such news coverage. Conversely, theMcginty et al. (2013)study concluded that those who read articles covering mass shootings were more likely to support stricter gun regulations. What these findings suggest, then, is that an individual's perception of gun violence – fueled, in part, by societal conditions and institutional dynamics informs personal choice and action on the matter of conceal and carry gun legislation as applied to college or university campuses. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Should individuals on American college campuses be permitted to carry concealed weapons? This issue positions second Amendment liberty guarantees against personal safety concerns and learning environment interests. Current policy prescription has yet to appropriately balance these competing demands. Accordingly, this article reviews and comments on three key dimensions of the concealed carry ban controversy. This includes a presentation of the governing case law, a recounting of the relevant social science findings, and a discussion of the societal forces and human dynamics that both inform and influence this public policy debate. We argue that these forces and dynamics constitute cultural impediments to achieving meaningful consensus-building legislation. The manuscript concludes by proposing several justice-based reformist directions with relevancies for academic researchers, political officials, and policy-makers.
    Preview · Article · Dec 2015 · Contemporary Justice Review
  • Source
    • "This, along with the other variables of loneliness, hostility and desensitization to violence, even if secondary to virtual exposure, is of great concern (Hald, Malamuth, & Yuen, 2010). Violence in the context of mental disorder is commonly attributed to firearm use, particularly in relation to the sizable number of mass shootings in the United States (but also in other countries), and the media attention these incidents understandably receive (McGinty, Webster, & Barry, 2013). Access to firearms is not easy in most European countries and most notably in Italy, where a medical certificate is to be presented attesting soundness of mind, when requesting a permit to own or carry a firearm even for hunting or sporting purposes (Italian State Police, 2015). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Predictability of dangerousness in association with mental disorders remains elusive, outside of a few relatively well established risk factors for the prognostication of violence, such as male sex, the presence of a psychotic disorder and comorbid substance abuse. In clinical practice inquiry into the presence of aggressive or violent ideation, in the form of ideas of homicide or suicide, are part of a standard mental status examination. Nonetheless fantasy life, when it concerns harm toward others, may not be as reliable an indicator of imminent danger as it may be in the case of self-harm. Five cases of young Italian men with Asperger syndrome and recurrent and extremely violent femicide fantasies are presented. While there is no direct correlation between autism spectrum conditions and violence, as other humans, persons with an autistic condition are capable of committing crimes, including homicide. All five had in common a number of characteristics and behaviors felt to be pathoplastic: all had been bullied; all had been romantically rejected; all were longstanding First Person Shooter game players and all were avid violent pornography consumers. The potential for an actual neurocognitive impact of violent video games, well documented in the literature, and its combination with personal life history and chronic habituation following longstanding violent pornography use is discussed in the context of social and emotional vulnerabilities. While aggressive fantasies cannot and should not be underestimated, in countries where duty to protect legislation does not exist, a clinical approach is imperative, as, incidentally, should be anywhere.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2015 · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
  • Source
    • "First, in a 1996 study using national survey data from the former West Germany, Angermeyer and Matschinger [9] found that public desire for social distance from persons with schizophrenia increased after two highly publicized violent attacks on politicians by individuals who had been diagnosed with schizophrenia. Second , in a 2013 study using a national US sample, participants were randomly assigned to read a news story about a mass shooting reportedly committed by a man with mental illness or were assigned to a control group who did not read any news story [10]. Compared with the control group, participants who read the news story about a mass shooting reported significantly higher perceived dangerousness of, and desired social distance from, people with serious mental illness in general. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose This article describes epidemiological evidence concerning risk of gun violence and suicide linked to psychiatric disorders, in contrast to media-fueled public perceptions of the dangerousness of mentally ill individuals, and evaluates effectiveness of policies and laws designed to prevent firearms injury and mortality associated with serious mental illnesses and substance use disorders. Methods Research concerning public attitudes towards persons with mental illness is reviewed and juxtaposed with evidence from benchmark epidemiological and clinical studies of violence and mental illness and of the accuracy of psychiatrists’ risk assessments. Selected policies and laws designed to reduce gun violence in relation to mental illness are critically evaluated; evidence-based policy recommendations are presented. Results Media accounts of mass shootings by disturbed individuals galvanize public attention and reinforce popular belief that mental illness often results in violence. Epidemiological studies show that the large majority of people with serious mental illnesses are never violent. However, mental illness is strongly associated with increased risk of suicide, which accounts for over half of US firearms-related fatalities. Conclusion Policymaking at the interface of gun violence prevention and mental illness should be based on epidemiological data concerning risk, to improve the effectiveness, feasibility, and fairness of policy initiatives.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2014 · Annals of Epidemiology
Show more